wo/man - Good to go. Bottom line, be a step away from the Creator. Once you take on a title, you are diminished. This is the reason for the pronouns, titles, re-definitions. They are attempting to keep people (man and woman) diminished and less than a creation of the Creator who creates.
When considering the reality, their goal is for al…
wo/man - Good to go. Bottom line, be a step away from the Creator. Once you take on a title, you are diminished. This is the reason for the pronouns, titles, re-definitions. They are attempting to keep people (man and woman) diminished and less than a creation of the Creator who creates.
When considering the reality, their goal is for all to not be accountable or responsible. The last thing the legal society wants is for your yeahs to be yeahs and your nays to be nays. Calling out another man or woman for trespass is biblical. It is safer for the liars and thieves to argue and complain like trained children and make things ambiguous rather than accept accountability and providing remedy for said trespass.
How do you make an entity take the stand and testify to how it did you harm? "It" cannot. But, a man or woman, they had to make the final decision. Your doctor, the nurse, the teacher, the administrator. Call them out as a man or woman, not as their title. Then they are responsible and accountable. No immunity. Does an entity autograph a document? No...
A corporation cannot contract with a living soul (man or woman). Only a corporation can contract with a corporation (maritime and admiralty law) and a man or woman can contract with a man or woman. So, call out those of mankind who do trespass.
Now, I see why govt. officials are neither capable, nor required to have any going definition for the word "woman". There''s no such legal entity, it's all "man".
\
Well, the last still-on-the- books-version of the Rule/Law of Thumb having been abandoned no sooner than the early nineties in Switzerland,
I can see how this simplifies the conondrum of trying to explain how chattel came to have human rights.
Naw. CHD threw me off their site two years ago, when I pointed out that lawyers make a lot of money from fining pharms, yet never seem to stop them, but just enable them until they've made enough "killings" for the courts and lawyers to get their share. Also pointed out how Joe...another Joe, yeah...made the Kennedy fortunes. Last I heard, alcohol is poison.
Had a beer tonight , tho. Grappling with the beast. Love to wrestle.
wo/man - Good to go. Bottom line, be a step away from the Creator. Once you take on a title, you are diminished. This is the reason for the pronouns, titles, re-definitions. They are attempting to keep people (man and woman) diminished and less than a creation of the Creator who creates.
When considering the reality, their goal is for all to not be accountable or responsible. The last thing the legal society wants is for your yeahs to be yeahs and your nays to be nays. Calling out another man or woman for trespass is biblical. It is safer for the liars and thieves to argue and complain like trained children and make things ambiguous rather than accept accountability and providing remedy for said trespass.
How do you make an entity take the stand and testify to how it did you harm? "It" cannot. But, a man or woman, they had to make the final decision. Your doctor, the nurse, the teacher, the administrator. Call them out as a man or woman, not as their title. Then they are responsible and accountable. No immunity. Does an entity autograph a document? No...
A corporation cannot contract with a living soul (man or woman). Only a corporation can contract with a corporation (maritime and admiralty law) and a man or woman can contract with a man or woman. So, call out those of mankind who do trespass.
Amendment: I have lots of friends here!! I finally found intelligent people!!
Epiphany , peeps, and Full Moon.
It's cake night!! Enjoy@!!
Fuck 'em. We;ll party.
This discussion has taught me loads.
Now, I see why govt. officials are neither capable, nor required to have any going definition for the word "woman". There''s no such legal entity, it's all "man".
\
Well, the last still-on-the- books-version of the Rule/Law of Thumb having been abandoned no sooner than the early nineties in Switzerland,
I can see how this simplifies the conondrum of trying to explain how chattel came to have human rights.
fucking cool. I think I do that all the time...is that why I have few friends?
if your friends are lawyers...
Naw. CHD threw me off their site two years ago, when I pointed out that lawyers make a lot of money from fining pharms, yet never seem to stop them, but just enable them until they've made enough "killings" for the courts and lawyers to get their share. Also pointed out how Joe...another Joe, yeah...made the Kennedy fortunes. Last I heard, alcohol is poison.
Had a beer tonight , tho. Grappling with the beast. Love to wrestle.
"First, we'll kill all the lawyers" Shakespeare.
He's my "daddy". Haha