Poison pills, sinful structures and legal unpalatability.
Poison pills, sinful structures and legal unpalatability.
Thinking through possible sequelae to repeal of kill box laws.
This post is for Bailiwick readers with an interest in philosophy and theology as related to human law and an interest in the creative possibilities offered by living during the period of history after the kill box laws are repealed or nullified, whenever and however those laws are struck down. The period of history, that is, when sound legal systems are being rebuilt from the rubble of ruined law.
My thinking and writing are not well-formed yet on these subjects, because they are confusing subjects. Living through a period of history dominated by anti-law masquerading as legitimate law, and watching criminals use anti-law law to hide their crimes and pre-exonerate themselves from future prosecution, is confusing and disorienting.
I hope to work out some of the ideas more clearly and fully over time.
Poison pill, corporate finance: “A poison pill is a defense strategy used by the directors of a public company to prevent activist investors, competitors, or other would-be acquirers from taking control of the company.” “The goal is to make the accumulation of shares beyond a defined limit financially unpalatable.”
The most effective legal remedy for the excruciating legal disease of the American kill box laws is Congressional repeal of those laws: a fully-conscious amputation of gangrenous law to protect the life of society, the body politic, from further injury.
And like an amputation without anesthetic, if applied, the remedy will also be excruciatingly painful: it is legally unpalatable.
This is by design. Toxic tripwires are embedded in the laws to discourage members of Congress, who hold the authority to perform the amputation by revoking the legal authorization for the killing programs they and their predecessors granted in the past and continue to extend in the present — from using that authority.
I haven’t fully explored this issue yet, and it’s among the thorny dilemmas that I believe can and will only be resolved by divine intervention, by mankind turning to Almighty God, Who is the supernatural, supranational, creative and legitimate source of properly-ordered Law strong enough to turn back the forces of anti-law chaos wielded by diabolical, destructive globalists.
During the Q&A part of the Oct. 4, 2023 Iceland event, I articulated the dilemma very briefly, in terms of the division of time into two segments delineated by the hypothetical repeal and nullification of kill box enabling laws.
The laws need to be repealed and nullified, because if they stay on the books, they will be used repeatedly to hurt and kill more people, day after day, year after year. That’s why they were put on the books in the first place: to authorize, disguise and pre-exonerate acts that would otherwise be recognized and handled by human societies as outrageous crimes.
And the killers have been very, very clear about their intent to continue using the laws to plan and direct and delegate and pre-exonerate the commission of more of those crimes, during the many future “public health emergencies” they will declare, using the many future “countermeasures” they will deploy.
The legal weapons need to be removed from the killers’ hands, to give the people who have survived the first onslaughts, better ability to care for the wounded and dying, and better odds of surviving and thriving in the future with intact bodies and souls.
The gangrenous kill box laws need to be amputated from the body politic so that the rest of the body can granulate new, healthy political tissue at the stump.
But.
Repealing the kill box laws means acknowledging they exist at all; that they have been in force, and enforced — that they had the force of law — prior to repeal, for all the years since 1944 and most visibly and violently and destructively since 2020.
To the extent that society wants the very principle of legitimate rule-of-law to prevail over rule-by-brute-force-hidden-behind-an-anti-law-mask, most of the otherwise criminal acts committed under the authority of the perverted, gangrenous anti-laws — lying, torture, murder, extortion and theft — will be construed as legally unprosecutable.
They will be construed as unprosecutable because when committed — between 2020 and date-of-repeal — most of those crimes were, by definition, not-crimes, especially the not-crime crimes committed by deceived health care workers following HHS Secretary orders and attacking also-deceived targets with illegal, biochemical, military weapons camouflaged — from pharmacists, nurses, and victims — as legal medicinal products.
And because, even though the evidence of the higher crimes of treason and sedition is and will remain readily available, in the form of Congressional roll call voting records on enabling statutes and Presidential signatures on executive orders and Cabinet secretary signatures on Federal Register notices, it will be much more difficult to determine and collect solid evidence about when each individual Congress member, president and Cabinet secretary crossed the line.
The kill box laws passed, because most of the members of Congress were led to believe, were deceived into thinking, that they were engaged in lawful governing to prepare for and manage truly life-threatening infectious disease events. Some of those who did the deceiving of Congress members, were themselves deceived into believing the same things.
With time, with experience, with honest assessment of reality, it’s possible to understand that the threats presented as ostensible justification are not real. They have been manufactured and theatrically-produced to drive public health officials and Congress toward the actual purpose: transforming rule of law into rule of anti-law to destabilize and weaken society and transfer governing power to outlaw, supranational, globalist institutions.
When did each Congress member finally understand what was really going on? Each public health official? When did each President figure it out, and each Cabinet secretary? Each state governor? Each judge? Each state lawmaker? And for those who haven’t yet, when will they?
It’s absolutely clear, from the legal history, that the laws were put in place with malicious intent to injure and kill targets using toxic EUA countermeasures during declared public health emergencies. It’s not at all clear which specific public health officials, lawmakers and executives possessed that malicious intent, when they first formed the intent, and when — if ever — they will renounce malicious intent, form good intent, and take concrete action to repeal the kill box laws.
In other words, recourse to repeal-of-law, as the remedy to restore soundness to Law itself, because Law has been corrupted by toxic anti-law adopted through normal lawmaking procedures, requires some degree of acceptance that many if not most of the identifiable criminals will never be brought to account for their crimes under human law, in the temporal world.
Again, because when those specific people committed the specifics acts of deceit, torture, murder, extortion and theft they committed, under the provisions of then-in-force anti-law, those acts were lawful, and because some number of those specific people didn’t understand the intrinsic evil of the acts they were undertaking.
I focus on supporting repeal and nullification efforts because, in my view, the first priority must be removing the legal weapons from the killers’ arsenal, so that the killing programs enabled by the kill box laws can be brought to an end.
I also focus on building cases for treason and sedition prosecutions, targeting the lawmaking, Law-destructive acts that enabled the other criminal acts to be committed without the perpetrators having any legal obligation to fully inform themselves about the moral dimensions of the acts they would commit, and without fear that they could be stopped by application of legitimate law.
I can see that the double-binds outlined above may well be among the reasons why there are no American lawyers or lawmakers publicly acknowledging the American kill box laws, much less publicly working to generate momentum for repeal and nullification.
Some of the litigators refuse to look at the kill box laws due to greed; they’re driven by the irrational hope that the killers have left escape hatches in the walls of the legal kill box. Some of the lawmakers refuse to look at the kill box laws due to terror about the financial consequences that will be unleashed by central bankers in response to legislative acts of resistance to medicalized intentional killing.
Some refuse to look at the kill box laws because the likelihood that many of the perpetrators — high-level and low-level — may well “get away with it,” because human law has become so sick that it lacks the moral strength to impose true justice, is such a bitter pill to swallow.
Vengeance belongs to Almighty God alone. The magnitude of the criminal conspiracy is vast, and the depth of the evil profound.
Is it possible for Almighty God to also guide mankind to create good legal structures that could provide some measure of temporal justice for the Covid-era criminals in the decades to come?
Yes. I have no idea what those good legal structures will look like. I find them hard to imagine.
But I’m also mindful that before January 2020, I found the evil legal workings of the human world as laid open to view since January 2020, equally unimaginable.
Pray the Rosary.
Sinful structures
Malachi Martin, writing in 1990:
As Christians and Roman Catholics, [Pope John Paul II] insists, we not only can but must speak of ‘sinful structures’ when we find that such structures are created by men and women who are inspired uniquely by economic, financial, political or ideological gain. For in acting out of such motives alone, the builders of such structures violate at least the First Commandment, which forbids the worship of false gods.
When money, ideology, class or technological development dictates exclusively how we behave, then we are in effect worshipping idols, just as surely as if we were to set up a golden calf in the Sinai of our world, ascribe omnipotence to it, and give it our obeisance and adoration.
In that sort of situation, at least one and probably two sinful intentions are operative: an all-consuming desire for profit; and the thirst for power. In fact, as these human attitudes and propensities are built into the structures of our society, they are not merely operative; they quickly become absolutized. They dominate our thoughts, our intentions and our actions. They become the household gods on the mantels of our structures.
The structures themselves, therefore, are rooted in the personal sins linked to the choices and the concrete acts of the individuals to design and introduce those structures, consolidate them, promote them, build their lives on them, define success in their terms, and make those structures difficult to remove.
As such structures grow stronger and spread farther, they become the source of other personal sins. They influence the behavior of increasing numbers of individuals, leading them in turn to violate God’s moral law and thus to commit sin.
The originators of those structures have, in other words, introduced into the everyday world of men and women influences and obstacles that last far beyond the actions and brief life span of any individual. The structures are the vehicles of their sins, and can aptly and accurately be described as ‘sinful structures.’
-Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood (1990) at pp. 158-159.
Oct. 23, 2023 - On civil suits against Pfizer for “contamination” of Covid-19 biochemical weapons.
A reader sent an email asking for my views on claims that Pfizer is newly vulnerable to civil suits, in the wake of 1) a Michigan state court ruling about the applicability of the PREP Act in cases involving “contaminated” pharmaceutical products and 2) the growing pile of sequencing studies replicating Kevin McKernan’s identification of plasmids, SV-40 promoters and other “contaminants” in the DoD biochemical weapons formerly known as “Covid-19 vaccines.”
Brief recap of events since 2020:
The alleged manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) did not disclose the ingredients now being found by independent researchers, to the alleged regulators (US-FDA, European Medicines Agency, Australian Therapeutic Goods Association, etc.) or to the public.
The alleged regulators did not demand disclosure of ingredients; did not independently evaluate the ingredient claims of the alleged manufacturers; and — even when they noted irregularities (see Latypova memo to Sen. Ron Johnson, Dec. 18, 2022, at p. 4/12, re: EMA Nov. 2020 “rolling review” of Pfizer’s Chemical and Manufacturing (CMC) Controls documentation) — did not enforce purity and non-adulteration regulations.
Instead, the alleged regulators granted “approvals” and “authorizations,” and instructed populations to submit to injection and shun anyone who wouldn’t submit.
Together, the alleged manufacturers and alleged regulators withheld ingredient information and information about regulatory non-regulation, from victims of the DoD’s biowarfare campaign formerly known as the “Covid-19 vaccination program.”
…the goal (of the Monster-agents pushing for new “contamination” civil suits against Pfizer) is to make it somewhat clearer that PREP Act coverage not only gives killers a “just following orders” defense if they’re challenged for doing the things HHS/CDC/DoD orders them to do (lethal injections, hospital homicides) but it also forces them to follow those orders by making the only circumstances under which they can be prosecuted, circumstances in which they don’t follow HHS/CDC/DoD orders to the letter.
…for example, HHS/CDC/DoD orders hospitals and health care workers to use Remdesivir, even though in its uncontaminated form, it’s deadly.
Hospitals and health care workers that refuse to use Remdesivir are the only ones who are liable under PREP.
That’s why the ones who didn’t want to be killers have all quit the “Covid wards,” and the only ones left are happy to kill…
HHS/CDC/DoD also orders Gilead to produce Remdesivir, to specifications that don’t include glass shards. Gilead is only liable to the extent that non-HHS-approved-toxins (ie glass shards) end up in the product…
PREP Act is a legal tunnel to trap health care workers and turn them into criminals.
Related Bailiwick reporting and analysis
Jan. 13, 2023 - Covid-19 bioweapons and the Defense Production Act of 1950
March 2, 2023 - Key quotes from Pfizer's April 22, 2022 Motion to Dismiss and US Government's Oct. 4, 2022 Statement of Interest in Support of MtD.
April 28, 2023 - Draft discovery materials for civil and criminal cases. Useful for promoting understanding that the factual record of events since January 2020 supports the legal conclusion that products labeled 'vaccines' are presumptive injectable biochemical weapons. PDF.
Aug. 8, 2023 - USA v. Dr. Kirk Moore et al. - “…Moore’s case is unusual because the US government is prosecuting alleged criminal acts, allegedly committed by civilians, relating to the products known as Covid-19 vaccines.
Most other Covid-19 vaccine cases are civil cases (not criminal prosecutions) and the parties are individual civilians and military personnel as plaintiffs, suing Department of Defense manufacturing contractors (including Pfizer and Moderna) and the US government as defendants — for violations of plaintiffs’ civil and constitutional rights…”
Dec. 1, 2023 - On 'mandates,' and the irrelevance of informed consent principles in the EUA countermeasures use context. “…I also think PREP Act and related laws legalize federal government to threaten federal contractor businesses and funding recipients (hospitals, nursing homes) that failure to reach vaxx uptake targets will result in loss of contracts and funding. And PREP Act sets up conditions so that the only acts by ‘covered persons,’ ‘program planners’ and ‘qualified planners’ that don’t enjoy full civil and criminal liability protection, are acts of resistance. Bribery, coercion, assault and murder do have full liability exemption. Refusal to commit bribery, to coerce other people, to assault other people and to kill them, will strip the PREP Act protections and expose the refusers to civil and criminal prosecution…”
