Reader forwarded this post to his US Senators, with the comment:
"Please read the below article and announce which side you are on; that of the Constitutional U.S. gov't OR that of the treasonous, DOD-HHS bioterrorists."
I encourage other Americans do follow his lead. Send it to your state and federal representatives and ask them: "Which side are you on?"
If you're outside the US, you can send the same question to your government officials, asking them which side of the US government they consider allies and which they consider to be bioterrorist enemies.
Manipulation of the legal system by the US government to delay guilt and restitution for harm of their citizens is a fine art form.  Think about how long it took to make them responsible for agent orange in Vietnam. There are many more examples of delay, delay delay.!
Thank you for your brilliant, tireless work. We are all in your debt. ‘Species of violence’-- Aquinas had that right. I hope today is a beautiful day for you-- fighting the monster. Maybe Sasha can paint an old world style painting someday ‘Katherine against the Dragon’ with herself right beside you.
GOD BLESS YOU!! And the idea of forwarding to our “representatives” is excellent …and I would wonder about passing out even to our local Sheriffs Departments and maybe other ways to get out to the ‘normies’ who cannot see past the NFL and NBC, etc….I am so GLAD you are here on this Earth at this time, Katherine Watts!!!!
THIS: "...the men and women doing these things are not acting in their official capacities or under color of legal authority but are rogue actors." This is evidence of infiltration and also illustrates what Catherine Austin Fitts stated within the last 6 months: US citizens have trouble accepting the fact that "We have no sovereign government." Eisenhower was well aware of the end of governmental sovereignty, post WWII. And CIA's Dulles continued to import Third Reich loyalists into the US Govt's DC/HQ infrastructure. It's been a long slide down a sewer hole, and many of us are praying that we still have many white hats who wish to restore the Republic.
Pagan Lesbo Herbalist 'Do No Harm' contingent says thanks. My senators and representitives from Oregon are best described as rogue actors, Merkley, Wyden, Blumenauer, perhaps also Bonamici, Bentz, Chavez-DeRemer, Salinas. My letters to Merkley and Wyden re the fakedemic/chemtrails are responded to with form letters with where to get more injections, or how the gov. is trying to 'help' the weather. It's insulting and only shows their lack of real knowledge, or lack of freedom to speak honestly. Bought. So bought.
Usually when I send my representatives anything they reply with a standard form letter that only means they got an email, but there is no way to know if they read it or what side of the equation they stand on.
Besides, they will usually lie about that depending on how advantageous it is for the next elections. Politicians change their stripes like a neon zebra with rotating stripes. You can not trust them.
Are they the ones supporting this bioterrorism? Are the the ones giving the DOD/HHS full immunity from any transgression? Is congress this far in the dark that they don't have a clue as to what is going on in this country right in their own backyards? At times it seems like congress are the bioterrorists because they have not enforce fought against this hijacking of the country.
This is an excellent approach. Given what we know about the financiers who control the US Corporation and their admissions that they have hijacked the USA via various unconstitutional acts, as well as their admissions and funding of various depopulation schemes, might it be worth adding that evidence?
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other major publications whose directors have attended our meetings and upheld their promise to maintain confidentiality for nearly forty years. It would have been impossible to develop our global project if we had been in the public spotlight during those years. But the world is more sophisticated now and is more willing to move towards a global government where there will be no more war, but only peace and prosperity for all humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination that existed in past centuries.” —David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, in an address to the Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton), as reported and translated from the September, 1991, issue of the Monte Carlo-based Hilaire du Berrier Report (also reported elsewhere in the French press, including Minutes, June 19, 1991 and Lectures Francaises, July/August, 1991). Mr. Du Berrier closely followed and chronicled the activities of Bilderberg and its overlapping groups, for over four decades.
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” —David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2003.
“The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1971.
Because of your deep dive into these matters and your detailed understanding of them, you might well be justified to wield the accusatory (in my judgment, incendiary) labels that you place on the people behind this gargantuan mess. But I honestly believe that you might loose potential allies, as they are put off by such bold, in-your-face name calling. The language just seems a little too brazen to attract the serious attention of people in power who might benefit from your exceptional experience and impressively meticulous research.
Readers who lack your depth of understanding probably need less emotionally charged language to describe the the people doing the wrongdoing. Calling what the wrongdoers do bio-terrorism and war crimes upfront in the same context of detailing the facts seems like making judgments for readers BEFORE the facts you so well present enable readers to make such judgments for themselves.
Also, the vast expanse of your research is somewhat overwhelming. You probably could write ten times as many substacks with all the knowledge that you have. Narrowing the focus of each substack might make the info more readily absorbed over a longer period of time, instead of trying to explain to readers the history of the universe, starting with the Big Bang (in one dose), which is what that impressive legal timeline of yours reminds me of. (^_^)
I visit your substack everyday now, even though the sheer amount of info is overwhelming.
Reader forwarded this post to his US Senators, with the comment:
"Please read the below article and announce which side you are on; that of the Constitutional U.S. gov't OR that of the treasonous, DOD-HHS bioterrorists."
I encourage other Americans do follow his lead. Send it to your state and federal representatives and ask them: "Which side are you on?"
If you're outside the US, you can send the same question to your government officials, asking them which side of the US government they consider allies and which they consider to be bioterrorist enemies.
Katherine is the honey badger of truth! God Bless you always.
Manipulation of the legal system by the US government to delay guilt and restitution for harm of their citizens is a fine art form.  Think about how long it took to make them responsible for agent orange in Vietnam. There are many more examples of delay, delay delay.!
Everyone...access Coffee and Covid today! All about the Missouri, Louisiana vs Biden lawsuit!
Thank you for your brilliant, tireless work. We are all in your debt. ‘Species of violence’-- Aquinas had that right. I hope today is a beautiful day for you-- fighting the monster. Maybe Sasha can paint an old world style painting someday ‘Katherine against the Dragon’ with herself right beside you.
GOD BLESS YOU!! And the idea of forwarding to our “representatives” is excellent …and I would wonder about passing out even to our local Sheriffs Departments and maybe other ways to get out to the ‘normies’ who cannot see past the NFL and NBC, etc….I am so GLAD you are here on this Earth at this time, Katherine Watts!!!!
Brilliant. Impeccable logic. Bless you.
THIS: "...the men and women doing these things are not acting in their official capacities or under color of legal authority but are rogue actors." This is evidence of infiltration and also illustrates what Catherine Austin Fitts stated within the last 6 months: US citizens have trouble accepting the fact that "We have no sovereign government." Eisenhower was well aware of the end of governmental sovereignty, post WWII. And CIA's Dulles continued to import Third Reich loyalists into the US Govt's DC/HQ infrastructure. It's been a long slide down a sewer hole, and many of us are praying that we still have many white hats who wish to restore the Republic.
Pagan Lesbo Herbalist 'Do No Harm' contingent says thanks. My senators and representitives from Oregon are best described as rogue actors, Merkley, Wyden, Blumenauer, perhaps also Bonamici, Bentz, Chavez-DeRemer, Salinas. My letters to Merkley and Wyden re the fakedemic/chemtrails are responded to with form letters with where to get more injections, or how the gov. is trying to 'help' the weather. It's insulting and only shows their lack of real knowledge, or lack of freedom to speak honestly. Bought. So bought.
If I even had a spoonful of Katherine's brain, I would die a happy woman.
Katherine, I love the fact that you referenced St. Thomas Aquinas and Pope Leo XIII. If only more people read the angelic doctor. Great post.
Fantastic work 🎩
Bless you Katherine.
Usually when I send my representatives anything they reply with a standard form letter that only means they got an email, but there is no way to know if they read it or what side of the equation they stand on.
Besides, they will usually lie about that depending on how advantageous it is for the next elections. Politicians change their stripes like a neon zebra with rotating stripes. You can not trust them.
Are they the ones supporting this bioterrorism? Are the the ones giving the DOD/HHS full immunity from any transgression? Is congress this far in the dark that they don't have a clue as to what is going on in this country right in their own backyards? At times it seems like congress are the bioterrorists because they have not enforce fought against this hijacking of the country.
This is an excellent approach. Given what we know about the financiers who control the US Corporation and their admissions that they have hijacked the USA via various unconstitutional acts, as well as their admissions and funding of various depopulation schemes, might it be worth adding that evidence?
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other major publications whose directors have attended our meetings and upheld their promise to maintain confidentiality for nearly forty years. It would have been impossible to develop our global project if we had been in the public spotlight during those years. But the world is more sophisticated now and is more willing to move towards a global government where there will be no more war, but only peace and prosperity for all humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national self-determination that existed in past centuries.” —David Rockefeller, June 5, 1991, in an address to the Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton), as reported and translated from the September, 1991, issue of the Monte Carlo-based Hilaire du Berrier Report (also reported elsewhere in the French press, including Minutes, June 19, 1991 and Lectures Francaises, July/August, 1991). Mr. Du Berrier closely followed and chronicled the activities of Bilderberg and its overlapping groups, for over four decades.
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” —David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2003.
“The nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, 1971.
https://coloradopublicbanking.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-virus-event-and-rockefeller.html
Because of your deep dive into these matters and your detailed understanding of them, you might well be justified to wield the accusatory (in my judgment, incendiary) labels that you place on the people behind this gargantuan mess. But I honestly believe that you might loose potential allies, as they are put off by such bold, in-your-face name calling. The language just seems a little too brazen to attract the serious attention of people in power who might benefit from your exceptional experience and impressively meticulous research.
Readers who lack your depth of understanding probably need less emotionally charged language to describe the the people doing the wrongdoing. Calling what the wrongdoers do bio-terrorism and war crimes upfront in the same context of detailing the facts seems like making judgments for readers BEFORE the facts you so well present enable readers to make such judgments for themselves.
Also, the vast expanse of your research is somewhat overwhelming. You probably could write ten times as many substacks with all the knowledge that you have. Narrowing the focus of each substack might make the info more readily absorbed over a longer period of time, instead of trying to explain to readers the history of the universe, starting with the Big Bang (in one dose), which is what that impressive legal timeline of yours reminds me of. (^_^)
I visit your substack everyday now, even though the sheer amount of info is overwhelming.