A reader sent me a link to Karen Kingston’s post: Jan. 3, 2022 - How Florida Can Bring Criminal Charges against Pfizer and the FDA Under Title 46 Ch. 790 Kingston quotes extensively from the Florida state law, which is worth reading in full, and is applicable to the two-part US Government chemical and biological weapons system:
"I want to devote more time to litigation and prosecution prep, while sticking with the historical research and writing about the 1861-1969 period, which means I’ll have less time available for following comment threads and responding to comments individually."
I just read this blog, where an Ohio judge obviously lowers sentence if the prisoners agree to being injected with the covid jabs. I hope it is not true. But god knows it might be!
I wholeheartedly agree to make govt officials respond in court, regardless of their so called immunity status. Del Bigtree's attorney, Aaron Siri on the Highwire, has done outstanding work in this. Yes, make the medical dictators at CDC, FDA, NIH etc. etc. respond to questioning in court, with at least pains of perjury. I like it.
How do we force our state to investigate the shots as bioweapons with an intent to have them declared as such? Is there a way to file a class action to force it? We all have standing of harm, either from the injection or the discrimination if we chose not to take it. Surely there is something we can do besides scream.
If Desantis doesn't take this lifeline, that what Tierney writes is correct...the Repubs will push for DeSantis because he is financed by big rino capital.
Trump needs to start talking about the damage from the vax...use the football player to say enough.
Can someone get to Trump with this? He should tell De santis what to do.
Great points as always. I have heard similar things about cell phones before. I wonder, are they any worse than a computer? Of course they track your movements but I’m curious what more insidious things are in play currently.
I know in Australia they were weaponized: during lockdown when they sent you a message you had 5 minutes to take a selfie of yourself at home, or else. That hasn’t happened here - yet.
Thank you for discussing what needs to be done. HOW do we accomplish that? Should we explore several options? Several options are being explored on this Substack. I am doing my best to examine all options and choose the best ones. If this approach is flawed or if somebody can do better, please do, and share with us. Or maybe visit my attempts below and offer constructive criticisms and/or your own attempts somewhere else? So far it is mainly just me? What else is there to do?
This is quite good because it does not require a state authority to prove that anyone had intent to create a bioweapon or intentionally release it. Knowingly distributing the bioweapon is sufficient for a capital offense.
Thank you Katherine. As always, your work at uncovering this and putting all the pieces together, explaining it all in simple layman's terms, is very much appreciated. I'm praying that 50 yrs from now, your name will be in our descendants' history books, or at least a book about you will be written - "How Katherine Watt Helped Save America and the World. God bless you!
"A small number of us, however, would rebel – but not primarily, I suspect, based on differences in individual moral character. Rebels, too, need to harness the logic of appropriateness – they need to find different norms and ideals, shared with fellow members of the resistance, or inspired by history or literature. Breaking out of one set of norms requires that we have an available alternative.
That said, some people may have more naturally non-conformist personalities than others, at least in periods of their lives. Whether such rebels are successful in breaking out, however, may partly depend on how convincingly they can justify to themselves, and defend to others, that we don't want to conform.
If so, we would expect a tendency to adopt non-standard norms to be linked to verbal ability and perhaps general intelligence in individuals who actually rebel, which there's some evidence to support.
How we react to unfairness may also affect our propensity to rebel. One study found that people who are risk averse and easily trust others are less likely to react strongly to unfairness. While not proven in the study, it may make such individuals more likely to conform.
Another factor is social circumstances. The upper and middle classes in Germany during the 1920s-1940s were almost twice as likely to join the Nazi party than those with lower social status.
So it may be that those who have the most to lose and/or are keen to climb the social ladder are particularly likely to conform. And, of course, if other members of your social circle are conforming, you may think it's the "appropriate" thing to do.
Few will fight Gilead after carefully weighing up the consequences – after all, the most likely outcome is failure and obliteration. What drives forward fights against an oppressive society is a rival vision – a vision of equality, liberty and justice, and a sense that these should be defended, whatever the consequences."
"I want to devote more time to litigation and prosecution prep, while sticking with the historical research and writing about the 1861-1969 period, which means I’ll have less time available for following comment threads and responding to comments individually."
GO GET'EM GIRL!
https://drtrozzi.org/2023/01/04/court-ordered-injections-a-dangerous-precedent/
I just read this blog, where an Ohio judge obviously lowers sentence if the prisoners agree to being injected with the covid jabs. I hope it is not true. But god knows it might be!
I wholeheartedly agree to make govt officials respond in court, regardless of their so called immunity status. Del Bigtree's attorney, Aaron Siri on the Highwire, has done outstanding work in this. Yes, make the medical dictators at CDC, FDA, NIH etc. etc. respond to questioning in court, with at least pains of perjury. I like it.
I would recommend another course of action: be involved in a group of like-minded people: co-religionists, neighborhood group, etc.
We stand no chance if we're all standing alone. Predators always target the isolated, injured, or young first.
As you note, never cut off or minimize ways of prosecuting the offending parties.
Discovery and testimony can provide leverage and actions that are not always seen immediately.
Go to work! And God Bless Your Efforts!
"...force them to make their horrific defense arguments". Amen. This must be done.
How do we force our state to investigate the shots as bioweapons with an intent to have them declared as such? Is there a way to file a class action to force it? We all have standing of harm, either from the injection or the discrimination if we chose not to take it. Surely there is something we can do besides scream.
Katherine...it's won't be easy to dig up, for sure, but for sure COG is at the back of all . There is no more federal govt, other than as a puppet.
COG trumps all. Maybe that's why they put Trump/Drumph in.
If Desantis doesn't take this lifeline, that what Tierney writes is correct...the Repubs will push for DeSantis because he is financed by big rino capital.
Trump needs to start talking about the damage from the vax...use the football player to say enough.
Can someone get to Trump with this? He should tell De santis what to do.
Great points as always. I have heard similar things about cell phones before. I wonder, are they any worse than a computer? Of course they track your movements but I’m curious what more insidious things are in play currently.
I know in Australia they were weaponized: during lockdown when they sent you a message you had 5 minutes to take a selfie of yourself at home, or else. That hasn’t happened here - yet.
Thanks 🙏
Thank you for discussing what needs to be done. HOW do we accomplish that? Should we explore several options? Several options are being explored on this Substack. I am doing my best to examine all options and choose the best ones. If this approach is flawed or if somebody can do better, please do, and share with us. Or maybe visit my attempts below and offer constructive criticisms and/or your own attempts somewhere else? So far it is mainly just me? What else is there to do?
Overall Situation:
Solution Seeking Introduction - Please Start Here
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/coming-soon
An Open Invitation For Readers To Use Their Visualization And Creative Writing Skills To Solve The World's Problems
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/an-open-invitation-for-readers-to
My Current Best Guess At The Best Way To Solve The World's Major Problems
https://solutionseeking.substack.com/p/my-current-best-guess-at-the-best
By the way, Katherine...have I shared this here yet? Worth posting again and again, as I have since early 2020.
" You know that there is an extremely interesting body of literature
in which the plague appears as the moment of panic and confusion
in which individuals, threatened by visitations of death, abandon their
identities, throw off their masks, forget their status, and abandon
themselves to the great debauchery of those who know they are going
to die. There is a literature of plague that is a literature of the de-
composition of individuality; a kind of orgiastic dream m which
plague is the moment when individuals come apart and when the law
is forgotten. As soon as plague breaks out, the town s forms of law-
fulness disappear. Plague overcomes the law just as it overcomes the
body. Such, at least, is the literary dream of the plague.15 But you can
see that there was another dream of the plague: a political dream in
which the plague is rather the marvelous moment when political
power is exercised to the full. Plague is the moment when the spatial
partitioning and subdivision (quadrillage) of a population is taken to
its extreme point, where dangerous communications, disorderly com-
munities, and forbidden contacts can no longer appear. The moment
of the plague is one of an exhaustive sectioning (quadrillage) of the
population by political power, the capillary ramifications of which
constantly reach the grain of individuals themselves, their time, hab-
itat, localization, and bodies. Perhaps plague brings with it the literary
or theatrical dream of the great orgiastic moment. But plague also
brings the political dream of an exhaustive, unobstructed power that
is completely transparent to its object and exercised to the full. You
can see that there is a connection between the dream of a military
society and the dream of a plague-stricken society,"
Michel Foucault, "Abnormal", Lectures at The College de France, 1974-75, pg. 47
This is quite good because it does not require a state authority to prove that anyone had intent to create a bioweapon or intentionally release it. Knowingly distributing the bioweapon is sufficient for a capital offense.
Thank you Katherine. As always, your work at uncovering this and putting all the pieces together, explaining it all in simple layman's terms, is very much appreciated. I'm praying that 50 yrs from now, your name will be in our descendants' history books, or at least a book about you will be written - "How Katherine Watt Helped Save America and the World. God bless you!
Written when the left was saying Trump was the dictator-wannabe in 2019.:
Would You Stand Up to an Authoritarian Regime or Conform? Here's The Science
ScienceAlert, October 11, 2019
https://www.sciencealert.com/would-you-stand-up-to-an-authoritarian-regime-or-conform-here-s-the-science
"A small number of us, however, would rebel – but not primarily, I suspect, based on differences in individual moral character. Rebels, too, need to harness the logic of appropriateness – they need to find different norms and ideals, shared with fellow members of the resistance, or inspired by history or literature. Breaking out of one set of norms requires that we have an available alternative.
That said, some people may have more naturally non-conformist personalities than others, at least in periods of their lives. Whether such rebels are successful in breaking out, however, may partly depend on how convincingly they can justify to themselves, and defend to others, that we don't want to conform.
If so, we would expect a tendency to adopt non-standard norms to be linked to verbal ability and perhaps general intelligence in individuals who actually rebel, which there's some evidence to support.
How we react to unfairness may also affect our propensity to rebel. One study found that people who are risk averse and easily trust others are less likely to react strongly to unfairness. While not proven in the study, it may make such individuals more likely to conform.
Another factor is social circumstances. The upper and middle classes in Germany during the 1920s-1940s were almost twice as likely to join the Nazi party than those with lower social status.
So it may be that those who have the most to lose and/or are keen to climb the social ladder are particularly likely to conform. And, of course, if other members of your social circle are conforming, you may think it's the "appropriate" thing to do.
Few will fight Gilead after carefully weighing up the consequences – after all, the most likely outcome is failure and obliteration. What drives forward fights against an oppressive society is a rival vision – a vision of equality, liberty and justice, and a sense that these should be defended, whatever the consequences."
Thanks for all the quality research you provide! Regarding your filing please see David Martin's website prosecutenow.io
Best
Mike