Bailiwick News

Share this post

Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally

bailiwicknews.substack.com

Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally

Set in motion by Bank of International Settlements in 1990, ratified by national governments in 2005, implemented in 2020 with “WHO-declared pandemic.”

Katherine Watt
Jan 31, 2022
11
3
Share this post

Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally

bailiwicknews.substack.com

UPDATE Feb. 28, 2022

I finished and posted the full report on this interview on Feb. 26:

  • Legal Walls of the Covid-19 Kill Box (PDF, 25 pages)

  • Legal Walls - Short Version (posted March 21)

It’s a long-read on the crosslinks between US federal law, WHO-directed biowarfare, Supreme Court precedents on patenting/ownership/licensing of genetically-modified living organisms, and local (county & state) public health/law enforcement merger, constructed between 1990 and 2021.

Outline:

  • Brief Analysis

  • 1990 - Three United Nations conventions

  • 2005 - The Owners, through the World Health Organization, create International Health Regulations

  • 2003, 2005 and 2014 US Presidents’ Executive Orders listing quarantinable communicable diseases

  • 2004 - 2006 - Congress passes Project Bioshield Act of 2004, PREP Act of 2005 and Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006 [Section added 3/26/22]

  • 2017 - Major rulemaking by US Department of Health and Human Services

  • Cumulative legal effect of International Health Regulations (IHR) and implementing national regulations and executive orders

  • 2013 - US Intellectual Property and Patent Law; Title 35 U.S.C. 101

  • 2020 — Clinical Treatment Protocol and Financial Coercion of Hospitals, Doctors and Nurses

  • 2008 — Merger of public health with law enforcement

  • Pennsylvania case study; how the IHR voids constitutional and statutory law and underpins public health martial law.

  • Ransom demand from World Health Organization to G20.

  • World Health Organization now working toward an expansion of the 2005 International Health Regulations

  • Conclusion

  • Related essays


ORIGINAL POST, Jan. 31, 2022 -

Extremely interesting and useful podcast.

It covers the legal redefinition of genetically-modified human beings as nonhuman, and therefore potentially without legally-cognizable human rights, through Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, US Supreme Court, 2013.

Also covers the relationship between the ICD-10 (international diagnosis code) and the funding mechanisms of the CARES Act (which I covered at the Centre County level for a few months in Spring 2021.)

Also covers military merger with public health systems, and hospital murder protocols.

Lots of material.


Other posts in this series:

Bailiwick News
January 19, 2017 Federal Register
I’m working on writing up my notes from Attorney Todd Callender’s interview by Dr. Elizabeth Vliet Lee, and doing some research to correct timeline errors and review cited documents. Among other key events, Callender pointed to the 2005 adoption, through the World Health Organization, of a set of…
Read more
a year ago · 1 like · KW
Bailiwick News
More on the International Health Regulations
Third installment of the Callender Interview series. Jan. 31, 2022 - Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally. Set in motion by Bank of International Settlements in 1990, ratified by national governments in 2005, implemented in 2020 with “WHO-declared pandemic…
Read more
a year ago · KW
Bailiwick News
How the International Health Regulations, voiding constitutional and statutory law in signatory nation-states...
Fourth installment of Callender Interview series. I just read a National File article about Pennsylvania Lieutenant Governor candidate Teddy Daniels' plans to arrest government officials who impose mandates, if Daniels is elected. The other day, as already noted, I listened to a…
Read more
a year ago · 1 like · KW
Bailiwick News
Ransom demand from World Health Organization to G20.
WHO wants rich states to contribute to Covid-19 plan. ACT-Accelerator initiative requires $16 billion to end the pandemic. RT The Access to Covid-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) is the WHO-led initiative that unites leading agencies in a bid to provide middle- and low-income countries with tests, vaccines, protective equipment, and other medical supplies ne…
Read more
a year ago · KW
Bailiwick News
World Health Organization now working toward an expansion of the 2005 International Health Regulations
Happening under cover of the worldwide temporary rollback of overt population control measures. United States Congress needs to withdraw the country from the World Health Organization…
Read more
a year ago · KW
Bailiwick News
Legal Walls of the Covid-19 Kill Box
I encourage readers to listen to this podcast interview of Attorney Todd Callender, conducted by Dr. Elizabeth Vliet Lee on Jan. 30, 2022. Callender is an international disability rights law expert and currently represents military personnel challenging Department of Defense "vaccine" mandates…
Read more
a year ago · 1 like · KW


“The 2005 International Health Regulations (Agreement) signed by all of the world’s countries, provided that in the event of a declared global pandemic, all human, constitutional, and charter rights guaranteed by each country were to be suspended with the World Health Organization in control of the solution. This legal framework was set into motion in March 2020 when the WHO declared a global pandemic.

DrLee4America interviews international attorney, Todd Callender, who founded Disabled Rights Advocates, and is the attorney of record on the Department of Defense lawsuit against vaccine mandates for the US Military. In this show, Callender lays out the historical and legal framework setting the stage for the Arizona Governor’s executive orders to implement the “Australia Plan” of forced quarantine camps and compulsory vaccination in America.”


Comments:

The information is terrifying, but important for understanding the spiritual war we’re all engaged in simply because we happen to be alive right now.

I find it better to know the Enemy, the Enemy’s goals and the Enemy’s legal and psychological tools and tactics, than not to know.

Also important to keep in mind, the Enemy tries very hard to persuade people that the structural changes in human society made in the past are irreversible, and the changes planned for the future are inevitable.

Both assertions are false, because humans have free will, are created in the image of God and have recourse to God’s guidance and God’s mercy.

Even the humans within legislatures and courts have that free will.

3
Share this post

Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally

bailiwicknews.substack.com
3 Comments
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Jan 3

I am a constitutionalist (Australia) and do not for one moment accept that the Commonwealth of Australia had any constitutional powers to hand over any sovereign powers to a foreign entity. The article white showing key points doesn't seem to set out details. I appreciate anyone providing additional details and email them to me. My email address is shown at my blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati. On 19 July 2006 I representing myself defeated the Commonwealth and the 9 Attorney-Generals on constitutional ground regarding FAILING TO VOTE in both cases, as I submitted to the court that "compulsory" part of voting was unconstitutional. While the Commonwealth and States/Territories nevertheless enforce compulsory voting it is because they ignore court decisions albeit cannot take me on again. Obviously for the USA the issue is if the Federal Government actually had the powers to assign its sovereign powers to the WHO, etc. And if Congress had any such constitutional powers. I understand that George W. H. Bush in 1991 (on video) made clear that the CDC is not a Government Department and neither are its employees public servants as the CDC must pursue the best interest of its sponsors (pharmaceutical companies, etc) and this then question why on earth the CDC was dictating hospital protocols regarding covid issues, etc?

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply
Book of Ours
Writes Book of Ours
Dec 1, 2022

Here is Todd Callender’s oral argument at court on 11/18/22

https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/oralarguments/22-1032.mp3?fbclid=IwAR1egAJ8ccugaN3QBo-qkKjoFg_nZHgpkDl_BgM38_os7lvOtyNOIPNtHeA&mibextid=Zxz2cZ

Expand full comment
Reply
1 more comment…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Katherine Watt
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing