Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, Sasha Latypova, Katherine Watt discuss Brook Jackson’s case.
Interview for TrialSite News
Orientation for new readers. Reconstitution starter pack.
New video:
April 12, 2023 - Brook Jackson Vs Pfizer Case Dismissed. What Next? TrialSite News. Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, Sasha Latypova, Katherine Watt (27 min)
Sasha, writing on her post, Katherine Watt and I discuss Brook Jackson v Ventavia Case Dismissal:
Brook Jackson is an American hero, a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s clinical trial for the contractor called Ventavia. Brook observed fraud and mismanagement of the study, complained and got promptly fired from her job.
While the case has been dismissed on March 31, 2023, after about 2 years of trying to bring it forward, this case was crucial to our understanding of the true nature of the global “pandemic” - i.e. a biological, technological and psychological war of the non-sovereign, governments captured by private globalist interests against their own people and against their own military forces.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893ca/893cada9593570bf82da7e305042e8cc89c33d28" alt=""
Katherine, you and Sasha are heroes. Please keep RFK jr. honest.
Thank all of you for your efforts in support of freedom and individual sovereignty.
The statement "the true nature of the global “pandemic” - i.e. a biological, technological and psychological war of the non-sovereign, governments captured by private globalist interests against their own people and against their own military forces." can be distilled down to ''war... by private interests... against the people".
Your assumption that the military forces belong to the people needs some proof other than the fact that they are paid from the public trough through taxation and borrowing. Same for the state and local police. The military is beholding to the private interests whom they were created to protect just like the CIA and National Security State are the private interest's personal "intelligence".
You can add in there the legal system and judges as demonstrated by Ms. Jackson's case.
The best lens to view things through is explained by C.J. Hopkins where he views the current situation as that after a military has taken over an area. They start to "secure" the space which means locking down, taking over administration and identifying and removing opposition.
That is why you will not see any debate about facts, reasoning or anything else which is "old". This is a New Normal as we have been told to get used to. There is a new sheriff in town.
If you want to debate, argue or cite facts, "screw you!" to quote Hopkins. "What are you going to do about it?" is an old expression. You are correct in that knowledge and understanding are the first steps in forming a like-minded group which will resist. It is a start but will not win in the enemy's arena.
Great research!