Dr Young has also confirmed the findings of the Spanish researchers - La Quinta Columna/Orwell City re graphene oxide: https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/quinta-columna-graphene-oxide-findings-confirmed
Super -- then let's get THEM to send a sample of the therapeutic THEY got, and Ryan will no doubt send a sample of the vials HE got -- and the two teams can cross-verify! SURELY you don't think -- having seen multiple reports from "how bad was my batch" and the differing levels of contamination -- that EITHER 'side' is 100% confirmatory? If the La Quinta samples show graphene, then Ryan will no doubt be able to confirm it. If Ryan shows them the PLANT parts they (they? or someone else?) "identify" as hydra, then THEY will be able to recognize the plant parts.
I STILL see no way on the PLANET that something some people are seeing as a 'hydra' -- an allegedly living animal -- could survive negative-80-degree storage, in a vial of some liquid NOT water, without O2 replenishment, and so on. And the "oooh, it's MOVING!!" cries from either 'don't know' or 'discounting' people (pls provide an alternate explanation to the normal one when using microscopes) -- when you prep a slide for a scope (you can SEE Ryan do this in his Del Hightower vid) -- you put the liquid sample onto the base slide, and then put a TOP slide on it. The pressure OF the top slide spreads the liquid out -- it MOVES the liquid. And then you move the slides under the scope 'brace' that hold them still, the increased, sometimes uneven pressure, makes the liquid MOVE...
Dr Young has also confirmed the findings of the Spanish researchers - La Quinta Columna/Orwell City re graphene oxide: https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/quinta-columna-graphene-oxide-findings-confirmed
Super -- then let's get THEM to send a sample of the therapeutic THEY got, and Ryan will no doubt send a sample of the vials HE got -- and the two teams can cross-verify! SURELY you don't think -- having seen multiple reports from "how bad was my batch" and the differing levels of contamination -- that EITHER 'side' is 100% confirmatory? If the La Quinta samples show graphene, then Ryan will no doubt be able to confirm it. If Ryan shows them the PLANT parts they (they? or someone else?) "identify" as hydra, then THEY will be able to recognize the plant parts.
I STILL see no way on the PLANET that something some people are seeing as a 'hydra' -- an allegedly living animal -- could survive negative-80-degree storage, in a vial of some liquid NOT water, without O2 replenishment, and so on. And the "oooh, it's MOVING!!" cries from either 'don't know' or 'discounting' people (pls provide an alternate explanation to the normal one when using microscopes) -- when you prep a slide for a scope (you can SEE Ryan do this in his Del Hightower vid) -- you put the liquid sample onto the base slide, and then put a TOP slide on it. The pressure OF the top slide spreads the liquid out -- it MOVES the liquid. And then you move the slides under the scope 'brace' that hold them still, the increased, sometimes uneven pressure, makes the liquid MOVE...