Damn! This was a good read. This part makes me slightly annoyed
“So, under a state of war, state of national emergency and/or state of public health emergency, all Americans are classified as enemies of the state (the District of Columbia federal government pretense), as insurgents, rebels or aliens, and can be legally targeted for killing, using any weapons the federal government and its military deem appropriate, at the President and Defense Secretary’s discretion.”
...but I appreciate the attempt at providing a possible solution to the challenge we face, Katherine. Cheers!
I’m still trying to digest the enormity of what Katherine has uncovered with this and the other recent posts about the legality and current structure of our govt/corporate officers masquerading as elected reps for 160+ years.
:...the current pseudo-legal structures that were designed by the central bankers to moot the Constitution..."
I concur.
Your points about States of Emergency under which our pseudo-legal government is operating help illuminate the situation as well. Thank you.
But those same bankers have also captured a majority of courts, legislatures and any regulatory agency. There will be no turning back. Those same bankers also set-up AntiFa and BLM while the captured law-enforcement agencies and MSM run cover.
At the root of our current global emergency seems to be the growing proliferation of manufactured emergencies aimed at replacing the remnants of Constitutional governance with administrative governance that has effectively transformed the legal status of humans from that of citizens to that of terrorists and enemy combatants.
The administrative state thinks we are all domestic terrorists, calling out one side plays into the red/blue, left/right paradigm that keeps everyone distracted from the actual tyrants.
But please keep paying your taxes. And don't get cute with demonstrations, or else you'll end up like those "insurrectionists" on Jan 6. The admin state can do whatever it wants, everyone knows it, so just play along and pretend we still have a "democracy" worth keeping.
Agreed. Karen Kingston is not the only one pointing out the legalese sleight of hand for the "approval", ive been shouting about it since they first discussed approving it and Jordan Schatel covered it in his Substack but seemed to lose interest. Yet even KK is missing the forest for the trees.
The shot "approved" is NOT the shot being distributed and given. Pfizer has even told us so on public record (Albert Bourla interview), that despite joyfully gaining "approval" of the Pfizer Inc "Comrinaty" shot to be manufactured and distributed, it would CONTINUE to distribute and the Pfizer-BioNtech "Comrinaty" shot to the public and around the world, until that was all used up.😐😐🤦♀️🤦♀️😑
Yes, and then there’s Sasha’s point that no one (outside of the DoD and its contractors) actually knows what’s in any of the shots as injected anyway, and no one is allowed to know.
Agreed, and again I ask the question- Where are all the lawyers in this?
Obviously, ones like Tom Renz and Aaron Siri are working hard but where are the rest? The Covid Investigation Committee seems to have imploded (Reinhardt and co). And as far as I can tell the Australian crew with Selena has disappeared. Contract law is intricate and I know (after reading the hacker-leaked Argentinian, Romanian versions etc) that Pfizer and co got crack teams of lawyers to draw them up- they are tight as! BUT, I know that they would not have been able to make it impossible. There will be something missed that can be exploited for humanity's benefit, not corporates for a change. #optimisticbutdetermined
Yeah, I noticed that too. I dont understand why that thread is not being pulled harder, particularly by journalists or lawyers. The USA DoD even got busted handing out EUA shots to military personnel that had label tampering on it, with the EUA shot being re-labelled with "Comrinaty" on it (note, no company name, just the brand). Because- they said, to counter shot hesitancy in the military near the beginning of the rollout. 🤔🤨🤦♀️
I can't get evidence here in Australia, as the Doctors and clinical staff are scared witless of losing their jobs/practice. (though that may be about to change..)
But it's the same story- People were being told they were given the "approved" shot, listed on their shot passport, but that was BEFORE Pfizer had actually petitioned and received FDA approval for Pfizer Inc "Comrinaty".
This will not be won in the courts, trust me, that’s what I do. On the state side any civil suit will be removed to federal court because there is a “federal question.” Then the federal courts will have to defer to the DOD/EUA/MIIC acts/statutes/exec orders and dismiss for lack of standing, etc. I’ve not looked into it, but would presume, that individual states, in return for Fed/Prep $$$, agreed to no liability against all potential bad actors. Might be interesting to empanel a grand jury to look into it though, should I?
Haven't checked on the status of their case for a couple of months, but it was being smothered by DOJ and the federal judge as of November.
It's a legal war of attrition, in my view, to move the needle on the attorneys, prosecutors, legislators and judges. As many people as possible, filing as many different types of cases, in as many different levels of court, as they can think of.
No one knows which straw will break the camel's back.
If you want to reach out privately, my email is kgwatt@protonmail.com. And I'm in contact with several lawyers and legal strategists and potential plaintiffs who have also been working for a long time to prepare to put the evidence and arguments together, for anyone who can get it in front of the right judges, juries and legislators.
in my opinion you, we all, could start over again. Just give it a chance. Small impact, no united things, communities, we all will prosper, have a wonderful life, in nature that will get the possibility to restore itself to its grand beauty. An organic live.
Katherine Watt I find this very interesting as you piece together the legal/political pieces of legislation.
However I think the other important strain to this is not a pandemic enabler per se, but the driver which is not the means (and yes Operation Covid is a cover, pure and simple).
And yes the bankers and the associated cohorts are behind much of this. But that's the main clue. The unraveling of the economic system has pushed this coup into overdrive using the medical system and most specifically the fraudulent use of the pseudo-science - virology - to make a fear based operation to induce a economic and social coma on the population at large.
Why? The system is unravelling and the free-fall need to be stopped while a "reset" was implemented. The Constitution was never as binding as we like to believe. All of the legal pieces seem almost incidentally, unnecessary to perform this control.
It could very well be that the United States will break apart and be a thing of the past as know it. I don't think Dorothy is going home.
I see no saviors. It's gone way to far for far too long.
"... the J6 protestors and their clear Constitutional allegiance, had potential to interfere with the central bankers’ bid for control, while BLM protestors did not."
And that would be because BLM is an FBI/central bankers op.
100% correct in your assumptions according to research I have done. President Lincoln did declare a national emergency and initiated Marshall Law. He was assassinated before he could rescind it. The Organic act of 1871 established the Federal Corporation. It was repealed in 1874 but pieces of it were included in other legislation over the years after that. The federal corporation is reported to have gone bankrupt in 2018 and finalized in I believe 2022. Also look at "The-Mythos-Mafia-The-Papal-Bloodlines-of-the-Jesuits1A", I believe it will tell you who the enemy is. In order to win a war, you must know your enemy.
Very informative. Katherine, if you have discussed this, point me in the right direction. Was a Constitutional crisis created when Southern Representatives walked out of Congress sine die, without any future date designated for resumption?
That’s one of the important events, but not the only one.
Word trickery in legal documents is one of the most difficult parts to unravel, but a lot of the Constitutional perversions were carried out through that mechanism.
Documents to look into if you’re interested include Lincoln’s executive proclamations from Sept. 1862 and Jan. 1863 (Emancipation Proclamation) and the 13th and 14th Amendments.
It has good info, but I find online article collections less helpful than hard bound books for the initial orientation process, so I’m not using it a lot yet.
I still think that just because evil makes laws to protect themselves from be held accountable for murderous, immoral acts against humanity dose not mean these laws can't be removed from the books. Murder is murder and no matter what they do to make it ok in their eyes, it is not ok. This is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard of. To legalize crimes against humanity is insane to even think it could hold water. Hang them high.
MIght have asked a Native North American. No doubt about it there.
I've never understood how the genocide of the Native North American, the prize winning genocide, can be so perpetually denied, in order for "americans" to keep the stroking party going.
We're so cool, we're so great, and god is on our side. That's why genocide wasn't genocide when we did it.
Wonder why we're where we're at today? I don't. I see, hear, and experience the reasons every single day of life. Along with the denial which accompanies.
Katherine, how do we decide whether our current disaster dates to 1861 or 1969? If the former, was the Civil War a long-term banker project for setting up an eventual all-powerful OWG that even then was already envisioned? It seems we keep going further back in history. Is the real source Adam Weishaupt/Bavarian Illuminati, 1776?
At some point, it's not going to matter how far back it goes, except to historians.
That point will be when enough people understand that it's all a premeditated criminal enterprise and figure out how to stop the crimes and punish the criminals.
We're not there yet, which is why I keep digging, currently looking at the 1861-1969 interval.
If I get a handle on that well enough, and the government landscape hasn't changed by that time, I guess I'll research and write about the 1776-1861 interval.
If the government landscape does change a lot, I think I'll probably write more about the new government as it emerges, and about the trials of the central bankers.
Damn! This was a good read. This part makes me slightly annoyed
“So, under a state of war, state of national emergency and/or state of public health emergency, all Americans are classified as enemies of the state (the District of Columbia federal government pretense), as insurgents, rebels or aliens, and can be legally targeted for killing, using any weapons the federal government and its military deem appropriate, at the President and Defense Secretary’s discretion.”
...but I appreciate the attempt at providing a possible solution to the challenge we face, Katherine. Cheers!
I thought that because the laws were made at sea the USA citizens were already enemies of the state from way back.
You could be right.
I’m still trying to digest the enormity of what Katherine has uncovered with this and the other recent posts about the legality and current structure of our govt/corporate officers masquerading as elected reps for 160+ years.
:...the current pseudo-legal structures that were designed by the central bankers to moot the Constitution..."
I concur.
Your points about States of Emergency under which our pseudo-legal government is operating help illuminate the situation as well. Thank you.
But those same bankers have also captured a majority of courts, legislatures and any regulatory agency. There will be no turning back. Those same bankers also set-up AntiFa and BLM while the captured law-enforcement agencies and MSM run cover.
Can we the people use Common Law to subvert the traitors and insurgents?
At the root of our current global emergency seems to be the growing proliferation of manufactured emergencies aimed at replacing the remnants of Constitutional governance with administrative governance that has effectively transformed the legal status of humans from that of citizens to that of terrorists and enemy combatants.
Chattel - that's the end game.
Under this rubric, it's no wonder Brandon can call half of America domestic terrorists.
The administrative state thinks we are all domestic terrorists, calling out one side plays into the red/blue, left/right paradigm that keeps everyone distracted from the actual tyrants.
But please keep paying your taxes. And don't get cute with demonstrations, or else you'll end up like those "insurrectionists" on Jan 6. The admin state can do whatever it wants, everyone knows it, so just play along and pretend we still have a "democracy" worth keeping.
Karen has been towing that line since 2021 right after the "approval". She's the only one calling it out as far as I know.
Agreed. Karen Kingston is not the only one pointing out the legalese sleight of hand for the "approval", ive been shouting about it since they first discussed approving it and Jordan Schatel covered it in his Substack but seemed to lose interest. Yet even KK is missing the forest for the trees.
The shot "approved" is NOT the shot being distributed and given. Pfizer has even told us so on public record (Albert Bourla interview), that despite joyfully gaining "approval" of the Pfizer Inc "Comrinaty" shot to be manufactured and distributed, it would CONTINUE to distribute and the Pfizer-BioNtech "Comrinaty" shot to the public and around the world, until that was all used up.😐😐🤦♀️🤦♀️😑
Yes, and then there’s Sasha’s point that no one (outside of the DoD and its contractors) actually knows what’s in any of the shots as injected anyway, and no one is allowed to know.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/nobody-knows-what-is-in-the-vials
Agreed, and again I ask the question- Where are all the lawyers in this?
Obviously, ones like Tom Renz and Aaron Siri are working hard but where are the rest? The Covid Investigation Committee seems to have imploded (Reinhardt and co). And as far as I can tell the Australian crew with Selena has disappeared. Contract law is intricate and I know (after reading the hacker-leaked Argentinian, Romanian versions etc) that Pfizer and co got crack teams of lawyers to draw them up- they are tight as! BUT, I know that they would not have been able to make it impossible. There will be something missed that can be exploited for humanity's benefit, not corporates for a change. #optimisticbutdetermined
"The shot "approved" is NOT the shot being distributed and given."
Yes, and for some reason, KK has said this is not so.
But it is.
Yeah, I noticed that too. I dont understand why that thread is not being pulled harder, particularly by journalists or lawyers. The USA DoD even got busted handing out EUA shots to military personnel that had label tampering on it, with the EUA shot being re-labelled with "Comrinaty" on it (note, no company name, just the brand). Because- they said, to counter shot hesitancy in the military near the beginning of the rollout. 🤔🤨🤦♀️
I can't get evidence here in Australia, as the Doctors and clinical staff are scared witless of losing their jobs/practice. (though that may be about to change..)
But it's the same story- People were being told they were given the "approved" shot, listed on their shot passport, but that was BEFORE Pfizer had actually petitioned and received FDA approval for Pfizer Inc "Comrinaty".
This will not be won in the courts, trust me, that’s what I do. On the state side any civil suit will be removed to federal court because there is a “federal question.” Then the federal courts will have to defer to the DOD/EUA/MIIC acts/statutes/exec orders and dismiss for lack of standing, etc. I’ve not looked into it, but would presume, that individual states, in return for Fed/Prep $$$, agreed to no liability against all potential bad actors. Might be interesting to empanel a grand jury to look into it though, should I?
If you have the power to empanel a grand jury, go for it.
Henry Ealy and other plaintiffs in Oregon have been trying for a few years.
https://www.beyondthecon.com/
Haven't checked on the status of their case for a couple of months, but it was being smothered by DOJ and the federal judge as of November.
It's a legal war of attrition, in my view, to move the needle on the attorneys, prosecutors, legislators and judges. As many people as possible, filing as many different types of cases, in as many different levels of court, as they can think of.
No one knows which straw will break the camel's back.
I do
Excellent.
God be with you, and let me know how I can help.
If you want to reach out privately, my email is kgwatt@protonmail.com. And I'm in contact with several lawyers and legal strategists and potential plaintiffs who have also been working for a long time to prepare to put the evidence and arguments together, for anyone who can get it in front of the right judges, juries and legislators.
Thank you Katherine for all you do, we’ll be in touch
I vote yes!
in my opinion you, we all, could start over again. Just give it a chance. Small impact, no united things, communities, we all will prosper, have a wonderful life, in nature that will get the possibility to restore itself to its grand beauty. An organic live.
Foster Gamble (Thrive) has a similar vision also.
I do not know him. But i only eat organic, and so i really saw the enormous possibilities in small scale.
Katherine Watt I find this very interesting as you piece together the legal/political pieces of legislation.
However I think the other important strain to this is not a pandemic enabler per se, but the driver which is not the means (and yes Operation Covid is a cover, pure and simple).
And yes the bankers and the associated cohorts are behind much of this. But that's the main clue. The unraveling of the economic system has pushed this coup into overdrive using the medical system and most specifically the fraudulent use of the pseudo-science - virology - to make a fear based operation to induce a economic and social coma on the population at large.
Why? The system is unravelling and the free-fall need to be stopped while a "reset" was implemented. The Constitution was never as binding as we like to believe. All of the legal pieces seem almost incidentally, unnecessary to perform this control.
It could very well be that the United States will break apart and be a thing of the past as know it. I don't think Dorothy is going home.
I see no saviors. It's gone way to far for far too long.
"... the J6 protestors and their clear Constitutional allegiance, had potential to interfere with the central bankers’ bid for control, while BLM protestors did not."
And that would be because BLM is an FBI/central bankers op.
100% correct in your assumptions according to research I have done. President Lincoln did declare a national emergency and initiated Marshall Law. He was assassinated before he could rescind it. The Organic act of 1871 established the Federal Corporation. It was repealed in 1874 but pieces of it were included in other legislation over the years after that. The federal corporation is reported to have gone bankrupt in 2018 and finalized in I believe 2022. Also look at "The-Mythos-Mafia-The-Papal-Bloodlines-of-the-Jesuits1A", I believe it will tell you who the enemy is. In order to win a war, you must know your enemy.
Nevermind...I found it very easily with a Duck-Duck-Go search.
I'd like to look at that Papal Bloodlines- Jesuit reference, but it's not a true linked article. Would you try to post that link again? Thank you.
https://archive.org/details/TheMythosMafiaThePapalBloodlinesOfTheJesuits1A
WOW! That was overwhelming!
Thank you.
This is huge! 😳
Very informative. Katherine, if you have discussed this, point me in the right direction. Was a Constitutional crisis created when Southern Representatives walked out of Congress sine die, without any future date designated for resumption?
That’s one of the important events, but not the only one.
Word trickery in legal documents is one of the most difficult parts to unravel, but a lot of the Constitutional perversions were carried out through that mechanism.
Documents to look into if you’re interested include Lincoln’s executive proclamations from Sept. 1862 and Jan. 1863 (Emancipation Proclamation) and the 13th and 14th Amendments.
Someone referred me to this site recently.
https://famguardian.org/
It has good info, but I find online article collections less helpful than hard bound books for the initial orientation process, so I’m not using it a lot yet.
Thank you
I still think that just because evil makes laws to protect themselves from be held accountable for murderous, immoral acts against humanity dose not mean these laws can't be removed from the books. Murder is murder and no matter what they do to make it ok in their eyes, it is not ok. This is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard of. To legalize crimes against humanity is insane to even think it could hold water. Hang them high.
"Without knowing it. "
MIght have asked a Native North American. No doubt about it there.
I've never understood how the genocide of the Native North American, the prize winning genocide, can be so perpetually denied, in order for "americans" to keep the stroking party going.
We're so cool, we're so great, and god is on our side. That's why genocide wasn't genocide when we did it.
Wonder why we're where we're at today? I don't. I see, hear, and experience the reasons every single day of life. Along with the denial which accompanies.
https://andersonatlarge.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c697453ef01b8d15d98d5970c-800wi
Post note: Sorry I meant Martial law, it apparently was a brain short circuit.
Katherine, how do we decide whether our current disaster dates to 1861 or 1969? If the former, was the Civil War a long-term banker project for setting up an eventual all-powerful OWG that even then was already envisioned? It seems we keep going further back in history. Is the real source Adam Weishaupt/Bavarian Illuminati, 1776?
I don't know.
At some point, it's not going to matter how far back it goes, except to historians.
That point will be when enough people understand that it's all a premeditated criminal enterprise and figure out how to stop the crimes and punish the criminals.
We're not there yet, which is why I keep digging, currently looking at the 1861-1969 interval.
If I get a handle on that well enough, and the government landscape hasn't changed by that time, I guess I'll research and write about the 1776-1861 interval.
If the government landscape does change a lot, I think I'll probably write more about the new government as it emerges, and about the trials of the central bankers.