Katherine, what exactly is Jonathan Couey's hypothesis and how does that relate if at all to the information you have presented with respect to the militarization of public health that was slowly/progressively enacted over decades in which HHS/CDC/FDA function as apparent but not actual controlling entities? In other words, even though the HHS head/director can declare an emergency with little or no evidentiary justification, the 3 letter agencies clearly enact policies they have no part in making. The control/power is much higher, and apparently global/undisclosed.
The main way Couey's hypothesis relates to the legal issues is that it's another window into another aspect of the overarching fraud-based mass murder and enslavement campaign of the criminal perpetrators.
The piece Couey is getting at is the scientific fraud, from his training and experience and careful thinking as a biologist.
The piece I work on unraveling is the work done by governments to pseudo-legalize the fraud and render it pseudo-immune to legal challenges and court-based termination of the cull-and-control program.
All the fraud pieces work together to have made the massive crime spree possible to begin with, and currently make it possible for the criminals to sustain it in the present.
I don't agree that the people working at the top levels of US federal agencies are enacting policies they have no part in making.
Those people have gotten into positions -- infiltrated or embedded themselves -- into all the public agencies and private sector co-conspirator institutions (GAVI, BMGF, Pfizer, etc), where they've been instrumental in making those policies, and in rigging elections to ensure a controlled Congress and US Presidents who have been steered (some knowingly, many unknowingly) to authorize and fund the policies and programs they set in motion.
The list of those people Fauci, Azar, Kadlec, Gruber, Becerra...the list is extremely long and their work goes back decades (not counting those who set things in motion in the first half of the 20th century and have died since then)
Their allegiance is not to the US Constitution or the American people.
Their allegiance is to Lucifer and the globalist banker predator-parasite elites who serve Luciferian purposes of human corruption (separation of human souls from God) and human enslavement.
I will never understand a doctors refusal to provide life saving treatment based on refusal of an experimental vaccine refusal (THERE IS STILL NO COMIRNATY IN ANY PHARMACY REFRIGERATOR) especially now to continually refuse after it has been demonstrated WITH EVIDENCE that it has NO BENEFIT WHATSOEVER. This appears to be a slam dunk case in my opinion.
Morgellons is a very painful condition, doctors generally deny it exists. I was offered antipsychotic medicine for it& the loony bin. It’s from something in the sky, my opinion. People have committed suicide over not getting help for it. Joni Mitchell is the only public figure I know that has had it. It’s related.
I recall seeing a doc on Morgellon's a few years ago- a practitioner in northern Ca.- can't remember the name- was doing blood filtration- like dialysis, to help clear the body...
Good to hear. I’ve heard you can get help in Boston. I was near Syracuse New York & got mocked. Heavy metal detox with integrative medicine doctor helped tremendously. And switching to distilled water, as much non gmo food as possible.
saw a program about morgellons about 15 years ago about case in young boy whose mother submitted fibers to FBI database to identify/match to known fibers and they were unable to match. was very curious about this and tried to discuss this with my dermatologist who dismissed this as a psychological issue… maybe this was the first time realized that doctors were not curious and just wanted their job to be as easy as possible = no hard questions OR questions without answers.
Glad you inquired. & started questioning the establishment. I wonder if we have genetically modified parasites now. Harold Vella Kutz has many talks on it but he’s very soft spoken.
I've brought your podcast with Latypova to the attention of Robert Barnes. He is preoccupied with the post midterms right now but it will be interesting to get his take on it relative to the Brooke Jackson Qui Tam lawsuit.
And thank you for posting about these issues on Barnes' Locals page.
Robert Barnes and the legal team working on Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case are already aware of these issues; I've been connected to her and Attorney Warner Mendenhall (who is on the team lead by Barnes) by email and writing about these issues in the context of her case for several weeks.
True, but Katherine seems to be saying that the word "prototype" was chosen as a way of skirting any applicable regulations that would have applied to traditional medical treatments including devices and immunizations. In her discussion with Sasha, she touched on it but said she would like to research the origin/meaning of the term in more detail. What she has uncovered is an extremely elaborate method of obfuscating any and all responsibility using a heretofore unheard-of degree of legalese if I understand her properly. I would be interested in hearing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s take on this material.
RFK Jr. also knows about these issues; I'm in contact with lawyers who have presented it to him and other CHD attorneys. They're not interested so far.
CHD is still stuck in the regulatory-capture, pharmaceutical-profiteering framework.
They're not ready to look closely at Congressional/US Government sponsorship of the campaign as components of DOD/HHS chemical and biological warfare program.
Why does RFK, Jr. in Real Anthony Fauci Movie frame the WHO as the entity trying to force through pandemic amendments and not say that HHS proposed them, per Malone himself?
That's really unfortunate. There must be no impediment to following the evidence wherever it leads, which your work seems to suggest was an off-shore concerted attempt to have all the pieces in place for when the requisite technology became available to do the deed. Multiple presidents, congresses, under both parties, all pulled in the same direction which was contrary to the constitution and the interests and rights of the people. To what extent the implications of what they were doing were understood by those who participated is difficult to assess given that hundreds if not thousands of people were involved over the years. My current view is that it was directed by high-level (unnamed) globalists. Clearly, the NWO/OWG cadre has been the major beneficiary.
Actually it's Robert Barnes that needs to see this because he's working with Mendenhall on the Brooke Jackson case. I posted this on his locals channel so he will see it soon.
Yes they attempted to do that but the OTA was meant for weapons systems or equipment used by military personnel not the public at large. I know they're trying to circumnavigate that with HHS but she is right that congress did not have the right to give that power away. My guess is that this ends up in the USSC.
Katherine, what exactly is Jonathan Couey's hypothesis and how does that relate if at all to the information you have presented with respect to the militarization of public health that was slowly/progressively enacted over decades in which HHS/CDC/FDA function as apparent but not actual controlling entities? In other words, even though the HHS head/director can declare an emergency with little or no evidentiary justification, the 3 letter agencies clearly enact policies they have no part in making. The control/power is much higher, and apparently global/undisclosed.
The main way Couey's hypothesis relates to the legal issues is that it's another window into another aspect of the overarching fraud-based mass murder and enslavement campaign of the criminal perpetrators.
The piece Couey is getting at is the scientific fraud, from his training and experience and careful thinking as a biologist.
The piece I work on unraveling is the work done by governments to pseudo-legalize the fraud and render it pseudo-immune to legal challenges and court-based termination of the cull-and-control program.
All the fraud pieces work together to have made the massive crime spree possible to begin with, and currently make it possible for the criminals to sustain it in the present.
I don't agree that the people working at the top levels of US federal agencies are enacting policies they have no part in making.
Those people have gotten into positions -- infiltrated or embedded themselves -- into all the public agencies and private sector co-conspirator institutions (GAVI, BMGF, Pfizer, etc), where they've been instrumental in making those policies, and in rigging elections to ensure a controlled Congress and US Presidents who have been steered (some knowingly, many unknowingly) to authorize and fund the policies and programs they set in motion.
The list of those people Fauci, Azar, Kadlec, Gruber, Becerra...the list is extremely long and their work goes back decades (not counting those who set things in motion in the first half of the 20th century and have died since then)
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/us-federal-crimes-for-which-there
Their allegiance is not to the US Constitution or the American people.
Their allegiance is to Lucifer and the globalist banker predator-parasite elites who serve Luciferian purposes of human corruption (separation of human souls from God) and human enslavement.
I see now what you are saying, and I totally agree with your last 2 sentences.
Must watch this one.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1640932656
JJ crystallizes his theory near the very end including a bullet point slide.
From about 45:00 to 1:25:00 he goes through it.
Chiseling , we got to keep chiseling. 🌞Thank you . ❤️🩹
wondering if I could get some brainstorming and raise awareness
https://tnc.news/2022/11/09/denying-unvaccinated-transplant1/
she lost her Charter Challenge
doctor refused organ transplant because she won't get vaxed.
(so death sentence)
criminal lawyer?
tort lawyers?
I will never understand a doctors refusal to provide life saving treatment based on refusal of an experimental vaccine refusal (THERE IS STILL NO COMIRNATY IN ANY PHARMACY REFRIGERATOR) especially now to continually refuse after it has been demonstrated WITH EVIDENCE that it has NO BENEFIT WHATSOEVER. This appears to be a slam dunk case in my opinion.
Yes. Thank you for this research!
So many threads from the post 9/11 era (and prior) combining into a ‘perfect storm’ like landscape.
Morgellons is a very painful condition, doctors generally deny it exists. I was offered antipsychotic medicine for it& the loony bin. It’s from something in the sky, my opinion. People have committed suicide over not getting help for it. Joni Mitchell is the only public figure I know that has had it. It’s related.
A heavy metal detox from Metagenics with my integrative medicine doctor helped tremendously.
I recall seeing a doc on Morgellon's a few years ago- a practitioner in northern Ca.- can't remember the name- was doing blood filtration- like dialysis, to help clear the body...
Good to hear. I’ve heard you can get help in Boston. I was near Syracuse New York & got mocked. Heavy metal detox with integrative medicine doctor helped tremendously. And switching to distilled water, as much non gmo food as possible.
saw a program about morgellons about 15 years ago about case in young boy whose mother submitted fibers to FBI database to identify/match to known fibers and they were unable to match. was very curious about this and tried to discuss this with my dermatologist who dismissed this as a psychological issue… maybe this was the first time realized that doctors were not curious and just wanted their job to be as easy as possible = no hard questions OR questions without answers.
Glad you inquired. & started questioning the establishment. I wonder if we have genetically modified parasites now. Harold Vella Kutz has many talks on it but he’s very soft spoken.
will have to look into Harold Vella Kurtz.
nothing surprises anymore.
also like outraged human Substack on environmental toxins:
https://outraged.substack.com/
Great substack, thanks for sharing here.
I've brought your podcast with Latypova to the attention of Robert Barnes. He is preoccupied with the post midterms right now but it will be interesting to get his take on it relative to the Brooke Jackson Qui Tam lawsuit.
Welcome new reader!
And thank you for posting about these issues on Barnes' Locals page.
Robert Barnes and the legal team working on Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case are already aware of these issues; I've been connected to her and Attorney Warner Mendenhall (who is on the team lead by Barnes) by email and writing about these issues in the context of her case for several weeks.
Related posts:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/please-pray-for-us-district-court
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/other-transactional-authority-ota
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/outline-for-writing-today
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/the-goal-is-getting-one-good-whistle
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/how-can-hhs-dod-and-dhs-be-foreign
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/jackson-v-pfizer-ventavia-icon-barnes
So it appears that he hasn't responded yet correct?
Prototypes are not meant for mass production but rather for demonstration of concept and testing and later in small mfg lots.
True, but Katherine seems to be saying that the word "prototype" was chosen as a way of skirting any applicable regulations that would have applied to traditional medical treatments including devices and immunizations. In her discussion with Sasha, she touched on it but said she would like to research the origin/meaning of the term in more detail. What she has uncovered is an extremely elaborate method of obfuscating any and all responsibility using a heretofore unheard-of degree of legalese if I understand her properly. I would be interested in hearing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s take on this material.
RFK Jr. also knows about these issues; I'm in contact with lawyers who have presented it to him and other CHD attorneys. They're not interested so far.
CHD is still stuck in the regulatory-capture, pharmaceutical-profiteering framework.
They're not ready to look closely at Congressional/US Government sponsorship of the campaign as components of DOD/HHS chemical and biological warfare program.
Question I got on my page, and my response:
"Why is Malone given such endorsement on CHD?"
-----
I'll do you one better.
Why does RFK, Jr. in Real Anthony Fauci Movie frame the WHO as the entity trying to force through pandemic amendments and not say that HHS proposed them, per Malone himself?
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/dr-robert-malone-and-bret-weinstein
That's really unfortunate. There must be no impediment to following the evidence wherever it leads, which your work seems to suggest was an off-shore concerted attempt to have all the pieces in place for when the requisite technology became available to do the deed. Multiple presidents, congresses, under both parties, all pulled in the same direction which was contrary to the constitution and the interests and rights of the people. To what extent the implications of what they were doing were understood by those who participated is difficult to assess given that hundreds if not thousands of people were involved over the years. My current view is that it was directed by high-level (unnamed) globalists. Clearly, the NWO/OWG cadre has been the major beneficiary.
Actually it's Robert Barnes that needs to see this because he's working with Mendenhall on the Brooke Jackson case. I posted this on his locals channel so he will see it soon.
Yes they attempted to do that but the OTA was meant for weapons systems or equipment used by military personnel not the public at large. I know they're trying to circumnavigate that with HHS but she is right that congress did not have the right to give that power away. My guess is that this ends up in the USSC.