Many already know this, but John Titus of “Best Evidence” Substack drills deep on this very topic and how it relates to Sovereignty. If you are at all interested in this topic I highly recommend Titus’ work as required reading. He discusses this topic regularly with Catherine Austin Fitts of Solari.com (paywall but some free content to non-members too -- I recommend membership here also if not already a Solari subscriber).

Thanks for your amazing work, Katherine!

Expand full comment

I think you would be interested to hear this, and I would like to hear your comment on it.


Expand full comment

RE "There's a good case to be made that the orchestrated implosion of FTX (Nov. 11, 2022) and other decentralized cryptocurrency systems earlier this year, were preparatory steps."

Indeed. This is what CAF has stated about FTX and its implications around CBDC's, when asked: "How are you going to market slavery?" Problem reaction solution, over and over again. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Please read all the way to the end and review the 'consumptive interventions' planned in the c40 cities. You can search your country and city on the first data base/ website link. Learn about what a c40 city is. These organizations seem to link together. (The Most Important link at the below, is also downloaded as an attachment for your thorough consideration.) https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/our-cities/


Every single city that is involved in this initiative the entire planet is listed. Do you know which Canadian cities are involved? Mississauga is. Toronto is. North Bay is. Edmonton is and a host of others. But do you know they have a target about how much meat you should eat in C40 Cities? (hint by 2030 NONE. Go through the tables in the link and attachment for yourself)

How many new clothes you can buy? hint: 3 a year is the aggressive target.

Each link is searchable. Read to the end. Consider closely the consumption mitigation or intervention strategies. Personal Auto ownership? Y Vins governed. Your food? decided.

Even the search terms are spooky; "our mayors" or "our cities"



search your city. Find out if its there. Notice anything about the cities missing. By the time you read and consider all of this, those are the cities you'll want to move to.

Has anyone heard of this? shouldn't we understand how they want to regulate the 'goods and services' consumed in their cities as it relates to climate change? This is also known as consumption mitigation and intervention strategies and involves food you eat/ energy/ clothes you're allowed to purchase.

(explore c40 website, you'll see what initiatives, which companies support this) As an aside how would the Strong Mayors Act recently passed fit in with this?


search your city. Find out if it's there. But move to C40 the more aggressive brand to truly see what a C40 city is.




The commitment of our 97 cities representing 700 million residents to the Leadership Standards demonstrates the resolve of the world’s mayors to deliver the urgent action needed to tackle the climate crisis. In this unprecedented moment in human history, we know that we must act without hesitation to save our planet and create a more equitable, prosperous, and healthy future for our children and grandchildren.

In the crucial years ahead, these Leadership Standards set us on a path to achieve a zero-carbon future, build meaningful and broad coalitions, and set a global model for cities around the world to follow suit. This work is grounded in the principles of the Global Green New Deal as the cornerstone of a green and just recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and the foundation of global efforts to address the climate emergency.

C40 Leadership Standards 2021-2024:

Plan. City has adopted a resilient and inclusive climate action plan aligned with the 1.5˚C ambition of the Paris Agreement, and updates it regularly;

Deliver. In 2024, city remains on track to deliver its climate action plan, contributing to increased resilience, equitable outcomes and halving C40’s overall emissions by 2030;

Mainstream. City uses the necessary financial, regulatory and other tools at their disposal to address the climate crisis and mainstreams their equitable climate targets into the most impactful city decision-making processes;

Innovate. City innovates and starts taking inclusive and resilient action to address emissions beyond the direct control of the city government, such as associated with goods and services consumed in their city;

Lead. Mayor and the city demonstrate global climate leadership and inspire others to act in support of the Paris Agreement.

These Leadership Standards will guide our collective action until at least 2024."

now take a look at this pdf: did you know that c40 wants you to have 3 new articles of clothing; look at the life of the car; how much meat by 2030 you can eat in a C40 city (0kg on the aggressive target- you've got to dig in and understand this is an agenda that has you on a leash. But who are the people that think you under their thumb to the point of food/car/flight/clothing consumption.. is theirs to control. Does it remind you of anything at all. What does it make you think of when you review this. Fedex likes and supports this. You can search which companies are involved in supporting this. Decide if they deserve your business. Is Post Media covering this?


Look at the tables for 'consumptive interventions'; Table 6 for instance tells you that these c40 cities believe they can dictate how many flights you should be able to have by 2030; Table 6.6.1? how many people can own vehicles; There's a table for how many kg of meat you can eat in these c40 cities. Aggressive target? 0kg. 2030 is 7 years away. Do you have a kid? a grand kid? should they taste burgers? or no. It's their mitt year this year? or will you get them underwear.

2 NEW EDITS share this information with city councilors in and not in c40 cities; and if you want to support me my book To Death by Lorna Park is on amazon (buy and give 5 stars)

Expand full comment

this morning the Dutch 'Frontnieuws' reported, that Dutch banks are now sending out warnings (almost threats) to people who take out too much cash. I know that in Belgium you can only pay a certain amount in cash, otherwise you are considered a criminal! I know the bank wherre I am at here in the US, only allows you to take out a small amount. Not sure if this is because they don't have much cash at the bank, it is just a small local one.

Expand full comment

If you are interested in more on CBDC what the recent George Gammon on the Fed being Bankrupt from yesterday. Problem is that the FED is NOT a government agency. WHY are we allowing them to treat us like they are???

Expand full comment

What climate crisis?

Expand full comment

Cryptocurrencies have been attracting fly-by-night artists for over a decade now, but FTX is the first one to make political hay with the khazar khabbal in ukraine.

The shekelberg boy just ran a fraudulent exchange and ran with the money, just like they do in other banks. The people who lost their money were just fools who left it sitting in on SBF's computer.

This in no-way invalidates time-tested, decentralized cryptocurrency. You only really own crypto that you have the keys for. Not your keys, not your coins.

Expand full comment
Dec 14, 2022·edited Dec 14, 2022

Katherine i cant thank you enough. Gonna wrote a letter and send to state and fed legislatures. I will not willingly put myself and future generations into this digital slave system If it is any good this letter I will share. Maybe if we can get one or two others to do so....

Expand full comment

Notwithstanding the calcified hemorrhoid, Biden's Executive Order, doesn't the Constitution forbid the issue of anything but "specie" for money? Technically, Federal Reserve Notes are unconstitutional, at least that's my understanding. But FRNs, while printed by the Treasury, are not issued by the government but by the Federal Reserve Banks (as Federal as Federal Express, so the saying goes).

So if the Treasury is to "issue" CBDC, then the Constitution should prevent this. Should. But... Then there is Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 and Julliard v Greenman ("The Legal Tender Case").

Would love Katherine's comments on this.

Expand full comment

"Orchestrated implosion", or are they taking advantage of the implosion? I guess, from our standpoint, it doesn't really matter ... but we keep seeing these gov't operations, run through or by, our intelligence agencies and FBI: Garland Mohamed Cartoon Operation (FBI); Governor Whitmer Kidnapping Operation (FBI); January 6 (multiple agencies); Infiltration of Twitter (DHS, among others); Covid and the Jab (DARPA, CISA & others); etc. They're all done with the intent (or result) of the further concentration of power in the Gov't and its Agencies.

No one is taking the opportunity to say a single thing about serious cuts to the Intelligence agencies and DOJ after all this? Man, are we unprepared and unserious.

And no significant political voice can apparently muster the courage to say a single thing? The only conclusion I can come to is that our leaders have already been recruited to the Agenda ... or they already so compromised by the Intelligence Community that they'll sign on "willingly" when the time and opportunity present themselves.

Expand full comment

Why are Executive Orders, i.e. rule by "executive fiat", even constitutional? 🤷‍♀️

Expand full comment

I never saw details, but I read somewhere that Nancy Pelosi tried to slip digital currency legislation into one of the big Covid-19 spending bills. But it was pulled out prior to the vote.

Expand full comment

They may try to use Executive orders in combination with Emergency Powers to fully implement the CBDC as the single currency. Emergency power is how all the tyranny has been implemented to date, the lockdowns, mandates, etc. According to the Constitution a replacement to the current fiat dollar would require an act of Congress(a new law), however some kind of Emergency Use Authorization could be imposed to bypass Congress(which Congress seems to love these days) in order to ‘get the camels nose inside the tent’. And as we all know once the camels nose is inside he’s coming in, and down comes the tent. When a CBDC is fully implemented there will be no going back. It is a one way street.

I believe it will be initially rolled out as a ‘parallel’ currency to the fiat dollar in some way, perhaps in some regional fashion, for example in blue states where the State government authorized it. But it is very unclear how this would work for any extended period, so I expect a relatively short transition period. So I for a parallel system to be established for a brief period, followed by a fomented “crisis”, followed by a ‘turning off’ of the fiat dollar and a complete conversion to a CBDC by EUA. The timing of all this is equally uncertain

Expand full comment

.....I would submit that, as the United States' CORPORATE dissolution is alleged to have ALREADY occurred, such EOs (and most ALL of Joey Hands', this Congress' actions) are ILLEGAL, not valid, NULLifiable - likely a MAJOR [set of] wrench[es] is in PLACE, Katherine.....

Expand full comment
Dec 15, 2022·edited Dec 15, 2022

This is off subject, but I can't believe my eyes. Is the Pope really advocating this:


Truly amazing to me if true. Thank you for taking time to answer.

Expand full comment