Our county prosecutor was unsure of what to do, who to charge, under Idaho criminal law statutes. I wonder about going after public health districts for the injections or the hospital for use of Remdesivir. 🤔
You can educate your county prosecutor about who to charge, under both federal and Idaho criminal statutes.
The basic charges are murder, conspiracy to murder and accessory to murder.
It will take time to educate DAs. The crime is complex. It began decades ago, alongside the cover-up.
For American defendants, the list runs from the top (Trump, Biden, Sec. Def. Austin, Gates and Fauci) through the upper-middle (Azar, Becerra, Kadlec, Gruber, Birx, Walensky etc.), the middle-middle (members of the EUA review committees at FDA, members of the scientific research teams at UNC-Chapel Hill, Harvard, etc.) down to the lowest level hospital CEOs, pharmacy CEOs, doctors, nurses and other mandaters and injectors.
The lowest-level murderers (the ones who pushed the syringes based on false information that it was a vaccine rather than a bioweapon) can be offered deals to testify against the mid-level and high-level murderers. They were manipulated and used as instruments by the higher-ups.
If you meet with your DA again, ask them to give you a list of questions they want answered for them to proceed with the next steps, and then send me the list of questions so I can help you put together responses focused on what the DA is looking for, without too much extra information.
Katherine, I'm all for this, but I have to wonder how many counties have the funds to prosecute these cases? And if there are enough funds, how many county prosecutors can gain access to those funds to pursue a massive case against the federal government?
And yes, counties from different states can probably join forces if they want to. They can certainly coordinate to have a few of them investigate and file the first charging documents, and then circulate those documents as templates for other counties to use.
At this point (Sept. 26, 2022), there isn’t a single county prosecutor in more than 3,200 counties in the US willing to even open an investigation and assign someone on their staff to collect the evidence and write up a charging document.
They’re not budget-strapped. They’re awash in Covid money from the feds, and those grant contracts probably include confidential terms and conditions discouraging or prohibiting investigations and prosecutions on pain of return-the-money, lose your career or get assassinated.
Which is why Trump appointed Army General Gustav Perna to oversee the covid jab program. Had to be a military guy because the entire thing was a military program, starting withe DARPA and the DoD down through promotion by Trump (remember his earlier "calm before the storm" press conference with all the military brass?) Azar, Biden, Valensky, Fauci the FDA, NIH and the entire HHS. Big Pharma companies were merely the manufacturers.
Amazing work, KW. Can you clarify this stunning point a bit?
--------
Among other things, I learned from the interview that by contract, the contents of the vials are legally under complete DOD control from the start of the raw materials and manufacturing chain, right up until the moment the product is injected into a human arm.
-------------
So are all the vaccine manufacturers selected under DOD control or just Pfizer?
BTW, they could use help in that project, if any readers want to help and have the careful reading skills and time to do so.
There are primary contracts and subcontracts, but all seem to lead back to DOD at the top.
I don’t yet have the specific citation to the contract(s) Sasha mentioned in the Christine Dolan interview, but will check with her by email about it today.
Sasha’s clarifications in response to my question: “If you have time, could you send me the source of your statement that DOD owns the products and controls them from start of manufacture to point of injection?”
“The sources are
1) DOD contracts. They specify delivery to the DOD of all doses, which is not typical for pharmaceutical products. The pharm products must be serialized and distributed through licensed regulated pharmaceutical distributors. If DOD wants to buy some for the military, ok, but why are they buying 100% of the supply?
2) that DOD maintains ownership through to the injection is Warner Mendenhall's statement. I trust him on that, and also it is corroborated by everything I anecdotally know regarding the control of the vials, preventing people from getting access to them, threats, etc.
In a regular drug or device situation, once it's "approved", any licensed professional can order them from distributors and do an independent study.
These injections are not serialized and not available through pharma distribution chain, so the only entity we know that holds them is the DOD.
When a hospital pharmacy orders drugs from distributors, they take possession, and then are responsible for maintaining regulatory compliance per their pharmacy license. The vax centers/hospitals/pharmacies do not buy the injections (so cannot take possession/oversight), they just "administer" them so again, last known purchaser is the DOD.”
Reposted excerpt from Mendenhall’s September 5 report:
Hundreds of millions of people have now been subjected to a “prototype” project by the Department of Defense under its Other Transactional Authority. The prototype project includes invention, production, supply chain mechanisms, and injection planning and performance.
The shots are government property until injected. Be careful if you disrupt delivery:
Diversion of COVID-19 Vaccines Prohibited (updated 06/11/2021).
"At this time, all COVID-19 vaccine in the United States has been purchased by the United States Government for administration exclusively through the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program. The vaccine and all related ancillary supplies, including the COVID-19 Vaccination Cards, remains U.S. government property until vaccine is administered to the recipient..."
Have you heard that Ted Cruz removed the amendment he had put into the bill (I'm sorry, I don't know the name or #. It was in the news a couple of weeks ago.) that is meant to suppress all free speech, including the internet? The amendment was supposed to keep the internet free speech open. Now removed.
Good post. We are fighting an epic battle right now. Fighting on several fronts is a difficult tightrope walk. We fight the Covid connected threats, the worldwide fascism connected threats and those battles going on within our own nations, states, and communities. These oligarchs have planned well to take down the world for themselves.
I'm going to mention Morgellons here --- biolab plague of the early 2000's. Do an image search if you're not familiar with it. The CDC, Kaiser Permanente and the Air Force (of course) 'investigated' it around 2006, then launched a coordinated campaign to label patients as 'delusional', also frequently using labels such as 'housewives', 'drug users', and 'uneducated' (probably still that way on Wikipedia.) Treating physicians and researchers were targeted, licenses lost, chat boards infiltrated, media campaigns. Patients have never received acknowledgement or information about their condition.
Meanwhile, they quietly moved all gain-of-function research overseas. Morgellons chat boards were discussing the Ukraine outbreaks more than a decade ago.
Catherine Austin Fitts at Solari.com is recently warning to prepare to witness and or experience, a weaponization of mental health diagnoses, or damning character innuendos for those who do not agree or even just might not agree with the propaganda, a suggested protocol or Rx, or resistance to "going along" in any number of ways. (As per your comment about a "coordinated campaign"). This might be seen in many ways such as notes documented / written into visits to a doctor, phone surveys, census questions, etc. Heads up to not get into these kinds of situations or conversational traps. Some time would be well spent to think about how to avoid the tentacles of "the system". Different for each of us. Keep copies of everything you can, such as medical records, tax records, bank statements, etc. I do not accept phone calls, with origins I do not know. I have experienced random calls from Soc. Sec., community non-profits, etc. However well meaning or sounding, unwelcome. Careful about giving out my phone number.
Doctors write into the patient notes coded language to indicate psychological rather than actual physical merit to complaints -- this leads to that patient being treated as such in the future. Your personal notes will unfortunately not stand up to a doctor-to-doctor letter with a few selective terms dropped in: best start with an innocent blank slate.
Morgellons patients do not stand a chance unless the doctor is informed. Biopsies glow a variety of florescent colors (the same as all the lab tools used for decades) when placed under a florescent microscope, but those are generally not available in the clinical office.
In around 2006 there was a push in the States backed by Mons. to add a new "mental illness" to the diagnostic catalogue. This "mental illness" described people who were picky about what they put into their body, such as eating organic food: as in, if you don't want to eat our genetically modified foods, you are mentally insane. This was the same era of major lawsuits forcing non-GM products to remove that announcement from their labels, and intimidation of farmers who were growing natural products.
As seen recently in Australia's ruling that people can be given vaccines when medically unable to decide for themselves -- including being unconscious e.g. during an operation -- there are medical implications to having someone labeled mentally unfit. Someone experiencing a schizophrenic episode can be forcefully administered medication against their will, agreed upon to be for their own good.
This is great. You are connecting with Walter's work, and you may know that Charles Rixley asked for a round table about the furine cleavage site because of his research about who knew what and when. They had a very long discussion on Kevin McCairn's twitch, with Walter, Jessica Rose, JJ Couey, Spartacus, Matthew Crawford and another doctor, I forget her name. https://m.twitch.tv/search?term=kevin_w_mccairn_phd&type=
Our county prosecutor was unsure of what to do, who to charge, under Idaho criminal law statutes. I wonder about going after public health districts for the injections or the hospital for use of Remdesivir. 🤔
You can educate your county prosecutor about who to charge, under both federal and Idaho criminal statutes.
The basic charges are murder, conspiracy to murder and accessory to murder.
It will take time to educate DAs. The crime is complex. It began decades ago, alongside the cover-up.
For American defendants, the list runs from the top (Trump, Biden, Sec. Def. Austin, Gates and Fauci) through the upper-middle (Azar, Becerra, Kadlec, Gruber, Birx, Walensky etc.), the middle-middle (members of the EUA review committees at FDA, members of the scientific research teams at UNC-Chapel Hill, Harvard, etc.) down to the lowest level hospital CEOs, pharmacy CEOs, doctors, nurses and other mandaters and injectors.
The lowest-level murderers (the ones who pushed the syringes based on false information that it was a vaccine rather than a bioweapon) can be offered deals to testify against the mid-level and high-level murderers. They were manipulated and used as instruments by the higher-ups.
If you meet with your DA again, ask them to give you a list of questions they want answered for them to proceed with the next steps, and then send me the list of questions so I can help you put together responses focused on what the DA is looking for, without too much extra information.
Katherine, I'm all for this, but I have to wonder how many counties have the funds to prosecute these cases? And if there are enough funds, how many county prosecutors can gain access to those funds to pursue a massive case against the federal government?
Can counties from different states join forces?
It’s not a funding shortage.
It’s a willpower shortage.
And yes, counties from different states can probably join forces if they want to. They can certainly coordinate to have a few of them investigate and file the first charging documents, and then circulate those documents as templates for other counties to use.
At this point (Sept. 26, 2022), there isn’t a single county prosecutor in more than 3,200 counties in the US willing to even open an investigation and assign someone on their staff to collect the evidence and write up a charging document.
They’re not budget-strapped. They’re awash in Covid money from the feds, and those grant contracts probably include confidential terms and conditions discouraging or prohibiting investigations and prosecutions on pain of return-the-money, lose your career or get assassinated.
They’re scared.
Fraud and homicide are not included in the total immunity from legal liability agreement under the PREP Act for the big Pharma criminals!
.............................RICO laws apply now!
Which is why Trump appointed Army General Gustav Perna to oversee the covid jab program. Had to be a military guy because the entire thing was a military program, starting withe DARPA and the DoD down through promotion by Trump (remember his earlier "calm before the storm" press conference with all the military brass?) Azar, Biden, Valensky, Fauci the FDA, NIH and the entire HHS. Big Pharma companies were merely the manufacturers.
Exactly.
Wrote this to my local DA
Mr. Schmitt
I am requesting a meeting with you after you have viewed this video
https://rumble.com/v1lbl6l-army-ltcol-theresa-long-md-full-testimony.html
I do not want to meet with your assistants or staff.
If you cannot find time to meet me, please respond with your thoughts after
the video to this email address.
Sincerely, Jacquelyn Sauriol
4815 N Commercial Ave
Portland OR 97217.
The Teresa Long testimony is powerful
Yes, it's brutal what these patriots and citizens have been put through.
Amazing work, KW. Can you clarify this stunning point a bit?
--------
Among other things, I learned from the interview that by contract, the contents of the vials are legally under complete DOD control from the start of the raw materials and manufacturing chain, right up until the moment the product is injected into a human arm.
-------------
So are all the vaccine manufacturers selected under DOD control or just Pfizer?
I believe it’s all of them.
Sasha and her team are working their way through the vaxx contracts posted here:
https://www.keionline.org/covid-contracts
BTW, they could use help in that project, if any readers want to help and have the careful reading skills and time to do so.
There are primary contracts and subcontracts, but all seem to lead back to DOD at the top.
I don’t yet have the specific citation to the contract(s) Sasha mentioned in the Christine Dolan interview, but will check with her by email about it today.
Checked with Sasha. Turns out Warner Mendenhall was the source of that statement during the interview. (See video at approximately 36:00-38:00 https://rumble.com/v1kkf0b-livestream-sunday-1230pm-est-the-globalists-in-plain-sight.html )
So I will check with him asking for the contract citations.
Sasha has a new report out at TrialSite News:
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/failure-to-scale-covid-19-injection-vials-must-be-independently-tested-for-conformity-to-label.-9a77eba4
Sasha’s clarifications in response to my question: “If you have time, could you send me the source of your statement that DOD owns the products and controls them from start of manufacture to point of injection?”
“The sources are
1) DOD contracts. They specify delivery to the DOD of all doses, which is not typical for pharmaceutical products. The pharm products must be serialized and distributed through licensed regulated pharmaceutical distributors. If DOD wants to buy some for the military, ok, but why are they buying 100% of the supply?
2) that DOD maintains ownership through to the injection is Warner Mendenhall's statement. I trust him on that, and also it is corroborated by everything I anecdotally know regarding the control of the vials, preventing people from getting access to them, threats, etc.
In a regular drug or device situation, once it's "approved", any licensed professional can order them from distributors and do an independent study.
These injections are not serialized and not available through pharma distribution chain, so the only entity we know that holds them is the DOD.
When a hospital pharmacy orders drugs from distributors, they take possession, and then are responsible for maintaining regulatory compliance per their pharmacy license. The vax centers/hospitals/pharmacies do not buy the injections (so cannot take possession/oversight), they just "administer" them so again, last known purchaser is the DOD.”
Warner Mendenhall reply:
Covid Injections: A DOD prototype project. The prototype shot is government property until it is in your body.
https://www.covidlawcast.com/p/covid-injections-a-dod-prototype
Reposted excerpt from Mendenhall’s September 5 report:
Hundreds of millions of people have now been subjected to a “prototype” project by the Department of Defense under its Other Transactional Authority. The prototype project includes invention, production, supply chain mechanisms, and injection planning and performance.
The shots are government property until injected. Be careful if you disrupt delivery:
Diversion of COVID-19 Vaccines Prohibited (updated 06/11/2021).
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/vaccination-provider-support.html#provider-agreement
(expand the links to find this wording, or print)
"At this time, all COVID-19 vaccine in the United States has been purchased by the United States Government for administration exclusively through the CDC COVID-19 Vaccination Program. The vaccine and all related ancillary supplies, including the COVID-19 Vaccination Cards, remains U.S. government property until vaccine is administered to the recipient..."
Katherine, I just followed your other post linked in this one to the HHS page.
All of the links now have asterisks and require FOIA.
then my email and substack windows froze. No kidding.
Prob. nothing, right? 😅
*edit: this page, the gov't contracts
https://www.hhs.gov/foia/coronavirus-contracts/index.html
I can still get to the contracts at the HHS site from my browser (Firefox).
But yeah, the web-suppression is intensifying.
Have you heard that Ted Cruz removed the amendment he had put into the bill (I'm sorry, I don't know the name or #. It was in the news a couple of weeks ago.) that is meant to suppress all free speech, including the internet? The amendment was supposed to keep the internet free speech open. Now removed.
Had not heard that. But not surprised.
I saw it on Utoob on, "The Common Sense Show," this morning.
I must admit that I had great hopes and am heart broken.
Sorry, our posts crossed, as I was updating.
Yes, I was able to access them, too. Sorry. Not trying to start a panic here.
edit to add: Even with FOIA, basically all redacted.
Good post. We are fighting an epic battle right now. Fighting on several fronts is a difficult tightrope walk. We fight the Covid connected threats, the worldwide fascism connected threats and those battles going on within our own nations, states, and communities. These oligarchs have planned well to take down the world for themselves.
I'm going to mention Morgellons here --- biolab plague of the early 2000's. Do an image search if you're not familiar with it. The CDC, Kaiser Permanente and the Air Force (of course) 'investigated' it around 2006, then launched a coordinated campaign to label patients as 'delusional', also frequently using labels such as 'housewives', 'drug users', and 'uneducated' (probably still that way on Wikipedia.) Treating physicians and researchers were targeted, licenses lost, chat boards infiltrated, media campaigns. Patients have never received acknowledgement or information about their condition.
Meanwhile, they quietly moved all gain-of-function research overseas. Morgellons chat boards were discussing the Ukraine outbreaks more than a decade ago.
Catherine Austin Fitts at Solari.com is recently warning to prepare to witness and or experience, a weaponization of mental health diagnoses, or damning character innuendos for those who do not agree or even just might not agree with the propaganda, a suggested protocol or Rx, or resistance to "going along" in any number of ways. (As per your comment about a "coordinated campaign"). This might be seen in many ways such as notes documented / written into visits to a doctor, phone surveys, census questions, etc. Heads up to not get into these kinds of situations or conversational traps. Some time would be well spent to think about how to avoid the tentacles of "the system". Different for each of us. Keep copies of everything you can, such as medical records, tax records, bank statements, etc. I do not accept phone calls, with origins I do not know. I have experienced random calls from Soc. Sec., community non-profits, etc. However well meaning or sounding, unwelcome. Careful about giving out my phone number.
Good point.
Doctors write into the patient notes coded language to indicate psychological rather than actual physical merit to complaints -- this leads to that patient being treated as such in the future. Your personal notes will unfortunately not stand up to a doctor-to-doctor letter with a few selective terms dropped in: best start with an innocent blank slate.
Morgellons patients do not stand a chance unless the doctor is informed. Biopsies glow a variety of florescent colors (the same as all the lab tools used for decades) when placed under a florescent microscope, but those are generally not available in the clinical office.
In around 2006 there was a push in the States backed by Mons. to add a new "mental illness" to the diagnostic catalogue. This "mental illness" described people who were picky about what they put into their body, such as eating organic food: as in, if you don't want to eat our genetically modified foods, you are mentally insane. This was the same era of major lawsuits forcing non-GM products to remove that announcement from their labels, and intimidation of farmers who were growing natural products.
As seen recently in Australia's ruling that people can be given vaccines when medically unable to decide for themselves -- including being unconscious e.g. during an operation -- there are medical implications to having someone labeled mentally unfit. Someone experiencing a schizophrenic episode can be forcefully administered medication against their will, agreed upon to be for their own good.
This is great. You are connecting with Walter's work, and you may know that Charles Rixley asked for a round table about the furine cleavage site because of his research about who knew what and when. They had a very long discussion on Kevin McCairn's twitch, with Walter, Jessica Rose, JJ Couey, Spartacus, Matthew Crawford and another doctor, I forget her name. https://m.twitch.tv/search?term=kevin_w_mccairn_phd&type=
Arrest Birx, Fauci and all CDC, NIH, WHO, FDA and big pharma and big tech. executives involved.
Fraud and homicide are not included in the total immunity from legal liability agreement under the PREP Act for the big Pharma criminals!
RICO laws apply now! The DOJ better wake the Fk Up and get busy!
Awesome! Sharing now!
Thank you.