Interview with Maria Zeee.
With essay about historical-legal arc of globalist programs, foundational lies, and need for discernment.
New interview:
Jan. 10, 2024 - Are They Planning Marburg in 2024? US Government Raises Alarm. (51 min., Rumble and other platforms). Speakers: Maria Zeee and Katherine Watt.
Bailiwick post discussed:
Dec. 15, 2023 - The PCR test viewed from the legal kill box perspective.
Related, on the topics of CDC-ACIP-recommended biological weapons schedules and world events whose unfoldings appear poised to intensify in 2024:
May 26, 2023 - 93 biochemical weapons to decline whenever a medical mercenary offers them to you or your children.
July 12, 2023 - Catechisms of the counterchurch. [Not mentioned there, but the WHO global ‘pandemic treaty’ and IHR amendment processes also began (publicly, anyway) in late 2021 and are expected to culminate in late 2024, comprising a third example of major, globalist-organized world events taking place between 2021 and October or November 2024.]
Points from the interview I want to emphasize:
Some people hold and publicly express the view that scientists working for the globalist sin-and-death cult may have developed the technological skill to inject functional control systems into the circulatory systems and organs of healthy, living human beings; and to inject compounds that can be activated or ruptured by electromagnetic frequency transmissions to release pathogens and toxins to cause symptomatic disease.
My understanding is that the evidence cited includes published scientific papers, patents and chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and electronic product supply catalogs.
I do not share the view that such threats are plausible, because I regard those documents as theatrical devices, and I think performative, false narratives are effective enough for driving behavioral compliance that the globalist death-cult doesn’t need more, for so long as people can't see and don’t reject the false narratives.
My views are not based on a lack of access to documents and videos; I have access to more than enough documents and videos.
My views are based, rather, on my assessment of these artifacts' credibility given what I know about how much false information is produced, in which forms, by whom, and for what deceitful, manipulative and fear-mongering purposes.
Sasha Latypova has also addressed these issues, from a perspective focused on technical feasibility and scalability, alongside philosophical and theological reflections.
Jan. 1, 2024 - Internet of No-Bodies. (Sasha Latypova, Substack). My favorite line: "... As you can see from the cruel and stupid experiment with that poor mouse above, if you are worried that someone is going to control you via the Internet of Bodies by sprinkling you with graphene and nanobots, you don’t have to be as long as you stay away from anyone trying to implant wires into your head..."
I find her assessment of the evidence to be reasonable.
From my perspective through lenses of law, geopolitics, philosophy and theology, I think the documents are written, published and promoted mostly to drive public fear.
Widespread fear is a necessary condition for public acceptance of several foundational lies the globalist death-cultists need people to think are true, to pseudo-justify the willful, systematic dismantling of constitutional rule of law; centralization of geopolitical power; and funding of the biodefense and public health industrial combines and their academic research and development collaborators.
One of the foundational lies is that God made human beings without free will, or with a free will that can be overcome with chemicals, heavy metals, and electronic devices.
This is error.
Whether any particular individual believes, understands or approves of God’s reasoning for making humans the way He made us, each man is morally responsible for developing and using his reason to discern truth from lies; for developing and using his conscience to discern the difference between good and evil; and for developing and using his will to perform acts that accord with natural and divine law, and refrain from acts that rebel against or violate natural and divine law.
Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, The Divine Cost of Stopping This War (1942 radio address):
In this chapter, we enter into the very heart of the question: "Why does God not stop the war?" The answer is to be found in another question: "What would be the divine cost of stopping this war?" The answer is, God would have to destroy human freedom.
This needs some explanation. Let us begin with this fact: that this is not the only kind of world God could have made. He could have made a world without freedom.
He could have so fashioned us that we would have been good with the same necessity with which the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. We might all have been saintly with the same necessity, with which the lily is white, or fire is hot, or ice is cold.
But God willed not to make a mechanical universe, peopled by automata; rather did He choose to communicate to us something of Himself, namely, His Freedom — not in the same degree of perfection, of course, but enough of it to say a no which would give charm to a yes, when we freely chose to say it.
In other words, God chose to make a moral universe, where characters would emerge by the right use of freedom — a universe where there would be patriots because men might be traitors; a universe like a nation, like a battlefield, where there would be heroes because men might be cowards; a universe like the Church, where there would be saints because men might also be devils...
God willed to make a moral universe of praise and blame, but this could be done only by making men captains and masters of their own fate and destiny.
There is one word which sums up God's plan in making the universe, and that is love. Got made each heart capable of love. But love implies a choice.
A heart that loves must be a heart to give or to keep. Because, therefore, God willed to make us, so we could love Him in this world, He had to make us free; but if He made us free to love, He had to make it possible for us to be free to hate.
The universe thus became populated with free wills, little gods, each armed with a reflection of God's freedom.
That some of these little gods would will wrongly was inevitable, for they had not God's Wisdom; that some of them would be rebellious was inevitable, for, being free, they could make a false declaration of independence and become like little foolish rays of the sun attempting to make themselves independent of the sun.
The fact that we come from God would not necessarily dispense us from the evil effects of such a rebellion, any more than because a child is the son of a king he is immune from drowning if he disobeys and goes into the whirlpool.
God gave us the power to rebel that there might be meaning and honor in our allegiance when we freely choose to give it.
God pledged Himself, after giving us that freedom, never to destroy it, regardless of how many petulant souls would shriek against him: "Why does God not stop the war?"
God could challenge us, overrule us, permit us to be visited by the consequences of our misdeeds — but He would never destroy that great gift of freedom.
-War and Peace: An Anthology, Sophia Institute Press, 2022. at pp. 87-88
Another foundational lie is the one about deadly global pandemics capable of traveling all around the world and killing lots of people.
The more I think about the arc of human history as reflected in American and international law during the public-health-emergencies/cross-border-communicable- disease-threats-Global-Health-Security-Agenda-pandemic-preparedness decades from 1944 to the present, the more it strikes me that the vaccine-based poisoning program that began in the 1950s and hit its’ full stride in 1986 with the National Vaccine Program and ever-expanding childhood immunization schedules, was Plan B.
It was Plan B for people whose Plan A was to find (in animal or human reservoirs) or modify (in labs) communicable pathogens capable of killing the numbers of people they really wanted to watch die without having to visibly bomb, poison or shoot them, but who realized — perhaps sometime in the 1950s or early 1960s — that they would never be able to achieve that goal.
The goal would remain perpetually out of reach because the pathogens they found or modified that were communicable enough to pass easily and sustainably across large geographic regions and borders were not deadly enough to kill many people.
And because the pathogens they found or modified to reliably and efficiently kill people, were not communicable enough to kill more than the small number of people physically very close to the initial release points.
The goal would be especially difficult to reach among people and societies with strong moral and religious traditions, who would promote and protect heterosexual, monogamous relationships formed for the purpose of bearing children and raising families, against the socially-corrosive, selfish sterility of homosexuality and the soul-crushing loneliness of promiscuity.
Thus the Plan B motive for the globalist death cult to also undermine formation of strong men and women, traditional marriages, families and neighborhoods, and instead promote self-sterilization and family-destruction programs including pornography; contraception; divorce; social rootlessness/internal migration; homosexuality; abortion; and transgenderism.
Thus the Plan B motive for the death cult to provide false moral rationales to drive the choices made by individuals in that seemingly free marketplace of options that is actually a collection of moral dead-ends: false rationales including overpopulation, resource scarcity, climate change and financial debt/social program budget crises.
And thus the Plan B motive to develop the whole system of routine poison-vaccinations and their myriad sickening effects, more or less acute or chronic depending on the individual vulnerabilities of the target bodies and the composition of the toxic compounds.
Across those decades — three generations of babies born since 1986, to three generations of parents — resultant neurological and depressive disorders, gastrointestinal disorders and dysbiosis, asthma, allergies and autoimmune disorders, infertility, obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancers have been attributed by the CDC-FDA poisoners, when addressing the targets of their public poisoning assaults, to poor nutrition, sedentary lifestyles, environmental pollutants and chronic stress.
The same CDC-FDA poisoners steadily suppressed every voice connecting the poor health outcomes to the accumulation of injected and nasal-sprayed toxins dispensed from vaccine vials.
Then the poisoners topped it off (2020 to present) with the more-toxic, faster-acting poison-vaccinations: public health emergency EUA ‘countermeasures.’
With that historical-legal arc in mind, I emphasize a point I made in the interview:
I regard the PREP Act declarations in the Federal Register about marburgvirus, ebolavirus, hemorrhagic fevers and acute radiation syndrome (and other PREP Act declarations) as multi-purpose.
They are legal coverage to exempt biological weapons manufacturers and users from liability for the injuries and deaths caused by use of bioweapons — including all vaccines and other biological products — for their intended, harmful purposes.
And they are document props to drive fear and behavioral compliance with government directives.
But I don’t regard them as signs or signals that the globalist death-cult can or will actually “release” novel pathogens.
To emphasize a second point:
I think it is plausible that EMF and RF transmissions may be used to cause radiation poisoning symptoms, and that those symptoms may be attributed — by government public health officials trying to drive compliant behavior — to communicable diseases.
Conspiracy Sarah has done a good post on this:
Dec. 17, 2023 - Turns Out, It's Marburg AND Acute Radiation Syndrome Season.
And yes, the weapons manufacturers are — under the active PREP Act declarations — already producing toxic injections and other products to be presented to the public as medicinal treatments for acute radiation syndrome.
Just as the weapons manufacturers have produced and are still producing toxic injections and other products presented to the public as medicinal treatments for Covid, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rotavirus, measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, rubella, anthrax, smallpox, hepatitis, human papilloma virus, meningitis, pneumonia, all among the 90-some toxic products currently sitting in the CDC-FDA's biochemical weapons arsenal.
Don't take them.
They are poisons.
They are not medicines.
I have access to more than enough information to draw these conclusions.
My views are based not on volume but on credibility assessments in light of what I’ve learned about how much false information is produced, by whom, and for what purposes. And about how much true information those lie-purveyors suppress, distort and malign.
My credibility assessments may be wrong; time will tell.
In the meantime, I'm offering this information and analysis in the hope that it might help interested readers alleviate some of their fears, and increase the confidence needed to look at events as they unfold, see them more clearly, and think them through better.
Maybe it will help more people quickly identify lies as lies, and thus be better able to withstand the next rounds of coercive, lie-based demands for behavioral compliance.
God-willing, three generations of parents deceived by lies, and three generations of children poisoned by vaccines, is enough.
God-willing, more babies in forthcoming years will get the chance to grow up without these poisons permeating their tiny, growing bodies.
