Thank all of you for your efforts in support of freedom and individual sovereignty.
The statement "the true nature of the global “pandemic” - i.e. a biological, technological and psychological war of the non-sovereign, governments captured by private globalist interests against their own people and against their own military forces." can be distilled down to ''war... by private interests... against the people".
Your assumption that the military forces belong to the people needs some proof other than the fact that they are paid from the public trough through taxation and borrowing. Same for the state and local police. The military is beholding to the private interests whom they were created to protect just like the CIA and National Security State are the private interest's personal "intelligence".
You can add in there the legal system and judges as demonstrated by Ms. Jackson's case.
The best lens to view things through is explained by C.J. Hopkins where he views the current situation as that after a military has taken over an area. They start to "secure" the space which means locking down, taking over administration and identifying and removing opposition.
That is why you will not see any debate about facts, reasoning or anything else which is "old". This is a New Normal as we have been told to get used to. There is a new sheriff in town.
If you want to debate, argue or cite facts, "screw you!" to quote Hopkins. "What are you going to do about it?" is an old expression. You are correct in that knowledge and understanding are the first steps in forming a like-minded group which will resist. It is a start but will not win in the enemy's arena.
The court dismissal of Brooke Jackson’s case is sort of microcosm of how deeply fascist our country is today. She documents crimes and corruption and the court dismissed the case. The fascist relations between industry and government grows ever stronger.
Another great interview. Sasha, I agree, more and more of the public is becoming aware- this is a win. I will never, ever agree to injecting myself or family with this bioweapon. Let’s keep talking and keep the trials coming. It’s all about awareness at this point.
The original states and commonwealth formed a Confederation and perpetual Union 1777 they named themselves "The United States of America." The articles of that Confederation and perpetual Union were ratified 1781. They later created the United States. There are only 2 lawful names any other variation is an error, ignorance, fraud and/or deception. Definitely not lawful. The United States of America and the United States (of Washington District of Columbia and its forts, ports and needful buildings). Circa 1859 the last lawful iteration of our Constitution.
The phrase united States of America was used in the first sentence of Declaration of independence. It was from the 13 colonies.
Then in 1789 they wrote and ratified an article and named it a Constitution and it was ratified by 12 of the states and commonwealths, the first break in the perpetual Union. The preamble was never ratified.
Rhode Island and Providence Plantation, under threat, ratified the Constitution May 29, 1790.
Vermont became the 14th state in 1790 after 14 years as an Independent Republic.
The Bill of Rights was adopted December 15, 1791; when ratified by Virginia the 10th state to ratify.
February 7th, 1795 the 11th amendment was ratified.
Each time there is an amendment to The United States of America's Constitution or a state was added the prior iteration becomes an artifact. Exactly as it was designed.
Now we need to look at de facto and de jure Black's Law 6th page 416. de facto is illegal or illegitimate and de jure is lawful.
When the Congress Assembled under the Confederation and perpetual Union's articles wrote the Constitution it was theirs by creation. Their name was The United States of America. That same Congress named the United States, another creation, as the government to assume the responsibilities of the 23 enumerated obligations, in a 10 mile square, known as Washington District of Columbia. There was no preamble ratified; it is an unauthorized, de facto affectation by the people of the United States of Washington District of Columbia.
People are party to their state, commonwealth or territory's Constitutions and they are beneficiaries to The United States of America's Constitution. see Amendment X and VII.
There are lawful 12th and 13th Amendments. Virginia ratified 13 TONA in 1819.
The last lawful State to join the several states was Oregon February 14, 1859.
South Carolina seceded from the Confederation and perpetual Union, on December 20, 1860 prior to Lincoln's inauguration. That was the start of color of law as the perpetual Union was broken the second time.
Original Jurisdiction, Black's 6th page 1099, of men and women with their progeny became effective July 4th, 1776, for the first known time in the history of the 3rd rock from our sun. Earth. People without rulers or subjects. Sovereign.That is critical. It was codified by the Confederation and perpetual Union's Constitution circa 1859 the last lawful interaction of our Constitution. Original Jurisdiction is the on timeline between February 14, 1859 and December 20, 1860. It was color of law until March 27, 1861.
On that date it became martial law. To be codified April 24, 1863 in Lincoln's executive order #100 the Lieber Code.
The Lieber code is still in effect. It was verified in March 2023, when it was included by the Army in the 2016 update.
ex parte Milligan SCOTUS ruling 1866; there can be no martial law/Lieber code on the land when there is a Civilian Court of record functioning.
There is only one known Civilian Court of record that has implemented ex parte Milligan and Nullified martial law/Lieber Code/FEMA. That was accomplished by the Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly aka ARTICLE I Section 1 of Oregon's Constitution see **. That was accomplished June 8, 2020 with docket # 04071776.
When the USDOJ, USMS, FBI, USMC, State of Oregon aka STATE OF OREGON's executive, legislative, judiciary, AG, JAG and 36 sheriffs acquiesced and defaulted to our Living Testimony in the form of an affidavit of truth , we became the lawful, de jure provisional government on Oregon. That has been acquiesced and defaulted many times since.
The Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly's Grand Jury and trial jury our Article III one supreme court claiming original jurisdiction found in our Amendment VII court whose jury verdict has no appeal in law. It has lawfully removed the executive, legislative and judiciary on Oregon as of 2022.
We are seeking to assist, cooperate, and assemble with the other states, commonwealths and territories to return to original jurisdiction with a Constitutional republican form of government this year 2023.
** "Natural rights inherent in people. We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; and they have at all times a right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper. —"
I have been thinking of this. There has been widespread mistruths about the origin of the virus. Also, there has been widespread misinformation from politicans, health officials and some media about the safety and efficacy of this non-vaccine. I am truly worried about the moves by the World Health Organization to exert more authorities in emergency situations. My idea is the member countries have little recourse in making a final decision for their citizens. It gives more say to the World Health Organization, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gavi. Call me a conspiraist, but I do not want to see a pandemic simulation in the bear future, which I am certain will happen.
Will this not make the legal route for citizens very complicated, through the treaty recommendations? The UN is pushing this with a draft document, very strange.
Comment from badgerbrigante - "SWISS PASCAL NAJADI: Incredible news you bloody wonderful fellow!! Well done and thank you for taking up the charge on this SO IMPORTANT issue. You are an inspiration. Cometh the Hour, Cometh the Man! I sincerely hope both of your cases pass to the next stage and the accused are charged - then we will know the justice system is truly willing to engage." Vax-injured Pascal states he has lost 20 years off his lifespan. 50 million dead worldwide. 20% stillborn deaths. 20% infertility rate in men". It took courage and integrity for one man to proceed in the way he did.
If we can understand that the Rule of Law, as the protector of human inalienable rights, is in terminal decline as the pyramid cap works toward their desired return of the divine right to rule as they see fit, then we can have a come to Jesus reality moment of clear understanding. We are now witness to extrajudicial killings, extrajudicial detention/imprisonment, the return of torture, the return of "Star Chamber" judicial appointments abrogating an independent judiciary among other transgressions of human inalienable rights. 'Nough said.
The judge did not want to rule against his own employer. The federal government gave itself permission to not be able to detect the moral problem at hand.
Words from Pope Benedict XVI in his 1985 lectures published recently as The Divine Project (getting toward 40 years ago!) :
"...we are also now witnessing situations in which the limits and the dangers of these kinds of constitutional structures [collegial bodies and the reciprocal checks inherent to them], where responsibility slips into anonymity, are becoming apparent. In the end , no one person has to account for what has been done, because it is the group that has decided, to which no one considers himself wholly identical. The group spreads out the responsibility for decisions and takes them out of the hands of individuals; majorities are products of chance and are ultimately not capable of bearing responsibility for themselves in the legal sense." [pg 157-158]
Katherine, I think you uttered recently this idea of the (national) death of law. The leading and managing of enormous groups of people (a nation or state) by a few, is more and more actually, and performatively, impossible. Without grace providing and protecting what are otherwise humanly unfeasible acts, the frailty of a few men cannot bear any judgment against their performance. It's like we want to have our kings, but never evaluate them. The powers themselves have prevented this evaluation the last three years, as if it is absurd to see even a remote necessity. It is also a death struggle: to concede to judgment is to die in a humiliation too bewildering. "This cannot be allowed."
We have not only the will to power but also the will to declare false true.
It could take decades to get to a righteous judicial majority who could carry out the moral judgments, pinning them on those frail kings with their human doctrines and deep positivism.
I don't see how we get out of this without an international tribunal as was brought upon the Nazis. Is anyone else reaching this higher authority idea yet?
Dr. Bhakdi is a highly accomplished and respected Thai-German Microbiologist, and has (co-)authored 314 PubMed publications, many of which are highly cited. Despite being heavily censored and "fact-checked," he has continued to raise the alarm about the plandemic and Covid-19 "vaccines."
I might be confused by this point. The procedure and regulation of products were unusual. Yet, due to the emergency nature of the situation, all is good enough. Pfizer is not liable because contract was fulfilled. Since, the vaccine is cleared from the military for emergency purposes. It is acceptable practice. Should not more people be pushing back. Yes, I know many people were discredited. This information needs to get out.
Katherine, you and Sasha are heroes. Please keep RFK jr. honest.
Thank all of you for your efforts in support of freedom and individual sovereignty.
The statement "the true nature of the global “pandemic” - i.e. a biological, technological and psychological war of the non-sovereign, governments captured by private globalist interests against their own people and against their own military forces." can be distilled down to ''war... by private interests... against the people".
Your assumption that the military forces belong to the people needs some proof other than the fact that they are paid from the public trough through taxation and borrowing. Same for the state and local police. The military is beholding to the private interests whom they were created to protect just like the CIA and National Security State are the private interest's personal "intelligence".
You can add in there the legal system and judges as demonstrated by Ms. Jackson's case.
The best lens to view things through is explained by C.J. Hopkins where he views the current situation as that after a military has taken over an area. They start to "secure" the space which means locking down, taking over administration and identifying and removing opposition.
That is why you will not see any debate about facts, reasoning or anything else which is "old". This is a New Normal as we have been told to get used to. There is a new sheriff in town.
If you want to debate, argue or cite facts, "screw you!" to quote Hopkins. "What are you going to do about it?" is an old expression. You are correct in that knowledge and understanding are the first steps in forming a like-minded group which will resist. It is a start but will not win in the enemy's arena.
Great research!
Deepest gratitude for your work and efforts.
The court dismissal of Brooke Jackson’s case is sort of microcosm of how deeply fascist our country is today. She documents crimes and corruption and the court dismissed the case. The fascist relations between industry and government grows ever stronger.
Another great interview. Sasha, I agree, more and more of the public is becoming aware- this is a win. I will never, ever agree to injecting myself or family with this bioweapon. Let’s keep talking and keep the trials coming. It’s all about awareness at this point.
Excellent interview. Thanks for sharing.
Hello,
The original states and commonwealth formed a Confederation and perpetual Union 1777 they named themselves "The United States of America." The articles of that Confederation and perpetual Union were ratified 1781. They later created the United States. There are only 2 lawful names any other variation is an error, ignorance, fraud and/or deception. Definitely not lawful. The United States of America and the United States (of Washington District of Columbia and its forts, ports and needful buildings). Circa 1859 the last lawful iteration of our Constitution.
The phrase united States of America was used in the first sentence of Declaration of independence. It was from the 13 colonies.
Then in 1789 they wrote and ratified an article and named it a Constitution and it was ratified by 12 of the states and commonwealths, the first break in the perpetual Union. The preamble was never ratified.
Rhode Island and Providence Plantation, under threat, ratified the Constitution May 29, 1790.
Vermont became the 14th state in 1790 after 14 years as an Independent Republic.
The Bill of Rights was adopted December 15, 1791; when ratified by Virginia the 10th state to ratify.
February 7th, 1795 the 11th amendment was ratified.
Each time there is an amendment to The United States of America's Constitution or a state was added the prior iteration becomes an artifact. Exactly as it was designed.
Now we need to look at de facto and de jure Black's Law 6th page 416. de facto is illegal or illegitimate and de jure is lawful.
When the Congress Assembled under the Confederation and perpetual Union's articles wrote the Constitution it was theirs by creation. Their name was The United States of America. That same Congress named the United States, another creation, as the government to assume the responsibilities of the 23 enumerated obligations, in a 10 mile square, known as Washington District of Columbia. There was no preamble ratified; it is an unauthorized, de facto affectation by the people of the United States of Washington District of Columbia.
People are party to their state, commonwealth or territory's Constitutions and they are beneficiaries to The United States of America's Constitution. see Amendment X and VII.
There are lawful 12th and 13th Amendments. Virginia ratified 13 TONA in 1819.
The last lawful State to join the several states was Oregon February 14, 1859.
South Carolina seceded from the Confederation and perpetual Union, on December 20, 1860 prior to Lincoln's inauguration. That was the start of color of law as the perpetual Union was broken the second time.
Original Jurisdiction, Black's 6th page 1099, of men and women with their progeny became effective July 4th, 1776, for the first known time in the history of the 3rd rock from our sun. Earth. People without rulers or subjects. Sovereign.That is critical. It was codified by the Confederation and perpetual Union's Constitution circa 1859 the last lawful interaction of our Constitution. Original Jurisdiction is the on timeline between February 14, 1859 and December 20, 1860. It was color of law until March 27, 1861.
On that date it became martial law. To be codified April 24, 1863 in Lincoln's executive order #100 the Lieber Code.
The Lieber code is still in effect. It was verified in March 2023, when it was included by the Army in the 2016 update.
ex parte Milligan SCOTUS ruling 1866; there can be no martial law/Lieber code on the land when there is a Civilian Court of record functioning.
There is only one known Civilian Court of record that has implemented ex parte Milligan and Nullified martial law/Lieber Code/FEMA. That was accomplished by the Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly aka ARTICLE I Section 1 of Oregon's Constitution see **. That was accomplished June 8, 2020 with docket # 04071776.
When the USDOJ, USMS, FBI, USMC, State of Oregon aka STATE OF OREGON's executive, legislative, judiciary, AG, JAG and 36 sheriffs acquiesced and defaulted to our Living Testimony in the form of an affidavit of truth , we became the lawful, de jure provisional government on Oregon. That has been acquiesced and defaulted many times since.
The Oregon Statewide Jural Assembly's Grand Jury and trial jury our Article III one supreme court claiming original jurisdiction found in our Amendment VII court whose jury verdict has no appeal in law. It has lawfully removed the executive, legislative and judiciary on Oregon as of 2022.
We are seeking to assist, cooperate, and assemble with the other states, commonwealths and territories to return to original jurisdiction with a Constitutional republican form of government this year 2023.
** "Natural rights inherent in people. We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; and they have at all times a right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper. —"
I have been thinking of this. There has been widespread mistruths about the origin of the virus. Also, there has been widespread misinformation from politicans, health officials and some media about the safety and efficacy of this non-vaccine. I am truly worried about the moves by the World Health Organization to exert more authorities in emergency situations. My idea is the member countries have little recourse in making a final decision for their citizens. It gives more say to the World Health Organization, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gavi. Call me a conspiraist, but I do not want to see a pandemic simulation in the bear future, which I am certain will happen.
Will this not make the legal route for citizens very complicated, through the treaty recommendations? The UN is pushing this with a draft document, very strange.
BREAKING! SWITZERLAND STOPS/WITHDRAWS ALL COVID VACCINATION RECOMMENDATIONS. https://metatron.substack.com/p/switzerland-withdraws-all-covid-vaccination?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=579085&post_id=113465152&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
Comment from badgerbrigante - "SWISS PASCAL NAJADI: Incredible news you bloody wonderful fellow!! Well done and thank you for taking up the charge on this SO IMPORTANT issue. You are an inspiration. Cometh the Hour, Cometh the Man! I sincerely hope both of your cases pass to the next stage and the accused are charged - then we will know the justice system is truly willing to engage." Vax-injured Pascal states he has lost 20 years off his lifespan. 50 million dead worldwide. 20% stillborn deaths. 20% infertility rate in men". It took courage and integrity for one man to proceed in the way he did.
If we can understand that the Rule of Law, as the protector of human inalienable rights, is in terminal decline as the pyramid cap works toward their desired return of the divine right to rule as they see fit, then we can have a come to Jesus reality moment of clear understanding. We are now witness to extrajudicial killings, extrajudicial detention/imprisonment, the return of torture, the return of "Star Chamber" judicial appointments abrogating an independent judiciary among other transgressions of human inalienable rights. 'Nough said.
Thanks Katherine.
The judge did not want to rule against his own employer. The federal government gave itself permission to not be able to detect the moral problem at hand.
Words from Pope Benedict XVI in his 1985 lectures published recently as The Divine Project (getting toward 40 years ago!) :
"...we are also now witnessing situations in which the limits and the dangers of these kinds of constitutional structures [collegial bodies and the reciprocal checks inherent to them], where responsibility slips into anonymity, are becoming apparent. In the end , no one person has to account for what has been done, because it is the group that has decided, to which no one considers himself wholly identical. The group spreads out the responsibility for decisions and takes them out of the hands of individuals; majorities are products of chance and are ultimately not capable of bearing responsibility for themselves in the legal sense." [pg 157-158]
Katherine, I think you uttered recently this idea of the (national) death of law. The leading and managing of enormous groups of people (a nation or state) by a few, is more and more actually, and performatively, impossible. Without grace providing and protecting what are otherwise humanly unfeasible acts, the frailty of a few men cannot bear any judgment against their performance. It's like we want to have our kings, but never evaluate them. The powers themselves have prevented this evaluation the last three years, as if it is absurd to see even a remote necessity. It is also a death struggle: to concede to judgment is to die in a humiliation too bewildering. "This cannot be allowed."
We have not only the will to power but also the will to declare false true.
It could take decades to get to a righteous judicial majority who could carry out the moral judgments, pinning them on those frail kings with their human doctrines and deep positivism.
I don't see how we get out of this without an international tribunal as was brought upon the Nazis. Is anyone else reaching this higher authority idea yet?
Dr. Bhakdi is a highly accomplished and respected Thai-German Microbiologist, and has (co-)authored 314 PubMed publications, many of which are highly cited. Despite being heavily censored and "fact-checked," he has continued to raise the alarm about the plandemic and Covid-19 "vaccines."
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/dr-sucharit-bhakdi-urgent-message?r=n7rts&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Katherine,
WHAT is in these vials that still to my knowledge today contain NO inserts, only blank paper?
ALL of humanity needs the answer to THE most important question after over 2 very destructive years…
WHAT EXACTLY IS IN THE COVID19 VIALS STILL BEING GIVEN TODAY???
For EVERYONE today…
https://newswithviews.com/no-pain-no-gain/
Regards,
Mother/Grandmother of 7 and counting
I might be confused by this point. The procedure and regulation of products were unusual. Yet, due to the emergency nature of the situation, all is good enough. Pfizer is not liable because contract was fulfilled. Since, the vaccine is cleared from the military for emergency purposes. It is acceptable practice. Should not more people be pushing back. Yes, I know many people were discredited. This information needs to get out.
FYI.... In case you were in any doubt – no “vaccine” authorized or licensed by the FDA needs to demonstrate prevention of infection or transmission
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/in-case-you-were-in-any-doubt-no