Christine Dolan of CD Media interview with Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt
Link to Roguski WHO reporting, plus repost of Oct. 12 draft 18 USC 2333 federal bioterrorism case against defendants Azar, Kadlec and Gruber.
Orientation for new readers. More info at About page.
Video
Jan. 8, 2023 - No doubt it’s a bioweapon, not a vaccine. Christine Dolan, Sasha Latypova, Katherine Watt. (52 min). Rumble/CDMedia. BitChute/Team Enigma.
Jan. 8, 2023 - No doubt it’s a bioweapon, not a vaccine. Written report on interview contents by Alexandra Bruce, ForbiddenKnowledgeTV
World Health Organization+US Government Global Overthrow+Genocide Program Updates
For coverage of this week’s closed-door, private World Health Organization/US Government global coup d’etat planning meetings, please follow James Roguski on Substack: Top 100 Reasons to #StopTheTreaty, #StopTheAmendments, and #ExitTheWHO.
I focus on American Constitutional and statutory law.
Roguski is the go-to for investigative reporting on World Health Organization treaties and regulations.
Repost
Oct. 12, 2022 - Secret Squirrel v. Azar, Kadlec and Gruber. First parts of draft 18 USC 2333 federal civil complaint. Secret Squirrel is a John Doe/Jane Doe figure: a stand-in for anyone injured or bereaved by the actions of the US Government agents who launched and currently maintain the fraudulent and murderous Covid-19 national ‘public health emergency’ program.
Jan. 9, 2023 Note:
The 18 USC 2333 federal civil-criminal legal strategy was the subject of several other posts and comment threads in October, including posts advocating that an 18 USC 2333 count be added to Brook Jackson’s False Claims Act case under 31 U.S.C. § 3730, against Pfizer, Ventavia and ICON.
I advocated for that strategy after the US Government intervened in her case on Oct. 4, 2022 (at pp. 6-8 ) to corroborate Pfizer’s April 22, 2022 claim (at pp. 8, 11-13 and 25-26) that contractors were supplying the Department of Defense under Other Transactions Authority (OTA) bioweapon production contracts that did not include valid clinical trials or compliance with safety or efficacy standards as conditions for product authorization, distribution and use, or as conditions for federal government payment to contractors for products supplied.
In my view, Alex Azar, Robert Kadlec and Marion Gruber should be the first American war criminals prosecuted for the American implementation of the Covid-19 mass terror and mass murder campaign. There will be hundreds of defendants eventually; I posted a starter list in August 2022 and update it as I find more criminals in the records.
As I state in the Oct. 12, 2022 original post and Oct. 13, 2022 further discussion, Anthony Fauci should be prosecuted. But the case against him will be much larger and more complex than the cases against Azar, Kadlec and Gruber, for example, because Fauci’s role as a primary architect of the crimes and the pseudo-legal pre-crime coverup mechanisms, goes back to the late 1960s when he arrived at the National Institutes of Health.
Please don’t interpret this draft’s focus on Azar, Kadlec and Gruber as somehow exonerating or letting Fauci or other war criminals off the hook.
Readers interested in the 18 USC 2333 and Jackson v. Pfizer/DoD discussions that preceded and followed the original post, please see footnoted PDF compilations of Bailiwick News for October 2022, and/or Substack links in the footnote below.1
Excerpts from Oct. 12, 2022 post
…18 USC 2333 authorizes individual injured plaintiffs and survivors of the dead to bring federal civil complaints against international terrorists whose acts caused loss, injury and/or death.
Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees…
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ____
CIVIL ACTION NO. _______________
SECRET SQUIRREL/JOHN DOE/JANE DOE, and other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs
v.
ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity as former Secretary of US Department of Health and Human Services, and in his personal capacity;
ROBERT KADLEC, in his official capacity as former Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, US Department of Health and Human Services, and in his personal capacity; and
MARION GRUBER, in her official capacity as former Director of the Office of Vaccine Review and Research (OVRR), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), US Department of Health and Human Services, and in her personal capacity.
____________
COMPLAINT
18 USC 2333 provides civil remedies in US courts for any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs.
Plaintiff SECRET SQUIRREL, files this suit individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.
Since January 2020, Plaintiff has been subjected to US-government-directed, purported but illegitimate, suspension of the US Constitution and purported but illegitimate suspension of federal and state laws and regulations criminalizing domestic and international terrorism and related criminal acts.
Plaintiff has been subjected to US Government-directed imposition of coercive psychological manipulation, propaganda and censorship campaigns; physical 'lockdowns;' electoral fraud; mask mandates; school, church and business closures; restrictions on freedom of movement, assembly and association; fraudulent diagnostic testing programs; lethal hospital and nursing home treatment protocols incentivized through federal funding schemes; and fraudulent 'vaccine' promotional campaigns and mandates.
This sequence of US Government attacks on the American people culminated in debilitating and/or lethal 'vaccine' injections which have resulted in personal injury and/or death to victims including Plaintiff and all others similarly situated.
Plaintiff files this action against Defendants Alex Azar, Robert Kadlec and Marion Gruber in their official capacities as government employees who served, at all relevant times, in the Department of Health and Human Services, to the extent that the US Government attempts to defend this suit on grounds that the PREP Act and related federal legislation duly authorized defendants' criminal acts.
On information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Azar committed the first in a series of criminal acts of international terrorism on or about January 31, 2020, when he signed a ‘Determination that a Public Health Emergency Exists,’ referring to the Covid-19 outbreak, and a ‘Declaration’ that “circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of in vitro diagnostics for detection and/or diagnosis of this novel coronavirus.” The determination and declaration were recorded in the Federal Register as taking effect Feb. 04, 2020. 85 Federal Register 7316.
On information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Kadlec conspired and coordinated additional criminal acts, including Defendant Azar’s March 10, 2020 issuance of A Declaration Under the PREP Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID–19, purported to take effect on Feb. 04, 2020. 85 Federal Register 15198.
On information and belief, Kadlec and Azar conspired to prepare and promulgate another ‘Declaration of Emergency Use Authorization’ on March 24, 2020, this time declaring “that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of medical devices, including alternative products used as medical devices.” 85 Federal Register 17335.
The “declarations” prepared and promulgated by Kadlec and Azar purported to provide blanket civil liability immunity for all persons involved in criminal acts of bioweapon research, development, manufacture, distribution, storage and administration for the toxic products that were later fraudulently presented to the public as ‘medical countermeasures’ intended to prevent or treat Covid-19 infection. These toxic and fraudulent products include but are not limited to masks, diagnostic tests, therapeutics and vaccines.
On information and belief, Defendant Marion Gruber knowingly, intentionally, maliciously and with reckless disregard for human life, supervised criminally fraudulent clinical trials and criminally fraudulent regulatory review procedures for the US Government-sponsored bioweapons known as Covid-19 vaccines between February and December 2020.
On information and belief, credible whistleblower reports were filed with FDA by clinical trials manager Brook Jackson, starting in September 2020. Between September and December 2020, Defendant Gruber ignored and suppressed investigation into Jackson’s claims.
On the basis of the data produced by the criminally fraudulent clinical trials and regulatory reviews, Defendant Gruber signed Emergency Use Authorization ratification documents on Dec.11, 2020 (Pfizer/BioNTech); Dec. 18, 2020 (Moderna); and Feb. 27, 2021 (Janssen).
The US Government ‘vaccination’ campaign began Dec. 12, 2020, immediately following Defendant Gruber’s signature authorizing emergency use of the Pfizer/BioNTech product.
[Update Jan. 09, 2023: See also FDA Chief Scientist Rear Admiral Denise Hinton, Jan. 12, 2021 Authorizations of Emergency Use of Certain Drug and Biological Products During the COVID–19 Pandemic; Availability. Effective Dec. 11, 2020 for Pfizer; Dec. 18, 2020 for Moderna. Published Jan. 19, 2021: 86 Federal Register 5200.]
But for the criminal actions of defendants Azar, Kadlec and Gruber, the US Government’s planned and coordinated massacre and maiming of the American people under the fraudulent pretext of ‘public health,’ operational from January 2020 to the present, could not have occurred.
Plaintiff further files this action against Defendants in their personal capacities to the extent that the US Government attempts to defend this suit on grounds that there are no federal laws authorizing the acts committed by defendants, and defendants therefore acted outside the scope of their official duties and authorities.
Plaintiff seeks declaratory judgment permanently terminating all active US Government emergency declarations and determinations, emergency use authorizations and 'vaccination' campaigns.
These declarations, determinations, authorizations and campaigns and the preparatory psychological, social, political, economic and religious assault on plaintiffs that made them possible, violate the US Constitution and federal laws which prohibit and provide civil and criminal penalties (including capital punishment,) for acts of international and domestic terrorism; acts of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear warfare; torture; maiming; mutilation; murder; conspiracy to murder; genocide; and other federal and international crimes.
Plaintiff denies that the actions of defendants in the Covid-19 context, undertaken since January 2020, fall under US federal statutes, regulations and executive orders governing public health emergencies, medical countermeasures, and security countermeasures through the Public Health Service Act at 42 USC 201 et seq, the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act at 21 USC 301 et seq. and related public health laws.
Plaintiff denies that the pathogen known as SARS-CoV-2 is a naturally-occurring virus subject to public health programs under any legitimate communicable disease control and prevention authorities and programs of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Plaintiff denies that the pandemic management program promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes for Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and related agencies, including but not limited to lockdowns and stay-at-home programs; mask programs; Plexiglass barrier programs; mass testing programs; six-foot 'social distancing' programs; occupancy limits and building closures; prohibitions on administration of early treatment protocols such as Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc; and coerced administration of deadly late-treatment protocols such as isolation, restraint, dehydration, starvation, sedation, Remdesivir/Veklury, ventilation, may be construed as legitimate exercise of communicable disease control authorities.
Plaintiff denies that the injectable toxins known as 'Covid-19 vaccines' are medical products or devices intended to treat or prevent disease, as regulated under FDA programs governing Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) products, Biologics License Applications (BLA), Investigational New Drug (IND), Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) or other FDA frameworks relating to production and use of novel biological and chemical products and devices on human beings.
Plaintiff denies the applicability of the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C Chapter 171; 28 USC 1346); Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (42 USC 300aa-10 et seq); Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (42 USC §247d–6e et seq) and other federal civil remedies, on the grounds that defendants have committed criminal acts of an almost-incomprehensibly outrageous nature, which cannot be adequately remedied through compensatory frameworks intended to address ordinary negligence, negligence per se, recklessness or willful misconduct.
Plaintiff asserts that the pathogen known as SARS-CoV-2 is an offensive biological weapon developed, patented and released by officials working for the US Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Defense Chemical and Biological Warfare Program, in violation of 50 USC Chapter 32 and related federal and international laws.
Plaintiff asserts that the pandemic management program, from the initial promulgation of 'stay-at-home orders' to the execution of CMS-funded hospital homicide protocols and the 'vaccination' campaign, has been — since inception — a planned, coordinated, comprehensive military campaign intended to isolate, disorient, injure and kill as many Americans as possible, under the re-classification of our civilian population as enemy targets by the US Government through the Department of Defense.
Plaintiff asserts that the injectable toxins known as 'Covid-19 vaccines' are biological and chemical weapons developed, patented and released by officials working for the US Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Defense.
Plaintiff asserts that, since January 2020, the US government has met the standards for designation as a foreign terrorist organization under 8 USC 1189, and that the actions of US government defendants in the Covid-19 context were, are and will continue to be criminal acts under US federal statutes, regulations and executive orders prohibiting and establishing criminal penalties for several federal crimes.
Federal crimes for which there is evidence to prosecute defendants, including but not limited to Azar, Kadlec and Gruber include international terrorism (18 USC 2331-1); domestic terrorism (18 USC 2331-2); biological weapons production and use (18 USC 175); chemical weapons production and use (18 USC 229); war crimes as defined by the 1949 Geneva Conventions, including torture, cruel or inhuman treatment, performing biological experiments without informed consent, murder, mutilation or maiming, and intentionally causing serious bodily injury (18 USC 2441); production and use of weapons of mass destruction (18 USC 2332a); genocide (18 USC 1091); murder (18 USC 1111); attempted murder (18 USC 1113); conspiracy to commit murder (18 USC 1117); torture (18 USC 2340A); financial transactions with countries supporting international terrorism (18 USC 2332d); providing material support to terrorists (18 USC 2339A); treason (18 USC 2381); misprision of treason (18 USC 2382); rebellion or insurrection (18 USC 2383) and seditious conspiracy (18 USC 2384).
Plaintiff seeks Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief terminating the 'public health emergency,' restoring our Constitutional, republican, federalist form of government, and suspending the US Government’s ongoing chemical and biological warfare program colloquially known as the ‘vaccination’ program.
Plaintiff seeks removal from office and federal criminal prosecution of the architects and executors of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen development, patenting, manufacture and release program.
Plaintiff seeks removal from office and federal criminal prosecution of the US government officials who served as architects and executors of the Covid-19 'vaccine' bioweapons development, patenting, manufacture, distribution and administration program.
Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages for injuries and deaths sustained by Plaintiff and others similarly situated.
Plaintiff seeks additional injunctions, removal from office and criminal prosecutions of all US Government officials identified as co-conspirators during this litigation, to prevent their continued planning and execution of additional US Government-sponsored crimes.
Plaintiff is prepared to produce ample evidence of such ongoing and forthcoming crimes, which have been planned and publicly announced through reports, tabletop exercises, executive orders, press releases and other public records relating to the establishment of ‘quarantine camps,’ and the deliberate US Government-directed destruction of food supply chains, fuel supply chains, financial transaction systems and other essential human support systems, for the offensive military purpose of instilling and maintaining chronic, intense fear and disorientation among the American people and establishing centralized behavioral control of the population through Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) linked to a centralized digital identification and credentialing system.
March 14, 2022 - Moderna’s 2013 patent on furin cleavage site, Brook Jackson’s 2020 report to FDA on clinical trial fraud, Pfizer 2021 SEC filings
May 4, 2022 - Faked Clinical Trials and 'Real World Evidence'
May 25, 2022 - Pfizer’s Motion to Dismiss the Brook Jackson, federal contracting fraud, clinical trial fraud, whistleblower case.
May 26, 2022 - Implications of 10 USC 2371b, the federal contracting provision cited by Pfizer
July 8, 2022 - Contracts
Aug. 19, 2022 - Mathew Crawford realizing that there were never any valid clinical trials; it was all fabricated.
Sept. 21, 2022 - Four American war criminals I think should be prosecuted first: Alex Azar, Robert Kadlec, Marion Gruber and Bill Gates
Oct. 12, 2022 - Secret Squirrel v. Azar, Kadlec and Gruber. First parts of draft 18 USC 2333 federal civil complaint
Oct. 13, 2022 - 18 USC 2333 cases: venue, national security, Fauci, summary judgment
Oct. 17, 2022 - Please pray for US District Court Judge Michael J. Truncale. Truncale is the federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas to whom whistleblower Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case is assigned.
Oct. 19, 2022 - Other Transaction Authority (OTA) is to federal procurement contract regulation as Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is to federal drug safety regulation. They're both provisions through which Congress and US presidents pretended to legalize criminal conspiracy to produce and use weapons of mass destruction.
Oct. 21, 2022 - Legal horror movie pitch: The World According to Darp. 'Shouting fire in a crowded theater' meets 'When did you stop beating your wife?' Starring US Government as Darpon Fink, serial-killer/arsonist.
Oct. 25, 2022 - Pharmaceuticidal tendencies. Condensing the legal nightmare for judicial review.
Oct. 26, 2022 - Synopsis of proposed Jackson v. Pfizer argument. Clinical trial documents are just props in a theatrical production; clinical investigators are fooled performers and in the fooled audience; playwright and director is DOD.
Oct. 26, 2022 -The goal is getting one good whistle-blower and one good federal judge together, through one solid, well-argued case.
Oct. 27, 2022 - How can HHS, DOD and DHS be ‘foreign terrorist organizations?’ Through the treasonous (18 USC 2381) primary allegiance of their secretaries, and other senior executives, to the World Health Organization and its conspiring globalist institutions.
Oct. 28, 2022 - Jackson v. Pfizer, Ventavia, Icon: Barnes legal team response filed Oct. 27
A reader asked if this case has been filed.
It has not been filed.
I wrote it as a draft, as part of my ongoing preparation for when attorneys and plaintiffs and/or prosecutors (state AGs or county DAs) decide to move forward. (I submitted parts of it to Warner Mendenhall and Robert Barnes for use in Brook Jackson’s case in October 2022, but they were not interested at that time.)
From the original post, Oct. 12, 2022:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/secret-squirrel-v-azar-kadlec-and
“I’m not working with attorneys, law firms or plaintiffs. I’m working as if there’s an interested law firm, and doing the legal research and writing that I’d do for that legal team.
I’m also doing the project as if there are a few federal judges somewhere in the United States working their way toward the same point: beginning the process of bringing key American war criminals/international terrorists to public account for their participation in planning and executing the globalist mass murder campaign, through meaningful, properly-scaled investigations, prosecutions and trials.
The project has two main purposes.
One is civic education: to build up the mental maps available for people (including me) to understand better what's happening, have more useful language to think and talk about it, and collaboratively process it through the comment discussions.
The second goal is litigation support: educating and emboldening plaintiffs, private attorneys, public prosecutors and judges.
I watched this this morning. And have shared. I feel at this point, what you and Sasha are offering are the only things we need to focus on. It's our clearest path to new actions that will stop this madness. Thanks for all you do, Katherine. (And Sasha!)