I am actively pressing a claim AT court for a trespass by false witness, theft extortion, harm to good name, etc... Coming forward as a man and pressing claim against others of mankind for said trespasses. There is a peaceful way to address these things, but it is best to press claim for harm against an individual man or woman with evide…
I am actively pressing a claim AT court for a trespass by false witness, theft extortion, harm to good name, etc... Coming forward as a man and pressing claim against others of mankind for said trespasses. There is a peaceful way to address these things, but it is best to press claim for harm against an individual man or woman with evidence, facts, and conclusions of law. The key is not allowing them to gain jurisdiction. That is done by knowing who you are and that you are NOT a title in any fashion (including MR or MRS), plaintiff, defendant, pro se, member, partner, party, etc... You are a man by the name of (_______). The others of mankind who did trespass are now interested in negotiating since the alternative is a trial by jury that is final.
This is not sexist. It is equal opportunity biological gender. The original question was asked as a man, by a man. Substitute woman as appropriate. Anything else?
I am actively pressing a claim AT court for a trespass by false witness, theft extortion, harm to good name, etc... Coming forward as a man and pressing claim against others of mankind for said trespasses. There is a peaceful way to address these things, but it is best to press claim for harm against an individual man or woman with evidence, facts, and conclusions of law. The key is not allowing them to gain jurisdiction. That is done by knowing who you are and that you are NOT a title in any fashion (including MR or MRS), plaintiff, defendant, pro se, member, partner, party, etc... You are a man by the name of (_______). The others of mankind who did trespass are now interested in negotiating since the alternative is a trial by jury that is final.
What if you are a "woman" by the name of?
Great question. The same applies. Stand as a man or woman. Not a person or any title.
BUT, IT NEVER SAYS "WOMAN" , ONLY "MAN" .
WERE THERE NO WOMEN THEN?
This is not sexist. It is equal opportunity biological gender. The original question was asked as a man, by a man. Substitute woman as appropriate. Anything else?
The terms have distinct definitions. Law depends on that.
Sure it's sexist!!! What ain't?"man" mean "man" Nothing else!!
No one else? No one else important?
Learn your history. It's totally sexist.
Was "more military" too subtle , folks?