Orientation for new readers. Reader comment on yesterday’s post. I watched the video below earlier today. Whistleblower Brook Jackson + Attorneys Warner Mendenhall & Robert Barnes, Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, Feb. 2, 2023) During this interview, both of Brook's attorneys talked about FDA's behavior as if there was no explanation for why they've allowed all this fraud and criminal activity to happen. They just said it was like FDA was inexplicably trusting Pfizer to do the right thing or something. They never mentioned anything at all in terms of what you and Sasha have discovered about how BARDA is the real agency in charge of regulating the cv injections, nor did they ever mention OWS, DOD, HHS or any other government agency with regard to accountability for the crimes being committed. They only talked about Pfizer being the culprit behind all the injury and death being perpetrated, and how it's such a David and Goliath battle against this behemoth, but they're going to do their darnedest to hold them to account for financial damages.
I am relatively new to your content, and I'm not a lawyer (but I am in law school, FWIW, 1L) so if my question has already been answered somewhere in your content or seems redundant, forgive me.
Is it possible that they (govt) don't mind allowing Pfizer to take the "fall" publicly, and this is the plan?
Also, so if this is DoD which means our own govt is harming us... do we suspect our govt is working in the interest of another adversarial (to us/U.S.) govt?
Is there someone beyond our govt running this show? I am aware of WEF, WHO, etc... I'm just having trouble figuring out who is ultimately at the top and what the exact end goal is, or if we even know that, yet ...
Well, the DOD/HHS/FDA and the judicial system (not mention the media and education cartel) have knowingly given aid and comfort to the enemy, which is the constitutional definition of treason.
High treason, in fact.
If there’s a lawyer in existence with the chutzpah to do the right thing, they would have filed formal charges against these criminals already.
So Mr Barnes, a celebrity lawyer essentially, has sat on this info for months and hasn’t tried to litigate any of it? He won’t even mention it or talk about? And he has plenty of media appearances where he could, so it’s certainly not for lack of opportunity.
This genocide must be stopped and frankly if Mr Barnes is unwilling or incapable of doing so, he needs to get out of the way. Even his empty promises cited above only refer to financial penalties, good luck getting someone to swing for killing your child or parents or loved ones. He’s not even pretending like that’s on the table.
The USG and their private corpo skinsuits have murdered millions of people. Money ain’t gonna cut it.
I find Steve Kirsch's approach fairly enlightening, and he's an on-the-ground activist. I admire activists who use intelligence to move BIG agendas which both he and you do, Katherine.
You, and he produce an overwhelming amount of text, and good information which in, and of itself can overwhelm people, especially ones not used to absorbing that much info, let alone then trying to figure out how to use it to get involved in moving an agenda. I'm used to using complex info., and histories to influence major power players, and yet, I still find both your, and Steve's substacks a bit overwhelming.
However, you both provide ways for your readers to take what you provide, and without too much effort get involved in driving positive change in these surreal times.
If there was no requirement to run clinical trials, then why did they? And why did they share results with the FDA? Why did FDA pretend to rely on them? Why did they use them to tell the people about them and use their claimed results to deceive the people they were safe and effective? I do not see how claiming their contract did not require any trials when they elected to use clinical trials to sell it to the population the vaccines were safe and effective, use it to claim they are 95% effective, and used real people to experiment on when they were not required to conduct any trials. By claiming they were not required to conduct clinical trials by their contract, and for the government to defend them on this lame excuse, only means the government, i.e., DoD, FDA, and CDC, WHO, were all conspiring together to defraud the people around the world. So, it isn't Pfizer defrauded the government, it is Pfizer, the government agencies, CDA, WHO, all conspired to together to defraud the people using deceptive clinical trials that were never required by the government, in order to deceive the people their bio-chemical weapon labeled as a vaccine was safe and effective. The biggest crime in world history that dwarfs the Holocaust.
Katherine, If I may in regards to you being seemingly bewildered by the lack of focus on DoD, BARDA etc. during Brooke’s interview. Although I am not aware if they are aware of you or Sasha’s work but even if they are I think it’s difficult to speak about it because of the nuisance needed. I have read and reread many of your articles because for me, it helps me conceptualize what you are saying and then crystallize in my mind. A causal reader who would read it once and move on is going to have great difficulty wrapping their head around the implications of what you are saying. I am not insulting the casual reader, not at all but not everyone has the lexicon to understand legal documents and especially the overwrought with doublespeak, bureaucratic legal speak the government employs. Don’t get me wrong , I love what you are doing, it really cuts to the heart of this matter and fills a black hole size lack of historical context that is missing is most everyone’s understanding of what is really going on. I think your reach is limited due to the way in which the subject matter is communicated. Of course this is just my personal opinion so I understand I could be wrong compared to others, I freely concede that possibility. If a layman approach to the narrative you are telling is applied I believe you’re story has the potential to set aflame the carefully crafted Wicker Man that has been carefully constructed in the public’s mind. I’ve shared your stuff on Twitter thinking my followers would be blown away but I don’t think the implications for what you are saying is really understood. Even the most ardent COVID skeptic can barely fathom what you are saying. Again I mean no disrespect to your writing, its fantastic and thoroughly cited and researched which I love. I’m just trying to pull back and look at this from a Meta perspective and trying to find ways to increase understanding. Just my two cents, much respect to you 🙏.
I don't understand the best approach to get out of the mess we are in, but I was very disappointed to learn that the EUA products do not end with EUA and the FDA will continue to be able to make EUA products as if this is the new normal way that drugs are to be approved in the future. According to Jeffrey Jackson of the Highwire, the infrastructure is in place to make a ton of new MRNA products and that they will use the Pfizer "trial" that the population is in to validate its safety and efficacy. If this is the plan to push ahead using this "trial" and its success (Peter Marks says they have gotten no safety signals in the billions of doses given out), then its full steam ahead. Yuck!!
I have heard it said that forcing Pfizer to publically admit it's relationship to the DOD is important for popular opinion. Also it's hard to imagine what chess moves might be required to arrive at a particular result regarding the entities involved. Just my thoughts.
Katherine.....I have an awesome opportunity. I will have the chance to submit questions for a panel of 4 people. A rep from NIH, CDC, FDA, HHS. If you had the opportunity to ask one question what would it be? I am thinking it will have something to do with the relationship between DoD and HHS?? A good lawyer never asks a question they do not already know the answer. So I will need the appropriate response to the question and the proof to back it up. This way when they lie there is a valid rebuttal to their lie. If you would like to contact me my email is: karen.bracken@reagan.com. I cannot go in to detail on this post but will privately if you contact me but this is a real opportunity and I want to make sure whatever questions I pose will get asked. Once I submit this comment I will delete it from your page because I am hoping it will go to your email. I have a Substack too and I get an email for every comment and I read every one of them.
Hi Katherine I just subscribed. I’ve been researching since 911 and while I had most of the individual pieces, your video about the #KillBox still has my head vibrating. It blew up my Twitter and I intend to blast it far and wide as I haven’t run across anything quite so concise and devastating to break through the “fog of psywar” even people who are mostly awake are experiencing. I would be honored to speak with you at a convenient time if that is possible. I have a bunch of pissed off duty and retired firefighters here in Florida that are planning to use our voices. I can’t think of anyone who could advise us. I’m on Twitter @firemanjohn628 or I’d be happy to give you my phone number if you could call. Thanks again, I will be blasting your video and your Substack in the meantime and look forward to speaking to you. God Bless
all perjured, all forsworn, all naught, all dissemblers.
~ William Shakespeare ~
***********************************
Dissemble: Feign, Pretend, Mask.
• Hide under a false appearance.
• Make believe with the intent to deceive.
***********************************
The Masters of Confusion
(Who are they?)
In the earliest history of America there was one group of people that were feared with reason--a society, you might say, whose often “insidious” craft had claimed a multitude of victims, ever since the middle ages in Europe.
One group of people were hated and feared from Massachusetts Bay to Virginia. The Magistrate would not burn them at the stake although surely a great many of the colonists would have surely recommended such a solution. Our forefathers were baffled by them. In the first place where did they come from? Of all who sailed from England to Plymouth in 1620, not one of them was aboard.
"Vermin," that's what the Colonist called them. “Parasites” who fed on human misery, spreading sorrow and confusion wherever they went ........ "Destructive," they were called.
And still they were permitted co-existence with the colonists, for a while, anyway. Of course there were colonial laws prohibiting the practice of their infamous craft. Somehow a way was always found around all those laws.
In 1641, Massachusetts Bay colony took a novel approach to the problem. The governors attempted to starve the "devils" out of existence through economic exclusion. They were denied wages, and thereby it was hoped that they would perish.
Four years later, Virginia followed the example of Massachusetts Bay and for a while it seemed that the dilemma had been resolved. It had not, somehow the "parasites" managed to survive, and the mere nearness of them made the colonists skin crawl.
In 1658, in Virginia, the final solution; banishment; exile. The "treacherous ones" were cast out of the colony. At last, after decades of enduring the "psychological gloom", the sun came out and the birds sang, and all was right with the world. And the elation continued for a generation.
I'm not sure why the Virginians eventually allowed the outcasts to return, but they did. In 1680 after twenty-two years, the despised ones were readmitted to the colony on the condition that they be subjected to the strictest surveillance ....… How soon we forget!!
For indeed over the next half century or so, the imposed restrictions were slowly, quietly swept away. And those whose treachery had been feared since the middle ages ultimately took their place in society.
You see, the "vermin” that once infested colonial America, the ”parasites” who prayed on the misfortunes of their neighbours until finally they were officially banished from Virginia, those dreaded, despised, outcasts, “masters of confusion” were LAWYERS.
Hello Katherine, I’ve been following your work for only a couple of weeks and discovered you through Sasha’s reference both written and videos. You two are profoundly insightful. I am catching up. This is a great post with the links to the litigation docs in the Jackson case and a summary and analysis by you. Thank you. I will be reviewing the info.
I’ve also been following Karen Kingston and have had several extended conversations with her.
My question to you is Karen asserts the DOD contract provides it is subject to FDA oversight and approval and as such they haven’t been side stepped. So which is it? What’s your view?
This apparent contradictory message from her seems to be almost attacking you and Sasha. It is adding mud to the water. I’ve been very busy lately with personal issues and haven’t been able to get to the bottom of this question yet. The dust is clearing and I’ll be able to dive back into this again shortly.
I’m very curious about tge apparent contradictions being asserted.
I am relatively new to your content, and I'm not a lawyer (but I am in law school, FWIW, 1L) so if my question has already been answered somewhere in your content or seems redundant, forgive me.
Is it possible that they (govt) don't mind allowing Pfizer to take the "fall" publicly, and this is the plan?
Also, so if this is DoD which means our own govt is harming us... do we suspect our govt is working in the interest of another adversarial (to us/U.S.) govt?
Is there someone beyond our govt running this show? I am aware of WEF, WHO, etc... I'm just having trouble figuring out who is ultimately at the top and what the exact end goal is, or if we even know that, yet ...
Well, the DOD/HHS/FDA and the judicial system (not mention the media and education cartel) have knowingly given aid and comfort to the enemy, which is the constitutional definition of treason.
High treason, in fact.
If there’s a lawyer in existence with the chutzpah to do the right thing, they would have filed formal charges against these criminals already.
Steve Kirsch is a clown. He actually banned me and deleted my comments linking to videos with you and Sasha, several times.
The government put me In jail after I ran for mayor against Gavin in 2007, and they shut down my business.
Now I am Destitute and the prostitute government murders with impunity and even the legal support of lawfare.
Harmacide scamdemic is the new Holocaust
Hmm.
So Mr Barnes, a celebrity lawyer essentially, has sat on this info for months and hasn’t tried to litigate any of it? He won’t even mention it or talk about? And he has plenty of media appearances where he could, so it’s certainly not for lack of opportunity.
This genocide must be stopped and frankly if Mr Barnes is unwilling or incapable of doing so, he needs to get out of the way. Even his empty promises cited above only refer to financial penalties, good luck getting someone to swing for killing your child or parents or loved ones. He’s not even pretending like that’s on the table.
The USG and their private corpo skinsuits have murdered millions of people. Money ain’t gonna cut it.
I find Steve Kirsch's approach fairly enlightening, and he's an on-the-ground activist. I admire activists who use intelligence to move BIG agendas which both he and you do, Katherine.
You, and he produce an overwhelming amount of text, and good information which in, and of itself can overwhelm people, especially ones not used to absorbing that much info, let alone then trying to figure out how to use it to get involved in moving an agenda. I'm used to using complex info., and histories to influence major power players, and yet, I still find both your, and Steve's substacks a bit overwhelming.
However, you both provide ways for your readers to take what you provide, and without too much effort get involved in driving positive change in these surreal times.
Thank you, BOTH!!!!
If there was no requirement to run clinical trials, then why did they? And why did they share results with the FDA? Why did FDA pretend to rely on them? Why did they use them to tell the people about them and use their claimed results to deceive the people they were safe and effective? I do not see how claiming their contract did not require any trials when they elected to use clinical trials to sell it to the population the vaccines were safe and effective, use it to claim they are 95% effective, and used real people to experiment on when they were not required to conduct any trials. By claiming they were not required to conduct clinical trials by their contract, and for the government to defend them on this lame excuse, only means the government, i.e., DoD, FDA, and CDC, WHO, were all conspiring together to defraud the people around the world. So, it isn't Pfizer defrauded the government, it is Pfizer, the government agencies, CDA, WHO, all conspired to together to defraud the people using deceptive clinical trials that were never required by the government, in order to deceive the people their bio-chemical weapon labeled as a vaccine was safe and effective. The biggest crime in world history that dwarfs the Holocaust.
Katherine, If I may in regards to you being seemingly bewildered by the lack of focus on DoD, BARDA etc. during Brooke’s interview. Although I am not aware if they are aware of you or Sasha’s work but even if they are I think it’s difficult to speak about it because of the nuisance needed. I have read and reread many of your articles because for me, it helps me conceptualize what you are saying and then crystallize in my mind. A causal reader who would read it once and move on is going to have great difficulty wrapping their head around the implications of what you are saying. I am not insulting the casual reader, not at all but not everyone has the lexicon to understand legal documents and especially the overwrought with doublespeak, bureaucratic legal speak the government employs. Don’t get me wrong , I love what you are doing, it really cuts to the heart of this matter and fills a black hole size lack of historical context that is missing is most everyone’s understanding of what is really going on. I think your reach is limited due to the way in which the subject matter is communicated. Of course this is just my personal opinion so I understand I could be wrong compared to others, I freely concede that possibility. If a layman approach to the narrative you are telling is applied I believe you’re story has the potential to set aflame the carefully crafted Wicker Man that has been carefully constructed in the public’s mind. I’ve shared your stuff on Twitter thinking my followers would be blown away but I don’t think the implications for what you are saying is really understood. Even the most ardent COVID skeptic can barely fathom what you are saying. Again I mean no disrespect to your writing, its fantastic and thoroughly cited and researched which I love. I’m just trying to pull back and look at this from a Meta perspective and trying to find ways to increase understanding. Just my two cents, much respect to you 🙏.
I am considering a pro se action in a local district Court. We have local victims. I want to achieve an emergency cease and desist injunction.
Please . Your thoughts.
I don't understand the best approach to get out of the mess we are in, but I was very disappointed to learn that the EUA products do not end with EUA and the FDA will continue to be able to make EUA products as if this is the new normal way that drugs are to be approved in the future. According to Jeffrey Jackson of the Highwire, the infrastructure is in place to make a ton of new MRNA products and that they will use the Pfizer "trial" that the population is in to validate its safety and efficacy. If this is the plan to push ahead using this "trial" and its success (Peter Marks says they have gotten no safety signals in the billions of doses given out), then its full steam ahead. Yuck!!
I have heard it said that forcing Pfizer to publically admit it's relationship to the DOD is important for popular opinion. Also it's hard to imagine what chess moves might be required to arrive at a particular result regarding the entities involved. Just my thoughts.
Katherine.....I have an awesome opportunity. I will have the chance to submit questions for a panel of 4 people. A rep from NIH, CDC, FDA, HHS. If you had the opportunity to ask one question what would it be? I am thinking it will have something to do with the relationship between DoD and HHS?? A good lawyer never asks a question they do not already know the answer. So I will need the appropriate response to the question and the proof to back it up. This way when they lie there is a valid rebuttal to their lie. If you would like to contact me my email is: karen.bracken@reagan.com. I cannot go in to detail on this post but will privately if you contact me but this is a real opportunity and I want to make sure whatever questions I pose will get asked. Once I submit this comment I will delete it from your page because I am hoping it will go to your email. I have a Substack too and I get an email for every comment and I read every one of them.
I just wanted to thank you for the time and effort it took to put this info together.
Hi Katherine I just subscribed. I’ve been researching since 911 and while I had most of the individual pieces, your video about the #KillBox still has my head vibrating. It blew up my Twitter and I intend to blast it far and wide as I haven’t run across anything quite so concise and devastating to break through the “fog of psywar” even people who are mostly awake are experiencing. I would be honored to speak with you at a convenient time if that is possible. I have a bunch of pissed off duty and retired firefighters here in Florida that are planning to use our voices. I can’t think of anyone who could advise us. I’m on Twitter @firemanjohn628 or I’d be happy to give you my phone number if you could call. Thanks again, I will be blasting your video and your Substack in the meantime and look forward to speaking to you. God Bless
JT
There's no trust, no faith, no honesty in men;
all perjured, all forsworn, all naught, all dissemblers.
~ William Shakespeare ~
***********************************
Dissemble: Feign, Pretend, Mask.
• Hide under a false appearance.
• Make believe with the intent to deceive.
***********************************
The Masters of Confusion
(Who are they?)
In the earliest history of America there was one group of people that were feared with reason--a society, you might say, whose often “insidious” craft had claimed a multitude of victims, ever since the middle ages in Europe.
One group of people were hated and feared from Massachusetts Bay to Virginia. The Magistrate would not burn them at the stake although surely a great many of the colonists would have surely recommended such a solution. Our forefathers were baffled by them. In the first place where did they come from? Of all who sailed from England to Plymouth in 1620, not one of them was aboard.
"Vermin," that's what the Colonist called them. “Parasites” who fed on human misery, spreading sorrow and confusion wherever they went ........ "Destructive," they were called.
And still they were permitted co-existence with the colonists, for a while, anyway. Of course there were colonial laws prohibiting the practice of their infamous craft. Somehow a way was always found around all those laws.
In 1641, Massachusetts Bay colony took a novel approach to the problem. The governors attempted to starve the "devils" out of existence through economic exclusion. They were denied wages, and thereby it was hoped that they would perish.
Four years later, Virginia followed the example of Massachusetts Bay and for a while it seemed that the dilemma had been resolved. It had not, somehow the "parasites" managed to survive, and the mere nearness of them made the colonists skin crawl.
In 1658, in Virginia, the final solution; banishment; exile. The "treacherous ones" were cast out of the colony. At last, after decades of enduring the "psychological gloom", the sun came out and the birds sang, and all was right with the world. And the elation continued for a generation.
I'm not sure why the Virginians eventually allowed the outcasts to return, but they did. In 1680 after twenty-two years, the despised ones were readmitted to the colony on the condition that they be subjected to the strictest surveillance ....… How soon we forget!!
For indeed over the next half century or so, the imposed restrictions were slowly, quietly swept away. And those whose treachery had been feared since the middle ages ultimately took their place in society.
You see, the "vermin” that once infested colonial America, the ”parasites” who prayed on the misfortunes of their neighbours until finally they were officially banished from Virginia, those dreaded, despised, outcasts, “masters of confusion” were LAWYERS.
Hello Katherine, I’ve been following your work for only a couple of weeks and discovered you through Sasha’s reference both written and videos. You two are profoundly insightful. I am catching up. This is a great post with the links to the litigation docs in the Jackson case and a summary and analysis by you. Thank you. I will be reviewing the info.
I’ve also been following Karen Kingston and have had several extended conversations with her.
My question to you is Karen asserts the DOD contract provides it is subject to FDA oversight and approval and as such they haven’t been side stepped. So which is it? What’s your view?
This apparent contradictory message from her seems to be almost attacking you and Sasha. It is adding mud to the water. I’ve been very busy lately with personal issues and haven’t been able to get to the bottom of this question yet. The dust is clearing and I’ll be able to dive back into this again shortly.
I’m very curious about tge apparent contradictions being asserted.
Any thoughts?
Thank you.