During this interview, both of Brook's attorneys talked about FDA's behavior as if there was no explanation for why they've allowed all this fraud and criminal activity to happen. They just said it was like FDA was inexplicably trusting Pfizer to do the right thing or something. They never mentioned anything at all in terms of what you and Sasha have discovered about how BARDA is the real agency in charge of regulating the cv injections, nor did they ever mention OWS, DOD, HHS or any other government agency with regard to accountability for the crimes being committed. They only talked about Pfizer being the culprit behind all the injury and death being perpetrated, and how it's such a David and Goliath battle against this behemoth, but they're going to do their darnedest to hold them to account for financial damages.
I'm curious if you've been in touch with these attorneys at all, or if you know if they're aware of the research on which you and Sasha have been collaborating and sharing?
Also, I remember hearing Sasha say that during initial proceedings in Brook's case it was DOJ attorneys who were arguing for the opposing side in court - not Pfizer attorneys. However neither Barnes nor Mendenhall ever made any reference to this. They just talked about how Pfizer has 100s of lawyers on their payroll so it's going to be an uphill battle.
Just wondering if you have any ideas about any of this?
Thank you for your amazing research and for any insights about these things if you have any to share.
I’m in touch with those individuals and they know about this research.
Brook does talk about it publicly. The attorneys’ reasons for not discussing it publicly are unknown to me.
Brook’s case is a False Claims Act case, filed under the qui tam provision, which can be used in a situation in which a private citizen (in this case Brook) serves as a whistleblower, reporting her observations of fraud against the US government, to the Department of Justice.
Brook reported her observations first to FDA in Sept. 2020, and then — after she got fired — reported the info to DOJ in December 2020.
In a qui tam case, the whistleblower provides the evidence, but the DOJ is the primary litigant against the defendants, in this case Ventavia, Pfizer and ICON. The first federal complaint filed in her case was filed in January 2021, by DOJ attorneys acting their own and Brook’s behalf, against Pfizer, Ventavia and ICON.
It was immediately sealed by the court, and Brook was put under a gag order. Throughout 2021, DOJ pretended to investigate her claims, but actually did nothing. They just sat on the case, because the DOJ is an active co-conspirator in the mass murder program.
In November 2021, when the killers started coming for children, Brook violated the gag order and gave an interview, published in the British Medical Journal Nov. 2, 2021.
Once the DOJ stepped out of the case, Brook had the option to hire a private attorney and pursue the case herself, which she did. She refiled the case on Feb. 22, 2022, this time as a private citizen, but still acting, in a way, on behalf of the US government’s interests in not being defrauded by contractors.
Pfizer then filed their Motion to Dismiss on April 22, 2022, saying that no fraud occurred, because the contracts did not require valid clinical trials.
There was some back and forth over the summer of 2022, and then US Government stepped in again — this time taking Pfizer’s side in the dispute — on Oct. 4, arguing that US Gov did not see any fraud, because Pfizer was never obligated to conduct valid clinical trials in order to receive payment for the manufactured bioweapons. [US Gov and Pfizer refer to the bioweapons as ‘vaccines.’]
I corresponded with and spoke to Brook and her attorneys during October 2022, to provide the material Sasha and I had collected about the DOD bioweapons program, and urge them to incorporate the information into their Oct. 27, 2022 response to the US Government’s re-entry into the case.
The attorneys declined to use the material or pursue the legal strategies suggested.
The judge has not yet ruled on the Motion to Dismiss, but has granted Pfizer’s request for a 90-day extension for discovery, which is now scheduled to start on March 15, 2023...
Wow thank you so much for taking the time to share this very detailed response, Katherine! I appreciate you letting us know that you've been in touch with Brook and her lawyers so at least they're informed.
It feels though as if your and Sasha's discoveries about the depth and breadth of criminal murderous collusion happening in 'high places' is just too hot to handle for too many people all across the health/freedom movement.
However regardless, news of your work is reaching more and more people as time has gone by, which is heartening.
Bless you and much gratitude to you for all your hard work, and for your courage, as you continue to seek and share the truth of what's really unfolding here in our world in the face of such unfathomable evil being perpetrated during these extraordinary times.
Thank you for this excellent run-down on Brook's case. It is concise but packed with understandable information, in a form that is easy to post on social media.
Awesome work and commitment Katherine. Do you know of any para-legal researching the legislative framework underpinning the "Domestic Bioterrorism Program" in Britain?
Yes. I wondered this too. I remember reading recently that the MHRA had more or less said that the decision to authorise the jabs came from Matt Hancock, not them. The headline was along the lines of "MHRA pass the buck"!
These are the receipts! Let’s get it out there and get these poison jabs stopped. I’ll be sharing and posting on Twitter and FB. Thank you for your research.
"...the states have power, under the federal constitution, to operate their own financial systems, including state banks and state bullion depositories."
The State Bank of North Dakota (the only state bank in the nation) returns all profits to the state, instead of enriching fat-cat bankers. It only provides rudimentary services (no charge or debit cards), but has turned a profit every year since inception. There are many financial services that could be provided by the states if citizens request them.
I really wish the answer to overcome this was in our government.
While I believe there could be a handful of good people with the right intentions, there are not enough to overcome the corruption and the majority of them are just useful idiot pawns that obey higher powers.
The states seceding just makes us more vulnerable to an easy takeover from UN troops or other methods should they make themselves known( already here).
I don't think we have the answer, except to announce we no longer recognize our government as legitimate.
To do that, we still have to educate the masses and while little by little it seems to be happening, is it fast enough on this timeline of events to thwart the global takeover?
When the cyber attack comes, IMO, that is when the clock strikes midnight and then the chance to resist them and fight them is reduced significantly.
Katherine I am curious to know your thinking re the most effective method to effect a cease and desist order against the continuation of administration of this bioweapon.
There has to be a way. Ms. Jackson's case could take decades.
Katherine, I watched the video below earlier today.
Whistleblower Brook Jackson + Attorneys Warner Mendenhall & Robert Barnes
https://rumble.com/v283a5q-live-news-a-replay-of-whistleblower-brook-jackson-attorneys-warner-mendenha.html
During this interview, both of Brook's attorneys talked about FDA's behavior as if there was no explanation for why they've allowed all this fraud and criminal activity to happen. They just said it was like FDA was inexplicably trusting Pfizer to do the right thing or something. They never mentioned anything at all in terms of what you and Sasha have discovered about how BARDA is the real agency in charge of regulating the cv injections, nor did they ever mention OWS, DOD, HHS or any other government agency with regard to accountability for the crimes being committed. They only talked about Pfizer being the culprit behind all the injury and death being perpetrated, and how it's such a David and Goliath battle against this behemoth, but they're going to do their darnedest to hold them to account for financial damages.
I'm curious if you've been in touch with these attorneys at all, or if you know if they're aware of the research on which you and Sasha have been collaborating and sharing?
Also, I remember hearing Sasha say that during initial proceedings in Brook's case it was DOJ attorneys who were arguing for the opposing side in court - not Pfizer attorneys. However neither Barnes nor Mendenhall ever made any reference to this. They just talked about how Pfizer has 100s of lawyers on their payroll so it's going to be an uphill battle.
Just wondering if you have any ideas about any of this?
Thank you for your amazing research and for any insights about these things if you have any to share.
I’m in touch with those individuals and they know about this research.
Brook does talk about it publicly. The attorneys’ reasons for not discussing it publicly are unknown to me.
Brook’s case is a False Claims Act case, filed under the qui tam provision, which can be used in a situation in which a private citizen (in this case Brook) serves as a whistleblower, reporting her observations of fraud against the US government, to the Department of Justice.
Brook reported her observations first to FDA in Sept. 2020, and then — after she got fired — reported the info to DOJ in December 2020.
In a qui tam case, the whistleblower provides the evidence, but the DOJ is the primary litigant against the defendants, in this case Ventavia, Pfizer and ICON. The first federal complaint filed in her case was filed in January 2021, by DOJ attorneys acting their own and Brook’s behalf, against Pfizer, Ventavia and ICON.
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2021.01.08-brook-jackson-complaint-pfizer-ventavia-fraud-81-p.pdf
It was immediately sealed by the court, and Brook was put under a gag order. Throughout 2021, DOJ pretended to investigate her claims, but actually did nothing. They just sat on the case, because the DOJ is an active co-conspirator in the mass murder program.
In November 2021, when the killers started coming for children, Brook violated the gag order and gave an interview, published in the British Medical Journal Nov. 2, 2021.
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2021.11.02-bmj-paul-thacker-brook-jackson-ventavia.pdf
In January 2022, the DOJ finally notified the federal judge that they did not plan to pursue the case further.
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2022.01.18-gov-declines-to-intervene.pdf
Once the DOJ stepped out of the case, Brook had the option to hire a private attorney and pursue the case herself, which she did. She refiled the case on Feb. 22, 2022, this time as a private citizen, but still acting, in a way, on behalf of the US government’s interests in not being defrauded by contractors.
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2022.02.22-jackson-amended-complaint.pdf
Pfizer then filed their Motion to Dismiss on April 22, 2022, saying that no fraud occurred, because the contracts did not require valid clinical trials.
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2022.04.22-pfizer-motion-to-dismiss.pdf
There was some back and forth over the summer of 2022, and then US Government stepped in again — this time taking Pfizer’s side in the dispute — on Oct. 4, arguing that US Gov did not see any fraud, because Pfizer was never obligated to conduct valid clinical trials in order to receive payment for the manufactured bioweapons. [US Gov and Pfizer refer to the bioweapons as ‘vaccines.’]
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2022.10.04-jackson-v.-ventavia-us-gov-intervene.pdf
I corresponded with and spoke to Brook and her attorneys during October 2022, to provide the material Sasha and I had collected about the DOD bioweapons program, and urge them to incorporate the information into their Oct. 27, 2022 response to the US Government’s re-entry into the case.
The attorneys declined to use the material or pursue the legal strategies suggested.
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2022.10.27-jackson-response-to-us-gov.pdf
They did leave themselves some openings to begin to move in that direction later, as I wrote in my analysis of their Oct. 27 filing here:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/jackson-v-pfizer-ventavia-icon-barnes
The judge has not yet ruled on the Motion to Dismiss, but has granted Pfizer’s request for a 90-day extension for discovery, which is now scheduled to start on March 15, 2023...
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2023/01/2022.01.15-jackson-v.-pfizer-scheduling-order.pdf
The footnote at this post:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/repost-other-transaction-authority
Is a list of all Bailiwick reporting about Brook’s case from March 2022 to October 2022.
Wow thank you so much for taking the time to share this very detailed response, Katherine! I appreciate you letting us know that you've been in touch with Brook and her lawyers so at least they're informed.
It feels though as if your and Sasha's discoveries about the depth and breadth of criminal murderous collusion happening in 'high places' is just too hot to handle for too many people all across the health/freedom movement.
However regardless, news of your work is reaching more and more people as time has gone by, which is heartening.
Bless you and much gratitude to you for all your hard work, and for your courage, as you continue to seek and share the truth of what's really unfolding here in our world in the face of such unfathomable evil being perpetrated during these extraordinary times.
It needs some sunlight from quasi mainstream media, like maybe zero hedge, Paul Craig Roberts, Martin Armstrong, others.
Thank you for this excellent run-down on Brook's case. It is concise but packed with understandable information, in a form that is easy to post on social media.
Katherine what a magnificent endeavor all of your posts are!
Awesome work and commitment Katherine. Do you know of any para-legal researching the legislative framework underpinning the "Domestic Bioterrorism Program" in Britain?
Yes. I wondered this too. I remember reading recently that the MHRA had more or less said that the decision to authorise the jabs came from Matt Hancock, not them. The headline was along the lines of "MHRA pass the buck"!
These are the receipts! Let’s get it out there and get these poison jabs stopped. I’ll be sharing and posting on Twitter and FB. Thank you for your research.
Thank you Katherine for giving us the Organized Compilations!
Katherine,
Have you run across something called the ARMY Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Program?
They happen to be recruiting now apparently.
This interview is highly informative and reveals how well informed, yet self-effacing, you are:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/enemies-of-the-state--south-african-doctor-charged/
Thank you! Cross-posted.
Excellent point, that needs to be emphasized:
"...the states have power, under the federal constitution, to operate their own financial systems, including state banks and state bullion depositories."
The State Bank of North Dakota (the only state bank in the nation) returns all profits to the state, instead of enriching fat-cat bankers. It only provides rudimentary services (no charge or debit cards), but has turned a profit every year since inception. There are many financial services that could be provided by the states if citizens request them.
I really wish the answer to overcome this was in our government.
While I believe there could be a handful of good people with the right intentions, there are not enough to overcome the corruption and the majority of them are just useful idiot pawns that obey higher powers.
The states seceding just makes us more vulnerable to an easy takeover from UN troops or other methods should they make themselves known( already here).
I don't think we have the answer, except to announce we no longer recognize our government as legitimate.
To do that, we still have to educate the masses and while little by little it seems to be happening, is it fast enough on this timeline of events to thwart the global takeover?
When the cyber attack comes, IMO, that is when the clock strikes midnight and then the chance to resist them and fight them is reduced significantly.
Your advice above is actually a reminder to duty, a requirement of any person who took an oath of office.
Thank you, Katherine.
They are obsessed with injecting this extremally dangerous toxic nanotechnology into every arm:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-and-the-new-arms-race
Katherine I am curious to know your thinking re the most effective method to effect a cease and desist order against the continuation of administration of this bioweapon.
There has to be a way. Ms. Jackson's case could take decades.
Be Blessed Stay Strong Mind Body & SOUL.
Thanks, will share.
Tremendous amount of research here. Thank you.