Key quotes from Pfizer's April 22, 2022 Motion to Dismiss and US Government's Oct. 4, 2022 Statement of Interest in Support of MtD.
Bailiwick reporting on Jackson v. Pfizer et al, linked at footnote.1
From the April 22, 2022 Pfizer Motion to Dismiss:
pp. 3-4
The Government’s “actual behavior” here says it all. Both the complaint itself and the public record show the Government has been fully aware of Relator’s allegations for nearly two years without withdrawing authorization or stopping payment for Pfizer’s vaccine.
To the contrary, FDA took regulatory action that made the vaccine widely available and publicly responded to Relator’s allegations by expressing the agency’s “full confidence” in the data used to support the vaccine.
DoD continues to purchase the product and make it available, free of charge, to all people living in the United States.
And the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), which was required under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(a) to investigate Relator’s allegations “diligently,” declined to intervene in this lawsuit.
All of this is “very strong evidence” that Relator’s allegations are not material to the United States, and accordingly Pfizer’s vaccine was—and continues to be— eligible for payment by the Government...
pp. 6-7
Because of pandemic-related exigencies, the agreement was not a standard federal procurement contract, but rather a ‘prototype’ agreement executed pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2371b[.]…
p. 8
The [contract’s Statement of Work] describes a ‘large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration’ that imposes no requirements relating to Good Clinical Practices (‘GCP’) or related FDA regulations…
And from the US Government's Oct. 4, 2022 statement of interest in support of Pfizer's Motion to Dismiss:
p. 10
…[Brook Jackson’s] complaint does not identify any provision in the SOW for the Project Agreement between Pfizer and the Army that conditioned Government payment for the vaccine on Pfizer’s compliance with the clinical trial protocol or regulations.
The SOW, which is attached to the complaint, further specifies that the Army did not regulate the conduct of the clinical trial, which is “out-of-scope” for the purchase agreement between the Army and Pfizer.
In short, the complaint does not plead factual content to support a conclusion that compliance with the clinical trial protocol or regulations was necessary under the contract between Pfizer and the Army such that clinical trial violations would give rise to a claim for express or implied certification liability.
As the complaint notes, the contract did condition payment between Pfizer and the Army on FDA approval or authorization of the vaccine. This provision in the contract could support a claim for fraud in the inducement if the complaint had pleaded facts supporting an inference that the alleged clinical trial violations at the Ventavia sites actually altered FDA’s approval or authorization decision.
However, while the complaint generally contends that the alleged clinical trial violations by Ventavia “call[] the vaccine’s EUA into question,” there are no allegations in the complaint that the data from the Ventavia sites caused FDA to authorize the vaccine or that FDA would have revoked authorization had it known about the alleged clinical trial violations by Ventavia…
Bailiwick reporting on Jackson v. Pfizer case
March 14, 2022 - Moderna’s 2013 patent on furin cleavage site, Brook Jackson’s 2020 report to FDA on clinical trial fraud, Pfizer 2021 SEC filings
May 4, 2022 - Faked Clinical Trials and 'Real World Evidence'
May 25, 2022 - Pfizer’s Motion to Dismiss the Brook Jackson, federal contracting fraud, clinical trial fraud, whistleblower case.
May 26, 2022 - Implications of 10 USC 2371b, the federal contracting provision cited by Pfizer
July 8, 2022 - Contracts
Aug. 19, 2022 - Mathew Crawford realizing that there were never any valid clinical trials; it was all fabricated.
Sept. 21, 2022 - Four American war criminals I think should be prosecuted first: Alex Azar, Robert Kadlec, Marion Gruber and Bill Gates
Oct. 12, 2022 - Secret Squirrel v. Azar, Kadlec and Gruber. First parts of draft 18 USC 2333 federal civil complaint
Oct. 13, 2022 - 18 USC 2333 cases: venue, national security, Fauci, summary judgment
Oct. 17, 2022 - Please pray for US District Court Judge Michael J. Truncale. Truncale is the federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas to whom whistleblower Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case is assigned.
Oct. 19, 2022 - Other Transaction Authority (OTA) is to federal procurement contract regulation as Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is to federal drug safety regulation. They're both provisions through which Congress and US presidents pretended to legalize criminal conspiracy to produce and use weapons of mass destruction.
Oct. 21, 2022 - Legal horror movie pitch: The World According to Darp. 'Shouting fire in a crowded theater' meets 'When did you stop beating your wife?' Starring US Government as Darpon Fink, serial-killer/arsonist.
Oct. 25, 2022 - Pharmaceuticidal tendencies. Condensing the legal nightmare for judicial review.
Oct. 26, 2022 - Synopsis of proposed Jackson v. Pfizer argument. Clinical trial documents are just props in a theatrical production; clinical investigators are fooled performers and in the fooled audience; playwright and director is DOD.
Oct. 26, 2022 -The goal is getting one good whistle-blower and one good federal judge together, through one solid, well-argued case.
Oct. 27, 2022 - How can HHS, DOD and DHS be ‘foreign terrorist organizations?’ Through the treasonous (18 USC 2381) primary allegiance of their secretaries, and other senior executives, to the World Health Organization and its conspiring globalist institutions.
Oct. 28, 2022 - Jackson v. Pfizer, Ventavia, Icon: Barnes legal team response filed Oct. 27
Jan. 18, 2023 - Repost - Other Transaction Authority (OTA) is to federal procurement contract regulation as Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is to federal drug safety regulation (Originally published Oct. 19, 2022)
Feb. 3, 2023 - Recap of Jackson v. Pfizer, whistleblower Brook Jackson’s False Claims Act case.
Feb. 9, 2023 - On the significance of 21 USC 360bbb-3(k): "use" of EUA products "shall not constitute clinical investigation."
Feb. 16, 2023 - Written artifacts of informational warfare. Truth, lies, war crimes and objective, observable realities.
Feb. 20, 2023 - Jackson v. Pfizer/DOD scheduled for March 1 oral argument on Motion to Dismiss. Plus a script for an evidence-supported exchange between Judge Truncale and DOJ/Pfizer/DOD/HHS attorneys.
Praise God I became aware of the depopulation injection before it was rolled out thankfully from those in the independent media who have been studying what the Globalists have been openly stating for decades. I warned many friends and family to no avail. Since then I have been consumed with trying to set brushfires in the minds of men and community “leaders” as if the matches and kindling are wet. All I can attribute the too much smoke and little fire, is that the people are under a spell.
Praise God for your work also Sasha Latypova and Karen Kingston, who are not actors playing a part trying to control the narratives as many among us who pass themselves off as angels of light.
I understand Karen Kingston is putting together a “packet” like that of her presentation in Collier County FL to be made available through Stew Peters, formatted for people to copy and present to their local officials.
I have collected most of articles of you three in an effort to compile enough information in a clear, concise chronological format (“packet(s)”) to present local officials such as a sheriff, county attorney, commissioners etc.
This, to be a limited introduction in an attempt get their attention and primed for more detailed investigation (more “packets”) and or for attachments when submitting a county Grand Jury complaint.
Presentations like this in the hands of the people of the country/ world I think would be earth shaking.
Like many, my acumen, technical expertise and ability to articulate are infinitesimal compared to you gals (by the way where are the men that contribute in the same way you three are?) However, many people like myself are willing to do the leg work and do best we are able to disseminate these.
I haven't seen Karen Kingston’s “packet” and there may be conflicting aspects between your work and hers however I am confident in what you and Sasha Latypova have done.
What of your articles, documents and in what order would you suggest for putting together an initial presentation (then subsequent documents).
I thought we are a Government of the People for the by the People. Looks to me, we have been high-jacked by some very evil and nefarious demons. On other words, "to Hell with the People".