A well-researched presentation of the facts. Near the end, the term "legalized war crimes" stood out to me. The key question that was not addressed is: What are we to do? The piece offers no hope and no direction.
I wonder about the contents of this video in which the allegation by a German carbon/graphene expert (Dr. Andreas Noack) claims that the vaccines are filled with graphene hydroxide, which is a 1 atom (.1nm) thick, non-biodegradable molecule with extremely sharp edges, which he equates to being like "nano-razors" and that when entered into the bloodstream, literally slice up the insides of blood vessels.
He is alleged to have died hours later under mysterious circumstances, though there is some dispute about how he died - some say his wife's comments were mistranslated to suggest an attack by others, then later changed to "heart attack".
Dr Ryan Cole, pathologist extraordinaire, did a fantastic interview/demonstration with Del Hightower -- and SHOWED the "graphene" folks are describing are actually cholesterol crystals. The "hydra" people are squawking about is a normal, natural PLANT part from, the underside of leaves: Ryan showed both the "hydra" -- and the google search page showing a gazillion of the same kind-of thing!
Ryan has done ... I forget what's called' -- the electro-thingie that lets you IDENTIFY the actual chemical/elemental make-up on some 'thing' you're observing/testing. (Like how 'we' identify the chemistry of stars or novae by their spectrum of the elements.) Cholesterol, not graphene.
Thanks! I had seen (and forgotten) some reference to Dr. Cole's info (didn't dig in) as I wanted to sit back and let more experienced voices chime in and let the dust settle.
Neither (so far, NO) demonstration has been definitive! Casting shade on EITHER side is ridiculous.
One: "I tested a vial from California!"
One: "I tested a vial from Spain!"
Both: "They differ! You MUST be a liar or a corrupt bad person!"
I refer everyone again to the website: how badismybatch -- which is TRACKING vial dispersal and the levels of injuries and deaths across, at least, the U.S. IN those dispersal areas. It is a complete GIVEN that these TRACKABLE differences 100% MEAN the 'stuff' in the vials are different, right? The logic of a 12-yr-old can see that!
So -- instead of forming up tug-of-war TEAMS to insult and try to downgrade this or that researcher -- HOLD your determinations, and consider the bigger picture! STOP maligning one or another researcher or research team... If someone disagrees with something YOU find persuasive, do NOT start shouting that s/he's compromised and an enemy agent! (Although I'm sure we all agree Fauci-Mengele is a murderous enemy agent to the human species!!)
I'm ... riled up right now, having just spent an hour answering people MIS-describing (as far as I've found so far) Dr Ryan Cole in Sweden. Suddenly, he's an enemy agent mistreating one of "our" ( THEIR!) heroes by 'jumping up on stage, stealing a mic, interrupting her presentation and harranguing Stuckle-somebody.' She is a *metals* expert - NOT a medical expert (as far as I know; I'm off to watch her presentation next). Except the video of Cole speaking that I have seen is clearly BETWEEN presentations; Stuckle.... is SITTING with others on the stage, preparatory to the NEXT presentation, a panel discussion apparently. The audience is very loud talking to each other,
Cole walks off the stage asks for and get a mic, CALMLY walks back onto the stage and says he disagrees. (You know, like you DO at a professional meeting where people disagree!!)
He ACTUALLY begins with the exact phrase: "before the panel begins..." (Kinda like PROOF Cole did not 'interrupt' the sitting Stuckle... who was speaking with the person next to her, NOT presenting to the crowd; doncha think?) Stuckle.... jumps up and hastens to the podium mic (next to Cole) and tries to argue *over* him, some guy in the audience jumps up and starts screaming at Cole...
Everyone keeps missing that Ryan Cole is ALWAYS 100% polite and reserved when disagreeing! No yelling, no insults, no shouting... he merely presents HIS SIDE, and waits for the other side's answer. I've never even seen him INTERRUPT another speaker (howinthehell he does THAT baffles me!).
BUT, in leaping up and shouting to defend THEIR hero ("She's right, she's the ONLY one on the planet who is right! And WE know she's right universally, so everyone else HAS to be wrong and an enemy agent!!!") (Yeah, see? I'm still ... riled up... but not sorry, because this is the way our enemies ALWAYS sow discord and destroy our efforts to find the truth; and we LET them!!) How about ... (oh, you know) professionally disagreeing, maybe even having a CALM discussion with Cole?! Novel thought, that....
So, Tina? We HAVE no demonstrations that are adequate to make the MANY determinations that we urgently need. We are blind men feeling a (huge and murderous) elephant (with an insane and vicious mahout!). And many of our "blind men" are making some pretty damned good and useful conclusions on the basis of the parts they have examined... and some (as is always true in science and medicine -- and in daily life) are making some wrong conclusions. The only WAY to find the truth is to keep working and talking with each other , not decide "anyone who disagrees with me is evil!"
I suspect Ryan Cole has been compromised. I watched and listened to him dismiss the findings of dozens of researchers and he is far too glib, far too dismissive and not convincing. Your choice of word 'squawking' gives your agenda away I am afraid.
EVERYONE who reads here -- or speaks out on it in public! -- agrees they're not vaccines!! Okay-so, not the sheep or the evil and/or sold-out -- but everyone working VERY hard to get across the damages, dangers, and deaths these gene-modifying therapeutics are causing.... AGREES they are not vaccines. That's not even a POINT that needs to be made on Steve Kirsch's substack, is it? (Oh sorry, *Katherine's* substack... I read so many!)
Ryan Cole is certainly glib, in the FIRST definition:
1. Performed with a natural, offhand ease.
but certainly NOT in the second!
2. Given to or characterized by fluency of speech or writing that often suggests insincerity, superficiality, or a lack of concern.
He is an *expert* in his field. He is direct and firm in his conclusions because he IS an expert. Would you have experts talk all uncertain and mealy-mouthed? "Fluency" generally leads to looking askance at what an expert says only by people who CANNOT speak fluently.
I worked with a man (at Boeing) who pooh-poohed my ... reservations ... about a potential hiree (for a technical editing position) , because the man completely misused a 'term of the art.' When the hiring authority thought that was a silly reason, I said: If you were interviewing a ROOFER -- for the possibility of spending a ton of money on his work -- and he described the (technical term:) "valley" as the "angled-thing between two sides," just how competent would think he might be?
Do you see the difference between a first-time public speaker -- and an old-hand expert at it? Ryan Cole is an old-hand expert at it -- so he SPEAKS fluently because he KNOWS what he's speaking about! (And yes, I DO have the medical and technological background to follow what he's speaking about: if he says spectrometry shows no graphene oxide in the samples he has tested -- then there IS none! If he off-handedly discards the contaminants that non-specialists, and certainly non-EXPERTS, are indeed squawking about are "hydras" -- by SHOWING exactly what the (I forget the name -- the (yes, hydra-LOOKING) things come from the undersides of leaves that float in the air everywhere on the planet and we breathe in all day) are; then I can confidently discard the "OMG! HYDRA in the shots!" (And so should you! Do you think a hydra COULD survive storage and shipping in -80 degree F?!)
Please go watch the Del Hightower / Ryan Cole video where Ryan actually DEMONSTRATES on camera the effect of the poison vax, under the microscope, when added to Del's fresh-drawn blood. I DO have a few reservations, in that the astonishing effect on a sample-size of blood on a slide, and even just one 'drop' of the various vax-samples Ryan tested, may be exaggerated because of the mis-matched amount. However, I have found Ryan -- over many, many hours of interviews and discussions -- to be precise, careful, and ACCURATE!
And finally. "Compromised" how? In what way? To do or say what? The finding of the not-dozens, but certainly SOME researchers being dismissed is HOW medicine and science works!! Do you think Peterson and Ardis's "snake venom in the water!!!!" should not be dismissed? I am NOT discarding the idea that venom IS used (all OVER the world) in entirely legit medical research and entirely legit medical treatments!! However, Stew and Bryan went WAY overboard; 'trying to be first in breaking news' -- as Bryan HAD been first-and-best in the Remdesivir trials, and then the Gilead trials, identifying the murder weapon!
PLEASE don't be slurring and trying to malign experts -- experts whom OTHER experts absolutely consider to be valid and worth listening to (do you remember Andrew Hill showing on video by Tess Laurie that he was a sell-out? And that was followed by Hill being shunned and discarded by OUR folks -- and feted by his controllers? After submitting to the money-control and NOT publishing the truth about ivermectin, Hill should have been -- and WAS legitimately by OUR folks -- discarded as a sell-out and murderer. He was a traitor to the truth.
Ryan Cole is a revealer of the truth. The trust OUR expert (and semi-expert and non-expert) folks have him IS warranted. Unless you actually HAVE any real "cause" (other than "I don't feel good watching him"?) to insult and distrust him that you can VALIDATE and verify -- then do not "cut down" OUR people! Our enemies are working VERY hard to do so. Don't YOU help THEM!
Super -- then let's get THEM to send a sample of the therapeutic THEY got, and Ryan will no doubt send a sample of the vials HE got -- and the two teams can cross-verify! SURELY you don't think -- having seen multiple reports from "how bad was my batch" and the differing levels of contamination -- that EITHER 'side' is 100% confirmatory? If the La Quinta samples show graphene, then Ryan will no doubt be able to confirm it. If Ryan shows them the PLANT parts they (they? or someone else?) "identify" as hydra, then THEY will be able to recognize the plant parts.
I STILL see no way on the PLANET that something some people are seeing as a 'hydra' -- an allegedly living animal -- could survive negative-80-degree storage, in a vial of some liquid NOT water, without O2 replenishment, and so on. And the "oooh, it's MOVING!!" cries from either 'don't know' or 'discounting' people (pls provide an alternate explanation to the normal one when using microscopes) -- when you prep a slide for a scope (you can SEE Ryan do this in his Del Hightower vid) -- you put the liquid sample onto the base slide, and then put a TOP slide on it. The pressure OF the top slide spreads the liquid out -- it MOVES the liquid. And then you move the slides under the scope 'brace' that hold them still, the increased, sometimes uneven pressure, makes the liquid MOVE...
Those behind these crimes are serial killers and mass murderers. Even if we are to put aside the fake 'vaccines' the lockdowns, masks, enforced isolation, quarantines, loss of jobs, loneliness, lack of treatment for genuine illnesses will have killed hundreds of thousands, maybe millions. This will have been well known beforehand. As for Noack, there is every indication that he was assassinated. Another German doctor was 'suicided' at around the same time when he allegedly threw himself off the roof of his own hospital, presumably because he was blowing the whistle.
And thereby you think putting Ryan Cole down is warranted?
Yes, our enemies are happily going around murdering people who stand up. That MIGHT add weight to their arguments... but without them still here (alas!) -- or someone who has followed and replicated their work -- who can 'stand in' and defend it in the NORMAL process of medicine and science to determine validity... then it's fantastic preliminary work -- that STILL NEEDS to be verified!
Sure, generally, whatever the govt/TPTB SAYS is to be looked at askance ()ot just straight discarded!), because they will ALWAYS be lying! However -- the DETAILS must be tested, CONtested, and worked out.
I don't think there is anything here that either proves or disproves the graphene hypotheses. Many, many researchers have theorized that there is graphene in the shots that should not be there and that has not been disclosed in the list of ingredients. Cole appears to support the germ theory of disease which many now are seriously questioning.
Cole is a LEADING extremely experienced and educated pathologist. IF HE says: "after matching it up to many many slides of cholesterol crystals, and spectrographic inspection, this is not graphene but is cholesterol crystals... on what POSSIBLE basis do you dispute him?
"has not been disclosed in the list of ingredients." There IS no list of ingredients! The FDA/CDC/ govt has made it LEGAL for them to hide whateverthehell they WANT! Surely you've seen the poison-vaxx 'drug insert' -- that in ENTIRELY BLANK!? (If your 'researchers" think they could or should "trust" the 'list of ingredients' -- then they are NOT researchers! They're idiots!)
"Many many researchers have THEORIZED" How many of your "many many" have decades of pathology work? How many have the amazing experiential background Cole has ... yes, I AM 'arguing from authority" because Cole IS an authority and esp. in this specific field! What are the back grounds of your "many many" researchers? We will likely NEVER prove of disprove -- unless Pfizer et al. included it in their lab notes (yeah, right!) AND we get out hands on them! However -- the WAY TO BET is with the guy with the best experience, equipment, and knowledge. That's Cole.
Does your list of (more valid? is that your point?) researchers include Bryan Ardis? On balance, I cannot find Ardis to be any kind of authority on this stuff. He had a VERY important (and very EARLY) absolute super HIT with the remdes. and tests. Broken clock? He had NOT followed it up with MORE substantive research. He's lost his path. The snake venom thing -- which he was SO convinced on -- completely DETRACTS from him being a solid course. I will continue to keep an eye on Ardis: blind squirrels sometimes find a second nut! But he will need a boatload more -- and better backed up -- sources and resources before I will do more than note and pass beyond whatever he shows up- with!
What background in actual slide microscopy do your 'many many' have? How MANY autopsies have they done over the past 30-40 YEARS?! LOTS of folks are ... getting out over their skis ... because they are SO SURE they've found something... see, e.g., the "hydra" in that Cole/Del video. Was that not persuasive enough for you? Do you need to go even further into HOW a living creature could live through the manufacture, the -80-degree storage, the transport, decanting and thawing, and injecting into a human and STILL 'allegedly' move about on the slide.
Have you never worked with a microscope? When you put the cover slide on top of the sample (on the other slide) and slide it under the microscope 'holders' -- any liquid or anything else is squished between the two glasses. The saline (or vaxx-matrix or whatever) spreads; it MOVES, it 'appears' to be capable of movement -- but it's merely the water/liquid spreading. These supposed "hydras" are leaf parts, and the movement OF the liquid, moves them too!
UNTIL this-all is over and "we" get a helluva long time to discuss, investigate, test, balance, experiment, and work on germ theory -- it is a DISTRACTION! (And fatal to some folks!) That is wasting time while MILLIONS are dying, and it's NOT the time to discuss "possible flaws" in the original underpinning of an entire wing of medicine. When we MANAGE to stop the forced use of this poison -- THEN it is absolutely worthwhile to discuss germ theory. I'll be right there with you. I don't yet KNOW if there's something there or not. I am interested to find out. I AM NOT willing to waste time trying to sidetrack and distract our folks DURING a GENOCIDE!
And to decide some CLEAR expert is not worth listening to because he is AS cautious in determining germ theory as he HAS been in determining -- and proving -- this is a poison vaxx?! I can't / won't support that at all! Look -- when we finally get to the "let's see what ELSE the ortho-docs have gotten (or cho$en to get) wrong" Cole will likely be right there in the thick of it -- discussing BOTH sides, while helping us work out the truth! He has NEVER stopped himself from admitting when new info changes his positions.
Really, are you LOOKING for reasons to discount him? For what possible purpose?!
Question: I had discovered the video last night and in sharing it with my brother, who said he looked into claims of graphene (hydr)oxide awhile back, said that the material itself is so dark it would be easily seen in the vials. Given carbon IS black, does that fact alone undercut the claims?
He went on to say that the doctors making that claim were asked how they got the vials, and they claimed it was sent to them, not knowing the source. Now, that could be plausible deniability so as to avoid huge sanctions for violating contracts, but it's also possible they got spiked versions of the vaccines to throw them off from mRNA spike factories.
Do you have any knowledge about this? I HAD heard about the graphene oxide component awhile back, but honestly, can't think of a lot of recent coverage on it, so a hoax is plausible at this point, although I recall the Japanese saying they had vials with a visible contaminant in it.
The Japanese tested the vials sent TO THEM by the govt... and discarded them as contaminated. The folks -- OUR folks -- testing various vials got them illicitly, because the iron-clad contracts the govt / Big Pharma REQUIRE govts to sign specifically DISALLOW any testing. Gee, wonder why?
And no, you cannot 'see' carbon or any other contaminants, and they are microscopic. I doubt the 'graphene oxide 'discoveries' were hoaxed. They DO look a lot like cholesterol crystals... which a doc who has done over 50,000 autopsies AND spectrography ON the crystals had determined to be so.
Thank you. I recall the Japanese story, and that there were reports that there were VISIBLE contaminants, which was why they tested it.
I wonder at what point (regardless of size), the change in color or reflectivity is visibly seen in solution by the naked eye. Perhaps up against light behind it, or behind you (the viewer), or against a contrasting color backdrop.
I didn't really get much more other than details of his death. I wonder if he was poisoned by that visitor. But the lights going out at the same time? Maybe he was remotely attacked... Just an awful and prolonged way to die. Thanks for the link.
This is an incredibly powerful talk by Dr Noack. It is completely irrelevant that the quality is not good and all the other deliberate distractions, obfuscations and strawmen. Whistleblowers have been murdered for far less. This was a warning to others. https://www.bitchute.com/video/WCfyNz0eK6zV/
Directed energy weapon or similar? Biowarfare weapons and technology hugely advanced in the past few decades and given that nearly all the wars are started by we all know who, then the biowarfare criminals in charge test the weapons on innocent civilians particularly if those civilians are exposing the foxes in charge of the hen coop. After all, whistleblowers are now the enemy. https://sansmemetics.net/dr-andreas-noacks-assassinated-by-gov-work/
Yes. We have to understand their modus operandi in order to expose their criminality and how they have got away with it so far, or so it seems. The psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists and other disordered individuals behind these atrocities are effectively mass murderers and serial killers. They are hiding in plain sight and have disguised themselves as 'philanthropists', 'experts', 'public health advisors' and so on. These are disguises and work with gullible populations who believe that medicine, law, public health etc is heavily regulated for safety. Catherine Austin Fitts called it out from the beginning, it's a coup d'etat and the goal is a modern-day slavery system. The globalists have had decades to line up their henchmen - the lesser psychopaths, narcissists and mini-hitlers desperate for a bit of power and the chance to practise some sadism. Serial killers are cunning, they can out-fox even experienced analysts. But once you've spotted the techniques, they are quite obvious. Bill Gates, for example, gives the game away with his body language. Schwab is harder to read but both talk utter rubbish - talk of saving millions of lives, saving the world, building back better etc are meaningless platitudes. And in fact, they mean the complete opposite. You have to reverse what psychopaths say to get to the truth. For the average person it's incredibly difficult to comprehend the mentality of a psychopath, which is why they have got away with so much. Beware the wolves in sheep's clothing.
The good news is that the globalists have overplayed their hand and are now in panic mode. Eg: Dr Peter Hotez has fully exposed himself as a WHO criminal. This is the perfect 'own goal' - he has shot himself in the foot.
In this article, Hotez reveals that the whole 'vaccination' program is to do with expansion of global tyranny under the disguise of 'saving lives'. Look how desperate he is (they are) to hit the developing world market. This is modern-day colonialism. Psychopaths do not take well to being exposed. (Hotez is a good frontman for the 'vax' fraud as he refuses to even consider whether his child's autism could be linked to vax. )
The devious device of accusing your critics of doing what you yourself are doing is a classic criminal technique, not only do you point the finger away from yourself but you also gas-light into the bargain. Win, win for the fraudsters! https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-does-peter-hotez-think-we-are
Peter Hotez being positioned as a replacement for Fraudchi? Certainly seems to be the case what with his latest mouthing off. The perfect puppet for Tedros who has to be one of the most unpleasant individuals one would ever hope not to encounter. The WHO is essentially a terrorist organisation. https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopolitics/peter-hotez-vies-for-power-as-fauci-steps-down/
Yes, but DON'T go too far. A major portion of OUR work is to sort out and discard the liars / evil / sellouts; and find and SUPPORT the valid, the true, and the helpful. THAT however, can be hugely dangerous because "sorting out" the GOOD FOLKS for non-valid reasons ("he sounds glib") HELPS our enemies and harms the truth!
Well, if someone were to publicly track where every one of them were located all the time, who knows who might show up to protest. Or just be present. Some people are driven to paranoia by thinking they're being watched/followed all the time... and maybe they are...
Just saying. I can imagine Soros, out on his yacht far out in the ocean, would get rattled by irregularly visiting boats that had people in bullhorns welcoming him to the deep blue sea, and then leaving.
Revolution is usually the end game with disfunctional governments. The Illuminati motto from the latin reads Order of of Chaos (created by them and their co conspirators)
We want to thank you so much for sharing our piece. You and Sasha were an inspiration for it and the value both of you have brought to the world has been an inspiration for our platform to find our voice again. Much love and solidarity, JP and Julie - book of ours -
Federal laws (US Code) cannot override the Constitution. This includes all the shenanigans during and after the Civil War (i.e, any declarations of martial law, the elimination of the original 13th Amendment, and the DC Organic Act). The original Constitution is still in force and the current government (the US Corporation) is an illegal construct in its entirety, including all it laws. https://coloradopublicbanking.blogspot.com/2022/05/un-pandemic-treaty-invalid-us-is-not.html
Presumably if these countermeasures are deployed overseas by US government (rather than by Pfizer under a commercial contract) and people are harmed then that could be construed as an act of war.
Just like "OUR" govt began the work on SARS-Cov2; then TRFed it to Canada, and thence to China where it was released or let out or spread on purpose to destroy humanity and give over control of the world the WEF / CCP / Khazarian Mafia??!
Just WHO is the enemy? It's NOT on national lines, because the nations have ALL been invaded and corrupted!
As I listened to this video I kept saying to myself “how dare they sell my safety and my health without my input or permission.” “Who gives them the authority to do this?” They DO NOT have the authority and they are guilty of crimes against humanity.
That's actually a very beautiful area, Cappadocia in Turkey. I stayed in the hotel and walked the street where this is filmed. There are thousands of hot air balloons taking off at sunrise.
The festival of lights is like this in Thailand. A night when pretty floaters powered by candles. that's right, candles as always..are lifted into the sky.
At a birthday party once where the host had bought some for all his guests to fly off, as we were looking up at them going and going, someone said "The Nadev Constellation.!!"
I'm about to watch the video and thanks so much for posting it, but want to say your Art choices are just absolutely grand and compelling ! ...don't know where you find the time to accompany all of your research with such inspiring, thought provoking images ...just more of your brilliance shining through.
Take note - All quarantine codes reference "person(s)". Th first sentence implicates a man (or woman) based on a title. If you do not take a title with duties and obligations, then this DOES NOT APPLY.
Black's Law Dictionary -4th Edition:
PERSON: A man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. People v. R. Co., 134 N.Y. 506, 31 N.E. 873.
"Persons" are of two kinds, natural and artificial. A natural person is a human being. Artificial persons include a collection or succession of natural persons forming a corporation; a collection of property to which the law attributes the capacity of having rights and duties. The latter class of artificial persons is recognized only to a limited extent in our law. Examples are the estate of a bankrupt or deceased person. Hogan v. Greenfield, 58 Wyo. 13, 122 P.2d 850, 853.
PERSON New York, 7 S.Ct. 108, 119 U.S. 110, 30 L.Ed. 342; and a statutory requirement of such conditions is not in conflict with the XIVth Amendment. (added for clarity - this is in reference to a 14th amendment citizen "person")
It has been held that when the word person is used in a legislative act, natural persons will be intended unless something appear in the context to show that it applies to artificial persons, Blair v. Worley, 1 Scam., Ill., 178; Appeal of Fox, 112 Pa. 337 ; 4 A. 149 ; but as a rule corporations will be considered persons within the statutes unless the intention of the legislature is manifestly to exclude them. Stribbling v. Bank, 5 Rand., Va., 132.
A county is a person in a legal sense, Lancaster Co. v. Trimble, 34 Neb. 752, 52 N.W. 711; BUT A SOVEREIGN IS NOT; In re Fox, 52 N.Y. 535, 11 Am.Rep. 751; U. S. v. Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 24 L.Ed. 192
Persons are the subject of rights and duties; and, as a subject of a right, the person is the object of the correlative duty, and conversely. The subject of a right has been called by Professor Holland, the person of inherence; the subject of a duty, the person of incidence. "Entitled" and "bound" are the terms in common use in English and for most purposes they are adequate. Every full citizen is a person; other human beings, namely, subjects who are not citizens, may be persons. But not every human being is necessarily a person, for a person is capable of rights and duties, and there may well be human beings having no legal rights, as was the case with slaves in English law.
A person is such, not because he is human, but because rights and duties are ascribed to him. The person is the legal subject or substance of which the rights and duties are attributes. An individual human being considered as having such attributes is what lawyers call a natural person. Pollock, First Book of Jurispr. 110. Gray, Nature and Sources of Law, ch. IL
Bottom line - if a man or woman WITHOUT a title and NOT a "person" (rights and duties and obligations prescribed) these do not apply. As a federal citizen one is a "person" with duties and obligations. A state national is a man or woman with a domicile on the land (Ohioan for example), no title, that is an American, not a federal citizen. As such, you have a lawful framework to refute all legal codes, rules, acts and statutes as they do not apply to you as a man or woman.
Ok, good luck with that. I’m not trying to be sassy, but with the judicial element clearly biased, the results from any questioning seems not in our favor. I appreciate your finding though and will tuck it away. Let’s keep digging or finding a way to reestablish our own government.
If you look into how to deal with a narcissist, ( which is what I consider this scam in its entirety), often it’s suggested to respond “ your reality is not my reality.” Maybe we create our own reality, our own military, & our own way to counter this countermeasure. If we are truly at war, than let’s fight back without the court system, instead with our courage.
I am actively pressing a claim AT court for a trespass by false witness, theft extortion, harm to good name, etc... Coming forward as a man and pressing claim against others of mankind for said trespasses. There is a peaceful way to address these things, but it is best to press claim for harm against an individual man or woman with evidence, facts, and conclusions of law. The key is not allowing them to gain jurisdiction. That is done by knowing who you are and that you are NOT a title in any fashion (including MR or MRS), plaintiff, defendant, pro se, member, partner, party, etc... You are a man by the name of (_______). The others of mankind who did trespass are now interested in negotiating since the alternative is a trial by jury that is final.
This is not sexist. It is equal opportunity biological gender. The original question was asked as a man, by a man. Substitute woman as appropriate. Anything else?
So you basically must state if/when the federal law is being enforced that you are an “Ohioan” (insert state resident name) and that precludes the particular enforceable federal quarantine edict? Not that it will make much difference because the “authorities” doing the arresting/enforcing aren’t hip to such law nuance so you’re going to go wherever they are taking you unless you are planning to resist at all costs.
You actually need to come forward as a man. Which can be done at any time. However, it is harder as a federal citizen due to the evidence created within the system that you did not realize captured you as a "person". There are other adhesion contracts that make this problematic (all part of the ruse) and they will claim these adhesion contracts prove you are in fact a "person". They are:
Voter Registration (would need to remove your registration and not participate in their corporate elections - each state has a form)
Birth Certificate (need to take back your name with Declaration of Political status and complete the Foreign Sovereigns Immunity Act Notice 18 USC 2333 18 USC 1341 and 1342 and remove all powers of attorney and and complete a Deed of Re-conveyance to make you the beneficiary of all trade names as a competent man not requiring representation)
Social Security Number (optional as it belongs to you as a man and is a trust account and you are the beneficiary)
Drivers License (optional - if you know and understand the "commercial vehicle" designation versus private property which can be used at any time if using your private property for travel with companions and not for commercial corporate use)
Conversion to a Ohioan is through the status change process with the Foreign Sovereigns Immunity Act.
Long answer - but - if you know you are a man and how to stand as a man AT court, these other changes are added proof of who you are. But, you need to be prepared.
They stopped teaching Common Law (soil and land jurisdiction) in schools by the 50s in any capacity.
I suggest (I get ZERO benefit from this recommendation and I do not know them personally) taking the law for mankind full knowledge share course to start and get a copy of Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition to start. That is the best way to get started. Also learn all you can from these three sites:
wo/man - Good to go. Bottom line, be a step away from the Creator. Once you take on a title, you are diminished. This is the reason for the pronouns, titles, re-definitions. They are attempting to keep people (man and woman) diminished and less than a creation of the Creator who creates.
When considering the reality, their goal is for all to not be accountable or responsible. The last thing the legal society wants is for your yeahs to be yeahs and your nays to be nays. Calling out another man or woman for trespass is biblical. It is safer for the liars and thieves to argue and complain like trained children and make things ambiguous rather than accept accountability and providing remedy for said trespass.
How do you make an entity take the stand and testify to how it did you harm? "It" cannot. But, a man or woman, they had to make the final decision. Your doctor, the nurse, the teacher, the administrator. Call them out as a man or woman, not as their title. Then they are responsible and accountable. No immunity. Does an entity autograph a document? No...
A corporation cannot contract with a living soul (man or woman). Only a corporation can contract with a corporation (maritime and admiralty law) and a man or woman can contract with a man or woman. So, call out those of mankind who do trespass.
Now, I see why govt. officials are neither capable, nor required to have any going definition for the word "woman". There''s no such legal entity, it's all "man".
\
Well, the last still-on-the- books-version of the Rule/Law of Thumb having been abandoned no sooner than the early nineties in Switzerland,
I can see how this simplifies the conondrum of trying to explain how chattel came to have human rights.
Thanks, I look forward to watching it later today. I'm so glad they put your and Sasha's great work into a video format. That will help spread it even more.
Denis Rancourt has done excellent work analysing overall mortality in the US during the "Covid Era." He starts, before the injections are rolled out, with the massive slaughter that happened in hospitals, nursing homes, etc. that was a result of the mandated protocols. The report cover excess mortality from the March 11th 2020 announcement of a "pandemic" to week-5 of 2022, corresponding to a total of 100 weeks.
His estimate for that time frame is that around 1.3 million people were killed due to the various "Covid measures." These individuals were mainly the elderly, the poor and the disabled.
What is that number here in early 2023- 10 months later?
This site which I'm guessing is organized by one of the author's of the video is an extraordinary compendium of information on just about anything you could want- it has been around for years.
Thank you Katherine along with everybody that has put together this video. We the people are very grateful. God Bless you all.
Hell I'm not even half way through and the subversion of laws that were inconspicuously implemented through the years seems to be unconstitutional at best and implemented for where we are at worst. It's a total destruction of the constitution as well as loss of any personal freedoms. We the people are now servitude to the US government.
Amen. It is my prayer that someone making waves on the pushback side picks up this story as a further reveal of what’s really happening here in the States.
Hi Katherine, I absolutely love your substack. Your research, critical thinking, and writing skills make for a refreshing read. I really like the video linked in this post as well.
There is one thing I've been wondering about, though. Maybe someone can give some feedback on this. I've been watching Attorney Todd Callendar's videos since he first appeared on the scene and I've thought what he said made sense. One thing bothers me about him, however. He has said in at least three different interviews, including one from last week, that the HPV vaccine is required in all 50 states. It is not, by a long shot. Seems like a pretty major thing for him to be getting wrong and to keep repeating it. It makes me wonder about his credibility.
A well-researched presentation of the facts. Near the end, the term "legalized war crimes" stood out to me. The key question that was not addressed is: What are we to do? The piece offers no hope and no direction.
"Legalized war" . That seems to sum it up for me?
"First, we'll kill all the lawyers. " Shakespeare
Exactly are we completely at a loss to stop this pre meditated legal genocide?
I someone was in the process of repeatedly stabbing your child to death, who would you go to to know what you might do to stop it?
I would not go to anyone but to my own hands and muscles to stop you!
Congratulations!! You are still human. No small feat.
I concur
I wonder about the contents of this video in which the allegation by a German carbon/graphene expert (Dr. Andreas Noack) claims that the vaccines are filled with graphene hydroxide, which is a 1 atom (.1nm) thick, non-biodegradable molecule with extremely sharp edges, which he equates to being like "nano-razors" and that when entered into the bloodstream, literally slice up the insides of blood vessels.
He is alleged to have died hours later under mysterious circumstances, though there is some dispute about how he died - some say his wife's comments were mistranslated to suggest an attack by others, then later changed to "heart attack".
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/murder-just-hours-after-publishing-the-secret-of-the-vaxx-dr-noack-is-dead/ (closed captioned, but also a text transcript further below at that link)
There are links further down the page to research papers regarding the structure and sharpness of graphene hydroxide.
video by itself is seen here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/WCfyNz0eK6zV/
One of the comments below the bitchute video link has a link to more info (or questions) about the nature of his death.
IF this is true, I really have to question this product: Graphene condoms, supposedly funded by Bill Gates. https://www.industrytap.com/bill-gates-funds-birth-graphene-condoms/19829 (granted, it's not the same molecule, but... man, what a sneaky way to kill people)
Dr Ryan Cole, pathologist extraordinaire, did a fantastic interview/demonstration with Del Hightower -- and SHOWED the "graphene" folks are describing are actually cholesterol crystals. The "hydra" people are squawking about is a normal, natural PLANT part from, the underside of leaves: Ryan showed both the "hydra" -- and the google search page showing a gazillion of the same kind-of thing!
Ryan has done ... I forget what's called' -- the electro-thingie that lets you IDENTIFY the actual chemical/elemental make-up on some 'thing' you're observing/testing. (Like how 'we' identify the chemistry of stars or novae by their spectrum of the elements.) Cholesterol, not graphene.
Thanks! I had seen (and forgotten) some reference to Dr. Cole's info (didn't dig in) as I wanted to sit back and let more experienced voices chime in and let the dust settle.
mass spectral analysis?
This “Demonstration” was not adequate to make that determination.
Neither (so far, NO) demonstration has been definitive! Casting shade on EITHER side is ridiculous.
One: "I tested a vial from California!"
One: "I tested a vial from Spain!"
Both: "They differ! You MUST be a liar or a corrupt bad person!"
I refer everyone again to the website: how badismybatch -- which is TRACKING vial dispersal and the levels of injuries and deaths across, at least, the U.S. IN those dispersal areas. It is a complete GIVEN that these TRACKABLE differences 100% MEAN the 'stuff' in the vials are different, right? The logic of a 12-yr-old can see that!
So -- instead of forming up tug-of-war TEAMS to insult and try to downgrade this or that researcher -- HOLD your determinations, and consider the bigger picture! STOP maligning one or another researcher or research team... If someone disagrees with something YOU find persuasive, do NOT start shouting that s/he's compromised and an enemy agent! (Although I'm sure we all agree Fauci-Mengele is a murderous enemy agent to the human species!!)
I'm ... riled up right now, having just spent an hour answering people MIS-describing (as far as I've found so far) Dr Ryan Cole in Sweden. Suddenly, he's an enemy agent mistreating one of "our" ( THEIR!) heroes by 'jumping up on stage, stealing a mic, interrupting her presentation and harranguing Stuckle-somebody.' She is a *metals* expert - NOT a medical expert (as far as I know; I'm off to watch her presentation next). Except the video of Cole speaking that I have seen is clearly BETWEEN presentations; Stuckle.... is SITTING with others on the stage, preparatory to the NEXT presentation, a panel discussion apparently. The audience is very loud talking to each other,
Cole walks off the stage asks for and get a mic, CALMLY walks back onto the stage and says he disagrees. (You know, like you DO at a professional meeting where people disagree!!)
He ACTUALLY begins with the exact phrase: "before the panel begins..." (Kinda like PROOF Cole did not 'interrupt' the sitting Stuckle... who was speaking with the person next to her, NOT presenting to the crowd; doncha think?) Stuckle.... jumps up and hastens to the podium mic (next to Cole) and tries to argue *over* him, some guy in the audience jumps up and starts screaming at Cole...
Everyone keeps missing that Ryan Cole is ALWAYS 100% polite and reserved when disagreeing! No yelling, no insults, no shouting... he merely presents HIS SIDE, and waits for the other side's answer. I've never even seen him INTERRUPT another speaker (howinthehell he does THAT baffles me!).
BUT, in leaping up and shouting to defend THEIR hero ("She's right, she's the ONLY one on the planet who is right! And WE know she's right universally, so everyone else HAS to be wrong and an enemy agent!!!") (Yeah, see? I'm still ... riled up... but not sorry, because this is the way our enemies ALWAYS sow discord and destroy our efforts to find the truth; and we LET them!!) How about ... (oh, you know) professionally disagreeing, maybe even having a CALM discussion with Cole?! Novel thought, that....
So, Tina? We HAVE no demonstrations that are adequate to make the MANY determinations that we urgently need. We are blind men feeling a (huge and murderous) elephant (with an insane and vicious mahout!). And many of our "blind men" are making some pretty damned good and useful conclusions on the basis of the parts they have examined... and some (as is always true in science and medicine -- and in daily life) are making some wrong conclusions. The only WAY to find the truth is to keep working and talking with each other , not decide "anyone who disagrees with me is evil!"
I suspect Ryan Cole has been compromised. I watched and listened to him dismiss the findings of dozens of researchers and he is far too glib, far too dismissive and not convincing. Your choice of word 'squawking' gives your agenda away I am afraid.
These two highly qualified, highly educated, highly intelligent and ethical professionals give their opinions on the so-called 'vaccines'. For starters, they both agree that they are not 'vaccines'. Neither are 'squawking' - they both talk complete sense which is more than can be said for the criminals behind these atrocities. https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/frances-long-time-vaccine-policy-chief-covid-policy-is-completely-stupid-and-unethical
EVERYONE who reads here -- or speaks out on it in public! -- agrees they're not vaccines!! Okay-so, not the sheep or the evil and/or sold-out -- but everyone working VERY hard to get across the damages, dangers, and deaths these gene-modifying therapeutics are causing.... AGREES they are not vaccines. That's not even a POINT that needs to be made on Steve Kirsch's substack, is it? (Oh sorry, *Katherine's* substack... I read so many!)
Ryan Cole is certainly glib, in the FIRST definition:
1. Performed with a natural, offhand ease.
but certainly NOT in the second!
2. Given to or characterized by fluency of speech or writing that often suggests insincerity, superficiality, or a lack of concern.
He is an *expert* in his field. He is direct and firm in his conclusions because he IS an expert. Would you have experts talk all uncertain and mealy-mouthed? "Fluency" generally leads to looking askance at what an expert says only by people who CANNOT speak fluently.
I worked with a man (at Boeing) who pooh-poohed my ... reservations ... about a potential hiree (for a technical editing position) , because the man completely misused a 'term of the art.' When the hiring authority thought that was a silly reason, I said: If you were interviewing a ROOFER -- for the possibility of spending a ton of money on his work -- and he described the (technical term:) "valley" as the "angled-thing between two sides," just how competent would think he might be?
Do you see the difference between a first-time public speaker -- and an old-hand expert at it? Ryan Cole is an old-hand expert at it -- so he SPEAKS fluently because he KNOWS what he's speaking about! (And yes, I DO have the medical and technological background to follow what he's speaking about: if he says spectrometry shows no graphene oxide in the samples he has tested -- then there IS none! If he off-handedly discards the contaminants that non-specialists, and certainly non-EXPERTS, are indeed squawking about are "hydras" -- by SHOWING exactly what the (I forget the name -- the (yes, hydra-LOOKING) things come from the undersides of leaves that float in the air everywhere on the planet and we breathe in all day) are; then I can confidently discard the "OMG! HYDRA in the shots!" (And so should you! Do you think a hydra COULD survive storage and shipping in -80 degree F?!)
Please go watch the Del Hightower / Ryan Cole video where Ryan actually DEMONSTRATES on camera the effect of the poison vax, under the microscope, when added to Del's fresh-drawn blood. I DO have a few reservations, in that the astonishing effect on a sample-size of blood on a slide, and even just one 'drop' of the various vax-samples Ryan tested, may be exaggerated because of the mis-matched amount. However, I have found Ryan -- over many, many hours of interviews and discussions -- to be precise, careful, and ACCURATE!
And finally. "Compromised" how? In what way? To do or say what? The finding of the not-dozens, but certainly SOME researchers being dismissed is HOW medicine and science works!! Do you think Peterson and Ardis's "snake venom in the water!!!!" should not be dismissed? I am NOT discarding the idea that venom IS used (all OVER the world) in entirely legit medical research and entirely legit medical treatments!! However, Stew and Bryan went WAY overboard; 'trying to be first in breaking news' -- as Bryan HAD been first-and-best in the Remdesivir trials, and then the Gilead trials, identifying the murder weapon!
PLEASE don't be slurring and trying to malign experts -- experts whom OTHER experts absolutely consider to be valid and worth listening to (do you remember Andrew Hill showing on video by Tess Laurie that he was a sell-out? And that was followed by Hill being shunned and discarded by OUR folks -- and feted by his controllers? After submitting to the money-control and NOT publishing the truth about ivermectin, Hill should have been -- and WAS legitimately by OUR folks -- discarded as a sell-out and murderer. He was a traitor to the truth.
Ryan Cole is a revealer of the truth. The trust OUR expert (and semi-expert and non-expert) folks have him IS warranted. Unless you actually HAVE any real "cause" (other than "I don't feel good watching him"?) to insult and distrust him that you can VALIDATE and verify -- then do not "cut down" OUR people! Our enemies are working VERY hard to do so. Don't YOU help THEM!
Dr Young has also confirmed the findings of the Spanish researchers - La Quinta Columna/Orwell City re graphene oxide: https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/quinta-columna-graphene-oxide-findings-confirmed
Super -- then let's get THEM to send a sample of the therapeutic THEY got, and Ryan will no doubt send a sample of the vials HE got -- and the two teams can cross-verify! SURELY you don't think -- having seen multiple reports from "how bad was my batch" and the differing levels of contamination -- that EITHER 'side' is 100% confirmatory? If the La Quinta samples show graphene, then Ryan will no doubt be able to confirm it. If Ryan shows them the PLANT parts they (they? or someone else?) "identify" as hydra, then THEY will be able to recognize the plant parts.
I STILL see no way on the PLANET that something some people are seeing as a 'hydra' -- an allegedly living animal -- could survive negative-80-degree storage, in a vial of some liquid NOT water, without O2 replenishment, and so on. And the "oooh, it's MOVING!!" cries from either 'don't know' or 'discounting' people (pls provide an alternate explanation to the normal one when using microscopes) -- when you prep a slide for a scope (you can SEE Ryan do this in his Del Hightower vid) -- you put the liquid sample onto the base slide, and then put a TOP slide on it. The pressure OF the top slide spreads the liquid out -- it MOVES the liquid. And then you move the slides under the scope 'brace' that hold them still, the increased, sometimes uneven pressure, makes the liquid MOVE...
Those behind these crimes are serial killers and mass murderers. Even if we are to put aside the fake 'vaccines' the lockdowns, masks, enforced isolation, quarantines, loss of jobs, loneliness, lack of treatment for genuine illnesses will have killed hundreds of thousands, maybe millions. This will have been well known beforehand. As for Noack, there is every indication that he was assassinated. Another German doctor was 'suicided' at around the same time when he allegedly threw himself off the roof of his own hospital, presumably because he was blowing the whistle.
Dr Noack (world expert in graphene) discussion: https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/introduce-yourself/doctor-andreas-noack
Dr Thoman Jendges (head of Cheminitz hospital in Germany) discussion: https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/anything-goes/head-clinic-commits-suicide-covid-19-vaccine-genocide
And thereby you think putting Ryan Cole down is warranted?
Yes, our enemies are happily going around murdering people who stand up. That MIGHT add weight to their arguments... but without them still here (alas!) -- or someone who has followed and replicated their work -- who can 'stand in' and defend it in the NORMAL process of medicine and science to determine validity... then it's fantastic preliminary work -- that STILL NEEDS to be verified!
Sure, generally, whatever the govt/TPTB SAYS is to be looked at askance ()ot just straight discarded!), because they will ALWAYS be lying! However -- the DETAILS must be tested, CONtested, and worked out.
I think this is the Ryan Cole interview with Del that you are referring to? https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-highwires-lab-investigation-of-covid-vaccines/
I don't think there is anything here that either proves or disproves the graphene hypotheses. Many, many researchers have theorized that there is graphene in the shots that should not be there and that has not been disclosed in the list of ingredients. Cole appears to support the germ theory of disease which many now are seriously questioning.
Cole is a LEADING extremely experienced and educated pathologist. IF HE says: "after matching it up to many many slides of cholesterol crystals, and spectrographic inspection, this is not graphene but is cholesterol crystals... on what POSSIBLE basis do you dispute him?
"has not been disclosed in the list of ingredients." There IS no list of ingredients! The FDA/CDC/ govt has made it LEGAL for them to hide whateverthehell they WANT! Surely you've seen the poison-vaxx 'drug insert' -- that in ENTIRELY BLANK!? (If your 'researchers" think they could or should "trust" the 'list of ingredients' -- then they are NOT researchers! They're idiots!)
"Many many researchers have THEORIZED" How many of your "many many" have decades of pathology work? How many have the amazing experiential background Cole has ... yes, I AM 'arguing from authority" because Cole IS an authority and esp. in this specific field! What are the back grounds of your "many many" researchers? We will likely NEVER prove of disprove -- unless Pfizer et al. included it in their lab notes (yeah, right!) AND we get out hands on them! However -- the WAY TO BET is with the guy with the best experience, equipment, and knowledge. That's Cole.
Does your list of (more valid? is that your point?) researchers include Bryan Ardis? On balance, I cannot find Ardis to be any kind of authority on this stuff. He had a VERY important (and very EARLY) absolute super HIT with the remdes. and tests. Broken clock? He had NOT followed it up with MORE substantive research. He's lost his path. The snake venom thing -- which he was SO convinced on -- completely DETRACTS from him being a solid course. I will continue to keep an eye on Ardis: blind squirrels sometimes find a second nut! But he will need a boatload more -- and better backed up -- sources and resources before I will do more than note and pass beyond whatever he shows up- with!
What background in actual slide microscopy do your 'many many' have? How MANY autopsies have they done over the past 30-40 YEARS?! LOTS of folks are ... getting out over their skis ... because they are SO SURE they've found something... see, e.g., the "hydra" in that Cole/Del video. Was that not persuasive enough for you? Do you need to go even further into HOW a living creature could live through the manufacture, the -80-degree storage, the transport, decanting and thawing, and injecting into a human and STILL 'allegedly' move about on the slide.
Have you never worked with a microscope? When you put the cover slide on top of the sample (on the other slide) and slide it under the microscope 'holders' -- any liquid or anything else is squished between the two glasses. The saline (or vaxx-matrix or whatever) spreads; it MOVES, it 'appears' to be capable of movement -- but it's merely the water/liquid spreading. These supposed "hydras" are leaf parts, and the movement OF the liquid, moves them too!
UNTIL this-all is over and "we" get a helluva long time to discuss, investigate, test, balance, experiment, and work on germ theory -- it is a DISTRACTION! (And fatal to some folks!) That is wasting time while MILLIONS are dying, and it's NOT the time to discuss "possible flaws" in the original underpinning of an entire wing of medicine. When we MANAGE to stop the forced use of this poison -- THEN it is absolutely worthwhile to discuss germ theory. I'll be right there with you. I don't yet KNOW if there's something there or not. I am interested to find out. I AM NOT willing to waste time trying to sidetrack and distract our folks DURING a GENOCIDE!
And to decide some CLEAR expert is not worth listening to because he is AS cautious in determining germ theory as he HAS been in determining -- and proving -- this is a poison vaxx?! I can't / won't support that at all! Look -- when we finally get to the "let's see what ELSE the ortho-docs have gotten (or cho$en to get) wrong" Cole will likely be right there in the thick of it -- discussing BOTH sides, while helping us work out the truth! He has NEVER stopped himself from admitting when new info changes his positions.
Really, are you LOOKING for reasons to discount him? For what possible purpose?!
I've seen these videos previously. Thanks for the links!
Question: I had discovered the video last night and in sharing it with my brother, who said he looked into claims of graphene (hydr)oxide awhile back, said that the material itself is so dark it would be easily seen in the vials. Given carbon IS black, does that fact alone undercut the claims?
He went on to say that the doctors making that claim were asked how they got the vials, and they claimed it was sent to them, not knowing the source. Now, that could be plausible deniability so as to avoid huge sanctions for violating contracts, but it's also possible they got spiked versions of the vaccines to throw them off from mRNA spike factories.
Do you have any knowledge about this? I HAD heard about the graphene oxide component awhile back, but honestly, can't think of a lot of recent coverage on it, so a hoax is plausible at this point, although I recall the Japanese saying they had vials with a visible contaminant in it.
So, honestly, I'm not sure now...
The Japanese tested the vials sent TO THEM by the govt... and discarded them as contaminated. The folks -- OUR folks -- testing various vials got them illicitly, because the iron-clad contracts the govt / Big Pharma REQUIRE govts to sign specifically DISALLOW any testing. Gee, wonder why?
And no, you cannot 'see' carbon or any other contaminants, and they are microscopic. I doubt the 'graphene oxide 'discoveries' were hoaxed. They DO look a lot like cholesterol crystals... which a doc who has done over 50,000 autopsies AND spectrography ON the crystals had determined to be so.
Thank you. I recall the Japanese story, and that there were reports that there were VISIBLE contaminants, which was why they tested it.
I wonder at what point (regardless of size), the change in color or reflectivity is visibly seen in solution by the naked eye. Perhaps up against light behind it, or behind you (the viewer), or against a contrasting color backdrop.
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/pharmaceutical-industrial-complex/official-uk-lab-report-confirms-covid-19-vaccines
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/graphene-oxide
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/unsolved-case-file/dr-campra-have-jabbed-been-chipped-shocking-new-evidence?page=1
I did see the videos about a year ago, and they certainly appear to be authentic. I don't know whether the graphene is visible in the vials with the naked eye. I did a quick search regarding the videos and came up with this, if you want to check them out (I didn't click because I've already seen the videos): https://www.eutimes.net/2021/12/leading-german-chemist-andreas-noack-dies-30-minutes-after-exposing-graphene-oxide-possibly-assassinated/
I didn't really get much more other than details of his death. I wonder if he was poisoned by that visitor. But the lights going out at the same time? Maybe he was remotely attacked... Just an awful and prolonged way to die. Thanks for the link.
This is an incredibly powerful talk by Dr Noack. It is completely irrelevant that the quality is not good and all the other deliberate distractions, obfuscations and strawmen. Whistleblowers have been murdered for far less. This was a warning to others. https://www.bitchute.com/video/WCfyNz0eK6zV/
Directed energy weapon or similar? Biowarfare weapons and technology hugely advanced in the past few decades and given that nearly all the wars are started by we all know who, then the biowarfare criminals in charge test the weapons on innocent civilians particularly if those civilians are exposing the foxes in charge of the hen coop. After all, whistleblowers are now the enemy. https://sansmemetics.net/dr-andreas-noacks-assassinated-by-gov-work/
We use their psyop war against them every opportunity and some.
Yes. We have to understand their modus operandi in order to expose their criminality and how they have got away with it so far, or so it seems. The psychopaths, sociopaths, malignant narcissists and other disordered individuals behind these atrocities are effectively mass murderers and serial killers. They are hiding in plain sight and have disguised themselves as 'philanthropists', 'experts', 'public health advisors' and so on. These are disguises and work with gullible populations who believe that medicine, law, public health etc is heavily regulated for safety. Catherine Austin Fitts called it out from the beginning, it's a coup d'etat and the goal is a modern-day slavery system. The globalists have had decades to line up their henchmen - the lesser psychopaths, narcissists and mini-hitlers desperate for a bit of power and the chance to practise some sadism. Serial killers are cunning, they can out-fox even experienced analysts. But once you've spotted the techniques, they are quite obvious. Bill Gates, for example, gives the game away with his body language. Schwab is harder to read but both talk utter rubbish - talk of saving millions of lives, saving the world, building back better etc are meaningless platitudes. And in fact, they mean the complete opposite. You have to reverse what psychopaths say to get to the truth. For the average person it's incredibly difficult to comprehend the mentality of a psychopath, which is why they have got away with so much. Beware the wolves in sheep's clothing.
The good news is that the globalists have overplayed their hand and are now in panic mode. Eg: Dr Peter Hotez has fully exposed himself as a WHO criminal. This is the perfect 'own goal' - he has shot himself in the foot.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-who-thinks-anti-vaccine-activism-is-deadlier-than-terrorism/ar-AA15Xzm5
In this article, Hotez reveals that the whole 'vaccination' program is to do with expansion of global tyranny under the disguise of 'saving lives'. Look how desperate he is (they are) to hit the developing world market. This is modern-day colonialism. Psychopaths do not take well to being exposed. (Hotez is a good frontman for the 'vax' fraud as he refuses to even consider whether his child's autism could be linked to vax. )
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340755/pdf/41577_2022_Article_770.pdf
The devious device of accusing your critics of doing what you yourself are doing is a classic criminal technique, not only do you point the finger away from yourself but you also gas-light into the bargain. Win, win for the fraudsters! https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-does-peter-hotez-think-we-are
Why the WHO has to go: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
WHO terrorist organisation: https://beforeitsnews.com/health/2022/12/uns-world-health-organization-terrorists-attack-on-your-bodily-autonomy-video-3048478.html
Peter Hotez being positioned as a replacement for Fraudchi? Certainly seems to be the case what with his latest mouthing off. The perfect puppet for Tedros who has to be one of the most unpleasant individuals one would ever hope not to encounter. The WHO is essentially a terrorist organisation. https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopolitics/peter-hotez-vies-for-power-as-fauci-steps-down/
Yes, but DON'T go too far. A major portion of OUR work is to sort out and discard the liars / evil / sellouts; and find and SUPPORT the valid, the true, and the helpful. THAT however, can be hugely dangerous because "sorting out" the GOOD FOLKS for non-valid reasons ("he sounds glib") HELPS our enemies and harms the truth!
Well, if someone were to publicly track where every one of them were located all the time, who knows who might show up to protest. Or just be present. Some people are driven to paranoia by thinking they're being watched/followed all the time... and maybe they are...
Just saying. I can imagine Soros, out on his yacht far out in the ocean, would get rattled by irregularly visiting boats that had people in bullhorns welcoming him to the deep blue sea, and then leaving.
Revolution is usually the end game with disfunctional governments. The Illuminati motto from the latin reads Order of of Chaos (created by them and their co conspirators)
If that ain't enough proof for anyone of just how stupid they are....I don't know!!
I didn't know that about their motto. Odd that they have a name "Illuminati" and they strive for chaos - the opposite of light.
We want to thank you so much for sharing our piece. You and Sasha were an inspiration for it and the value both of you have brought to the world has been an inspiration for our platform to find our voice again. Much love and solidarity, JP and Julie - book of ours -
Federal laws (US Code) cannot override the Constitution. This includes all the shenanigans during and after the Civil War (i.e, any declarations of martial law, the elimination of the original 13th Amendment, and the DC Organic Act). The original Constitution is still in force and the current government (the US Corporation) is an illegal construct in its entirety, including all it laws. https://coloradopublicbanking.blogspot.com/2022/05/un-pandemic-treaty-invalid-us-is-not.html
Oh. Too easy. We'll just hire some lawyers and have them all arrested, charged and locked up.
Presumably if these countermeasures are deployed overseas by US government (rather than by Pfizer under a commercial contract) and people are harmed then that could be construed as an act of war.
https://thediplomat.com/2021/06/biden-announces-international-covid-19-vaccine-sharing-plan/
Just like "OUR" govt began the work on SARS-Cov2; then TRFed it to Canada, and thence to China where it was released or let out or spread on purpose to destroy humanity and give over control of the world the WEF / CCP / Khazarian Mafia??!
Just WHO is the enemy? It's NOT on national lines, because the nations have ALL been invaded and corrupted!
Bingo
It could.
Is that why the contracts mentioned surrender of military assets if a country tried to sue?
Really good point.
As I listened to this video I kept saying to myself “how dare they sell my safety and my health without my input or permission.” “Who gives them the authority to do this?” They DO NOT have the authority and they are guilty of crimes against humanity.
Repeat after me: "Life is not for sale"
Nice intro video. I know the exact spot it was filmed from :)
Ominous sight but quite beautiful....it's a mystery to me
That's actually a very beautiful area, Cappadocia in Turkey. I stayed in the hotel and walked the street where this is filmed. There are thousands of hot air balloons taking off at sunrise.
Oh, thanks for filling us in on that ...yes, hauntingly beautiful. I used to feel sorry for Countries that were beautiful yet had disgraceful legal systems but now my Canada has joined the ranks of such. Our Dr. Jordan Peterson who we adore has just been ordered to take re education training ! ...https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/canada-isnt-finished-yet-or-is-it?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email and USA shockingly too !
On a side note, between you and Katherine, we have now found out everything we need to know in grave detail about how serious a situation we are in.
We are indeed exceedingly grateful to you both for your unstinting bravery and integrity.
Little different in New Zealand and Australia, just different arms of the same corporate globalist WEF experiment.
So, you missed that Jordan Peterson was U.N. involved from early on?
Do you realize that a Judas Goat APPEARS to be protective and on your side -- AS HE LEADS YOU TO THE ABBATOIR! Catch up! Stop falling for the act.
Read any of these, esp. the first...
https://voxday.net/2018/11/15/jordan-peterson-trilateralist/
https://voxday.net/2018/12/30/mailvox-the-creation-of-jordan-peterson/
https://voxday.net/2022/07/05/jordan-peterson-rolls-over/
https://voxday.net/2019/10/15/jordan-peterson-is-a-mirror/
https://voxday.net/2019/04/22/jordan-peterson-humiliates-himself/
The festival of lights is like this in Thailand. A night when pretty floaters powered by candles. that's right, candles as always..are lifted into the sky.
At a birthday party once where the host had bought some for all his guests to fly off, as we were looking up at them going and going, someone said "The Nadev Constellation.!!"
That was birthday boy's name. Great memory.
"I choose to let the mystery be. "
Iris Dement "Let The Mystery Be". Fabulous Song!!!
Dear Kathrine,
I'm about to watch the video and thanks so much for posting it, but want to say your Art choices are just absolutely grand and compelling ! ...don't know where you find the time to accompany all of your research with such inspiring, thought provoking images ...just more of your brilliance shining through.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-quarantine-and-isolation-statutes.aspx
Take note - All quarantine codes reference "person(s)". Th first sentence implicates a man (or woman) based on a title. If you do not take a title with duties and obligations, then this DOES NOT APPLY.
Black's Law Dictionary -4th Edition:
PERSON: A man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. People v. R. Co., 134 N.Y. 506, 31 N.E. 873.
"Persons" are of two kinds, natural and artificial. A natural person is a human being. Artificial persons include a collection or succession of natural persons forming a corporation; a collection of property to which the law attributes the capacity of having rights and duties. The latter class of artificial persons is recognized only to a limited extent in our law. Examples are the estate of a bankrupt or deceased person. Hogan v. Greenfield, 58 Wyo. 13, 122 P.2d 850, 853.
PERSON New York, 7 S.Ct. 108, 119 U.S. 110, 30 L.Ed. 342; and a statutory requirement of such conditions is not in conflict with the XIVth Amendment. (added for clarity - this is in reference to a 14th amendment citizen "person")
It has been held that when the word person is used in a legislative act, natural persons will be intended unless something appear in the context to show that it applies to artificial persons, Blair v. Worley, 1 Scam., Ill., 178; Appeal of Fox, 112 Pa. 337 ; 4 A. 149 ; but as a rule corporations will be considered persons within the statutes unless the intention of the legislature is manifestly to exclude them. Stribbling v. Bank, 5 Rand., Va., 132.
A county is a person in a legal sense, Lancaster Co. v. Trimble, 34 Neb. 752, 52 N.W. 711; BUT A SOVEREIGN IS NOT; In re Fox, 52 N.Y. 535, 11 Am.Rep. 751; U. S. v. Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 24 L.Ed. 192
Persons are the subject of rights and duties; and, as a subject of a right, the person is the object of the correlative duty, and conversely. The subject of a right has been called by Professor Holland, the person of inherence; the subject of a duty, the person of incidence. "Entitled" and "bound" are the terms in common use in English and for most purposes they are adequate. Every full citizen is a person; other human beings, namely, subjects who are not citizens, may be persons. But not every human being is necessarily a person, for a person is capable of rights and duties, and there may well be human beings having no legal rights, as was the case with slaves in English law.
A person is such, not because he is human, but because rights and duties are ascribed to him. The person is the legal subject or substance of which the rights and duties are attributes. An individual human being considered as having such attributes is what lawyers call a natural person. Pollock, First Book of Jurispr. 110. Gray, Nature and Sources of Law, ch. IL
Bottom line - if a man or woman WITHOUT a title and NOT a "person" (rights and duties and obligations prescribed) these do not apply. As a federal citizen one is a "person" with duties and obligations. A state national is a man or woman with a domicile on the land (Ohioan for example), no title, that is an American, not a federal citizen. As such, you have a lawful framework to refute all legal codes, rules, acts and statutes as they do not apply to you as a man or woman.
Ok, good luck with that. I’m not trying to be sassy, but with the judicial element clearly biased, the results from any questioning seems not in our favor. I appreciate your finding though and will tuck it away. Let’s keep digging or finding a way to reestablish our own government.
If you look into how to deal with a narcissist, ( which is what I consider this scam in its entirety), often it’s suggested to respond “ your reality is not my reality.” Maybe we create our own reality, our own military, & our own way to counter this countermeasure. If we are truly at war, than let’s fight back without the court system, instead with our courage.
Yeah for sure. Put on your God Courage pants because this fight is for all the marbles.(paraphrasing Catherine Austin Fitts)
I am actively pressing a claim AT court for a trespass by false witness, theft extortion, harm to good name, etc... Coming forward as a man and pressing claim against others of mankind for said trespasses. There is a peaceful way to address these things, but it is best to press claim for harm against an individual man or woman with evidence, facts, and conclusions of law. The key is not allowing them to gain jurisdiction. That is done by knowing who you are and that you are NOT a title in any fashion (including MR or MRS), plaintiff, defendant, pro se, member, partner, party, etc... You are a man by the name of (_______). The others of mankind who did trespass are now interested in negotiating since the alternative is a trial by jury that is final.
What if you are a "woman" by the name of?
Great question. The same applies. Stand as a man or woman. Not a person or any title.
BUT, IT NEVER SAYS "WOMAN" , ONLY "MAN" .
WERE THERE NO WOMEN THEN?
This is not sexist. It is equal opportunity biological gender. The original question was asked as a man, by a man. Substitute woman as appropriate. Anything else?
Was "more military" too subtle , folks?
More military, that's a great idea!!
Interesting!
So you basically must state if/when the federal law is being enforced that you are an “Ohioan” (insert state resident name) and that precludes the particular enforceable federal quarantine edict? Not that it will make much difference because the “authorities” doing the arresting/enforcing aren’t hip to such law nuance so you’re going to go wherever they are taking you unless you are planning to resist at all costs.
You actually need to come forward as a man. Which can be done at any time. However, it is harder as a federal citizen due to the evidence created within the system that you did not realize captured you as a "person". There are other adhesion contracts that make this problematic (all part of the ruse) and they will claim these adhesion contracts prove you are in fact a "person". They are:
Voter Registration (would need to remove your registration and not participate in their corporate elections - each state has a form)
Birth Certificate (need to take back your name with Declaration of Political status and complete the Foreign Sovereigns Immunity Act Notice 18 USC 2333 18 USC 1341 and 1342 and remove all powers of attorney and and complete a Deed of Re-conveyance to make you the beneficiary of all trade names as a competent man not requiring representation)
Social Security Number (optional as it belongs to you as a man and is a trust account and you are the beneficiary)
Drivers License (optional - if you know and understand the "commercial vehicle" designation versus private property which can be used at any time if using your private property for travel with companions and not for commercial corporate use)
Conversion to a Ohioan is through the status change process with the Foreign Sovereigns Immunity Act.
Long answer - but - if you know you are a man and how to stand as a man AT court, these other changes are added proof of who you are. But, you need to be prepared.
They stopped teaching Common Law (soil and land jurisdiction) in schools by the 50s in any capacity.
Also, so I can stand as a man at court what schooling would you think would be necessary?
I suggest (I get ZERO benefit from this recommendation and I do not know them personally) taking the law for mankind full knowledge share course to start and get a copy of Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition to start. That is the best way to get started. Also learn all you can from these three sites:
https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/
https://states.americanstatenationals.org/
http://www.annavonreitz.com/
Right on thank you. Good luck on your case. Please share how it turns out
www.thesovereignsway.com - should have provided you the web link.
What about if you aren't a "man" , but a "woman". ???????
wo/man - Good to go. Bottom line, be a step away from the Creator. Once you take on a title, you are diminished. This is the reason for the pronouns, titles, re-definitions. They are attempting to keep people (man and woman) diminished and less than a creation of the Creator who creates.
When considering the reality, their goal is for all to not be accountable or responsible. The last thing the legal society wants is for your yeahs to be yeahs and your nays to be nays. Calling out another man or woman for trespass is biblical. It is safer for the liars and thieves to argue and complain like trained children and make things ambiguous rather than accept accountability and providing remedy for said trespass.
How do you make an entity take the stand and testify to how it did you harm? "It" cannot. But, a man or woman, they had to make the final decision. Your doctor, the nurse, the teacher, the administrator. Call them out as a man or woman, not as their title. Then they are responsible and accountable. No immunity. Does an entity autograph a document? No...
A corporation cannot contract with a living soul (man or woman). Only a corporation can contract with a corporation (maritime and admiralty law) and a man or woman can contract with a man or woman. So, call out those of mankind who do trespass.
Amendment: I have lots of friends here!! I finally found intelligent people!!
Epiphany , peeps, and Full Moon.
It's cake night!! Enjoy@!!
Fuck 'em. We;ll party.
This discussion has taught me loads.
Now, I see why govt. officials are neither capable, nor required to have any going definition for the word "woman". There''s no such legal entity, it's all "man".
\
Well, the last still-on-the- books-version of the Rule/Law of Thumb having been abandoned no sooner than the early nineties in Switzerland,
I can see how this simplifies the conondrum of trying to explain how chattel came to have human rights.
fucking cool. I think I do that all the time...is that why I have few friends?
if your friends are lawyers...
Thanks for the thorough explanation!
I would not want to be in a bar fight with Sasha or Katherine.
I'm tough, but I'm A realist
What I meant is that I'd love to have them on my side in any circumstance.
I would. Can't wait for the day when I can get up there and gift my songs without having to deal with "bar bitches".
Pardon my french.
Sasha, Katherine no nonsense.
Men will say about our kind of "womb man" "they don't take shit from anyone"
Damn right. We've taken enough in our time.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BYUzax_34Iw
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a6IVkQ8-Lx8&t=280s
What can I say. I'm A child.
Background. The Nazi is with2 US army sabateurs, spy.
Intense
"A Circle of Stones" S Griffin
nazi germany...heimler bio...history
Will try to check out.
Swamped.
I have to destroy nwo etc
Peace.😎😎😎
"I am a child. I last a while. You can't conceive of the pleasure in my smile"
Thanks a million for that one. Ditto.
Thanks, I look forward to watching it later today. I'm so glad they put your and Sasha's great work into a video format. That will help spread it even more.
Excellent video.
Denis Rancourt has done excellent work analysing overall mortality in the US during the "Covid Era." He starts, before the injections are rolled out, with the massive slaughter that happened in hospitals, nursing homes, etc. that was a result of the mandated protocols. The report cover excess mortality from the March 11th 2020 announcement of a "pandemic" to week-5 of 2022, corresponding to a total of 100 weeks.
His estimate for that time frame is that around 1.3 million people were killed due to the various "Covid measures." These individuals were mainly the elderly, the poor and the disabled.
What is that number here in early 2023- 10 months later?
Report here:
https://correlation-canada.org/covid-period-mass-vaccination-campaign-and-public-health-disaster-in-the-usa/
His video interviews are here:
https://denisrancourt.ca/page.php?id=12&name=videos
This site which I'm guessing is organized by one of the author's of the video is an extraordinary compendium of information on just about anything you could want- it has been around for years.
https://ratical.org/rhrIndex/index.html
https://ratical.org/rat_haus.html
Yes, Mr Rancourt was early in posting true results.
FRENCH Canadien.
Probably a good idea to also post it on Rumble and Bitchute before the information Nazis take it down off YouTube.
anyone as can do it, do it Now is the time/
Thank you Katherine along with everybody that has put together this video. We the people are very grateful. God Bless you all.
Hell I'm not even half way through and the subversion of laws that were inconspicuously implemented through the years seems to be unconstitutional at best and implemented for where we are at worst. It's a total destruction of the constitution as well as loss of any personal freedoms. We the people are now servitude to the US government.
I will not go quietly into the night !
Ever had a "land lord" like that? Keeps adding new charges after the contract is signed?
I have.
The "cream " rises from the milk . Plain fact.
Amen. It is my prayer that someone making waves on the pushback side picks up this story as a further reveal of what’s really happening here in the States.
Powerful.
Really good! I shared it around.
Hi Katherine, I absolutely love your substack. Your research, critical thinking, and writing skills make for a refreshing read. I really like the video linked in this post as well.
There is one thing I've been wondering about, though. Maybe someone can give some feedback on this. I've been watching Attorney Todd Callendar's videos since he first appeared on the scene and I've thought what he said made sense. One thing bothers me about him, however. He has said in at least three different interviews, including one from last week, that the HPV vaccine is required in all 50 states. It is not, by a long shot. Seems like a pretty major thing for him to be getting wrong and to keep repeating it. It makes me wonder about his credibility.
Anyone have thoughts on this?