Discover more from Bailiwick News
Paper trail and analysis.
Dr. David Martin has been one of the most prominent medical freedom-fighters of Covid-times.
He has consistently written and spoken about the many patents held on coronavirus manufacturing methods, genetic sequences, and components of recombinant viruses, and identified these as criminal violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5), the domestic terrorism section of the 2001 Patriot Act, and other laws.
Martin has been quoted saying:
“You cannot patent something that is naturally occurring. Therefore the only legal patented virus is manufactured. If it is manufactured, then that becomes a violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties.”
Some of the patents Martin has identified include:
2002 - Ralph Baric of University of North Carolina, US7279327B2, methods for producing recombinant coronaviruses
2004 - US Health and Human Services Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), US7220852B1, coronavirus isolated from humans.
2007 - CDC, US7776521B1, methods to detect virus and kit to measure it.
Martin is currently pursuing this line of attack through the federal courts, in Griner v. Biden, (2:2022-cv-00149) filed in Utah March 4, 2022.
Plaintiffs have asked the court to find, as a matter of fact and law, that the products marketed as vaccines are not vaccines, but rather that they are medical treatments or gene therapy devices, such that mandates “violate the liberty protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, which includes rights of personal autonomy, self-determination, bodily integrity and the right to reject medical treatment.”
Griner v. Biden plaintiffs cite US Supreme Court precedent for the proposition that a “general liberty interest in refusing medical treatment exists,” Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 US 261 (1990) and that “forcible injection of medication into a non-consenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty.” Washington v. Harper, 494 US 201 (1990).
Under 1990 United States law (the Biological Weapons Antiterrorism Act of 1989 adopted to implement the UN Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction, as entered into force March 25, 1975) what Fauci, Shi, Baric, Daszak, Gates, Tedros and their co-conspirators have done to manufacture and deploy deadly viruses and gene manipulation injections would probably have qualified as domestic bioterrorism.
But since roughly 2000, Congress has rewritten the laws
Those acts have been redefined as public health emergencies, public health measures, and pandemic countermeasures.
Domestic, state-run bioterrorism is now legal in America.
2005/12/31 - PREP Act adopted by Congress and signed by President Bush. Covered countermeasures, security countermeasures, qualified pandemic or epidemic products include:
“i. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic; or to limit the harm such pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause;
ii. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in clause (i).” 42 USC 247d-6d(i)(7)(A)
2018/10/09 - Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks, Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security, Medical Countermeasure Distribution, Dispensing and Administration, pp. 41-56
P. 46 - “Self-spreading vaccines—also known as transmissible or self-propagating vaccines—are genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection. The vision is that a small number of individuals in the target population could be vaccinated, and the vaccine strain would then circulate in the population much like a pathogenic virus…
This approach comes with several big challenges. One important component of the current vaccination approach for humans is the informed consent process. In order to receive a vaccine, individuals (or their legal guardians) must be informed about the risks of vaccination by a healthcare provider and provide their consent before being vaccinated. Those who decline are not forced to receive a vaccine.
In the case of self-spreading vaccines, the individuals directly vaccinated would have this option, but those to whom the vaccine subsequently spreads would not. Additionally, self-spreading vaccines would potentially infect individuals with contraindications, such as allergies, that could be life-threatening. The ethical and regulatory challenges surrounding informed consent and prevention and monitoring of adverse events would be critical challenges to implementing this approach even in an extreme event.
Finally, there is a not insignificant risk of the vaccine virus reverting to wild-type virulence, as has sometimes occurred with the oral polio vaccine—which is not intended to be fully virulent or transmissible, but which has reverted to become both neurovirulent and transmissible in rare instances. This is both a medical risk and a public perception risk; the possibility of vaccine-induced disease would be a major concern to the public.”
P. 51 - “Synthetic Vaccinology: Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccines
Recent research in synthetic vaccinology has highlighted self-amplifying mRNA (SAM) vaccines…
Once inside a cell, the SAM is immediately translated and creates 2 proteins: the antigen of interest and the viral replicase. The viral replicase is then able to drive intracellular amplification by synthesizing a negative sense copy of the originally injected RNA, which will then result in production of additional positive sense viral RNA in a recursive process…
During the 2013 H7N9 outbreak in China, a prototype SAM(H7) vaccine was synthesized in only 8 days.”
“SARS-CoV-2 is “a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE-2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-CoV backbone.”
Side note: 10 days later, 8/23/21, the Food and Drug Administration publicly announced the legally-ambiguous ‘full approval’ of Pfizer injections manufactured from, and intended to promote internal, human-cell based manufacture of, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. One day after that, 8/24/21, US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin issued a purported vaccine mandate on all military service members, based on the alleged FDA full approval.
2021/11/17 - US Health and Human Services revision to 42 CFR 73.3, HHS select agents and toxins that pose severe public health threats. 86 Federal Register 64081:
"SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 chimeric viruses resulting from any deliberate manipulation of SARS-CoV-2 to incorporate nucleic acids coding for SARS-CoV virulence factors" added to the list of "biological agents and toxins listed in this section [that] have the potential to pose a severe threat to public health and safety."
Side note: On the same day, 11/17/21, Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colorado) introduced Cures 2.0 Act, HR-6000, to update, expand, strengthen and appropriate additional funding for the domestic bioterrorism program authorized (in part) by the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016, which was signed into law on Dec. 13, 2016 during President Obama’s last few weeks in office.
I’ve received comments from readers raising important points about the proper procedures for nation-states to enter into international treaties, the role of the US Senate in ratifying lawful treaties, the legal requirement that counter-parties be sovereign entities (which the World Health Organization may not be) and the likelihood that US laws appearing to transfer governing power from the three co-equal Constitutional branches to the US Secretary of Human Health conflict with the Constitution itself and other US laws.
The concern expressed is that, by writing about governments flouting those standards and procedures, I risk demoralizing people: persuading readers that the battle has already been lost, the Constitution has already fallen, the legal protections of our inalienable rights have already been stripped, and our resistance is futile.
I understand those concerns.
I’m not saying the takeover of the US government and oppression of the American people, and the takeover and oppression of other governments and other peoples, by the World Health Organization and its financial backers is good, moral, lawful, legitimate, ethical, or even properly ratified as treaties (although they may have been, and I’ll try to find out as I keep working).
I’m saying the takeover is factually true, and we currently live in a civil society controlled by HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, the public World Health Organization leadership to whom he answers, and the private individuals who control WHO’s governance and funding.
My position is that the possible lack of formal Senate ratification of the WHO International Health Regulations of 2005 and forthcoming ‘pandemic treaty’ updates, the lack of Constitutional court review for federal implementing statutes and regulations, conflicts with existing laws, and the other excellent points, haven’t stopped government abuses from happening for the last two years of our lives, and won’t matter again until some combination of counter-forces gathers social and political power and gains the upper hand in the quasi-declared biowar into which we’ve been driven.
Possession, as they say, is nine-tenths of the law.
Currently, the actual governing power in the U.S. is firmly in the hands of the Health and Human Services, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense bureaucracies.
This is true even though no one in American government — elected or appointed — says it plainly to the People.
For two years, US citizens in many states, counties and municipalities have not been able to exercise our inalienable civil liberties. I live in a place under that oppression.
Federal courts haven’t exercised Constitutional review powers.
Presidents have simply signed Executive Orders put in front of them by agency directors.
Congress has done nothing other than fund agency budgets (apart from a few excellent hearings organized by Senator Ron Johnson).
I’m also not saying this state of affairs will be perpetual.
I think the state-run bioterrorist attack will be thwarted, because totalitarian governments are inherently unstable and God is Almighty.
I’m saying the American domestic public-health/law-enforcement bioterrorists will not stop using and abusing the power they currently hold until they’re forced to stop by entities outside their circle of co-conspirators.
The counter-forces will certainly include divinely-inspired mass civil disobedience.
The counter-forces will probably include courageous federal judges who step out of line and stop providing judicial air cover for the legalized domestic bioterrorism program.
The counter-forces will probably include a new majority in Congress, or the legislatures of breakaway regions that secede to re-establish Constitutional republics, by repealing the unnatural, sinful laws that have legalized domestic, state-run bioterrorism for the time being.
The counter-forces may even include a massive change in the way the mainstream media functions — to steer back toward a somewhat independent, accountability-and-investigational oversight role, rather than a complicit propaganda role.
I’m saying it’s counterproductive to pretend our inalienable, God-given, natural human rights are also legally-cognizable rights in our secular societies, during a time in history when those rights are demonstrably not being upheld by our governments.
I’m saying we can better organize as the good guys to fight alongside each other when we accurately understand the Devil we’re all fighting against, and can clearly identify the legal rules the Devil has imposed on the earthly battlefield to empower his minions to carry out his plans for enslavement and death, while confusing, frightening and demoralizing the rest of us.
In other words, it’s essential for the truth of the takeover to be clearly understood and openly discussed by the People, so that we can mount a sustained, well-informed, well-targeted, effective mass civil disobedience campaign, followed by a sacred campaign to rebuild civil society according to God’s laws.
1983 Public Health Emergencies, Section 319, added to Public Health Service Act, 42 USC 247d
1988 Health Omnibus Programs Act
2000 Public Health Improvement Act
2001 USA PATRIOT Act
2002 Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act
2002 Homeland Security Act
2004 Project Bioshield Act
2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act
2006 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act
2007 John Warner Defense Authorization Act
2012 National Defense Authorization Act
2013 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act
2016 21st Century Cures Act
2019 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act
2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
2022 Cures Act 2.0 (pending, in committee)
Letter from Birmingham Jail: “You express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws. This is certainly a legitimate concern. Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, it is rather
strange and paradoxical to find us consciously breaking laws. One may well ask, "How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "An unjust law is no law at all."
Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine when a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. To use the words of Martin Buber, the great Jewish philosopher, segregation substitutes an "I - it" relationship for the "I - thou" relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. So segregation is not only politically, economically, and sociologically unsound, but it is morally wrong and sinful. Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation. Isn't segregation an existential expression of man's tragic separation, an expression of his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness? So I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court because it is morally right, and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances because they are morally wrong.”