wa state needs to split. lived there for 30 years. left october 2019. little did we know what was coming. been back to visit family a few times and got accosted for not wearing a mask. dimslee stole that last election too. heard from many wa state residents there were very few signs supporting him. he also needs to be charged for murdering nursing home residents. evil.
Exactly. And they are purposely destroying CA, OR, and WA. Their focus is primarily on California, though. That's because California is the 7th largest economy in the ENTIRE WORLD. Yes, the 7th largest economy in the entire world.....and crucial to the over all economy of the United States. That is why they are trying so hard to destroy California.
Why do Latinos in California continue to vote so overwhelmingly for Dems? Shouldn't recent events make it clear to them that blacks are the minority with power in the Democratic Party?
I had an idea today. Someone had mentioned putting markers up ( flags or ribbons) to represent deaths from Covid vaccines. They are doing this in Europe, so I looked it up. The problem here is it wouldn’t last, or we would need a “ protest” permit, too much red tape to take up that much space in a park, etc.
So, what about ribbons around trees or anywhere? Like back in the war days,
But, maybe instead of yellow we do red, white & blue. The elite globalists hate our national pride and love for this country. They want us to be all one country under tyrant rule.
I think we show them, visually, that we will defend this country to the end. We can use yellow- but definitely not white. That’s a sign of surrender, and that won’t happen.
The ribbons can represent lost loved ones to the Covid vaccine. It can represent how strong we are & that we will not forget the last 3 years. Names can go on a larger ribbon or words “ we won’t forget”, on others. Or just plain, doesn’t matter. And if it really takes off, it would send a message nationwide & worldwide that we are done with the lies, the bioweapons, and continual fear- mongering, by these cowards. Mostly, it would represent the individuals, and their families that have paid the biggest price if all. And the deaths will continue, unfortunately, as will unknown side effects from these experiments in our bodies. We can’t wait any longer to do something.
I can get this to as many substacks as possible. And if others do the same, we can get this to go viral. It certainly can’t hurt. And letters to local papers, in the editorials, can explain the ribbons. When a lot are seen and duplicated, the message will be loud and clear. We can do this! What do you think?
I love the chalk idea but I live in drip, drip, drip, Seattle. Waterproof ribbon should work.
Also, painted rocks along paths or parks with Bioweapon victim’s names, etc. would make people pause. It’s time to get busy.
I am doing more. Thanks, for the encouragement. Most are writing words & that’s it. I just want someone to pause & think. Then when their friend dies from shot or their child, they might realize the connection.
EVERY state needs to oust ANY politicians with ties to the World Economic Forum. That includes Judges. The same goes for politicians, DA's, etc with any ties to George Soros.
I too left WA, it looked like and felt like ground zero to me, the Spring of 2020. Was a lovely place to be for a very long time, but it was definitely time to go. In hindsight one of my best "life" decisions and soooo grateful I could do it.
The 2005 IHR required WHO satellite offices in every nation, state, and region. Public Health offices are loyal and report to the who and do not represent the people. The way to the heart of this is to strike the legislation that adopted the initial 2005 WHO IHR treaty or have it declared null and void in a court. Thereby the amendments are immaterial. Foreign agents loyal to another power on US soil might do it.
Protections of the sovereign people (man or woman) clarified independent of any legislation:
• Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 May Term, 1796 – United States Supreme Court (pre-civil war) “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.”
• Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, 1803: “All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”*****
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491: “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”*****
• Hurtado v. People of the State of California, 110 US 516: “The state cannot diminish the rights of the people.”
• Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, 24: “The assertion of federal rights [Bill of Rights], when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.”*****
• Shere v. Cullen, 481 F 946: “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights.”
• Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356, 370: “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law.”
• “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, Sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” —supreme Court Decision, Woo Lee vs. Hopkins 118 U.S. 356
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny
or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Thank you for these references. I'm having difficulty finding the quotes in any of the search results. Are those quotes from the actual cases you've cited?
For the first example to reference: Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, 1803: “All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."
https://casetext.com/case/marbury-v-madison - Actual case opinion. I recommend reading the entire opinion. It covers many things including jurisdiction of congress, the supreme court, appellate courts, and government in its function and who is supreme (the people creating it - section 176 and 177). This jurisdiction is covered quite well in section 148 and then again much later in the opinion regarding the distinction of common law, maritime and admiralty law.
The first statement confirming constitutional restrictions from this opinion is as follows:
"Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and, consequently, the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void."
Further in the opinion and closing:
"Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?
If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or, to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.
It is also not entirely unworthy of observation, that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the constitution, have that rank.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.
The rule must be discharged." (meaning the rule in conflict with this tenant)
In addition, early in the opinion, there is the distinct clarification of jurisdiction in the application of maritime and admiralty law in district courts. It is as follows:
"Congress, by a law passed at the very first session after the adoption of the constitution, vol. 1. p. 58. s. 13. have expressly given the supreme court the power of issuing writs of mandamus. The words are, "the supreme court shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts, and courts of the several states, in the cases hereinafter specifically provided for; and shall have power to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts, when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; and writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States."
This is an important distinction that maritime and admiralty law applies to the territorial and municipal government (DC and municipality) in the enumerated duties of the constitution because the respective courts are inherently for territorial and international commerce. These foreign courts (maritime and admiralty) are not what we are to use in local, county and state courts as these are for the people. Hence, the jurisdiction clarification. But, that has been abused through BAR attorneys and other foreign corporate legal fictions since about 1939.
I may add an article to my Substack for this purpose to help clarify as it is a hinge point to understand where people and the legal system has gone off the rails.
I m not from the US, but what I just read is the most significant thing that the people of the world must follow. Thank you from Germany and elsewhere. God bless
This is a fallacy, in my opinion. For my entire life, the U.S. federal government has implemented unConstitutional policies and mandates by threat to withhold money to states. That ability and willingness manipulates officials into actions that turn into habits that become de facto laws.
Break the fiscal dependency. Give back the federal bribes. Independent, fiscally sound states are what breaks the cycle.
States need to stop sending money to the federal government. States send the tax money they collect to the federal government, then the federal government holds those funds hostage unless the state complies with often unconstitutional policies and mandates. The states and states rights is how we take back control from this out of control federal government.
Yes it has because the people are sheep. Turn de facto into de jure. States don't have to accept the Education Department's money then do its curriculum. They can say no thank you and do their own, but no, sheep again, That's just one example.
Energy is conserved when it is directed towards something rather than opposing something the individual states have to form their own bank like either north or South Dakota Ellen brown spells out simple solutions
I don't know much about the laws implementation in the US but what for sure I know is everywhere, is the the same BS. It's just, we are gouverne by unfit, weak people, who knows they are, and try to survive by implementing rules that suits them. And the problem is, they are the many.
I don't know that much myself, but I do know that we are at least 50 times as many as the government and there still is a gun behind every blade of grass.
the whole world needs to do this and to arrest every single individual who acted or enabled this historical tragedy to occur MUST be held accountable for high(est) crimes
Every State needs to do this. Am sending it to my State Senators and Reps. Katherine, could you write an addendum that the state will not recognize any Central Bank Programmable Digital Currency, nor allow any bank currenctly operating in the state to also traffic in them? And heretofore are taking back their power to create a state bank. and a state currency?
Find your legs and your voice (yes, we all have one and its not confined to select groups), stand up and demand to be rid of WHO tyranny in New Zealand, Canada and Australia.
I had an idea today. Someone had mentioned putting markers up ( flags or ribbons) to represent deaths from Covid vaccines. They are doing this in Europe, so I looked it up. The problem here is it wouldn’t last, or we would need a “ protest” permit, too much red tape to take up that much space in a park, etc.
So, what about ribbons around trees or anywhere? Like back in the war days,
But, maybe instead of yellow we do red, white & blue. The elite globalists hate our national pride and love for this country. They want us to be all one country under tyrant rule.
I think we show them, visually, that we will defend this country to the end. We can use yellow- but definitely not white. That’s a sign of surrender, and that won’t happen.
The ribbons can represent lost loved ones to the Covid vaccine. It can represent how strong we are & that we will not forget the last 3 years. Names can go on a larger ribbon or words “ we won’t forget”, on others. Or just plain, doesn’t matter. And if it really takes off, it would send a message nationwide & worldwide that we are done with the lies, the bioweapons, and continual fear- mongering, by these cowards. Mostly, it would represent the individuals, and their families that have paid the biggest price if all. And the deaths will continue, unfortunately, as will unknown side effects from these experiments in our bodies. We can’t wait any longer to do something.
I can get this to as many substacks as possible. And if others do the same, we can get this to go viral. It certainly can’t hurt. And letters to local papers, in the editorials, can explain the ribbons. When a lot are seen and duplicated, the message will be loud and clear. We can do this! What do you think?
I love the chalk idea but I live in drip, drip, drip, Seattle. Waterproof ribbon should work.
Also, painted rocks along paths or parks with Bioweapon victim’s names, etc. would make people pause. It’s time to get busy.
Piggybacking on your thought, some sort of recognition pin would help those of us in the medical freedom/ personal sovereignty movement recognize one another. (Just a thought.)
I was thrilled to see this news about Wyoming. So, if we can kick CDC and WHO out, can we also work to rescind or severely limit the power of the HHS secretary? Undo PREP? Will the restoration of liberty have to be done piecemeal as the Wyoming legislation suggests?
That these traitors -- the women who wrote that report can say with their faces hanging out, as it were, this: “During the COVID-19 pandemic, some politicians weaponized constitutional rights in state legislatures to push for limitations on public health measures..." tells us that traitors to Natural Law, the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and God are 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 in this country. And they include most especially, it seems, the "loi-yers"
Listen, 𝒈𝒊𝒓𝒍𝒔, they're not "constitutional rights." They're inherent rights that every single human being on Earth possesses and the Declaration of Independence says are off-limits and the Constitution is supposed to protect -- from the likes of you.
As you correctly point out, Katherine, "public health" is state-run bioterrorism. Did anyone seriously think it could lead anywhere else? As I've said for a long time, there ain't no such thing as "public health." There is only individual health. But not to collectivists and other power-hungry freaks.
Not exactly, there is US Inc-DC and then USA-us with Brandon thinking he matters to us. I don't know about any of you, but I pay no attention to the illegitimate crime spree goofballs.
I just sent that bill link to everyone I could think of in 30 seconds. Thank you for sharing! I think it's especially helpful when someone else has already written the bill up and they can essentially copy/paste it, haha. Maybe someone will listen and do something similar here in AL. Eternally grateful for your work.
STAND UP EVERY SINGLE STATE! Thank you Katherine !
I agree that all states should follow Wyoming's lead.
Fat chance in Commiefornia
Coastal states, you're right.
STAND UP Washington State!
wa state needs to split. lived there for 30 years. left october 2019. little did we know what was coming. been back to visit family a few times and got accosted for not wearing a mask. dimslee stole that last election too. heard from many wa state residents there were very few signs supporting him. he also needs to be charged for murdering nursing home residents. evil.
The Governor of Washington State, Jay Inslee, is a member of the World Economic Forum.
As is the whole West Coast
Exactly. And they are purposely destroying CA, OR, and WA. Their focus is primarily on California, though. That's because California is the 7th largest economy in the ENTIRE WORLD. Yes, the 7th largest economy in the entire world.....and crucial to the over all economy of the United States. That is why they are trying so hard to destroy California.
Absolutely.
NY spread to California in the 60’s and 70’s.
That infection has metastasized.
Time for the Cancer to be cut out.
Just read Jen Newsom just produced a porn video for children’s schools.
Weiner , Newsoms , Shiff , Eric. So many of them are nothing more than blackmailed treasonous perverts.
Why do Latinos in California continue to vote so overwhelmingly for Dems? Shouldn't recent events make it clear to them that blacks are the minority with power in the Democratic Party?
The only thing is, Oregon isn't a part of the US anymore. It has its own sovereignty. They went to SCOTUS for that.
How so?
Gov Brown was a disaster.
Kotex was installed
I had an idea today. Someone had mentioned putting markers up ( flags or ribbons) to represent deaths from Covid vaccines. They are doing this in Europe, so I looked it up. The problem here is it wouldn’t last, or we would need a “ protest” permit, too much red tape to take up that much space in a park, etc.
So, what about ribbons around trees or anywhere? Like back in the war days,
https://wp.yellowribbonamerica.org/history-of-the-yellow-ribbon/
But, maybe instead of yellow we do red, white & blue. The elite globalists hate our national pride and love for this country. They want us to be all one country under tyrant rule.
I think we show them, visually, that we will defend this country to the end. We can use yellow- but definitely not white. That’s a sign of surrender, and that won’t happen.
The ribbons can represent lost loved ones to the Covid vaccine. It can represent how strong we are & that we will not forget the last 3 years. Names can go on a larger ribbon or words “ we won’t forget”, on others. Or just plain, doesn’t matter. And if it really takes off, it would send a message nationwide & worldwide that we are done with the lies, the bioweapons, and continual fear- mongering, by these cowards. Mostly, it would represent the individuals, and their families that have paid the biggest price if all. And the deaths will continue, unfortunately, as will unknown side effects from these experiments in our bodies. We can’t wait any longer to do something.
I can get this to as many substacks as possible. And if others do the same, we can get this to go viral. It certainly can’t hurt. And letters to local papers, in the editorials, can explain the ribbons. When a lot are seen and duplicated, the message will be loud and clear. We can do this! What do you think?
I love the chalk idea but I live in drip, drip, drip, Seattle. Waterproof ribbon should work.
Also, painted rocks along paths or parks with Bioweapon victim’s names, etc. would make people pause. It’s time to get busy.
“Stop the Shot” on the ribbons and “We Won’t Forget” 🔥😢
need to do more than ribbons and rock painting. they will laugh and this while they continue to murder our people. need to think outside the box.
I am doing more. Thanks, for the encouragement. Most are writing words & that’s it. I just want someone to pause & think. Then when their friend dies from shot or their child, they might realize the connection.
so sad. some folks have trouble admitting they were conned. we left WA state October 2019. Little did we know. stay safe my friend.
yes
EVERY state needs to oust ANY politicians with ties to the World Economic Forum. That includes Judges. The same goes for politicians, DA's, etc with any ties to George Soros.
How????
Sheriffs have the power to arrest any politician for treason.
Time for sheriffs to do their job
And when I say OUST, I DO NOT mean by voting. These people control our election process with Dominion voting machines, etc
Bullets are pretty final.
this is old news, but "just sayin'". Don't know what happened if anything with this lawsuit.
https://nationalfile.com/citizens-sue-jay-inslee-whose-daughter-in-law-works-for-gates-foundation/
I too left WA, it looked like and felt like ground zero to me, the Spring of 2020. Was a lovely place to be for a very long time, but it was definitely time to go. In hindsight one of my best "life" decisions and soooo grateful I could do it.
can i ask where you moved to?
Pardon my French, but...
Phuck Inslee.
Lost cause, I'm sorry to say.
Thanks Katherine:
The 2005 IHR required WHO satellite offices in every nation, state, and region. Public Health offices are loyal and report to the who and do not represent the people. The way to the heart of this is to strike the legislation that adopted the initial 2005 WHO IHR treaty or have it declared null and void in a court. Thereby the amendments are immaterial. Foreign agents loyal to another power on US soil might do it.
I'd love it, but it won't happen in Ohio. DeWine is a pussy, I've held him at gunpoint simply to open the state..
Protections of the sovereign people (man or woman) clarified independent of any legislation:
• Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 May Term, 1796 – United States Supreme Court (pre-civil war) “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.”
• Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, 1803: “All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”*****
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491: “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”*****
• Hurtado v. People of the State of California, 110 US 516: “The state cannot diminish the rights of the people.”
• Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, 24: “The assertion of federal rights [Bill of Rights], when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.”*****
• Shere v. Cullen, 481 F 946: “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights.”
• Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356, 370: “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law.”
• “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, Sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” —supreme Court Decision, Woo Lee vs. Hopkins 118 U.S. 356
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny
or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
And of course the first amendment upon which all the others depend....
I’d say the 2nd
Repugnant to the Constitution means the entire left.
Thank you for these references. I'm having difficulty finding the quotes in any of the search results. Are those quotes from the actual cases you've cited?
For the first example to reference: Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, 1803: “All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."
https://casetext.com/case/marbury-v-madison - Actual case opinion. I recommend reading the entire opinion. It covers many things including jurisdiction of congress, the supreme court, appellate courts, and government in its function and who is supreme (the people creating it - section 176 and 177). This jurisdiction is covered quite well in section 148 and then again much later in the opinion regarding the distinction of common law, maritime and admiralty law.
The first statement confirming constitutional restrictions from this opinion is as follows:
"Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and, consequently, the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void."
Further in the opinion and closing:
"Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?
If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or, to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.
It is also not entirely unworthy of observation, that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the constitution, have that rank.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.
The rule must be discharged." (meaning the rule in conflict with this tenant)
In addition, early in the opinion, there is the distinct clarification of jurisdiction in the application of maritime and admiralty law in district courts. It is as follows:
"Congress, by a law passed at the very first session after the adoption of the constitution, vol. 1. p. 58. s. 13. have expressly given the supreme court the power of issuing writs of mandamus. The words are, "the supreme court shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts, and courts of the several states, in the cases hereinafter specifically provided for; and shall have power to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts, when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; and writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States."
This is an important distinction that maritime and admiralty law applies to the territorial and municipal government (DC and municipality) in the enumerated duties of the constitution because the respective courts are inherently for territorial and international commerce. These foreign courts (maritime and admiralty) are not what we are to use in local, county and state courts as these are for the people. Hence, the jurisdiction clarification. But, that has been abused through BAR attorneys and other foreign corporate legal fictions since about 1939.
I may add an article to my Substack for this purpose to help clarify as it is a hinge point to understand where people and the legal system has gone off the rails.
https://shirenews.substack.com/
I m not from the US, but what I just read is the most significant thing that the people of the world must follow. Thank you from Germany and elsewhere. God bless
So easy to do. Just don't comply.
This is a fallacy, in my opinion. For my entire life, the U.S. federal government has implemented unConstitutional policies and mandates by threat to withhold money to states. That ability and willingness manipulates officials into actions that turn into habits that become de facto laws.
Break the fiscal dependency. Give back the federal bribes. Independent, fiscally sound states are what breaks the cycle.
States need to stop sending money to the federal government. States send the tax money they collect to the federal government, then the federal government holds those funds hostage unless the state complies with often unconstitutional policies and mandates. The states and states rights is how we take back control from this out of control federal government.
You are so right! Bribery by the federal government has got to be denied!
Yes it has because the people are sheep. Turn de facto into de jure. States don't have to accept the Education Department's money then do its curriculum. They can say no thank you and do their own, but no, sheep again, That's just one example.
Energy is conserved when it is directed towards something rather than opposing something the individual states have to form their own bank like either north or South Dakota Ellen brown spells out simple solutions
I don't know much about the laws implementation in the US but what for sure I know is everywhere, is the the same BS. It's just, we are gouverne by unfit, weak people, who knows they are, and try to survive by implementing rules that suits them. And the problem is, they are the many.
I don't know that much myself, but I do know that we are at least 50 times as many as the government and there still is a gun behind every blade of grass.
Needs the strength of numbers
the whole world needs to do this and to arrest every single individual who acted or enabled this historical tragedy to occur MUST be held accountable for high(est) crimes
I'll post this up on locals to get the attention of the Viva Barnes crowd.
Looks like it got his attention.
I'll post link or clip of the livestream happening now.
Every State needs to do this. Am sending it to my State Senators and Reps. Katherine, could you write an addendum that the state will not recognize any Central Bank Programmable Digital Currency, nor allow any bank currenctly operating in the state to also traffic in them? And heretofore are taking back their power to create a state bank. and a state currency?
Find your legs and your voice (yes, we all have one and its not confined to select groups), stand up and demand to be rid of WHO tyranny in New Zealand, Canada and Australia.
Wyoming residents should kick the Jackson Holes all the way to Canada.
We don’t need anymore WEF puppets in Canada... we’re full.
Sorry I should have said the Mojave Desert or the Pacific Ocean :/
Displace them with an anti-Davos
Jordan Peterson's Proposal for Alternative to World Economic Forum
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/jordan-petersons-proposal-for-alternative
Spectacular!
I had an idea today. Someone had mentioned putting markers up ( flags or ribbons) to represent deaths from Covid vaccines. They are doing this in Europe, so I looked it up. The problem here is it wouldn’t last, or we would need a “ protest” permit, too much red tape to take up that much space in a park, etc.
So, what about ribbons around trees or anywhere? Like back in the war days,
https://wp.yellowribbonamerica.org/history-of-the-yellow-ribbon/
But, maybe instead of yellow we do red, white & blue. The elite globalists hate our national pride and love for this country. They want us to be all one country under tyrant rule.
I think we show them, visually, that we will defend this country to the end. We can use yellow- but definitely not white. That’s a sign of surrender, and that won’t happen.
The ribbons can represent lost loved ones to the Covid vaccine. It can represent how strong we are & that we will not forget the last 3 years. Names can go on a larger ribbon or words “ we won’t forget”, on others. Or just plain, doesn’t matter. And if it really takes off, it would send a message nationwide & worldwide that we are done with the lies, the bioweapons, and continual fear- mongering, by these cowards. Mostly, it would represent the individuals, and their families that have paid the biggest price if all. And the deaths will continue, unfortunately, as will unknown side effects from these experiments in our bodies. We can’t wait any longer to do something.
I can get this to as many substacks as possible. And if others do the same, we can get this to go viral. It certainly can’t hurt. And letters to local papers, in the editorials, can explain the ribbons. When a lot are seen and duplicated, the message will be loud and clear. We can do this! What do you think?
I love the chalk idea but I live in drip, drip, drip, Seattle. Waterproof ribbon should work.
Also, painted rocks along paths or parks with Bioweapon victim’s names, etc. would make people pause. It’s time to get busy.
Piggybacking on your thought, some sort of recognition pin would help those of us in the medical freedom/ personal sovereignty movement recognize one another. (Just a thought.)
I was thrilled to see this news about Wyoming. So, if we can kick CDC and WHO out, can we also work to rescind or severely limit the power of the HHS secretary? Undo PREP? Will the restoration of liberty have to be done piecemeal as the Wyoming legislation suggests?
That these traitors -- the women who wrote that report can say with their faces hanging out, as it were, this: “During the COVID-19 pandemic, some politicians weaponized constitutional rights in state legislatures to push for limitations on public health measures..." tells us that traitors to Natural Law, the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and God are 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 in this country. And they include most especially, it seems, the "loi-yers"
"...'weaponized' constitutional rights..."??? Stunning.
Listen, 𝒈𝒊𝒓𝒍𝒔, they're not "constitutional rights." They're inherent rights that every single human being on Earth possesses and the Declaration of Independence says are off-limits and the Constitution is supposed to protect -- from the likes of you.
As you correctly point out, Katherine, "public health" is state-run bioterrorism. Did anyone seriously think it could lead anywhere else? As I've said for a long time, there ain't no such thing as "public health." There is only individual health. But not to collectivists and other power-hungry freaks.
Sorry, Katherine...Venting...
"Prohibitions on Proof of Vaccination and Vaccine Mandates"
We really need to expand our laws. As soon as we call them vaccines and stop that, they're rename or reclassify them as something else.
"Prohibitions on Proof or Mandate of any Medical Condition or Procedure or Status"
FTFY
One of the premises should be--but likely isn't--the illegitimacy of the US Corporation which is currently pretending to be the United States of America, thereby rending all laws and treaties enacted by this body as null and void. https://coloradopublicbanking.blogspot.com/2022/05/un-pandemic-treaty-invalid-us-is-not.html
Not exactly, there is US Inc-DC and then USA-us with Brandon thinking he matters to us. I don't know about any of you, but I pay no attention to the illegitimate crime spree goofballs.
I disagree. Biden works for US-Inc, which is controlled by the Anglo-Euro-American banking cartel, and which operates under an altered Constitution. The USA still exists but is not operating at this time. https://coloradopublicbanking.blogspot.com/2018/12/global-corporate-power-structure.html
Almost three years since the useless government promised us two weeks to flatten the earth...
Next up, BorisVirus23
I just sent that bill link to everyone I could think of in 30 seconds. Thank you for sharing! I think it's especially helpful when someone else has already written the bill up and they can essentially copy/paste it, haha. Maybe someone will listen and do something similar here in AL. Eternally grateful for your work.