Information added to today’s post on homo borgiensis. UPDATE/CORRECTION: I checked in with Callender after posting, to request the source of the term. The correct spelling is homo borgiensis — and the term wasn’t created by NASA or DOD or any other government. It’s not, as far as I know, used in relevant government or NGO reports.
Between flat earth, we never went to the moon, viruses don't exist, and nuclear weapons are not what we've been taught they are, adding humanity is one long genetic experiment by some mysterious overlords, as Thompson and others contend, gets us to nearly half a dozen fascinating so-called conspiracy theories.
I'd call them hypotheses as there is, oddly enough, fairly compelling evidence for the first four, and if all five were true, it wouldn't change my life one bit. I'm even open to the fifth hypothesis being true, but have yet to see any evidence of it.
I remember thinking as I sat in class in 6th grade that I was being indoctrinated, as much as I was being educated, and I've long known I was being lied to, and manipulated by the filth that run advertising, marketing, and media.
So now I'm only occasionally stunned by the sureality that I'm living through a global genocidal operation using bioweaponry.
I guess it's like being Gregor Samsa awakening to find he's a bug or awakening to find you're in a Salvador Dali painting.
Given the history of use of poisonous gasses by the Nazis, use of bioweaponry by the Japanese in China, and unconsented experimentation of various kinds on Americans in large numbers I guess none of what's happening today should strike anyone as surreal. The Fascists won WWII in reality, and lost in on paper.
Attorney Todd Callender has been talking about this GMO ownership issue as it relates to the Covid bioweapons for a long time, so he's been deep into this for his cases. I'm so glad he is now getting more coverage on this issue. We are six weeks away from the hearing of his case, right?
When Monsanto sued farmers for having GMO crops without contracts this is what happened: All it took was some GMO crop pollen floating over into their field and contaminating their non-GMO plantings. It was unfair and sick. And the result (by plan?) was they forced many farmers to knuckle under and grow only GMO crops. So, there is a precedent about Genetically Modified Organisms being held under patent, wherever their patented genetic material pops up. Was it a fair decision? I wonder!
Regarding the mRNA shots altering humans, reaching into a person's cells and changing ANYTHING gene-based at all, or is it just an injury like too much radiation? My question is this: We are finding there is nothing in the mRNA used in the jabs that is truly BIOLOGICAL because it was all made SYNTHETICALLY, so doesn't that mean that any claims to altering a person genetically (biologically) is probably a hoax when actually all that has happened is that victims of the shots have had their cells/DNA TOXIFIED by synthetic foreign materials?
Perhaps a distinction like this might not be obvious to scientific sorts who are so deep into the many fine points that they might not look at this as NOT being a true genetic engineering event, but rather an outright toxifying/POISONING event. (I think dismissing Dr. Bryan Ardis' venomization observations is part of avoiding this elephant in the room, because, to give credence to Dr. Ardis' observations about synthetic venoms would mean POISONING would be in the forefront of discussion. As it is, allowing mRNA tech to APPEAR truly controllable and effective for bioengineering distinct things (other than ADDING toxic components and inciting injury) may be sleight of hand -- in the propaganda realm with 9/11's two planes turning three skyscrapers to dust. We mustn't be duped. Do we always let the opposition define the terms or do we have a chance at key points to take the lead and make them REALLY PROVE what they claim is true?
So how many of us are genetic engineering specialists? How easy it is for a Dr. Malone or anybody else to talk over us, talk over our common sense.
POISONING is POISONING. I don't care if they call it genetic engineering. Prove it isn't poisoning. Prove that those patents the government and Pharma are brandishing are not just patents for poisons that the BIOLOGICAL WORLD CANNOT TOLERATE. Look at what result is following years of GMO crops and glyphosate dominance. This is NOT a thriving biosphere since its introduction; they CANNOT prove we are better off or that the planet is improved. Just the opposite -- plant and habitat diversity, health of pollinators, quality of water and so on have dived. Glyphosate is a poison. Putting a poison into a living plant does not make a new plant so much as it poisons it at the cellular level.
I surmise mRNA "vaccines" are delivering an undisclosed number of synthetic substances that are foreign to human bloodstream, brain, organs, tissues, all the body's cells, that these are essentially poisonous to us by being foreign first, and, second, by being poisonous or diease-inducing in actuality (for instance polyethylene glycol and also bovine fetal serum with prion potential). This could make those they seek to classify as Homo borgiensis as no more than poisoned Homo sapiens.
GMO technology is in its infancy for sure. They have jumped the gun on this one. They do not have an ability to assure outcomes in advance. But that hasn't stopped them from doing so anyway. Plus they have had the opportunity to additionally insert poisons and harming substances in their pharmaceuticals and misinform us that their products are still health preserving with safety and efficacy assured by their word alone. BY THEIR WORD ALONE. Because inadequate research trials give inadequate results and therefore nothing exists but their word. And that shouldn't be enough in the marketplace or in the courtroom!
Thanks. A borg by any other name... is just as scary.
Got it !
In any case, what a strange word indeed...yet fitting for such a strange inhuman adulterated being.
Please do say more about Elva Thompson.
Between flat earth, we never went to the moon, viruses don't exist, and nuclear weapons are not what we've been taught they are, adding humanity is one long genetic experiment by some mysterious overlords, as Thompson and others contend, gets us to nearly half a dozen fascinating so-called conspiracy theories.
I'd call them hypotheses as there is, oddly enough, fairly compelling evidence for the first four, and if all five were true, it wouldn't change my life one bit. I'm even open to the fifth hypothesis being true, but have yet to see any evidence of it.
I remember thinking as I sat in class in 6th grade that I was being indoctrinated, as much as I was being educated, and I've long known I was being lied to, and manipulated by the filth that run advertising, marketing, and media.
So now I'm only occasionally stunned by the sureality that I'm living through a global genocidal operation using bioweaponry.
I guess it's like being Gregor Samsa awakening to find he's a bug or awakening to find you're in a Salvador Dali painting.
Given the history of use of poisonous gasses by the Nazis, use of bioweaponry by the Japanese in China, and unconsented experimentation of various kinds on Americans in large numbers I guess none of what's happening today should strike anyone as surreal. The Fascists won WWII in reality, and lost in on paper.
Excellent! Thank you!
Thank you, Katherine. You're the best!
Attorney Todd Callender has been talking about this GMO ownership issue as it relates to the Covid bioweapons for a long time, so he's been deep into this for his cases. I'm so glad he is now getting more coverage on this issue. We are six weeks away from the hearing of his case, right?
When Monsanto sued farmers for having GMO crops without contracts this is what happened: All it took was some GMO crop pollen floating over into their field and contaminating their non-GMO plantings. It was unfair and sick. And the result (by plan?) was they forced many farmers to knuckle under and grow only GMO crops. So, there is a precedent about Genetically Modified Organisms being held under patent, wherever their patented genetic material pops up. Was it a fair decision? I wonder!
Regarding the mRNA shots altering humans, reaching into a person's cells and changing ANYTHING gene-based at all, or is it just an injury like too much radiation? My question is this: We are finding there is nothing in the mRNA used in the jabs that is truly BIOLOGICAL because it was all made SYNTHETICALLY, so doesn't that mean that any claims to altering a person genetically (biologically) is probably a hoax when actually all that has happened is that victims of the shots have had their cells/DNA TOXIFIED by synthetic foreign materials?
Perhaps a distinction like this might not be obvious to scientific sorts who are so deep into the many fine points that they might not look at this as NOT being a true genetic engineering event, but rather an outright toxifying/POISONING event. (I think dismissing Dr. Bryan Ardis' venomization observations is part of avoiding this elephant in the room, because, to give credence to Dr. Ardis' observations about synthetic venoms would mean POISONING would be in the forefront of discussion. As it is, allowing mRNA tech to APPEAR truly controllable and effective for bioengineering distinct things (other than ADDING toxic components and inciting injury) may be sleight of hand -- in the propaganda realm with 9/11's two planes turning three skyscrapers to dust. We mustn't be duped. Do we always let the opposition define the terms or do we have a chance at key points to take the lead and make them REALLY PROVE what they claim is true?
So how many of us are genetic engineering specialists? How easy it is for a Dr. Malone or anybody else to talk over us, talk over our common sense.
POISONING is POISONING. I don't care if they call it genetic engineering. Prove it isn't poisoning. Prove that those patents the government and Pharma are brandishing are not just patents for poisons that the BIOLOGICAL WORLD CANNOT TOLERATE. Look at what result is following years of GMO crops and glyphosate dominance. This is NOT a thriving biosphere since its introduction; they CANNOT prove we are better off or that the planet is improved. Just the opposite -- plant and habitat diversity, health of pollinators, quality of water and so on have dived. Glyphosate is a poison. Putting a poison into a living plant does not make a new plant so much as it poisons it at the cellular level.
I surmise mRNA "vaccines" are delivering an undisclosed number of synthetic substances that are foreign to human bloodstream, brain, organs, tissues, all the body's cells, that these are essentially poisonous to us by being foreign first, and, second, by being poisonous or diease-inducing in actuality (for instance polyethylene glycol and also bovine fetal serum with prion potential). This could make those they seek to classify as Homo borgiensis as no more than poisoned Homo sapiens.
GMO technology is in its infancy for sure. They have jumped the gun on this one. They do not have an ability to assure outcomes in advance. But that hasn't stopped them from doing so anyway. Plus they have had the opportunity to additionally insert poisons and harming substances in their pharmaceuticals and misinform us that their products are still health preserving with safety and efficacy assured by their word alone. BY THEIR WORD ALONE. Because inadequate research trials give inadequate results and therefore nothing exists but their word. And that shouldn't be enough in the marketplace or in the courtroom!