Sen. Ron Johnson gets senators on record re: international contracts that enslave Americans to globalists through the World Health Organization and pharmaco-martial law.
Sen. Ron Johnson gets senators on record re: international contracts that enslave Americans to globalists through the World Health Organization and pharmaco-martial law.
Thanks for the love - I greatly appreciate it. Kudos to you for all the great work you do!
When you think about it, Senator Johnson's proposed amendment really did expose quite a lot, didn't it? If Young's vote had been switched, it would have been a 48-48 tie.
49 Senators voted against exercising their Constitutional authority to give their advice and consent over foreign entanglements.
We need a Great Recall of all our politicians and a Great Repeal of the many laws that Bailiwick News has identified as being the root of our problems
LOL. This is starting to become funny. For awhile I was scared. Scared because I looked around and saw that my fellow man was a complete worthless wimp that went along with everything the gov't, media, and bought and paid for doctors told them. Shot a freaking injection in their arm because they were told. I thought it's over, I'm going into a slave camp as not enough people will push back. I'm starting to think maybe people will. How is the WHO going to enforce their draconian rules on the American public? Are all the cops and miltary going to back the WHO? The WHO has no chance, there are too many of us that will die before we take orders from them. Thier plan seems to be moving along without incident but I'm afraid for them the "incident' that's coming is going to be like a massive and gigantic tital wave of pushback. AND, when it begins it will be like trying to put out a fire with a drop water.
"Health care" is not among the powers delegated to the government under the constitution. Ratified or not, the authority to comply (or not) resides with each individual.
Great, Katherine, as always. It made me think, in a somewhat unrelated way, that the military coups in South America in the 60s, which distorted the whole continent forever, were just little exercises and warm-ups for what seems to be now the big gig. The Gran Ole Opry of the Mother Event of the Final Big Symphony. Thank god my mom is already dead.
Surely the determination of what constitutes a treaty or not within the meaning of the US Constitution is a classic legal determination, not a political decision belonging the the legislative branch. Isn't a court the proper venue for determining whether the WHO Pandemic Treaty is an actual treaty. Or maybe the protection of our national sovereignties from UN ingestion creates the opening for both input to, and output from, many courts of law, both domestically and internationally?
Rather than putting us all under duress with timelines calling for ratifications first, juridical procedures second, we need an venue designed to arbitrate the matter as a question of law rather than one of partisan politics. Moreover, we need to play for time to address and explain the fact that the UN itself and the governments of most of its member states have shown themselves to be agents of bioterrorism engaged in biowarfare against the world's people. For the moment the imperative seems to be insert procedural monkey wrenches into the gears of mounting tyranny to at least slow down the global coup presently underway.
"Roguski has done much more detailed research, writing and video presentation about the World Health Organization ... because I focus on the American domestic law components."
No.
Because James has chosen to pursue that avenue tirelessly and doggedly.
Credit where credit is due in spades please.
Thank you for the valuable work you do. We all do what we can where we can, and we utilize our energy and expertise to cover the multitude of diabolical premeditated and calculated assaults perpetrated against humanity, social trust and cohesion, culture, customs, country, borders, identity, ethics, science, medicine, law and religion.
I just want to say that a country like the United States will break any treaty and/or pull out of any treaty, at any time, and anywhere, if that's what it wants to do.
If the United States wants out of a Treaty, no country or group exists that will be able to hold a powerful United States to any Treaty. It may get negotiated, rewritten, or cancelled, with payment, gifts, favors, or other arrangement.
The WHO is the single most criminal "organization" in the entire world - as it is fully under the control of KILL BILL Gates agenda for "DEPOPULATION" - down from 8 Billion to one half Billion People.
.
For 40 years the "Georgia Guide Stones" have hypnotized Americans to get used to this GENOCIDE against climate-change . . .
The biggest threat to our Republic is the US Congress. Of course, it may be in a tie with the MSM. But right up there is the frozen inaction of the American citizen. Back in the 60's we referred to that as a "bubbling hotbed of apathy". But back then we hadn't yet been taken over by communists. Yes, that's the word that fits these scoundrels. Nikita was right when he said, :We will bury you!" They have. That poisonous ideology is even worse than the mRNA jab. Article V where are you?
Fascinating to address the benefits derived from those in the population wearing 'Rose-Colored Glasses' as they can't imagine living the arms of evil after all the indoctrination inherent to U.S. education. Continue to somehow intuit caution involving your reporting up to these last weeks. It is time to remove the blinders as everybody united is the only way to clobber the enemy in this war.
In this vote 49 Senators are exposed as having lied when they did their oath of office to give top priority to protect the US Constitution! These 49 Senators are impeachable for what they put on the record. Sen. Johnson's proposed amendment simply reiterated the US Constitution and reinforced his oath of office to prioritize protection of the US Constitution. The Senate has the ability to police its own members for violations of the oath of office and for immoral acts and other acts deemed not to respect the dignity of the Senate office. But a Recall from elected office would come from the represented State that identifies displeasure with elected officials who openly do not respect and do not clarify the US Constitution. These are two mechanisms to remove those 49 Senators from office, and we just need the will to do this. The problem at the US Senate level is that a near majority has, in this way, in effect, admitted that they do not respect their oath of office, and this is an impeachable offense, if anything is impeachable.
Thank you for this. Since reading Jame’s substack, I have been writing to my Senators asking them why they are voting “nay”. I haven’t had much response but I see they both supported theJohnson legislation. McConnell didn’t vote on either the Rand or Johnson legislation. Are Fetterman and Feistein still out of action? Maybe they just shouldn’t count.
As I've been saying for over a decade: Get rid of the government Muppet shows. Reject representative democracy, and replace it with "Direct Democracy". Reject all current forms of statute (Maritime) law. No law should be recognized outside of Lawful Civil Referendum expressed by a 75% civil majority. Rid yourselves of career government officials, and select all party members via Sortition.
Your democracy is a sham operating as corporate ponzi scheme. No good thing will be accomplished via current strategies. Your Freedom will become effective, when You become effective.
Thanks for the love - I greatly appreciate it. Kudos to you for all the great work you do!
When you think about it, Senator Johnson's proposed amendment really did expose quite a lot, didn't it? If Young's vote had been switched, it would have been a 48-48 tie.
49 Senators voted against exercising their Constitutional authority to give their advice and consent over foreign entanglements.
We need a Great Recall of all our politicians and a Great Repeal of the many laws that Bailiwick News has identified as being the root of our problems
LOL. This is starting to become funny. For awhile I was scared. Scared because I looked around and saw that my fellow man was a complete worthless wimp that went along with everything the gov't, media, and bought and paid for doctors told them. Shot a freaking injection in their arm because they were told. I thought it's over, I'm going into a slave camp as not enough people will push back. I'm starting to think maybe people will. How is the WHO going to enforce their draconian rules on the American public? Are all the cops and miltary going to back the WHO? The WHO has no chance, there are too many of us that will die before we take orders from them. Thier plan seems to be moving along without incident but I'm afraid for them the "incident' that's coming is going to be like a massive and gigantic tital wave of pushback. AND, when it begins it will be like trying to put out a fire with a drop water.
Me thinks this paper is so complicated, can I rewrite it and someone correct me:
Ron Johnson tried to stop the Who from having world control and lost by a small percentage.
All, but one Republican agree with Ron, and all Democrats want the WHO to rule the world.
"Health care" is not among the powers delegated to the government under the constitution. Ratified or not, the authority to comply (or not) resides with each individual.
Great, Katherine, as always. It made me think, in a somewhat unrelated way, that the military coups in South America in the 60s, which distorted the whole continent forever, were just little exercises and warm-ups for what seems to be now the big gig. The Gran Ole Opry of the Mother Event of the Final Big Symphony. Thank god my mom is already dead.
Thank you.
not one Democrat voted for this. What on earth is wrong with these people? The WHO has been wrong on everything and giving away our Sovereignty.
Surely the determination of what constitutes a treaty or not within the meaning of the US Constitution is a classic legal determination, not a political decision belonging the the legislative branch. Isn't a court the proper venue for determining whether the WHO Pandemic Treaty is an actual treaty. Or maybe the protection of our national sovereignties from UN ingestion creates the opening for both input to, and output from, many courts of law, both domestically and internationally?
Rather than putting us all under duress with timelines calling for ratifications first, juridical procedures second, we need an venue designed to arbitrate the matter as a question of law rather than one of partisan politics. Moreover, we need to play for time to address and explain the fact that the UN itself and the governments of most of its member states have shown themselves to be agents of bioterrorism engaged in biowarfare against the world's people. For the moment the imperative seems to be insert procedural monkey wrenches into the gears of mounting tyranny to at least slow down the global coup presently underway.
"Roguski has done much more detailed research, writing and video presentation about the World Health Organization ... because I focus on the American domestic law components."
No.
Because James has chosen to pursue that avenue tirelessly and doggedly.
Credit where credit is due in spades please.
Thank you for the valuable work you do. We all do what we can where we can, and we utilize our energy and expertise to cover the multitude of diabolical premeditated and calculated assaults perpetrated against humanity, social trust and cohesion, culture, customs, country, borders, identity, ethics, science, medicine, law and religion.
I just want to say that a country like the United States will break any treaty and/or pull out of any treaty, at any time, and anywhere, if that's what it wants to do.
If the United States wants out of a Treaty, no country or group exists that will be able to hold a powerful United States to any Treaty. It may get negotiated, rewritten, or cancelled, with payment, gifts, favors, or other arrangement.
The WHO is the single most criminal "organization" in the entire world - as it is fully under the control of KILL BILL Gates agenda for "DEPOPULATION" - down from 8 Billion to one half Billion People.
.
For 40 years the "Georgia Guide Stones" have hypnotized Americans to get used to this GENOCIDE against climate-change . . .
The biggest threat to our Republic is the US Congress. Of course, it may be in a tie with the MSM. But right up there is the frozen inaction of the American citizen. Back in the 60's we referred to that as a "bubbling hotbed of apathy". But back then we hadn't yet been taken over by communists. Yes, that's the word that fits these scoundrels. Nikita was right when he said, :We will bury you!" They have. That poisonous ideology is even worse than the mRNA jab. Article V where are you?
Fascinating to address the benefits derived from those in the population wearing 'Rose-Colored Glasses' as they can't imagine living the arms of evil after all the indoctrination inherent to U.S. education. Continue to somehow intuit caution involving your reporting up to these last weeks. It is time to remove the blinders as everybody united is the only way to clobber the enemy in this war.
My neighbours got their 6th shots today, both vax injured.
In this vote 49 Senators are exposed as having lied when they did their oath of office to give top priority to protect the US Constitution! These 49 Senators are impeachable for what they put on the record. Sen. Johnson's proposed amendment simply reiterated the US Constitution and reinforced his oath of office to prioritize protection of the US Constitution. The Senate has the ability to police its own members for violations of the oath of office and for immoral acts and other acts deemed not to respect the dignity of the Senate office. But a Recall from elected office would come from the represented State that identifies displeasure with elected officials who openly do not respect and do not clarify the US Constitution. These are two mechanisms to remove those 49 Senators from office, and we just need the will to do this. The problem at the US Senate level is that a near majority has, in this way, in effect, admitted that they do not respect their oath of office, and this is an impeachable offense, if anything is impeachable.
Thank you for this. Since reading Jame’s substack, I have been writing to my Senators asking them why they are voting “nay”. I haven’t had much response but I see they both supported theJohnson legislation. McConnell didn’t vote on either the Rand or Johnson legislation. Are Fetterman and Feistein still out of action? Maybe they just shouldn’t count.
As I've been saying for over a decade: Get rid of the government Muppet shows. Reject representative democracy, and replace it with "Direct Democracy". Reject all current forms of statute (Maritime) law. No law should be recognized outside of Lawful Civil Referendum expressed by a 75% civil majority. Rid yourselves of career government officials, and select all party members via Sortition.
Your democracy is a sham operating as corporate ponzi scheme. No good thing will be accomplished via current strategies. Your Freedom will become effective, when You become effective.