There is a show on Fox Nation called Constitution Alive! that is very good at explaining the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in an easy to understand manner. It's all of our responsibility to read, understand and teach the principles of the Constitution to the upcoming generation so they can be free.
Federalism is the way to slay this beast, and a few AGs have started, AG Landry from Louisiana and another (Oklahoma, maybe?) have been granted discovery on government collusion with tech on covid. The Red State AGs can band together in similar fashion to the Big Tobacco take and straighten things out. Especially since the nutbars are concentrated in only a few localities.
In my experience many people are apathetic, they understand what's going on, but they do not want to stand up and challenge anything because "it won't make any difference". People need to be educated, on the fact that it DOES make a difference when even a handful of regular people speak up. And today it's easier than ever to reach people, we don't need to own a printing press anymore. American Revolution had something like ~3% population participating. The rest thought it won't make a difference I guess.
I am always shocked by the lack of knowledge and understanding of basic tenets like freedom, why it is important and how we have it (at least in theory). Even college educated people younger than I (56) have literally no idea what we're talking about. We're not even on the same planet.
I remember Civics being required in high school in the 80s---to have a basic understanding of how our government works and why preserving what we have is worthwhile. Those courses are long gone. Most people don't know the difference between the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and Constitution. Some don't know what any of these are. That's where we are.
My ex-boss who was in his 50's, once exclaimed to me that he was shocked there were military troops that refused to take the common cold shots, since that was insubordination and insurrection against military law. First, I told him the shot mandates were not law but executive edicts. Next, I said there are higher laws - the Constitution and ultimately God.
He said nothing after that. I don't think he understood a word I said. I would say 90% + of people have no idea about natural law and God - we threw Him out of society long ago.
I don’t know a percentage but anyone coming up in public education is indoctrinated to the “hate the constitution” camp (there are some students resisting it, YAL and others). So unfortunately #1 is a dwindling number as time rolls on. An important line of inquiry. The key is what percentage of group one can be persuaded to look into this and act on it (and they would need to have an idea of what to do).
The problem I find with telling people about the evil intentions of world leaders is inconceivability: people just can’t imagine it. I had a family member read a document that listed at one point some of the objectives of the New World order. They put the document aside and wouldn’t read further. I suspect the same might happen with your material, Katherine. They see it as
I have run into this in talking with others, and also have this problem myself.
I go through cycles of not being able to grasp the extent of the evil, thinking it can’t be as bad as it is. And then I get back to accepting it and processing it a little bit more, and then lose it again briefly in disbelief.
Most likely as a self-preservation mechanism. I think most decent peoples’ minds and hearts and souls have to cope with it all in an ebb-and-flow way over time, as we build up the strength to look it in the face in a more consistent way without collapsing into despair and paralysis.
I also think that’s one of the main reasons why social isolation is so important to the NWO architects. It’s easier to cope with trauma of any kind and stabilize to fight back or recover, if you can be connected to others who are dealing with the same experiences and emotional responses. It’s much more difficult if you’re forced to do it in isolation and can’t easily check your understanding and be part of human mutual support networks.
They know that. That’s why they work so hard to keep us isolated and divided.
That’s why I’m so grateful for Substack and readers — for as long as TPTB let us have this platform, it’s someplace where we can help each other through it and build the strength to get back the even more powerful, in-person human social bonds they’ve stolen and broken.
I’m reading in detail the COVID 19 kill box article. I want to see if I can find specific language in the statutes/EOs that I can share. Your summary analysis is spot on, but to a random person you wouldn’t have credibility (same with me even for people I know very well. Pretty much they either understood it early on, or they are enmeshed in the WEF propaganda machine).
Regardless of any of that, I deeply appreciate your research, and sharing it with us.
Yes that is good to know but we have to stop the slide. SOS (save our schools) operates in TN and perhaps elsewhere. They gave a detailed talk exposing what the are doing.
Do children even learn about the Constitution and their rights in schools? I came here 20 years ago, got naturalized 10 years ago, learned about it and like it because it is a good start for law. I have a feeling lots of Americans don't know much about it.
The only reason I selected the "less than 10%" option is because there wasn't a "less than 1/10 of 1%" option. The people of this country are incredibly ignorant of the organization of our government. Need an example? Listen to this woman - AN ATTORNEY - at the 40 second mark of this video. "We got the Supreme Court to create, explicitly create, Constitutional rights with regard to abortion . . ."
Comments on excerpts of the Constitution of the USA
The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Comment from Wikipedia:
Meaning and application
The Preamble serves solely as an introduction and does not assign powers to the federal government,[3] nor does it provide specific limitations on government action. Due to the Preamble's limited nature, no court has ever used it as a decisive factor in case adjudication,[4] except as regards frivolous litigation.[5]
Thoughts on Wikipedia's post.
No doubt that Wiki posted the current attitude regarding the Preamble. But to dismiss it so easily is stunning. The Preamble states the intention or the light by which one should understand the constitution. In a word the "INTENTION" of those who wrote the Constitution is found in the Preamble.
If you haven't already, would you be willing to reach out to James Roguski? He seems to be focusing mostly on the WHO Pandemic Treaty. As I understand it, a month or two ago, one or more African nations defected, or refused to support the WHO's sinister plan, and the attempt to install this power- grab failed, or stalled. Mr. Roguski provided a means to protest at that time. He now says the WHO are calling their evil machination by another name with more recent efforts in secret meetings to destroy national sovereignty. Apparently, sometime in September is when to expect the official WHO ratification; but implementation of the peril is underway, according to what I'm hearing and reading. Mr. Roguski is attempting to grow a global effort of protest he calls "The People's Treaty." Here are links to his work, and a recent video interview of him:
More digging needed on that to find the line-by-line sources of the legal authority and logistical programs, but there are a couple of places to start, some mentioned in the second half of this post
One source is the HHS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) waiver program, which they put in place very early — Spring 2020, with updates since then — to exempt health care providers from patient care standards and regulations that would legally apply in non-pandemic circumstances.
That’s the source for things like stripping patients of their rights to have family members and pastors/rabbis visit them and advocate for them in the hospital or nursing home, which supports hospital demands that law enforcement remove family and pastors from the premises by force.
A second piece is the merger of law enforcement and public health systems, and the training and planning programs put in place since about 2006. This would need to be tracked down in each county or town/hospital system to find the dates and times, but I think the frameworks promulgated by HHS/CDC to the states and from there to the localities between 2006 and 2008 were used to run tabletop drills and train law enforcement officers to understand their role in a public health emergency as protecting the health care workers and system from frightened or angry patients and patient family members, on the premise that the emergency will cause people to behave erratically and the law enforcement officers must protect system stability, not individual patient rights.
Some examples of those federal guidance documents are listed in the Covid-19 Kill Box post, and I have a few others on my hard drive.
Third set of documents are the specific intergovernmental agreements or contracts that exist at the county level in many, but not all states. I think it depends whether the state has adopted a version of the 2001 Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.
“Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public.”
Many states have passed those, and even those that haven’t passed them have had their state legislatures draft and debate them, so the state public health systems are well aware of the model and have thought through how to implement elements of it even without state laws in place.
Arizona’s intergovernmental agreements are examples - they explicitly tie federal HHS funding to the county and the county’s public health systems, to the county’s provision of data about county residents to federal agencies, and to county compliance with directives already issued, or directives that may be issued in the future, by HHS.
It’s those potential future directives that are the most evil: the quarantine orders authorizing law enforcement to domestically apprehend and detain American individuals against their will, under 42 CFR 70.6 and related regulations
As far as I know, they haven’t yet been issued, not because HHS lacks the legal authority to do it, but because psychological and social and economic coercion have achieved the goals they wanted to achieve: cooperation with lockdown/isolation orders, mask orders, test orders and vaxx orders.
In other words, the US government biomedical police State hasn’t needed to use armed force yet, because most Americans just complied without any form of resistance.
By report, a NY Supreme Court Judge recently struck down a quarantine regulation passed by the NY State Governor that would have given its DOH the power to lock-up folks it believes have a communicable disease. Apparently the governor is appealing the case. Could the governor's trying to pass her own law, and her appeal, reflect a transfer of power from the 3 branches of government to DHHS, or, as the attorney has shared in an interview, that NY's Congress has simply not been supportive in sponsoring a bill to create legislation for it?
When rights erode awakening will occur. But bodily energy will be eviscerated thru mandated drugged/ poisoned compliance. It's now shameful to express happiness because cancel culture's feelings get hurt..therefore the masses will bond thru our sorrows and fight for food like animals.
When people are deprived of land ownership as is the current state of most citizens of the United States it is hard to viscerally understand the Constitution. Even worse is the fact that very few people put over 50% of the food on the table from their own labor.
I have mentioned else where that in the 1950s the hard rock Appalachian coal miners went on strike against the mine owners and they WON. The reason they won is there wives had deep pantries. So the miners out lasted the Coal mine owners. They ran out of coal to sell before the miners ran out of food. Most of those miners didn't own their places. But their wives worked hard toiling in large gardens putting up food which made all the difference.
There is a song written by Merle Travis and latter sung by Tennessee Ernie Ford - 16 Tons... Mr Ford recorded and sang it in 1955. It is about coal miners. This is the song I heard growing up. My dad was from Pennsylvania and his dad worked in the steal mills of Pittsburgh. So there was sympathy for the miners even though both my parents were Republicans. But this song is a mockery of the miners, even though I love the rhythm and the rhyme. See what you think. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIfu2A0ezq0
Since the 1970s the small farmer has been steadily put out of business and sent to the city or the poor house. This started with Ag Secretary Earl Butz, who told farmers to "Get Big or Get Out" from there we lost our connection to the land one decade at a time.
We are losing more now. Our jobs are being taken by robots. But in fact before robots our health has been under attack with pollution of Water, Air, Soil and Food. Since the early 1970s when the US was about fourth in Health and Longevity in the world we have been on a decline. We are now 79th in the world in health and longevity and falling. How can a nation be # ONE in the world when the health of the population is 79th?
It is important to remember that longevity in the 1970s didn't mean senility or warehoused in an old folks home. No the folks of earlier generations had fought for and gained the right to retirement for hard work. They still had good health clear wits and much more. Part of that much more is the depth of life experience we can't imagine. We don't have anything like that now.
The youth were more robust then too. Civil rights movement was for the most part by and for the black community. However all races were participants and they too reaped the benefits of supporting the realization of the movement. Earth Day the EPA (it worked in those days) all a result of that time and energy. I know that the number of young people today are less %wise than we were in the 1960s and 1970s. Yet from the 1950s thru the 1980s there is an energy of improving the over all health and welfare of the country. You don't see it much today. Just look carefully at the Covid fiasco. Prevention and natural/innate immunity is ignored as if it doesn't exist. Like your inalienable rights.
Certainly being cut off from the land, is why we feel cut off from understanding the depths of the Constitution of the US. But at the same time the Blob was learning how to dilute and destroy the energy the average person. That was done through the destruction of peoples health, family and community cohesion, self discipline, endurance and much more. If you think the current environmental crisis can't be helped and it is just an unfortunate side effect of technology. Think again. It is no accident.
Today we don't own or control the core technologies. They own us. Back in the early 1900s thru to the mid 1980s folks used to own in some sense the technologies of their existence. Even if it was just a shovel, a hoe and a pick, to loosen the soil in your garden and just the glass Ball/Mason jars that are used for canning fruit and vegetables for the pantry. It was a way to stand against tyranny. It worked! What can we do to stand against it today that isn't totally controlled by the blob?
Instead we are absorbed by cell phones and computers that in large part define our cognitive space and that space keeps shrinking.
Reflecting on these transitions and trends in light of the Constitution should shine a light on the slow perversion of our status. Not just in the Law as Katherine so valiantly points out, but also in our status as humans, the environment we inhabit both cognitively and biologically. We are giving our inalienable rights away . But if you look up the meaning of "inalienable" we can't do that. They are like our finger prints. They are our essence. However we can be made to forget we ever had them to begin with. We are being deceived into "having nothing and being happy".
Welcome to the human version of CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations). Where the food you eat is corporate, the air you breath, the water you drink, are all corporate (at a minimum poisoned), even the thoughts you think.
No way you say to yourself. My thoughts are my own.
Well as Jennifer Rose quotes "Alrightttttyyyyyyy Thennnnnnnnnnn".
It is true we have given away and forgotten so much. Check when have you had an original thought that was not subliminally planted or outright suggested by your cell phone, computer or advertisement?
I wish I believed differently, but I think there are less than 10% of us who worship the Consitution, know it has been subverted and are willing to try and get it back. Let us know if you can think of a plan where we might be able to get through via a chink in the legal armor....
I do not have much hope, but I am willing to die trying.
Archimedes quote "Give me a place to stand and I will move the earth. Or in our case care for and nurture the Earth.
Still we need a place to stand and that has been very quietly and stealthfully taken away. When it comes to a place to stand possession is 9/10 of the law. So what can you do?
Get connected to local community gardens and farms. Sink your heart and mind into the soil and the community of people that care.
seems to me that the constitution that matters to most people is the one that houses their vital organs. they'll start paying more attention to the other one when they can't feed theirs.
There is a show on Fox Nation called Constitution Alive! that is very good at explaining the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in an easy to understand manner. It's all of our responsibility to read, understand and teach the principles of the Constitution to the upcoming generation so they can be free.
Federalism is the way to slay this beast, and a few AGs have started, AG Landry from Louisiana and another (Oklahoma, maybe?) have been granted discovery on government collusion with tech on covid. The Red State AGs can band together in similar fashion to the Big Tobacco take and straighten things out. Especially since the nutbars are concentrated in only a few localities.
schmitt from missouri. he's doing good work
In my experience many people are apathetic, they understand what's going on, but they do not want to stand up and challenge anything because "it won't make any difference". People need to be educated, on the fact that it DOES make a difference when even a handful of regular people speak up. And today it's easier than ever to reach people, we don't need to own a printing press anymore. American Revolution had something like ~3% population participating. The rest thought it won't make a difference I guess.
apathy is exactly the sentiment here:
https://cjhopkins.substack.com/p/the-normalization-of-the-new-normal
Thanks Sasha for all the great work you do. Do you or Team Enigma have a Substack?
Thank you! I have a bitchute channel Team Enigma, and I am writing on Trial Site News.
Thanks 😊
I am always shocked by the lack of knowledge and understanding of basic tenets like freedom, why it is important and how we have it (at least in theory). Even college educated people younger than I (56) have literally no idea what we're talking about. We're not even on the same planet.
I remember Civics being required in high school in the 80s---to have a basic understanding of how our government works and why preserving what we have is worthwhile. Those courses are long gone. Most people don't know the difference between the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and Constitution. Some don't know what any of these are. That's where we are.
My ex-boss who was in his 50's, once exclaimed to me that he was shocked there were military troops that refused to take the common cold shots, since that was insubordination and insurrection against military law. First, I told him the shot mandates were not law but executive edicts. Next, I said there are higher laws - the Constitution and ultimately God.
He said nothing after that. I don't think he understood a word I said. I would say 90% + of people have no idea about natural law and God - we threw Him out of society long ago.
I don’t know a percentage but anyone coming up in public education is indoctrinated to the “hate the constitution” camp (there are some students resisting it, YAL and others). So unfortunately #1 is a dwindling number as time rolls on. An important line of inquiry. The key is what percentage of group one can be persuaded to look into this and act on it (and they would need to have an idea of what to do).
Thanks. I’ll add more later.
The problem I find with telling people about the evil intentions of world leaders is inconceivability: people just can’t imagine it. I had a family member read a document that listed at one point some of the objectives of the New World order. They put the document aside and wouldn’t read further. I suspect the same might happen with your material, Katherine. They see it as

I have run into this in talking with others, and also have this problem myself.
I go through cycles of not being able to grasp the extent of the evil, thinking it can’t be as bad as it is. And then I get back to accepting it and processing it a little bit more, and then lose it again briefly in disbelief.
Most likely as a self-preservation mechanism. I think most decent peoples’ minds and hearts and souls have to cope with it all in an ebb-and-flow way over time, as we build up the strength to look it in the face in a more consistent way without collapsing into despair and paralysis.
I also think that’s one of the main reasons why social isolation is so important to the NWO architects. It’s easier to cope with trauma of any kind and stabilize to fight back or recover, if you can be connected to others who are dealing with the same experiences and emotional responses. It’s much more difficult if you’re forced to do it in isolation and can’t easily check your understanding and be part of human mutual support networks.
They know that. That’s why they work so hard to keep us isolated and divided.
That’s why I’m so grateful for Substack and readers — for as long as TPTB let us have this platform, it’s someplace where we can help each other through it and build the strength to get back the even more powerful, in-person human social bonds they’ve stolen and broken.
I couldn’t have said it better myself.
I’m reading in detail the COVID 19 kill box article. I want to see if I can find specific language in the statutes/EOs that I can share. Your summary analysis is spot on, but to a random person you wouldn’t have credibility (same with me even for people I know very well. Pretty much they either understood it early on, or they are enmeshed in the WEF propaganda machine).
Regardless of any of that, I deeply appreciate your research, and sharing it with us.
Public education is local and the anti-constitutionalism is more recent in the places that indoctrinate with that philosophy. It's not monolithic.
Yes that is good to know but we have to stop the slide. SOS (save our schools) operates in TN and perhaps elsewhere. They gave a detailed talk exposing what the are doing.
Do children even learn about the Constitution and their rights in schools? I came here 20 years ago, got naturalized 10 years ago, learned about it and like it because it is a good start for law. I have a feeling lots of Americans don't know much about it.
The only reason I selected the "less than 10%" option is because there wasn't a "less than 1/10 of 1%" option. The people of this country are incredibly ignorant of the organization of our government. Need an example? Listen to this woman - AN ATTORNEY - at the 40 second mark of this video. "We got the Supreme Court to create, explicitly create, Constitutional rights with regard to abortion . . ."
A freakin' lawyer makes this statement as if it's perfectly okay for the court to create rights out of thin air!!! https://rumble.com/v1cwjql-pro-choice-attorney-wendy-murphy-explains-devastating-roe-decision.html
Comments on excerpts of the Constitution of the USA
The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Comment from Wikipedia:
Meaning and application
The Preamble serves solely as an introduction and does not assign powers to the federal government,[3] nor does it provide specific limitations on government action. Due to the Preamble's limited nature, no court has ever used it as a decisive factor in case adjudication,[4] except as regards frivolous litigation.[5]
Thoughts on Wikipedia's post.
No doubt that Wiki posted the current attitude regarding the Preamble. But to dismiss it so easily is stunning. The Preamble states the intention or the light by which one should understand the constitution. In a word the "INTENTION" of those who wrote the Constitution is found in the Preamble.
I'm firmly in the first group. Here's proof.
https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/aaron-schwartz-julian-assange-edward
And I see I voted with the majority.
Hello Katharine.
Thanks for your revealing work.
If you haven't already, would you be willing to reach out to James Roguski? He seems to be focusing mostly on the WHO Pandemic Treaty. As I understand it, a month or two ago, one or more African nations defected, or refused to support the WHO's sinister plan, and the attempt to install this power- grab failed, or stalled. Mr. Roguski provided a means to protest at that time. He now says the WHO are calling their evil machination by another name with more recent efforts in secret meetings to destroy national sovereignty. Apparently, sometime in September is when to expect the official WHO ratification; but implementation of the peril is underway, according to what I'm hearing and reading. Mr. Roguski is attempting to grow a global effort of protest he calls "The People's Treaty." Here are links to his work, and a recent video interview of him:
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/stop-the-who?s=w
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-peoples-treaty
https://rumble.com/v1d99w3-secret-meeting-massive-step-toward-nwo-when-the-pandemic-treaty-arrives-goo.html
Thank you - yes, I’m in contact with Roguski by phone and email.
I was looking at your Covid 19 kill box article and am still wondering: how is
it that local law enforcement knows to deny people their rights (in hospitals),
and why areso many officers complying? The implication is that many people
in local power, and some in congress, don't know what's going on. I'm puzzled
that so many in local law enforcement would know, and how they would know it.
Thanks again for all you do.
More digging needed on that to find the line-by-line sources of the legal authority and logistical programs, but there are a couple of places to start, some mentioned in the second half of this post
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/on-the-world-health-organizations
One source is the HHS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) waiver program, which they put in place very early — Spring 2020, with updates since then — to exempt health care providers from patient care standards and regulations that would legally apply in non-pandemic circumstances.
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/summary-covid-19-emergency-declaration-waivers.pdf
That’s the source for things like stripping patients of their rights to have family members and pastors/rabbis visit them and advocate for them in the hospital or nursing home, which supports hospital demands that law enforcement remove family and pastors from the premises by force.
A second piece is the merger of law enforcement and public health systems, and the training and planning programs put in place since about 2006. This would need to be tracked down in each county or town/hospital system to find the dates and times, but I think the frameworks promulgated by HHS/CDC to the states and from there to the localities between 2006 and 2008 were used to run tabletop drills and train law enforcement officers to understand their role in a public health emergency as protecting the health care workers and system from frightened or angry patients and patient family members, on the premise that the emergency will cause people to behave erratically and the law enforcement officers must protect system stability, not individual patient rights.
Some examples of those federal guidance documents are listed in the Covid-19 Kill Box post, and I have a few others on my hard drive.
2006 - https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/role-law-enforcement-public-health-emergencies-special-considerations-all
2008 - https://intersector.com/resource/framework-improving-cross-sector-coordination-emergency-preparedness-response/
Third set of documents are the specific intergovernmental agreements or contracts that exist at the county level in many, but not all states. I think it depends whether the state has adopted a version of the 2001 Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12150674/
“Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public.”
Many states have passed those, and even those that haven’t passed them have had their state legislatures draft and debate them, so the state public health systems are well aware of the model and have thought through how to implement elements of it even without state laws in place.
Arizona’s intergovernmental agreements are examples - they explicitly tie federal HHS funding to the county and the county’s public health systems, to the county’s provision of data about county residents to federal agencies, and to county compliance with directives already issued, or directives that may be issued in the future, by HHS.
https://twpundit.com/2022/01/21/twp-exclusive-warning-the-federal-government-is-stealing-our-freedom-by-circumventing-state-legislatures-opinion/
https://destinyhosted.com/cochidocs/2021/BOS/20210810_2176/5983_CTR055990_Cochise_County_COVID-19_Health_Disparities.pdf
It’s those potential future directives that are the most evil: the quarantine orders authorizing law enforcement to domestically apprehend and detain American individuals against their will, under 42 CFR 70.6 and related regulations
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/70.6
HHS drafted a quarantine order as early as Feb. 2020 for international travelers (42 CFR 70.5).
https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/pdf/Public-Health-Order_Generic_FINAL_02-13-2020-p.pdf
As far as I know, they haven’t yet been issued, not because HHS lacks the legal authority to do it, but because psychological and social and economic coercion have achieved the goals they wanted to achieve: cooperation with lockdown/isolation orders, mask orders, test orders and vaxx orders.
In other words, the US government biomedical police State hasn’t needed to use armed force yet, because most Americans just complied without any form of resistance.
By report, a NY Supreme Court Judge recently struck down a quarantine regulation passed by the NY State Governor that would have given its DOH the power to lock-up folks it believes have a communicable disease. Apparently the governor is appealing the case. Could the governor's trying to pass her own law, and her appeal, reflect a transfer of power from the 3 branches of government to DHHS, or, as the attorney has shared in an interview, that NY's Congress has simply not been supportive in sponsoring a bill to create legislation for it?
https://unitingnys.com/actions/we-won-our-quarantine-camp-lawsuit-but-hochul-is-appealing-help-us-defeat-hochuls-appeal/
https://unitingnys.com/actions/stoptheregulations/
https://unitingnys.com/actions/spread-the-word-for-our-lawsuit/
https://rumble.com/v1d0d91-secret-ny-quarantine-camps-obliterated-hero-lawyer-exposes-destroys-u.s.-co.html
When rights erode awakening will occur. But bodily energy will be eviscerated thru mandated drugged/ poisoned compliance. It's now shameful to express happiness because cancel culture's feelings get hurt..therefore the masses will bond thru our sorrows and fight for food like animals.
When people are deprived of land ownership as is the current state of most citizens of the United States it is hard to viscerally understand the Constitution. Even worse is the fact that very few people put over 50% of the food on the table from their own labor.
I have mentioned else where that in the 1950s the hard rock Appalachian coal miners went on strike against the mine owners and they WON. The reason they won is there wives had deep pantries. So the miners out lasted the Coal mine owners. They ran out of coal to sell before the miners ran out of food. Most of those miners didn't own their places. But their wives worked hard toiling in large gardens putting up food which made all the difference.
There is a song written by Merle Travis and latter sung by Tennessee Ernie Ford - 16 Tons... Mr Ford recorded and sang it in 1955. It is about coal miners. This is the song I heard growing up. My dad was from Pennsylvania and his dad worked in the steal mills of Pittsburgh. So there was sympathy for the miners even though both my parents were Republicans. But this song is a mockery of the miners, even though I love the rhythm and the rhyme. See what you think. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIfu2A0ezq0
You should read a bit of the history about the song here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteen_Tons
I didn't lose my theme. It is important to feel those times as best you can.
Since the 1970s the small farmer has been steadily put out of business and sent to the city or the poor house. This started with Ag Secretary Earl Butz, who told farmers to "Get Big or Get Out" from there we lost our connection to the land one decade at a time.
We are losing more now. Our jobs are being taken by robots. But in fact before robots our health has been under attack with pollution of Water, Air, Soil and Food. Since the early 1970s when the US was about fourth in Health and Longevity in the world we have been on a decline. We are now 79th in the world in health and longevity and falling. How can a nation be # ONE in the world when the health of the population is 79th?
It is important to remember that longevity in the 1970s didn't mean senility or warehoused in an old folks home. No the folks of earlier generations had fought for and gained the right to retirement for hard work. They still had good health clear wits and much more. Part of that much more is the depth of life experience we can't imagine. We don't have anything like that now.
The youth were more robust then too. Civil rights movement was for the most part by and for the black community. However all races were participants and they too reaped the benefits of supporting the realization of the movement. Earth Day the EPA (it worked in those days) all a result of that time and energy. I know that the number of young people today are less %wise than we were in the 1960s and 1970s. Yet from the 1950s thru the 1980s there is an energy of improving the over all health and welfare of the country. You don't see it much today. Just look carefully at the Covid fiasco. Prevention and natural/innate immunity is ignored as if it doesn't exist. Like your inalienable rights.
Certainly being cut off from the land, is why we feel cut off from understanding the depths of the Constitution of the US. But at the same time the Blob was learning how to dilute and destroy the energy the average person. That was done through the destruction of peoples health, family and community cohesion, self discipline, endurance and much more. If you think the current environmental crisis can't be helped and it is just an unfortunate side effect of technology. Think again. It is no accident.
Today we don't own or control the core technologies. They own us. Back in the early 1900s thru to the mid 1980s folks used to own in some sense the technologies of their existence. Even if it was just a shovel, a hoe and a pick, to loosen the soil in your garden and just the glass Ball/Mason jars that are used for canning fruit and vegetables for the pantry. It was a way to stand against tyranny. It worked! What can we do to stand against it today that isn't totally controlled by the blob?
Instead we are absorbed by cell phones and computers that in large part define our cognitive space and that space keeps shrinking.
Reflecting on these transitions and trends in light of the Constitution should shine a light on the slow perversion of our status. Not just in the Law as Katherine so valiantly points out, but also in our status as humans, the environment we inhabit both cognitively and biologically. We are giving our inalienable rights away . But if you look up the meaning of "inalienable" we can't do that. They are like our finger prints. They are our essence. However we can be made to forget we ever had them to begin with. We are being deceived into "having nothing and being happy".
Welcome to the human version of CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations). Where the food you eat is corporate, the air you breath, the water you drink, are all corporate (at a minimum poisoned), even the thoughts you think.
No way you say to yourself. My thoughts are my own.
Well as Jennifer Rose quotes "Alrightttttyyyyyyy Thennnnnnnnnnn".
It is true we have given away and forgotten so much. Check when have you had an original thought that was not subliminally planted or outright suggested by your cell phone, computer or advertisement?
thank you for all you do.
I wish I believed differently, but I think there are less than 10% of us who worship the Consitution, know it has been subverted and are willing to try and get it back. Let us know if you can think of a plan where we might be able to get through via a chink in the legal armor....
I do not have much hope, but I am willing to die trying.
Where will we stand.
Archimedes quote "Give me a place to stand and I will move the earth. Or in our case care for and nurture the Earth.
Still we need a place to stand and that has been very quietly and stealthfully taken away. When it comes to a place to stand possession is 9/10 of the law. So what can you do?
Get connected to local community gardens and farms. Sink your heart and mind into the soil and the community of people that care.
seems to me that the constitution that matters to most people is the one that houses their vital organs. they'll start paying more attention to the other one when they can't feed theirs.
I predict there will not be mid term elections.
Present powers will use new virus or war to suspend the constitution. Will probably start WWIII.