Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally
Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally
Set in motion by Bank of International Settlements in 1990, ratified by national governments in 2005, implemented in 2020 with “WHO-declared pandemic.”
Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally
UPDATE Feb. 28, 2022
I finished and posted the full report on this interview on Feb. 26:
Legal Walls of the Covid-19 Kill Box (PDF, 25 pages)
Legal Walls - Short Version (posted March 21)
It’s a long-read on the crosslinks between US federal law, WHO-directed biowarfare, Supreme Court precedents on patenting/ownership/licensing of genetically-modified living organisms, and local (county & state) public health/law enforcement merger, constructed between 1990 and 2021.
Outline:
Brief Analysis
1990 - Three United Nations conventions
2005 - The Owners, through the World Health Organization, create International Health Regulations
2003, 2005 and 2014 US Presidents’ Executive Orders listing quarantinable communicable diseases
2004 - 2006 - Congress passes Project Bioshield Act of 2004, PREP Act of 2005 and Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006 [Section added 3/26/22]
2017 - Major rulemaking by US Department of Health and Human Services
Cumulative legal effect of International Health Regulations (IHR) and implementing national regulations and executive orders
2013 - US Intellectual Property and Patent Law; Title 35 U.S.C. 101
2020 — Clinical Treatment Protocol and Financial Coercion of Hospitals, Doctors and Nurses
2008 — Merger of public health with law enforcement
Pennsylvania case study; how the IHR voids constitutional and statutory law and underpins public health martial law.
Ransom demand from World Health Organization to G20.
World Health Organization now working toward an expansion of the 2005 International Health Regulations
Conclusion
Related essays
ORIGINAL POST, Jan. 31, 2022 -
Extremely interesting and useful podcast.
It covers the legal redefinition of genetically-modified human beings as nonhuman, and therefore potentially without legally-cognizable human rights, through Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, US Supreme Court, 2013.
Also covers the relationship between the ICD-10 (international diagnosis code) and the funding mechanisms of the CARES Act (which I covered at the Centre County level for a few months in Spring 2021.)
Also covers military merger with public health systems, and hospital murder protocols.
Lots of material.
Other posts in this series:
“The 2005 International Health Regulations (Agreement) signed by all of the world’s countries, provided that in the event of a declared global pandemic, all human, constitutional, and charter rights guaranteed by each country were to be suspended with the World Health Organization in control of the solution. This legal framework was set into motion in March 2020 when the WHO declared a global pandemic.
DrLee4America interviews international attorney, Todd Callender, who founded Disabled Rights Advocates, and is the attorney of record on the Department of Defense lawsuit against vaccine mandates for the US Military. In this show, Callender lays out the historical and legal framework setting the stage for the Arizona Governor’s executive orders to implement the “Australia Plan” of forced quarantine camps and compulsory vaccination in America.”
Comments:
The information is terrifying, but important for understanding the spiritual war we’re all engaged in simply because we happen to be alive right now.
I find it better to know the Enemy, the Enemy’s goals and the Enemy’s legal and psychological tools and tactics, than not to know.
Also important to keep in mind, the Enemy tries very hard to persuade people that the structural changes in human society made in the past are irreversible, and the changes planned for the future are inevitable.
Both assertions are false, because humans have free will, are created in the image of God and have recourse to God’s guidance and God’s mercy.
Even the humans within legislatures and courts have that free will.
I am a constitutionalist (Australia) and do not for one moment accept that the Commonwealth of Australia had any constitutional powers to hand over any sovereign powers to a foreign entity. The article white showing key points doesn't seem to set out details. I appreciate anyone providing additional details and email them to me. My email address is shown at my blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati. On 19 July 2006 I representing myself defeated the Commonwealth and the 9 Attorney-Generals on constitutional ground regarding FAILING TO VOTE in both cases, as I submitted to the court that "compulsory" part of voting was unconstitutional. While the Commonwealth and States/Territories nevertheless enforce compulsory voting it is because they ignore court decisions albeit cannot take me on again. Obviously for the USA the issue is if the Federal Government actually had the powers to assign its sovereign powers to the WHO, etc. And if Congress had any such constitutional powers. I understand that George W. H. Bush in 1991 (on video) made clear that the CDC is not a Government Department and neither are its employees public servants as the CDC must pursue the best interest of its sponsors (pharmaceutical companies, etc) and this then question why on earth the CDC was dictating hospital protocols regarding covid issues, etc?
Here is Todd Callender’s oral argument at court on 11/18/22
https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/oralarguments/22-1032.mp3?fbclid=IwAR1egAJ8ccugaN3QBo-qkKjoFg_nZHgpkDl_BgM38_os7lvOtyNOIPNtHeA&mibextid=Zxz2cZ