NO JOKE...Of every western nation throughout the old British Empire...Including the U.S. The Monarchy with its Aristocracy IS the HIDDEN ENTITY behind the Central Bankers/Bank of International Settlements of the Rothschilds. The Ruling Elites really ARE going for broke and pulling-out all of the stops for ABSOLUTE CONTROL. Layers upon la…
NO JOKE...Of every western nation throughout the old British Empire...Including the U.S. The Monarchy with its Aristocracy IS the HIDDEN ENTITY behind the Central Bankers/Bank of International Settlements of the Rothschilds. The Ruling Elites really ARE going for broke and pulling-out all of the stops for ABSOLUTE CONTROL. Layers upon layers of smoke and mirrors to get through to get to the top. The people have arrived at the truth of their charades AND THEY KNOW IT.
I don't know. The King reigns, but he does not rule. Ruling is done by his government, and as head of state in the UK the King is constitutionally obliged to follow the government’s advice. The Queen certainly let us down when she pushed the "vaccines". Not that that did her or Philip much good as they didn't last much longer after being jabbed.
Apparently, the King himself is above the law although In general, the English Bill of Rights (1689) limited the power of the monarchy, elevated the status of Parliament and outlined specific rights of individuals.
Some of the key liberties and concepts laid out in the articles included:
'Freedom to elect members of Parliament, without the king or queen’s interference
Freedom of speech in Parliament
Freedom from royal interference with the law
Freedom to petition the king
Freedom to bear arms for self-defence
Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment and excessive bail
Freedom from taxation by royal prerogative, without the agreement of Parliament
Freedom of fines and forfeitures without a trial
Freedom from armies being raised during peacetimes'.
But in the UK laws are now made by 3 parts of Parliament ie
The House of Commons, The House of Lords (This is Parliament's second chamber. Its main job is to 'double check' new laws to make sure they are fair and will work. People working here are not elected by the people) and The Monarchy.
The King has the final say on whether a bill becomes law. This is because the King is our head of state. What actually happens is that he accepts the advice of his government
The Commons is captured by the shadowy elites, the Lords has been made toothless and not independent and the Queen signed off the coronavirus acts and did not say 'no' on behalf of the British people.
Whether this is because she was never political during her reign and/or because she was part of the shadowy elite is hard to say. It could be that if she or her son Charles were to stand up and say 'no' to the Rothschilds etc they would be replaced or even the Monarchy itself would be at risk. The public could easily be turned against it by the media.
NO JOKE...Of every western nation throughout the old British Empire...Including the U.S. The Monarchy with its Aristocracy IS the HIDDEN ENTITY behind the Central Bankers/Bank of International Settlements of the Rothschilds. The Ruling Elites really ARE going for broke and pulling-out all of the stops for ABSOLUTE CONTROL. Layers upon layers of smoke and mirrors to get through to get to the top. The people have arrived at the truth of their charades AND THEY KNOW IT.
I don't know. The King reigns, but he does not rule. Ruling is done by his government, and as head of state in the UK the King is constitutionally obliged to follow the government’s advice. The Queen certainly let us down when she pushed the "vaccines". Not that that did her or Philip much good as they didn't last much longer after being jabbed.
Apparently, the King himself is above the law although In general, the English Bill of Rights (1689) limited the power of the monarchy, elevated the status of Parliament and outlined specific rights of individuals.
Some of the key liberties and concepts laid out in the articles included:
'Freedom to elect members of Parliament, without the king or queen’s interference
Freedom of speech in Parliament
Freedom from royal interference with the law
Freedom to petition the king
Freedom to bear arms for self-defence
Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment and excessive bail
Freedom from taxation by royal prerogative, without the agreement of Parliament
Freedom of fines and forfeitures without a trial
Freedom from armies being raised during peacetimes'.
But in the UK laws are now made by 3 parts of Parliament ie
The House of Commons, The House of Lords (This is Parliament's second chamber. Its main job is to 'double check' new laws to make sure they are fair and will work. People working here are not elected by the people) and The Monarchy.
The King has the final say on whether a bill becomes law. This is because the King is our head of state. What actually happens is that he accepts the advice of his government
The Commons is captured by the shadowy elites, the Lords has been made toothless and not independent and the Queen signed off the coronavirus acts and did not say 'no' on behalf of the British people.
Whether this is because she was never political during her reign and/or because she was part of the shadowy elite is hard to say. It could be that if she or her son Charles were to stand up and say 'no' to the Rothschilds etc they would be replaced or even the Monarchy itself would be at risk. The public could easily be turned against it by the media.