As a quick note, and not at all to distract from the current path of legal deconstruction of the illegal acts perpetrated by those in "power", I suggest reading "Fruit From A Poisonous Tree". Written by Melvin Stamper, 2008. This book provides much of the history being sought and the clever word games within the legal society. There is much more to it than this one compilation of how common law was quietly subverted (although it still exists if you know how to bring it forth). But, this is a good start for everyone. Melvin Stamper is a much more credible source than i. As always, do your own research and do not count on someone else to do the work for you.
Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil. Though a sinner does evil a hundred times, and his days are prolonged, yet I surely know that it will be well with those who fear God, who fear before Him. But it will not be well with the wicked; nor will he prolong his days, which are as a shadow, because he does not fear before God.
I can certainly apply these verses to public officials concerned with health after today’s revelations in the news regarding government overreach.
Your valuable time is well-spent pursuing the strategies for detailing the existing crimes, statues, and legal remedies that you laid out. Too bad we can't clone you into a million more Katherine Watts! Of course, I am against cloning... : )
My thoughts on America's organic law is a joke played on us. If you read American History, you will discover that before the 1783 King George 3rd's Treaty dictate all 13 Colonies chose a much different Rule of Law form.
The Common law for America as entitled 'Colonial Law, sums up what the Thirteen Colonies considered to be the final bases for all law in America or ever to be in America... "the colonies were so impressed with the idea of an overruling law of nature that the laws of God and so-called natural laws were regarded as the true laws, and all temporal legislation was considered to be binding only in so far as it was an expression of this natural law" Yes, back then there were some moral white hats. James Wilson, the foremost lawyer at the Constitutional Convention, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and a man who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1789 and was well familiar with this legal principal stated above called Natural Law and stated; "Parliament may, unquestionably, be controlled by natural or revealed law, proceeding from divine authority".
However, history seems to document King George 3rd. and the King's men, Washington, Franklin, Congress & Senate overruled this with their man-made Laws of the Sea, Maritime, and Admiralty Law.
After 1783 the Americans were not allowed to vote during the founding years, were not allowed to own their lands with free and clear title (Allodial or Land Patent), not allowed to implement their Rule of Law form (Our Rights Come from God) and in 1791 lost the right to choose their currency forms, commerce practices and private-side banking. Remember, Washington and Hamilton sided with the King in 1791 and we got a foreign banking system with foreign stockholders. this all stands to this date; exception would be voting LOL.
Ban/block them. I've been wondering why they keep posting the same thing with no explanation about what it is, how it would help, or how it's better, so I've never looked at it. I may have all the time in the world (yeah, right), but there's still other stuff I need to get done.
You are a god send! Your outline is how I remember it too. I was young but remember where I was when JFK was killed. My parents were republican and up to his assassination were not happy with his presidency. All that changed to my surprise. When I got home from grammar school my parents were in deep reverence/respect for President Kennedy. It was surprising and I asked questions about the change, which were brushed aside. Still a very sad memorable day.
Don’t forget that the fulcrum of the administrative state is that the Speaker of the House is the leader of Washington DC, and is governed by a pure democracy, The Congress, who control the corporate US Government. All it takes is a MAGA congress to overthrow the unlawful corp. The Corp. also arrived with law of the sea statutory rule, which is also immoral and unlawful, a revolution against the common law.
WOW, this is a tutorual on how to politely body slam someone intellectually while still keeping the door open to possibly relevant new information by putting the onus on the one making a claim of great relevance of said information for a succinct summary of a 247 page volume of what is, in essence, sovereign citizen gobbledygook.
My take on this sovereign citizen movement is that it is, in part, a legit aspect of US governance but not one about which 99.99% of Americans will have two clues. It's not how our present legal system works, and the movement seems to attract nutters, and convicted felons, like Shawn Rice, which makes it very appealing to criminal filth in the FBI to use run infiltrators, entrappers, disrupters, dividers, and distractors into legit efforts like the one Katherine is helping lead.
Solving crimes is not the primary function of the FBI. That's mainly just their cover. It was formed as the American version of the Gestapo to infiltrate, and destroy or co-opt anything that threatens the power of the criminals who have long controlled our federal government.
I look forward to reading the document as I've long tried to find legit sources of info on this subject. So far I've found none that explain the aspects of Maritime, and Common Law in any cohesive, practical manner. It's all written by nutters. Clif Hi is the only one of whom I am aware who has used this type of information to dispose of a case that the scam artist Corey Goode filed against him.
The conflict between human rights and natural rights relates to the monsters of Edom.
From Ballentine's Law Dictionary (1930)
human being: See MONSTER.
monster: A human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land.
Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men.
Matthew 2:16
Josephus records that Herod was quick to execute anyone he perceived to threaten his rule, including his wife and children (Antiquities 15.7.5–6 and 16.11.7). Herod was born in southern Palestine. His father, Antipater, was an Edomite. Edom is another name for Esau, who sold his inheritance to his brother Jacob.
May I suggest reading the affidavit: It was written and put into play in 2015 by Baron David Ward challenging the presumptions of legal law... If you would like a copy email me and ill send it or a link to it.. Keep writing :)
No, you're on the right track. The only thing is the timeline, go to 1871, that was when DC was bought and an 'experiment' the Rothschilds thought with the ten square miles. Otherwise it doesn't apply to ordinary Americans. That Washington, Franklin and the rest at that time (freemasons) signed our sovereignty over to King James III was in days gone by and forgotten about. Queen Elizabeth, Prince Charles and Prince William were all executed at Gitmo for unspeakable crimes against mankind.
You're on track, Katherine.
A NDE during a minor surgery that went sideways brought me so much knowledge, most of it stripped when I was forced to return to the Valley of Tears.
Of the few pieces of knowledge that I was allowed to bring back:
All of this HAS to happen and it's happening exactly as it NEEDS to happen.
So keep heart, and keep applying your talents with love and prayer. I'll be praying for you as well.
As a quick note, and not at all to distract from the current path of legal deconstruction of the illegal acts perpetrated by those in "power", I suggest reading "Fruit From A Poisonous Tree". Written by Melvin Stamper, 2008. This book provides much of the history being sought and the clever word games within the legal society. There is much more to it than this one compilation of how common law was quietly subverted (although it still exists if you know how to bring it forth). But, this is a good start for everyone. Melvin Stamper is a much more credible source than i. As always, do your own research and do not count on someone else to do the work for you.
To quote a Wise man about Justice Delayed. Read
Ecclesiastes 8:11-13
Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil. Though a sinner does evil a hundred times, and his days are prolonged, yet I surely know that it will be well with those who fear God, who fear before Him. But it will not be well with the wicked; nor will he prolong his days, which are as a shadow, because he does not fear before God.
I can certainly apply these verses to public officials concerned with health after today’s revelations in the news regarding government overreach.
Your valuable time is well-spent pursuing the strategies for detailing the existing crimes, statues, and legal remedies that you laid out. Too bad we can't clone you into a million more Katherine Watts! Of course, I am against cloning... : )
My thoughts on America's organic law is a joke played on us. If you read American History, you will discover that before the 1783 King George 3rd's Treaty dictate all 13 Colonies chose a much different Rule of Law form.
The Common law for America as entitled 'Colonial Law, sums up what the Thirteen Colonies considered to be the final bases for all law in America or ever to be in America... "the colonies were so impressed with the idea of an overruling law of nature that the laws of God and so-called natural laws were regarded as the true laws, and all temporal legislation was considered to be binding only in so far as it was an expression of this natural law" Yes, back then there were some moral white hats. James Wilson, the foremost lawyer at the Constitutional Convention, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and a man who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1789 and was well familiar with this legal principal stated above called Natural Law and stated; "Parliament may, unquestionably, be controlled by natural or revealed law, proceeding from divine authority".
However, history seems to document King George 3rd. and the King's men, Washington, Franklin, Congress & Senate overruled this with their man-made Laws of the Sea, Maritime, and Admiralty Law.
After 1783 the Americans were not allowed to vote during the founding years, were not allowed to own their lands with free and clear title (Allodial or Land Patent), not allowed to implement their Rule of Law form (Our Rights Come from God) and in 1791 lost the right to choose their currency forms, commerce practices and private-side banking. Remember, Washington and Hamilton sided with the King in 1791 and we got a foreign banking system with foreign stockholders. this all stands to this date; exception would be voting LOL.
Ban/block them. I've been wondering why they keep posting the same thing with no explanation about what it is, how it would help, or how it's better, so I've never looked at it. I may have all the time in the world (yeah, right), but there's still other stuff I need to get done.
You are a god send! Your outline is how I remember it too. I was young but remember where I was when JFK was killed. My parents were republican and up to his assassination were not happy with his presidency. All that changed to my surprise. When I got home from grammar school my parents were in deep reverence/respect for President Kennedy. It was surprising and I asked questions about the change, which were brushed aside. Still a very sad memorable day.
Be well.
Don’t forget that the fulcrum of the administrative state is that the Speaker of the House is the leader of Washington DC, and is governed by a pure democracy, The Congress, who control the corporate US Government. All it takes is a MAGA congress to overthrow the unlawful corp. The Corp. also arrived with law of the sea statutory rule, which is also immoral and unlawful, a revolution against the common law.
God bless you for doing this.
A…MA…Z..ING post Katherine!
WOW, this is a tutorual on how to politely body slam someone intellectually while still keeping the door open to possibly relevant new information by putting the onus on the one making a claim of great relevance of said information for a succinct summary of a 247 page volume of what is, in essence, sovereign citizen gobbledygook.
My take on this sovereign citizen movement is that it is, in part, a legit aspect of US governance but not one about which 99.99% of Americans will have two clues. It's not how our present legal system works, and the movement seems to attract nutters, and convicted felons, like Shawn Rice, which makes it very appealing to criminal filth in the FBI to use run infiltrators, entrappers, disrupters, dividers, and distractors into legit efforts like the one Katherine is helping lead.
Solving crimes is not the primary function of the FBI. That's mainly just their cover. It was formed as the American version of the Gestapo to infiltrate, and destroy or co-opt anything that threatens the power of the criminals who have long controlled our federal government.
I look forward to reading the document as I've long tried to find legit sources of info on this subject. So far I've found none that explain the aspects of Maritime, and Common Law in any cohesive, practical manner. It's all written by nutters. Clif Hi is the only one of whom I am aware who has used this type of information to dispose of a case that the scam artist Corey Goode filed against him.
Thank you!
❤️
The conflict between human rights and natural rights relates to the monsters of Edom.
From Ballentine's Law Dictionary (1930)
human being: See MONSTER.
monster: A human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land.
Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men.
Matthew 2:16
Josephus records that Herod was quick to execute anyone he perceived to threaten his rule, including his wife and children (Antiquities 15.7.5–6 and 16.11.7). Herod was born in southern Palestine. His father, Antipater, was an Edomite. Edom is another name for Esau, who sold his inheritance to his brother Jacob.
May I suggest reading the affidavit: It was written and put into play in 2015 by Baron David Ward challenging the presumptions of legal law... If you would like a copy email me and ill send it or a link to it.. Keep writing :)
No, you're on the right track. The only thing is the timeline, go to 1871, that was when DC was bought and an 'experiment' the Rothschilds thought with the ten square miles. Otherwise it doesn't apply to ordinary Americans. That Washington, Franklin and the rest at that time (freemasons) signed our sovereignty over to King James III was in days gone by and forgotten about. Queen Elizabeth, Prince Charles and Prince William were all executed at Gitmo for unspeakable crimes against mankind.