Wyoming state lawmakers standing up.

More of this, please.

Feb 06, 2023

Two weeks ago, a group of Wyoming legislators led by Rep. Jeanette Ward sponsored House Bill 143 - Health mandates - CDC and WHO jurisdiction in Wyoming.

The proposed new state law is concise and clear:

A BILL for AN ACT relating to public health and safety; prohibiting health mandates and requirements by specified federal and nongovernmental health organizations as specified; and providing for an effective date.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:
Section 1.  W.S. 35‑4‑1001 is created to read:
ARTICLE 10 - PROHIBITED HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS
35‑4‑1001.  Consideration and compliance with specified health organizations; limitations.
The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization shall have no jurisdiction in Wyoming and any requirements, mandates, recommendations, instructions or guidance provided by either organization shall not be used in this state to justify any mask, vaccine or medical testing requirements and shall have no force or effect in Wyoming.
Section 2.  This act is effective July 1, 2023.

Sponsors in the Wyoming House of Representatives include Jeanette Ward, Bill Allemand, Jeremy Haroldson, Mark Jennings, Tony Locke, Ken Pendergraft, Allen Slagle and Tomi Strock.

Sponsors in the Senate include Lynn Hutchings and Bob Ide.

HB-143 was introduced Jan. 16, 2023.

On Feb. 3, 2023, it passed out of the Labor Committee by a 5-4 vote.

It’s scheduled for a floor session today: Feb. 6, 2023.

HB-143 is not yet passed by the full Wyoming House and Senate, and even if passed, it could be vetoed by the governor.

But it’s a good sign that it got introduced at all and voted out of committee so quickly.

This sort of public naming of, and resistance to, the globalists’ violent, attempted world takeover can and should be done in all 50 states, by all 50 state legislatures.

It should be done all over the world, to make the globalist Monsters take off their ‘public health’ velvet gloves and openly show us their iron bioterrorist fists.

Wyoming lawmakers have put together a good state law that not only blocks the criminals operating from the bowels of the American CDC, but also blocks the puppet-masters in the transnational criminal network: the World Health Organization. The law protects and defends Wyoming’s state borders from domestic and foreign enemies, and protects the people and commerce of Wyoming from masking, testing, and the class of bioweapons fraudulently labeled as ‘vaccines.’

There are probably similar bills already introduced in other states; this one just happened to show up in my Gab feed last night.

Some commenters at the Gab post scoffed at the Wyoming move, saying that CDC and WHO non-jurisdiction over American citizens, territories, businesses and resources should be the “default” position; it shouldn’t require codification into law.

Fair enough. It shouldn’t, and it wouldn’t require codification if we weren’t living in crazy-times, when CDC and WHO are overriding national, state and individual sovereignty; when they are killing us off with injectable bioweapons and other poisonings; when they are orchestrating financial collapses, famines and wars and many other mass murder programs; and when they are daily, actively working to expand their level of global totalitarian control.

We’re living in crazy-times.

That makes it necessary to set, re-set, enforce and re-enforce moral, legal and physical boundaries with exceptional clarity, strength and repetition.

For more of the state and local laws the globalists hate — which is the best reason for state and local governments to introduce them and pass them with great enthusiasm and speed:

Oct. 2022 - State Laws Limiting Public Health Protections: Hazardous for Our Health. Network for Public Health Law.

Translation tips: ‘public health’ is ‘State-run contract bioterrorism.’

The authors and funders of that report — who see themselves as experts looking out for the common good of their inferiors and subordinates — are actually members of the Network for State-run Bioterrorism Law.

They harbor bitter contempt for individual liberty: the Creator-endowed moral agency of living human beings to exercise discernment and will and make our own determinations, guided by the teachings of Jesus Christ, about what’s good, what’s evil, what we must do and what we must avoid doing, to protect and sustain the lives and souls entrusted to our care.

Another lie in the report: “masks provide critical protection from illness.”

Translate as: “Masks are excellent psychological and social control mechanisms. They disrupt social bonds mediated through human facial expressions, eye contact, speech and body language, they interfere with breathing, and they provide constant visual triggers eliciting fear responses and suppressing cognitive reasoning.”

Another lie: “Vaccines save lives.”

Translate as: “Bioweapons labeled as vaccines induce suppression of human self-preservation and offspring-preservation instincts. They elicit quiet compliance with induced suicide, sterilization, and homicide, and thereby facilitate covert mass murder.”

“Protect the community” or “protect the common good,” means “shield State officials from facing justice for their participation in financially-coerced mass murder.”

In sum, the Network for Public Health Law does not count among its membership, trustworthy arbiters of what’s healthy and what’s hazardous. The lawyers who wrote the report, and the report itself, are part of the psychological manipulation system, intended and effective at instilling a sense of inevitability and helplessness among targeted enemies.

(For more on language manipulation, see Nov. 14, 2022 - Thought-stopping stage sets in legal pleadings. Proposed thought-restarting language to help people revoke their coerced suspension of disbelief.)

Much as I disagree with their positions, I’m grateful to the report’s authors: Donna E. Levin, J.D.; Jill Krueger, J.D.; Kathleen Hoke, J.D.; Emely Sanchez, J.D., M.P.H.; Brianne Schell, J.D., Dawn Hunter, J.D.; M.P.H.; Sara Rogers, M.P.H.; Erica N. White, J.D., and Center for Public Health Law Research at Temple University attorneys Elizabeth Platt, J.D., M.A.; and Katie Moran-McCabe, J.D.

These women have assembled the best ways Americans can and should defend ourselves from biomedical martial law and state-sponsored mass murder programs. Under each heading, they even list sample bills from dozens of states, with citations, making it easy for readers to track existing bills and lobby for drafting and passage of more.

List of the state and local laws State-run contract bioterrorism lawyers don’t like:

Prohibitions on Mask Requirements
Prohibitions on Proof of Vaccination and Vaccine Mandates
Shifts in Authority and Limitations on Public Health Orders - “These laws remove authority from the chief executive and public health agencies to exercise their expertise and the flexibility needed for day-to-day public health protection and emergency response. These laws give this authority to those with less knowledge and expertise to make health decisions that impact entire communities. Among other provisions, these laws impose time limits on emergency orders and establish new legislative authority to limit public health protective measures, including guidelines on public gatherings, and to extend, change, terminate, and oversee implementation and enforcement of emergency orders.” Translation: “Shut up and submit, you stupid peasants.”
Prohibitions on Measures to Protect the Community in the Name of Individual Liberties - “During the COVID-19 pandemic, some politicians weaponized constitutional rights in state legislatures to push for limitations on public health measures that keep us healthy.” Translation: “Some Americans invoked constitutional rights as defensive weapons, to protect and defend themselves and their families from the State’s toxic, lethal trespass of their bodies, bloodstreams and organs.”

For readers interested in more data about state-level efforts, the Policy Surveillance Program at the Temple University Center for Public Health Law Research maintains several databases tracking compliance and insubordination records for state governments and governments in other countries.

The NPHL report linked above was based on the US data set for Reallocation of Public Authority.

Some data sets haven’t been updated since pre-Covid, but the information is still useful for identifying what the killers’ like to see governments do, and what they don’t like.

Available data sets include:

Bailiwick News

Discussion about this post