Shifting the frame

Away from protecting citizen constitutional rights from overreaching government public health measures, toward citizen self-defense against government-run bioterrorism and extortion.

Federal courts have persistently refused to hear challenges to the constitutionality of government actions taken since January 2020 in the Covid-19 context.

This is part of the evidence base supporting the conclusion that the US Constitution has been suspended since Jan. 31, 2020, and that US citizens currently have no government-recognized, much less government-protected, constitutional rights.

As more civil lawsuits are filed, I think it would be useful for plaintiffs to begin asking federal judges to rule on the public record, as a threshold issue, on whether the US Constitution is still controlling law in the United States, and whether individual American citizens are presumed to have Constitutional liberties and the right to exercise them freely, without interference from government officials.

If a judge rules on the record, "No, the US Constitution is null and void for as long as the Health and Human Services Secretary extends the public emergency and the related declarations of medical countermeasures," then plaintiffs will know that their constitutional cases will be dismissed before discovery and trial. 

If a judge answers, “Yes, the US Constitution is still in force, and plaintiffs are presumed to possess Constitutional rights unless and until they are deprived of those rights after due process of law," then plaintiffs will have good reason to pursue their cases and try to prove that the government is violating legal limits on its power.

If civil cases make it to discovery, plaintiffs could also file Requests for Admission to federal government defendants, asking the government attorneys to admit or deny, under oath, that the government’s legal position is that the US Constitution has been suspended and that American citizens currently have no government-recognized Constitutional rights.

---

Another way to shift the cognitive and litigation frames would be for more people to file civil suits under federal and state laws criminalizing bioterrorism, possession and use of bioweapons, extortion and threats.

Accurately defined, masks, PCR tests, and injections are not medical devices, diagnostics, preventatives or treatments when inflicted on victims through coercion; threats of theft of property, including income-generating livelihood; threats of bodily injury; or actual theft/dismissal from employment and physical assault.

They’re bioweapons.

Their use by government and non-government agents against Americans is domestic bioterrorism.

As such, plaintiffs could file civil claims and private criminal complaints — against individual, corporate, school or government defendants — seeking remedies for acts of domestic bioterrorism committed under 18 USC 2331(5) and acts of extortion and threats committed under 18 USC 872 and 875(b) and related state criminal codes, with extortion defined as “obtaining money, goods, or a desired behavior from another person through violence or threats...commonly practiced by organized crime groups."

Federal judges might dismiss bioterrorism and extortion claims, just as they’ve been dismissing constitutional claims, and for the same reason: cowardice.

But even if dismissed, articulating the fight as ordinary people standing up to federal government criminality, has the power to wake more people up and mobilize more people to join the war effort.

---

While digging in this rabbit hole, I found relevant provisions in the 2001 PATRIOT Act, now added to the main American Domestic Bioterrorism Program post:

• 2001 Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act - PL 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (132 pages). Amended 18 USC 2331 - Definitions section of 18 USC 113B - Terrorism - to add “domestic terrorism,” at 18 USC 2331(5), defined as activities that “(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”

---

As David Martin has compiled in excruciating detail, there is plenty of evidence, going back decades, to prosecute and convict Fauci, Baric, Gates, Daszak and many others for crimes under 18 USC 2331(5) and related criminal laws.

However, the clear applicability of 18 USC 2331(5) to the federal government officials and corporate executives who have orchestrated the Covid democide, is also why co-conspirators within the federal government deployed Federal Bureau of Investigations agents to infiltrate the January 6, 2021 Washington DC election protests.

By ensuring a civilian breach of the Capitol, leading to heavily publicized arrests and indefinite detentions of non-violent trespassers, Fauci, Gates and team created predicates to whip up a national frenzy of fear about domestic terrorism, defined by the government and popularized by the propagandist legacy media as peaceful acts of civil disobedience committed by civilians angry at government officials and critical of government acts.

The purpose of this ongoing deflection campaign is to steer public understanding, distrust and anger away from the hiding-in-plain-sight government agents who are silencing, imprisoning, maiming and killing us, to the decoy ducks of J6 protestors and moms and dads at school board meetings.

The deflection campaign keeps showing up in the public record, through, for example, Department of Homeland Security bulletins classifying citizens who publicly criticize government acts related to Covid crisis management and publicly question the integrity of the 2020 general election, as domestic violent extremists engaging in mis-, dis- and mal-information and “exacerbating societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest.”

The list of trial balloons and government reports includes:

• Nov. 13, 2020 Wall Street Journal report on Biden’s plans for a new Domestic Terrorism Act

• Jan. 8, 2021 Off-Guardian report compiling recent public official comments on the need for domestic terrorism crackdowns/PATRIOT Act 2;

• July 2, 2021 Congressional Reporting Service - Domestic Terrorism: Overview of Federal Criminal Law and Constitutional Issues

• Feb. 7, 2022 DHS National Terrorism Advisory Center Bulletin

• March 11, 2022 DHS Office of the Chief Security Officer Report to the Secretary of Homeland Security - Domestic Violent Extremism Internal Review: Observations, Findings, and Recommendations.

It’s more evidence of just how thoroughly the global crime syndicate premeditated the campaign of mass fraud, psychological abuse, medical battery, enslavement and killing they are carrying out.

---

To sum up:

The Department of Health and Human Services is, in truth, the Department of Domestic Bioterrorism, and its mission is to sicken and kill the American people.

The Department of Homeland Security is, in truth, the Department of Tyranny Preservation, and its mission is to silence and imprison the American people.

---

St. Gregory of Nanzianzus