105 Comments

I have read you several times saying “Divinely inspired” WRT the American constitution. Have you written an article fleshing our what you mean by this? BTW I may agree😉...

Expand full comment
author
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023Author

No, I’ve never done a post specifically on that topic.

I just agree with those who have made arguments to that effect, because it’s become clear to me that adherence to principles protected by the Constitution would have interfered with the rollout of the cull so far, and recourse/restoration of those principles can help us move past this point and back to legitimate government. And that that’s why the globalists have worked so hard to suppress Constitutional governance structures and loyalty among populations. The US Constitution is an obstacle they need to discredit and destroy, to get where they’re trying to go.

One of the people who said it in recent years (not the only person, by far) was Dr. Zelenko before he passed away last year. I also put a lot of weight on the observations of people who have left socialist, communist or other totalitarian countries, and come to the US, because they have a deep experiential understanding of the results of not having foundational legal principles protecting human moral integrity, that born-and-raised Americans usually don’t have.

I just looked for a citation to Zelenko’s statements on the subject - the one I remember best related to second amendment — but I can’t find a report or video link at the moment.

Update - someone sent me the link and that the constitution comment is at timestamp 18:42

https://rumble.com/vstm52-dr.-zelenko-exposing-the-medical-fraud-of-the-globalist-great-reset.html

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023Liked by Katherine Watt

I agree with your sentiment regarding:

“I also put a lot of weight on the observations of people who have left socialist, communist or other totalitarian countries, and come to the US, because they have a deep experiential understanding of the results of not having foundational legal principles protecting human moral integrity...”

I’ve met many people in Michigan from communist/socialist countries who are quick to call out what they see happening here. They left their homelands to live in the USA and know exactly what the unchecked oppression looks and feels like...they say we are staring down the barrel of that gun right now. We must stand up and reclaim our sovereignty at all costs or devolve into a dystopian slave-state often depicted in sci-fi/fantasy films.

Expand full comment

In central Florida, many Cuban immigrants say similar.

Expand full comment

Hate to break it to you, Katherine, but Zelenko was Chabad Lubavitch who would then adhere to the Talmudic Noahide laws. Lots more I could say but you can do your own deep dive.

Might want to start here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/house-joint-resolution/104/text

Expand full comment

sunny, I’ve not pulled up your link yet, but are you saying that Zelenko was not our friend or may have been controlled opp? Because I’ve heard that before. If so, ☹️

Expand full comment

I have not and a lot of people would be up in arms to even hear that.

Expand full comment

They are not globalists, they are globacidist!

Expand full comment

Katherine since I have discovered you and Sasha Latypova I cannot get enough of either one of you. Thank you for in your.  You two together are a force to be reckoned with.  Please keep up the superlative work and God bless you. 

Expand full comment

Second that. Thank You.

Expand full comment

Blessed by them!

Expand full comment

LEGISLATURE

I am an attorney, and whether you like attorneys or not, I can tell you that Katherine Watt has CORRECTLY located the laws that Congress has (unfortunately) passed, and she has analyzed these laws correctly.

EXECUTIVE

Katherine has also CORRECTLY located the Executive Orders, and how the HHS, and Department of Defense have gotten away with all this, and she has analyzed them correctly.

JUDICIARY

And, lastly, Katherine has CORRECTLY located the recent prohibitions of the Judiciary, and she has analyzed correctly how these acts keep the Courts from holding the tyrants accountable.

Expand full comment

IMHO, it is impossible to overestimate the value of what she has provided.

Expand full comment

And everyone needs to see that this is the intended model at the state and international level as well. California came SO VERY CLOSE to implementing a similar set of laws - we still have a new law that punishes doctors who say anything against the "vaccine". I'm sure it will be shot down in the courts, but there was a HUGE push to try to rush through a number of laws, nearly all of them sponsored by an outgoing radical and power-hungry state senator named "Richard Pan". (see https://web.archive.org/web/20221208203001/https://theunityproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Bad-Bill-Flyer-UPDATE.pdf )

And current HHS secretary Xavier Beccera was there in the early stages as the state's AG.

And now the WHO is trying to grab the same power at the world-wide level.

Expand full comment
author
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Author

This is so clearly written. Thank you.

I am surprised that Florida and Alaska are two of the three states that already have the Turning Point Model Health Act, (that seeks to make emergency health powers permanent and eliminate constitutional rights.) We'll see what happens.

My own state, Washington, is another one of the three. That does not surprise me. 😬

Expand full comment
author

I accidentally put the same link twice in that reply above. Have corrected it.

The second link:

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/forced-internment-on-communicable

includes information that 48 states have some version of the model health/police state laws.

Expand full comment

Katherine

I listened to the Rumble video from the first link with Maria Zee and Todd Calender.

Who can tell me specifically how to "get involved locally," who to contact, what to do first, second, etc, to try to replace county, city, and state judges that Maria and Todd said volunteers would be so helpful in doing?

Expand full comment
author

I can't remember exactly what Todd said in that interview, but if he was referring to the Five Small Stones campaign, here are two starting points:

https://5smallstones.com/medical-integrity/

https://5smallstones.wordpress.com/templates/

I worked with another person to set up the first site, and it has a lot of useful material but ended up more complex (included election materials) and visually overwhelming.

I set up the second site myself, to offer a site that's less cluttered and is focused entirely on self-help legal tools for Covid crime victims.

I planned to draft some more templates for the "moderately difficult" state civil complaint collection -- mostly dealing with medical malpractice and wrongful death claims related to hospital death protocols and lethal injections.

But I haven't had time to do that. If you are interested in helping draft some more templates, please email me at kgwatt@protonmail.com and I can send you more info about what needs to be done.

Expand full comment

These materials look helpful. I'll start taking a look at them definitely a whole lot than most would have and a big time saver. I don't think the materials in either link are overwhelming.

I do have a question: Do you have the names and contact info for a few others who have been using these Complaints, letters, etc that might be willing to talk and share any of their experiences, tips for using them, perhaps pitfalls to avoid, and just generally moving through the system? Someone , perhaps, who could be called from time to time, so as to not reinvent the wheel?

Expand full comment
author

No, I don’t have such a list.

One reason for setting it up for self-help is because there aren’t enough lawyers and paralegals to handle the massive case load. Another reason is to keep it as a decentralized movement and so more difficult for the criminals to interfere with.

Expand full comment

Is there anyway anything that can be done?

Am not an attorney…

Rumors of military tribunals is the only way.

Options

We are just going to allow the slow or fast kill to continue bc we are subjected to laws that prevent us from doing anything?

Options

???

Ideas??

Expand full comment
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by Katherine Watt

Well, Congress could pass some laws. For example, they could pass a law that changes who can announce that we're under an "Emergency," whom currently is only the President (and right now the head of Health and Human Services (HHS.) However, the President can Veto laws that Congress passes and I think Biden would use his veto because he is in on all if this. He wants to keep the power to declare Emergencies, and in fact, truthfully, it is typical for the President to keep that power. We just haven't had a President before who would abuse that power.

So, why does President Biden continue to extend the Emergency every few months like he just did, even though he recently said on TV that the Pandemic is over? And why hasn't the Democrat-ruled Congress done something? Can the Congress do something now that the Republicans "have the House?" And why don't the Republicans in Congress or the Senate do something to fix this situation?

We have found out that in 2012, the Department of Defense began making the Covid "vaccines" that we have now for Covid 19 (SARS CoV II.)

In 2014, Congress passed the "Cures Act." It sounded helpful on its face, but it was confusing, and probably many in Congress never read it, and didn't understand what it would allow to happen.

For example, the Cures Act gave a great deal of power to the HHS to let them decide when we had a health emergency. It also said that medicines that had not been approved for the exact medical problem occurring could not be prescribed.

That law has hurt us, because it allows the government to say that we couldn't have any Hydroxychloriquine or Ivermectin to help us with Covid -- because they "haven't been approved for Covid and may not be safe," even though Hydroxychloriquine and Ivermectin have been used safely for decades. Big Pharma does not want us to get inexpensive Hydroxychloriquine and Ivermectin, when they can charge upwards of a hundred times that for some of their still-under-an-active-patent "treatments" (that by the way, didn't work and were not safe.)

Who knew that the protective-sounding law, the Cures Act, would be used to hurt us?

We're also pretty sure that some people in Congress, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumar, Mitch McConnell, to name a few, understood exactly what was going on. We also are pretty sure that any of our Congress men and women who did have the courage to stand up and ask why they weren't changing the laws or enacting new ones to protect us, were silenced rather quickly.

You see, it was known by enough people from the very beginning that if only people who had Covid could get Hydroxychloriquine or Ivermectin, and take it in the early to mid time of a Covid infection, they would not die, and would not even have to go to the hospital. But, the government would not let anyone get Hydroxychloriquine or Ivermectin, but, of course, they allowed the members of Congress, our Legislature, to get them.

Also, when it came time to take the "vaccine," the government told Congress (and other employees of the government), and all the federal and state judges, that they were all exempt from having to take the vaccine. From that, Congress and the Judiciary knew something was wrong with the "vaccine." But, as you know, most of We the People were given the choice to either take the "vaccine" or lose our jobs and our pensions.

So, the Executive branch of our government "bought off" the Congress and the judges so they would not interfere. Sadly, and almost unbelievably, no one in Congress or the Judiciary stood up and helped us. They must have realized by that point that this whole thing was much bigger than we ever could have thought -- much bigger than the U.S. government. And, indeed it was. This was and is part of a world-wide plan that involves some sinister people and groups.

Obviously, our Congress and our Judiciary must have been very afraid to say anything and oppose these forces, and some, I guess, just didn't care. Others, I'm sure, had already been compromised by past actions illegal acts. So, they were blackmailed, and weren't going to risk jail and the loss of their family.

When some people sued and tried to get the Courts to hold the government accountable, and to make rulings that would not allow all of this to continue, the Courts did not or could not help. They, too, were scared to stand up. They threw out cases, refusing to "hear" them, or they just decided the cases in favor of the government. Sometimes they legitimately had to decide them in favor of the government or other group because of the laws that had been surreptitiously been passed. So, we haven't had much help from the Judiciary.

In my opinion, when Trump lost the 2020 election, (almost surely by the Democrats cheating, with some other groups involved in it, too), We the People lost many of our rights, most importantly free speech. We were told to keep on wearing masks, staying six feet away from others, that we couldn't keep getting routine check ups, or screening tests, or even have medical procedures that we really needed. We couldn't go to church, or go to weddings or funerals, our neighborhood parks' outdoor swing sets and slides were wrapped in yellow crime scene-tape, our kids had to learn to school at home, and we saw elementary soccer teams trying to run outdoors with masks on. My daughter even had to go through hours of labor and the process of giving birth with a mask on -- hospital rules! But we didn't understand, we were gaslit, and confused, we wanted to help out society, we were still scared of the Pandemic, and too scared to disobey, so we went along with it.

Very few of us were willing to stand up to the government and say, "No, I won't keep doing this." Those who did stand up, were usually punished pretty badly for it. Arrests, jail, fines, and some doctors' and nurses' rights to keep practicing medicine were taken away by medical boards, who had no right to do so.

I think people were scared that they would be treated like the Jan. 6ers, put in solitary in a small cell in the DC Gulag, and with no right to a trial. I think that discouraged protests. We never thought that things would keep getting worse, and it was very difficult to believe that our own government would ever do anything this nefarious to us. So we told ourselves that maybe we were just not understanding things correctly. We were "gaslit" into thinking that we were wrong.

So, you were asking, what are our options? Petsonally, I believe that the best option is what is happening -- doctors, lawyers, people who were vaccine-injured, and people from all walks of life, are standing up and explaining how the "vaccines" are killing and disabling people.

True, it is difficult to get the word out, with social media canceling accounts of people trying to spread the truth, and our heroes losing the rights to practice their own professions, and being ridiculed.

However, I believe the tide has turned, and the truth is beginning to reach so many people, that before long, enough of We the People will stand up and just refuse to go along with any more "vaccines" or other harms. We will begin to gut many parts of our government to reestablish our Constitutional Republic.

While we have already lost many friends and loved ones, and many are living with serious adverse events and disabilities, we ARE winning. We can get Hydroxychloriquine and Ivermectin from some U.S. pharmacies, now, as well as from India, and we're learning more and more about "detoxing" from the "vaccines."

We will win. It's just a matter of how long it will take for enough people to wake up and realize that they were deceived.

You mentioned the military. Remember how the DoD made our troops either take the "vaccine" or leave the military, often with a

"less than honorable" discharge, and with loss of their retirement and medical benefits? The "vaccine" is medically harming our military. They are not as strong. They started losing so many people that they had to eliminate the requirement that new recruits had to finish high school. The military lost those who were willing to stand up and do the right thing -- those that would have probably "fought for us." At this point in time, thpugh, the military is just not strong enough to help us.

Our heroes, though, are many, and more and more good is happening. People are refusing to take the "vaccines." We have more "America First" Representatives and Senators in Congress who won't just go along with the Uniparty, and I see some Judiciary positives. We have to keep supporting our heroes, and keep fighting the good fight, remembering that we are Americans, and like our forefathers, we will prevail.

Expand full comment

Thank you for taking the time to write this summary.

Expand full comment

🙏🌹❤️🙏

Expand full comment

Thanks Jennifer. Well stated!! Nice summary.

Expand full comment

Katherine, very well written. I am curious as to whether you have read what is at this link: https://www.newshawknetwork.com/united-state-history-constitution/dc-organic-act-1871-changed-everything/ It does have a couple of typos, at least they appear to be but maybe they were trying to indicate something else. A while back now I took an oath to defend and protect the Constitution and I still honor that to this day. At the time I did not know there were two Constitutions; the Constitution for the United States of America (1787) and the Constitution of the United States of America (circa 1871). Just for the record my oath is to the first one because that is what I believed I was pledging it to. Also, you might want to look at this link: https://expose-news.com/2022/11/16/why-are-names-on-birth-certificates-in-all-caps/ as I believe it lends credence to the first link. I am interested in your opinion regarding these articles. There is always a way to use "their" system against them. I have more to say but I will leave it there for now.

Expand full comment
author

Question: Since the states brought the Federal Government into existence by ratifying the Original 1787-89 Constitution don't they still have the same power today to put it back like it was before it was usurped?

Expand full comment

I have been following your writings since June 2022 when you did the Dr. Ruby interview. I went through the posts you have listed above as a refresher and my own research confirms everything you wrote and what others you referenced have added. To me it says that everything they have done and put into "law" since Lincoln was president is illegal and they got away with it since no one questioned it which follows their playbook. All of the wars ever fought were setup to benefit the bankers using the hegelian dialect (Hegel a german professor established it), work both sides to make money. I believe from my research into what led up to the Civil War it set the stage for the secession to happen and because wars cost lots of money, to bankrupt the United States of America so they could come in and take over by loaning money to take control. I have read some articles which indicate there was some connection between Lincoln and the Rothchilds. To solve our current situation, all we have to do is find a way to resurrect the original Constitution and Government. It belongs to We the People and there are more of us than of them but we have to stand together. We need to find a way to inform everyone without causing an uprising because the bad guys will fight back.

Expand full comment

Nice Job Katherine. I'm seeing a lot of cognitive dissonance in the alternative media and forums about the issues you and Sasha have chronicled here in substack. Many are not yet willing to accept what's right in front of them.

Expand full comment

Good luck. I’m reading One Nation Under Blackmail Vol.1 by Whitney Webb and so far all I see is a massive web of corruption. To correct the issues that Katherine has so nicely laid out will be a generational undertaking.

Expand full comment

2007,11-27.i went to jail after charged with terrorism, thrown off my own counsel after ran against Gavin in SF killafornia for mayor.

Given zadik Shapiro as unwanted lawyer, he has a speech impediment. Lawfare. Months in solitary. IsoLa. Thanks ScKamala....vice.

2020, 3-11...

London Greed and Gavin locked up the whole freaking planet, especially killafornia.

Lawfare upon all.

Both London and Gavin party without masks middle of scamdemic.

London has high security guards to protect her jail.

Fake protests in city , no real outcry. No constitution. No mercy on our poor murdered souls.

Expand full comment

Don't forget the Vatican -- the 3rd leg of the evil.

Expand full comment

I recommend looking into the Awaken India Movement for guidance on how to proceed in the US. These people are very strong and they go after businesses, judges, politicians and Bill Gates! Here is a link to their telegram channel: https://t.me/awakenindiamovement/6186

Expand full comment

No, they can’t. They have and use the same energy. A new government will not solve a thing. No government is. We all have to return to small scale. That is the only solution.

Expand full comment

Congress failed to act after 9/11 and they will find reasons to fail with Covid. We are in extreme devolution

Expand full comment

The truth starts here Theft of a Nation by the Bench and Bar by Ralph Boryszewski and he wrote a smaller book called Treason. In 1995 He wrote The Constitution that never was. The word attorney and attorney general ARE NEVER MENTIONED in the Constitution. This is because they were the real enemy back then. Claude G Bowers books all support what Ralph brought out. The Tragic Era the Revolution after Lincoln is one of the first books I got by Claude. I found out about this book from a book from Eustance Mullins wrote called The Curse of the Canaan. We need to stop using the attorney Crown Lawyer written document called the Constitution as it was never we the Real Peoples document.

Ralph spent almost his entire life tying to wake the People up to the fraud that is the Crown Document.

He passed on to Father God at 103. Yes please people get these books to learn how the BAR has hijacked our Peoples courts. Think about this here in Washington republic the STATE does not "license"

any attorney. The BAR does and this is NOT a license at all it is a "union card" All over America these non entities are running around saying we the People can not represent ourselves on any issues. They are the RICO MONOPOLY that needs to be put on a Admiralty Ship and sent back to England where they all came from.

Expand full comment

The BAR as union card. Excellent analogy.

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023

Unless we have a quick mass awakening, the argument is futile.

The tragedy witnessed Monday night in the NFL, had to have a unsuspecting sacrificial lamb for 50 million that were watching to get the ambers lit within them.

We can't fix this!

The corruption is too deep and vast to overcome, into the states and private sector.

But we can try to unite both fronts and collectively ABOLISH the entire government.

This comes with the biggest personal sacrifice to every American that will not escape the ramifications of doing this.

ABOLISHING the government is like setting off the biggest EMP every imagined.

It will shut down everything dead in its tracks.

I can not see another viable alternative until the time to shed blood arrives?

Expand full comment

Katherine, agree with you wholeheartedly. However, being a solutions person and moving forward, the only way to beat, stop and fight this intolerance is to get involved either locally or professionally. When you see the power of fighters like Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert, it’s inspiring to know we do have fighters in the fight.

In order to stop tyrannical power grabbers, lawful guidelines need to be installed in each branch with an appointed watchdog group like Judicial Watch to have enforcement power to ensure this behavior is nipped in the butt and reprimanded at onset. Without a trusted (constantly vetted) watchdog group that can enforce Constitutional abuse, chaos will continue and The People will continue to feel they are powerless against these regime types. Until a watchdog force like this is implemented (with powers to hold those abusing power accountable), a continuous uphill battle will ensue with no end in sight.

Also, I believe it necessary that the Supreme Court needs its own enforcement team to secure and protect itself from threats and abuse.

Expand full comment

And what about the people? How does a nation whose vast majority lacks any capacity for indignation expect to survive?

Expand full comment

To take your analysis further is to determine the root cause of the coma. It is precisely what the negative entities (globalist = globacidist) have been forcing into use; fluoride, heavy metals and parasites. Are bodies are at war with these 3 things resulting in cognitive decline and this results in a docile state. AKA the coma you speak of. Everyone must detox and decrease consumption of toxins then the docile state will fade away and with it the coma.

Expand full comment

Katherine, The Brunson case is up for consideration at the Supreme Court now. The Brunson brothers have demonstrated how to fight back. Info here: https://7discoveries.com/ and here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

Thank you for all that you do. Your work is extremely important!

Expand full comment

That's a conference not a hearing. Please don't confuse people.

Expand full comment

Yes, however, please note, the chance a litigant's case is selected for a Supreme Court Conference is less than .1%, so this is quite remarkable for the Brunson Brothers.

Expand full comment

How does "up for consideration" equal a hearing? The Supreme Court considered whether or not to hear the Brunson case Friday, January 6th, 2023. We now await their decision re. to hear or not to hear the case.

Expand full comment

I believe one law could solve much of the problem, but Congress will never pass it. It would go something like this: "No rule of any agency shall have force of law. Rules shall be considered suggestions for Congress to consider through the normal legislative process."

Expand full comment