18 USC 2333 cases: venue, national security, Fauci, summary judgment

Reader comment on yesterday’s post:

I have a question about venue for this case. If I convinced my friend who is a very experienced litigator in Chicago to file this case, assuming he believed the case was viable, could it be filed in the Northern District of Illinois, or would it have to be filed in the district of the cesspool in which the Three Stooges who are defendants are carrying out their genocidal insanity?

Our fascist security state uses "national security" to commit most of its illegal, unconstitutional crimes, so it will likely try to hide behind that sledge hammer to justify its genocide which is likely one of the reasons the Level 4 bioweapons lab in Wuhan was funded.

It's good you're starting with the Three Stooges as defendants but why not include Shemp Fauci as he is a Stooge who stands in in many of the episodes of the Three Stooges go genocidal?

He's the main face of the genocide, he's old, and holding him accountable before he heads to his Hell realm through the portal of death is important. Plus he garners publicity, and the court of public opinion is very important.

Another issue is juries as the pool is a cesspool of taint given how polarizing the bioweapon is. The vaxxed population is shrinking rapidly. I read an estimate that 20 million have already died in the U.S.

---

My reply, revised and slightly expanded:

The estimate was 20 million dead globally:

20 Million Dead from the Jab, 2.2 Billion Injuries – Analyst Estimates

My read of 18 USC 2333 is that cases can be filed in any U.S. district court in which the acts of international terrorism occurred, which includes all of them, since the kill-campaign is nation-wide. It’s global, but nation-wide for Americans.

I’m sure the US Department of Justice, in defending Department of Defense and Department of Health and Human Services and other US Government officials, will argue to remove cases from other courts to the Washington DC court.

So the complaints will need to preemptively address that, probably with evidence of the corruption of the DC federal district court.

The complaints will also need to preemptively address the DOJ’s likely national-security motions to dismiss.

Probably by laying out evidence as clearly as possible for the horse-has-left-the-barn argument: the takeover of the US government has already happened.

All well-aimed litigation from here on out is aimed at 1) expelling the illegitimate imposters/occupiers who are working for foreign agents and have already completed the violation of national security through infiltration, legislation and executive orders since the mid-1940s; and 2) restoring a legitimate US government to power.

As to Fauci, I think he’s in a different category from the three named in Secret Squirrel v. Azar, Kadlec and Gruber.

Fauci was a leader among the technocrats who maneuvered Congress to build the legal weapon platform on which the biochemical weapons are mounted, from 1969 onward.

But Azar, Kadlec and Gruber were the ones who actually climbed up onto that legal platform in 2020, signed the papers, pulled the trigger and fired those bioweapons at the world.

So I think it would be better to file a different suit against Fauci as a sole defendant to present the evidence and charges against him.

Or group him with NIH’s Francis Collins, White House’s Deborah Birx, CDC’s Rochelle Walensky and the others who took front-stage in the public manipulation campaign.

Re: jury pool, that will also need to be addressed preemptively. Will think about that more. One possible scenario includes motions for summary judgment, asking the federal judges to review the evidence and arguments presented, and rule that there is no dispute as to material facts: that the evidence against the US Government is so clear, the cases don’t need to move to trial.

Plaintiffs will be arguing that the US Government has criminally built an illegitimate statutory, regulatory and executive authority framework to theoretically de-criminalize acts of terrorism and use of chemical and biological weapons against the American people when committed by the US Government itself through the Department of Defense behind the false front of ‘public health.’

And that starting in January 2020, named officials within the US Government actually used those illegitimate legal frameworks to turn real bioweapons on the people.

[I understand that there were a lot of prior, less-visible attacks, going back to the 1940s or earlier. But the overt, aggressive nature of the Covid attack that began in January 2020 finally made the program visible in a way it wasn’t prior.]

The US Government’s primary defense will — in all likelihood — be based on its arguments that everything done by defendants was authorized by Congress and US presidents through the same statutes, regulations and executive orders.

Which means that on the basic issues of material fact, there is no dispute.

The only questions are the moral and legal questions: can a government lawfully kill off its own people?

Judges can and do summarily grant relief to plaintiffs on the basis of solid pleadings, early discovery and lack of dispute over material facts.

The cognitive mind-fuckery the globalists set up is that there’s usually a difference between the facts and the law during litigation.

But in this case, the material facts are the laws.

The twisted forms and massive scale of these crimes are so enormous that dealing with them is going to break new legal ground in many ways. It already has created new systemic responses — through things like the DailyClout, Team Enigma and DRASTIC crowdsourced data collection, review and analysis projects.

---

There are a lot of things that will need to be preemptively addressed, to fight back against the DOJ/US Gov. arguments. And these comment-thread discussions help case drafters identify those issues and work through possible arguments, so they’re extremely useful — thank you.

---

St. Edward the Confessor. Bayeux Tapestry.