Presumably if these countermeasures are deployed overseas by US government (rather than by Pfizer under a commercial contract) and people are harmed then that could be construed as an act of war.
Presumably if these countermeasures are deployed overseas by US government (rather than by Pfizer under a commercial contract) and people are harmed then that could be construed as an act of war.
Just like "OUR" govt began the work on SARS-Cov2; then TRFed it to Canada, and thence to China where it was released or let out or spread on purpose to destroy humanity and give over control of the world the WEF / CCP / Khazarian Mafia??!
Just WHO is the enemy? It's NOT on national lines, because the nations have ALL been invaded and corrupted!
Presumably if these countermeasures are deployed overseas by US government (rather than by Pfizer under a commercial contract) and people are harmed then that could be construed as an act of war.
https://thediplomat.com/2021/06/biden-announces-international-covid-19-vaccine-sharing-plan/
Just like "OUR" govt began the work on SARS-Cov2; then TRFed it to Canada, and thence to China where it was released or let out or spread on purpose to destroy humanity and give over control of the world the WEF / CCP / Khazarian Mafia??!
Just WHO is the enemy? It's NOT on national lines, because the nations have ALL been invaded and corrupted!
Bingo
It could.
Is that why the contracts mentioned surrender of military assets if a country tried to sue?
Really good point.