Discover more from Bailiwick News
On American state-level prosecution for federal government chemical and biological WMD crimes.
A reader sent me a link to Karen Kingston’s post:
Kingston quotes extensively from the Florida state law, which is worth reading in full, and is applicable to the two-part US Government chemical and biological weapons system:
SARS-CoV-2 communicable pathogen [and precursors], designed, funded and managed by the Fauci-Daszak-Baric-Shi consortia within the US Government through the Department of Defense (DARPA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (NIH, NIAID, BARDA), plus
mRNA/DNA/lipid nanoparticle, assorted-payload-carrying lethal, coerced injections designed, funded, managed and mandated by the US Government through DoD, HHS (CDC, FDA, Strategic National Stockpile) and Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise.
Florida 790.166 Manufacture, possession, sale, delivery, display, use, or attempted or threatened use of a weapon of mass destruction or hoax weapon of mass destruction prohibited; definitions; penalties.—
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Weapon of mass destruction” means:
1. Any device or object that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to any human or animal, or severe emotional or mental harm to any human, through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors;
2. Any device or object involving a biological agent;
3. Any device or object that is designed or intended to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human or animal life; or
4. Any biological agent, toxin, vector, or delivery system…
(c) “Biological agent” means any microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product that may be engineered through biotechnology, or any naturally occurring or bioengineered component of any such microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product, capable of causing:
1. Death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or other living organism…
(d) “Toxin” means the toxic material of plants, animals, microorganisms, viruses, fungi, or infectious substances, or a recombinant molecule, whatever its origin or method of reproduction, including:
1. Any poisonous substance or biological product that may be engineered through biotechnology produced by a living organism; or
2. Any poisonous isomer or biological product, homolog, or derivative of such substance.
(e) “Delivery system” means:
1. Any apparatus, equipment, device, or means of delivery specifically designed to deliver or disseminate a biological agent, toxin, or vector; or
2. Any vector.
(f) “Vector” means a living organism or molecule, including a recombinant molecule or biological product that may be engineered through biotechnology, capable of carrying a biological agent or toxin to a host…
(2) A person who, without lawful authority, manufactures, possesses, sells, delivers, sends, mails, displays, uses, threatens to use, attempts to use, or conspires to use, or who makes readily accessible to others a weapon of mass destruction commits a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life…and if death results, commits a capital felony…
I wrote briefly about a similar state-level strategy in October: State authority to seize and destroy mRNA/DNA injections delivered by DOD across state borders, if classified as bioweapons, after a reader quoted Igor Chudov’s statement on a post about Florida’s recommendation that males under 40 not take the lethal injections.
Chudov had written: “Florida cannot ban mRNA vaccines, because it can only be done at the federal level.”
I replied to the reader:
Without more information, my guess is that Chudov means “If the mRNA injections are classified as FDA-approved medicines, or as Drug Enforcement Administration-regulated controlled substances, then states must defer to federal agency decisions on interstate commerce in those substances.”
However, Florida’s governor, Surgeon General, legislature and/or courts could classify the mRNA injections — once delivered across their state border — as bioweapons, and classify the DOD delivery supply chain as a WMD attack.
Then I think they could ban them and destroy them under their own state-level statutes prohibiting possession, transport or use of weapons of mass destruction.
In Florida, that law is Florida Statutes 790.166.
Please do pursue it at the state level.
This is the main thrust of what I'm getting at with the federal complaint drafting.
If the product gets shifted at every legal level where it's legally classified in some way, out of the medical countermeasure/FDA pharmaceutical product framework and into the criminal DOD-bioweapon/WMD-attack framework, it changes the whole ballgame.
That shift can and should be pushed in every state too.
Most of the states have WMD laws, ever since 9/11.
In her post, Kingston makes an argument for state prosecutors in Florida and other states to go after Pfizer officials and FDA regulators, but not US Presidents, senior executive service (SES) officials in HHS, DoD or other cabinet agencies, on grounds that US government officials will seek refuge in government immunity, by arguing that their use of bioweapons is authorized under national security frameworks.
I think state prosecutors should investigate and charge federal officials anyway, even though they will try to claim immunity.
Investigate and charge them, to force them to make their horrific defense arguments under oath in public filings and open courtrooms.
Make President Trump, President Biden, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, through Attorney General Merrick Garland on their behalf and as a co-defendant, file sworn defenses to filed charges.
Make them argue that the US government must commit global mass murder in order to save humanity from famine, poverty, and climate disasters; they must destroy the village to save it.
Make them argue that they must kill us to save us from food, water, energy and other calamities that — like the chemical and biological warfare program — are threats they themselves have demonstrably planned and implemented for at least a century for the same evil purpose: to kill people.
Make Merrick Garland say, loudly and clearly, that Becerra, Austin and Biden are committing mass atrocities using toxic pathogens and lethal injections, “with lawful authority.”
Make them say it so everyone can hear them.
Dec. 27, 2022 - Alberta Passes Law Rejecting Federal Sovereignty. David Kelly writing at The New American:
…Seeking to take a stand against federal legislation and policies that are unconstitutional, the provincial government of Alberta introduced, passed, and instituted the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act this month.
The provincial government overview stated, “The act will be used to address federal legislation and policies that are unconstitutional, violate Albertans’ charter rights or that affect or interfere with our provincial constitutional rights…. The act gives Alberta a democratic legislative framework for defending the federal-provincial division of powers while respecting Canada’s Constitution and the courts.”
The Alberta government designed the act to, as stated, “Shift the burden to the federal government to legally challenge Alberta’s refusal to enforce unconstitutional or harmful federal laws or policies instead of Alberta having to initiate legal challenges and waiting years for a decision while those same federal laws or policies harm Albertans day in and day out.”
I know the material presented here is hard to process.
I don’t offer it to help readers resign themselves to being enslaved and killed by the US Government, its globalist central banker overlords, and counterparts in other sovereign nation-states around the world.
I do it because I think the odds of successfully fighting off the would-be slave masters and murderers goes up, the better the targeted victims understand the plans, programs and pseudo-legal tools the killers build and use against us.
I think that people should continue to fight the fight using the weak legal tools the bankster-killers have left intact — as so many courageous, persistent people have already been doing for three years, and so many more have been doing for decades and centuries previously.
I think people should continue to investigate and learn how and when the bankster-killers weakened the legal tools.
I think people should keep crafting stronger legal tools to replace the collapsing mess as it falls.
And I think the construction process for new legal tools benefits from broader, deeper understanding of the current predicament and how it was brought into being.
If you disagree and think it’s better to roll over and expose your soft underbelly and the underbellies of your children and grandchildren to the knives, please don’t read or comment at Bailiwick.
There are other online venues at which you can discuss your sense of futility and wait for the next bio-digital-banking-police shackles to snap shut around your neck.
On commenting at Bailiwick
Bailiwick’s readership is growing, and there are also a lot of tectonic shifts happening in the litigation and prosecution domains.
As a result of those two developments, I’ve changed the comment notification settings so that I will no longer get an email notification every time someone posts a comment.
I want to devote more time to litigation and prosecution prep, while sticking with the historical research and writing about the 1861-1969 period, which means I’ll have less time available for following comment threads and responding to comments individually.
Comment threads will still be open for readers, and I’ll try to skim the discussions at least once a week.
If you post comments referring to documents, please post links to the documents so other readers can track down your sources if they’re interested.
“What to do?”
July 18, 2022 - Reader comment on American Domestic Bioterrorism Program:
What do we do? If they cannot be prosecuted...or held legally liable...Seems to me like HHS needs to be disbanded at once? Along with anyone else they passed the authority to?
The short answer is, we need to dismantle the existing institutions, down to the bedrock of the US Constitution, and build new institutions on that foundation: legislatures, courts, executives, health care, schools, journalism, financial transaction systems, and many others.
And to do that, we need to build a critical mass of people who understand that that’s the scale of the problem, and are prepared to fight until their last breath to do the work: educate people, dismantle the corrupt institutions, protect the Constitutional bedrock, and build the new institutions.
In the meantime, do not comply. Withhold your individual explicit and implicit consent.
Regarding criminal prosecutions — I have been thinking about this for a long time. The state of Nevada is offering to allow the set up of tech cities with their own rules and regulations.
What is to prevent us from setting one up based upon the Constitution? We could get prosecutors, judges and law enforcement who honor the rights of the people and take their oath of office seriously. We can be courageous and find other courageous people who will take on the task of arresting and trying people who have been/still are committing genocide.
It would be a good idea to have tech savvy people because we need to block spying and EMF to the best of our ability.
So why not set up such a city and do the work? We could invite the inventors, entrepreneurs, the artists, the teachers the true healers. This might be a way.
I've been thinking along similar but less ambitious lines, about setting up grassroots courts of assizes. Can't remember how it crossed my path recently, but something I read. Dates back to 1166 Assize of Clarendon and 1215 Magna Carta, in use in England up until 1972.
Jan. 2, 2022 - Reader comment on Bioweapon prototype deployments, informed consent, targeted enemies, state of war, doctrine of necessity.
If what you are saying is correct — that we are under rules of war — the next question would seem to be "What are our rights, and how should we proceed?” That’s only if it really matters, of course, since being at war with your own government pretty much means that all bets (and laws) are off…
It does matter. Here and now is not the first time and place a government has been at war with its own people, covertly or overtly.
It's always been worth fighting back and it still is.
It's going to be a slow process of pulling more thoughts together about which rules— if any — ordinary people can wield against government agents.
I've done some thinking and writing about it already, (one example of half-dozen or so) and am now doing much more research and thinking about it.
Things we already know:
Don't voluntarily take any more government-sponsored "medical treatments." Those are not medical treatments. Those are bioweapons.
Smartphones are bad news. If you use one, wean off of it. They're too useful for the government to surveil, track and control us.
Electronic payments (auto-pay, debit cards, credit cards) are bad news. Pay in cash or with checks.
Household guns and the strong gun culture in the U.S. are good news. If you are interested in buying guns and ammo and learning how to use them (if you don't already have them and know how to use them), do so. If you don't want to for your own reasons, don't. There's room for all kinds of people in the resistance. The biggest benefit for the people, against the government that's trying to kill us, is the government agents not knowing which people have guns and which don't, and being worried about going door-to-door to do round-ups in case a lot of the people who have them, are mentally prepared to use them.1
Prayer is useful. Especially the Rosary.
Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago:
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?
Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?...
The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!
If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”