Share this comment
Dr Ryan Cole, pathologist extraordinaire, did a fantastic interview/demonstration with Del Hightower -- and SHOWED the "graphene" folks are describing are actually cholesterol crystals. The "hydra" people are squawking about is a normal, natural PLANT part from, the underside of leaves: Ryan showed both the "hydra" -- and the google sea…
Dr Ryan Cole, pathologist extraordinaire, did a fantastic interview/demonstration with Del Hightower -- and SHOWED the "graphene" folks are describing are actually cholesterol crystals. The "hydra" people are squawking about is a normal, natural PLANT part from, the underside of leaves: Ryan showed both the "hydra" -- and the google search page showing a gazillion of the same kind-of thing!
Ryan has done ... I forget what's called' -- the electro-thingie that lets you IDENTIFY the actual chemical/elemental make-up on some 'thing' you're observing/testing. (Like how 'we' identify the chemistry of stars or novae by their spectrum of the elements.) Cholesterol, not graphene.
Thanks! I had seen (and forgotten) some reference to Dr. Cole's info (didn't dig in) as I wanted to sit back and let more experienced voices chime in and let the dust settle.
mass spectral analysis?
This “Demonstration” was not adequate to make that determination.
Neither (so far, NO) demonstration has been definitive! Casting shade on EITHER side is ridiculous.
One: "I tested a vial from California!"
One: "I tested a vial from Spain!"
Both: "They differ! You MUST be a liar or a corrupt bad person!"
I refer everyone again to the website: how badismybatch -- which is TRACKING vial dispersal and the levels of injuries and deaths across, at least, the U.S. IN those dispersal areas. It is a complete GIVEN that these TRACKABLE differences 100% MEAN the 'stuff' in the vials are different, right? The logic of a 12-yr-old can see that!
So -- instead of forming up tug-of-war TEAMS to insult and try to downgrade this or that researcher -- HOLD your determinations, and consider the bigger picture! STOP maligning one or another researcher or research team... If someone disagrees with something YOU find persuasive, do NOT start shouting that s/he's compromised and an enemy agent! (Although I'm sure we all agree Fauci-Mengele is a murderous enemy agent to the human species!!)
I'm ... riled up right now, having just spent an hour answering people MIS-describing (as far as I've found so far) Dr Ryan Cole in Sweden. Suddenly, he's an enemy agent mistreating one of "our" ( THEIR!) heroes by 'jumping up on stage, stealing a mic, interrupting her presentation and harranguing Stuckle-somebody.' She is a *metals* expert - NOT a medical expert (as far as I know; I'm off to watch her presentation next). Except the video of Cole speaking that I have seen is clearly BETWEEN presentations; Stuckle.... is SITTING with others on the stage, preparatory to the NEXT presentation, a panel discussion apparently. The audience is very loud talking to each other,
Cole walks off the stage asks for and get a mic, CALMLY walks back onto the stage and says he disagrees. (You know, like you DO at a professional meeting where people disagree!!)
He ACTUALLY begins with the exact phrase: "before the panel begins..." (Kinda like PROOF Cole did not 'interrupt' the sitting Stuckle... who was speaking with the person next to her, NOT presenting to the crowd; doncha think?) Stuckle.... jumps up and hastens to the podium mic (next to Cole) and tries to argue *over* him, some guy in the audience jumps up and starts screaming at Cole...
Everyone keeps missing that Ryan Cole is ALWAYS 100% polite and reserved when disagreeing! No yelling, no insults, no shouting... he merely presents HIS SIDE, and waits for the other side's answer. I've never even seen him INTERRUPT another speaker (howinthehell he does THAT baffles me!).
BUT, in leaping up and shouting to defend THEIR hero ("She's right, she's the ONLY one on the planet who is right! And WE know she's right universally, so everyone else HAS to be wrong and an enemy agent!!!") (Yeah, see? I'm still ... riled up... but not sorry, because this is the way our enemies ALWAYS sow discord and destroy our efforts to find the truth; and we LET them!!) How about ... (oh, you know) professionally disagreeing, maybe even having a CALM discussion with Cole?! Novel thought, that....
So, Tina? We HAVE no demonstrations that are adequate to make the MANY determinations that we urgently need. We are blind men feeling a (huge and murderous) elephant (with an insane and vicious mahout!). And many of our "blind men" are making some pretty damned good and useful conclusions on the basis of the parts they have examined... and some (as is always true in science and medicine -- and in daily life) are making some wrong conclusions. The only WAY to find the truth is to keep working and talking with each other , not decide "anyone who disagrees with me is evil!"
I suspect Ryan Cole has been compromised. I watched and listened to him dismiss the findings of dozens of researchers and he is far too glib, far too dismissive and not convincing. Your choice of word 'squawking' gives your agenda away I am afraid.
These two highly qualified, highly educated, highly intelligent and ethical professionals give their opinions on the so-called 'vaccines'. For starters, they both agree that they are not 'vaccines'. Neither are 'squawking' - they both talk complete sense which is more than can be said for the criminals behind these atrocities. https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/frances-long-time-vaccine-policy-chief-covid-policy-is-completely-stupid-and-unethical
EVERYONE who reads here -- or speaks out on it in public! -- agrees they're not vaccines!! Okay-so, not the sheep or the evil and/or sold-out -- but everyone working VERY hard to get across the damages, dangers, and deaths these gene-modifying therapeutics are causing.... AGREES they are not vaccines. That's not even a POINT that needs to be made on Steve Kirsch's substack, is it? (Oh sorry, *Katherine's* substack... I read so many!)
Ryan Cole is certainly glib, in the FIRST definition:
1. Performed with a natural, offhand ease.
but certainly NOT in the second!
2. Given to or characterized by fluency of speech or writing that often suggests insincerity, superficiality, or a lack of concern.
He is an *expert* in his field. He is direct and firm in his conclusions because he IS an expert. Would you have experts talk all uncertain and mealy-mouthed? "Fluency" generally leads to looking askance at what an expert says only by people who CANNOT speak fluently.
I worked with a man (at Boeing) who pooh-poohed my ... reservations ... about a potential hiree (for a technical editing position) , because the man completely misused a 'term of the art.' When the hiring authority thought that was a silly reason, I said: If you were interviewing a ROOFER -- for the possibility of spending a ton of money on his work -- and he described the (technical term:) "valley" as the "angled-thing between two sides," just how competent would think he might be?
Do you see the difference between a first-time public speaker -- and an old-hand expert at it? Ryan Cole is an old-hand expert at it -- so he SPEAKS fluently because he KNOWS what he's speaking about! (And yes, I DO have the medical and technological background to follow what he's speaking about: if he says spectrometry shows no graphene oxide in the samples he has tested -- then there IS none! If he off-handedly discards the contaminants that non-specialists, and certainly non-EXPERTS, are indeed squawking about are "hydras" -- by SHOWING exactly what the (I forget the name -- the (yes, hydra-LOOKING) things come from the undersides of leaves that float in the air everywhere on the planet and we breathe in all day) are; then I can confidently discard the "OMG! HYDRA in the shots!" (And so should you! Do you think a hydra COULD survive storage and shipping in -80 degree F?!)
Please go watch the Del Hightower / Ryan Cole video where Ryan actually DEMONSTRATES on camera the effect of the poison vax, under the microscope, when added to Del's fresh-drawn blood. I DO have a few reservations, in that the astonishing effect on a sample-size of blood on a slide, and even just one 'drop' of the various vax-samples Ryan tested, may be exaggerated because of the mis-matched amount. However, I have found Ryan -- over many, many hours of interviews and discussions -- to be precise, careful, and ACCURATE!
And finally. "Compromised" how? In what way? To do or say what? The finding of the not-dozens, but certainly SOME researchers being dismissed is HOW medicine and science works!! Do you think Peterson and Ardis's "snake venom in the water!!!!" should not be dismissed? I am NOT discarding the idea that venom IS used (all OVER the world) in entirely legit medical research and entirely legit medical treatments!! However, Stew and Bryan went WAY overboard; 'trying to be first in breaking news' -- as Bryan HAD been first-and-best in the Remdesivir trials, and then the Gilead trials, identifying the murder weapon!
PLEASE don't be slurring and trying to malign experts -- experts whom OTHER experts absolutely consider to be valid and worth listening to (do you remember Andrew Hill showing on video by Tess Laurie that he was a sell-out? And that was followed by Hill being shunned and discarded by OUR folks -- and feted by his controllers? After submitting to the money-control and NOT publishing the truth about ivermectin, Hill should have been -- and WAS legitimately by OUR folks -- discarded as a sell-out and murderer. He was a traitor to the truth.
Ryan Cole is a revealer of the truth. The trust OUR expert (and semi-expert and non-expert) folks have him IS warranted. Unless you actually HAVE any real "cause" (other than "I don't feel good watching him"?) to insult and distrust him that you can VALIDATE and verify -- then do not "cut down" OUR people! Our enemies are working VERY hard to do so. Don't YOU help THEM!
Dr Young has also confirmed the findings of the Spanish researchers - La Quinta Columna/Orwell City re graphene oxide: https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/quinta-columna-graphene-oxide-findings-confirmed
Super -- then let's get THEM to send a sample of the therapeutic THEY got, and Ryan will no doubt send a sample of the vials HE got -- and the two teams can cross-verify! SURELY you don't think -- having seen multiple reports from "how bad was my batch" and the differing levels of contamination -- that EITHER 'side' is 100% confirmatory? If the La Quinta samples show graphene, then Ryan will no doubt be able to confirm it. If Ryan shows them the PLANT parts they (they? or someone else?) "identify" as hydra, then THEY will be able to recognize the plant parts.
I STILL see no way on the PLANET that something some people are seeing as a 'hydra' -- an allegedly living animal -- could survive negative-80-degree storage, in a vial of some liquid NOT water, without O2 replenishment, and so on. And the "oooh, it's MOVING!!" cries from either 'don't know' or 'discounting' people (pls provide an alternate explanation to the normal one when using microscopes) -- when you prep a slide for a scope (you can SEE Ryan do this in his Del Hightower vid) -- you put the liquid sample onto the base slide, and then put a TOP slide on it. The pressure OF the top slide spreads the liquid out -- it MOVES the liquid. And then you move the slides under the scope 'brace' that hold them still, the increased, sometimes uneven pressure, makes the liquid MOVE...