76 Comments

It is fascinating to see the US government argue in court that they knowingly participated in creating the appearance of a clinical trial that actually had no bearing on their intent to strong arm corporations, schools, and individuals into receiving an injection.

"They can't say the fraudulent nature of the trial would have impacted our decision to purchase this substance and coerce people into having it injected because we never cared if it was safe or effective in the first place-- and we have the legal structure to prove it!"

How can a governing system survive arguing that they legalized murder as long as it is by authorized government agents during a self-declared emergency?

One memorable part of "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire," was when Gibbon reported that the post-Roman tribal kingdoms of Gaul imposed a fine on a member of the ruling tribe for murder of a non-member versus the death penalty they imposed on the lower classes for the same crime. It is a sign of the end of civilization when an elite group grants themselves the power over life and death merely by their status.

Expand full comment

It is indeed very discouraging. I think any self-declared emergency needs Congressional oversight, so it is not self-declared. There should a discussion in Congress with and a couple of never-government or Pharma affiliated medical personnel and scientists (not university affiliated, too.) Someone from the HHS should have to attend, ready to answer questions about the specific actions planned for the American people if such an emergency is declared. There should be this type of detailed oversight for many years.

Expand full comment

In which document did you find the quote above beginning “They can’t say…?”

Expand full comment

It is not in any. It is my rephrasing of the substance of the legal argument presented in this substack article in the section that says US Government page 10.

However, the clever lawyers that wrote it would object that they are not asserting that the government didn't care about the results of the 'clinical trials,' but that they instead carefully used weaselly lawyer language to say merely that the litigant cannot show that the fraud as represented would have changed the outcome of the government decisions. That is a very narrow line to walk.

Expand full comment

Thank you for the clear explanation. I guess the quotes made me assume otherwise.

Expand full comment

You are a blessing. We are much indebted. May the Lord keep you and watch over you.

Expand full comment

I’m sorry you are burnt out! I have been praying and hoping for justice!

Expand full comment

Interesting stance, but the defeatism arguments do need to be shelved and people need to stop parroting ridiculous nonsense. They are the "refuge" of the abused victim trying to justify why they shouldn't bravely fight back against their abuser.

Many examples of successful revolutions. American War of Independence is just one of many.

We can *all* do something to fight this tyranny, and it behooves us to act. If we're fearful, we must at the very least acknowledge that cowardice - not to justify it, but to see it as a problem to be addressed and rectified over time, like alcoholism or drug abuse.

People might be fearful if they fight the government goons will kill them, but make no mistake - they intend to kill you all anyway, whether you comply or not.

They already kill their own loyalists:

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/why-government-goons-wont-be-saved

What do you think they have in-store for the compliant? They will not ignore you. The digital ID state will try to come for you and tag and control and kill you, mass processed like meat in factories.

***We are obliged to FIGHT BACK.***

No quarter to tyranny!

Expand full comment

Yes I agree. Even if they do kill us it’s a much better option than being a slave to their tyranny. And then they will kill you anyway after they have destroyed you with their evil experiments. I already know that this is the hill I will die on.

Expand full comment

I forget which founder said that IT'S OUR DUTY TO FIGHT TYRANNY.

Expand full comment

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants"

- Thomas Jefferson

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."

- Benjamin Franklin

"Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God"

- Thomas Jefferson

"This Constitution…can only end in despotism…when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other"

- Benjamin Franklin

"If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace, one of the most powerful instruments of our rising prosperity, it must be known, that we are at all times ready for War."

- George Washington

"A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained in arms, is the best most natural defense of a free country."

- James Madison

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."

- Patrick Henry

"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."

- James Madison

"It is the religion of ignorance that tyranny begins."

- Benjamin Franklin

"The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears "

- Hubert Humphrey

"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide."

- John Adams

"The great object is that every man be armed."

- Patrick Henry

Expand full comment

Probably more than one, but Sam Adams comes to mind.

Expand full comment

Katherine,

The amount of information you produce is stunning. I don’t know how you keep it coming. God is obviously your source of strength and stamina. All this work you do I s so appreciated by me as are you. Brook Jackson? What a brave and principled soul she is. And she is pretty much the only one to to stand against Goliath/Pfizer. Hod bless you both and your teams.

Expand full comment

I'm very interested in how people are planning to respond to the new ICD code requirement when asked by their personal physician/staff. Suppose you wish to keep your PCP, and you are presently not jabbed, what is a good tactical response to the question he/she is forced to ask? Supposing the EMR only allows a yes/no answer for ICD coding purposes.

Note: the question is not about "honesty", it is about tactics.

Expand full comment

Say, "Oh, either way, I don't believe people should give that out.

Expand full comment

You could alternatively say, "Let me think about doing that, and I'll call back."

Expand full comment

I'm seeing hope in that once people learn pieces of the truth, they will ask questions.

The DOD operation warp speed operation, although known since Trump in 2020, was considered a "crazy conspiracy".

“Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.” ― Benjamin Franklin

Sooner or later reform will have to happen if the medical industrial complex monolith wants to regain trust in the people.

Expand full comment

Try not to buy their medicines, and if you must, tell your doctor you want the generic or equivalent brand whose patent (the money maker) has expired.

Expand full comment

Lead, follow or get out of the way! Like your style.

Signed,

A faithful follower from the beginning.

Expand full comment

One thing that has constantly bugged me is why 'they' would want so many deaths - there must be an incentive? All these false flags which kill people - money is the root of all evil, so they say. I understand the saving money in pensions part, but the deaths are among all age groups. Okay, AI needs fewer people but, but.....that's not really an incentive to kill people. Maimed people are good for business, like pharma, but not dead people. If you look into the common law stuff then there appears to be an entire fraudulent name fraud going on with birth certificates and the creation of a 'strawman'. So one's 'legal fiction' is used by corporations to make money and do business plus rake in tax etc. So we are effectively 'debt slaves' A hidden life insurance system could take out life insurance on all employees/members and then pay out to the corporation when a person dies. I was surprised to learn only recently that life insurance is not subject to probate and is quite quickly and easily paid out. I thought how easy it would be for someone of criminal intent to benefit from this and was surprised there was not a more robust system to guard against this. We know we are in the hands of a criminal cabal. Criminals profit from crime. There must be a clear financial incentive for all these deaths. Is this in part at least, an insurance scam? IF we had a robust judicial system then there would be a disincentive to commit this type of crime (killing someone to get life insurance/money). But with corrupted justice systems, corrupt police forces (criminalizing normal human behaviour and interactions) then we are in the wild west and anything goes. Occam's razor: the simplest explanations. Why do criminals do what they do? Money, psychopathy, power, sadism etc. Serial killers can be caught for crimes that are not directly related to killing - eg: GP Harold Shipman, serial killer, was only caught when he falsified one of his victim's wills. No-one could conceive that this popular doctor could be deliberately killing patients but he became too complacent. The daughter of one of his victims smelt a rat and the 'game' was up. Hubris is the downfall of many a criminal.

Expand full comment

Butterballs, they want to reduce the earth's population.

Expand full comment

I’m aware of that - there must be a financial incentive in the here and now, They wouldn’t bother otherwise.

Expand full comment

Even if there were absolutely no financial gain, they would still depopulate. There have always been ways (much easier than this) for them to increase their riches.

Expand full comment

If that is the case, why don't they target that specific element of world population which breeds prolifically, rather than the nation states whose population has already declined beyond reproductive levels?

Expand full comment

Which element do you think "breeds prolifically?"

Expand full comment

I assume your question is disingenuous since most people know the highest birth rates worldwide are in many African and Muslim nations, the latter for religious reasons, the former often because of a lack of social care in old age. There are of course a number of very much smaller groups dotted around the world with high reproductive rates but it would be hard to understand the eugenicists' concern for them simply because of their very low numeric impact. If we are to believe that the Schwab brigade's wish is to eliminate large numbers in order to attain their objective of a "better" world, then it would be logical for their policies to target the groups producing the highest number of offspring. Instead of which, most of their efforts seem to be concentrated in the West with a rapidly declining birthrate. Perhaps you see a different logic?

Expand full comment

I think they are about to target Africa and India next with vaccines because of their total populations. That might take care of the birth rate. As for us, maybe we are no longer favored any more than other countries in the West. We do have billions.

Expand full comment

As always, THANK YOU for your work. Also your decision to delete the comments from Futility-ville is most appropriate and appreciated! While it is indeed human to feel overwhelmed (at times) by the prospect of fighting such a huge amount of entrenched corruption THIS IS WHEN WE MUST REMEMBER THAT WE ARE GIFTED WITH THE BIGGEST TOOL IN THE TOOL SHED. GOD GAVE US PRAYER! Thank you Katherine for reminding us of our rosaries a couple days ago! These are absolutely Godless beings that may have money and power but they do not have the power of prayer. I encourage and invite everyone reading this to put aside some moments EACH day at 3 o'clock ( hour of Divine Mercy) and let's pray together. Let us move mountains TOGETHER!!

Expand full comment

Katherine, Reading your posts since the beginning, they are among the most in-depth, reasoned analyses anywhere. I can see why you are exhausted. But the Truth will out if people will let it see the light of day. Your contribution to doing that is way beyond what one would expect from any individual. I am humbled and awed to be able to read it; thank you for sharing it.

Expand full comment

Your list of demands that we should be making in the light of what has been found out, reminds me of an email I received from a prisoner in Wrexham jail, here in Britain. Paul Edwards was a blogger and a good one at that.

He was jailed for 21 months for smashing a window in a "vaccine " centre. He did it to save lives.

He is restricted now in what he can do as he can't use the internet, but he did write to me to suggest setting up a petition and taking it out on the streets so people can be spoken to face to face.

He thinks that the publc would support an enquiry especially if we concentrate on the fact that the injections cost a lot of money and don't work!

These are his words:

"THE VACCINES DON'T WORK!

WE WANT OUR MONEY BACK!

The people of the UK have been cheated.

We were promised that the Vaccine Programme would end Covid19. It hasn't worked.

£tens of billions of our taxpayers money has been wasted on them and other useless articles like masks and plastic test kits.

The economy is spiralling out of control but we are still throwing away £billions on the Vax Programme.

Not only are they useless. They are DANGEROUS!

Evidence is mounting that rather than helping people they are killing and maiming:

Over 1/2Million adverse reaction reports.

More than 14,000 extra out-of-hospital heart attacks in 2021 compared to 2020.

They weren't even tested properly, but our regulators rubber-stamped their approval.

The authorities know they are causing devastating casualties but try to bury the evidence.

We can't allow this to continue! We want:

1. Immediate suspension of the programme.

2. Immediate stop to monies being paid to the manufacturers and distributors of the vaxes.

3. The contracts made by the authorities with the pharmaceutical companies to be declared null and void as they are fraudulent.

4. A full refund of all monies paid. The vaxes didn't work. We want out money back!

5. Full compensation to be sought from the pharma cos. for those who have died and are injured.

6. The pharma cos. to be prosecuted for fraud.

7.Investigations launched into the health administrators responsible for recommending the vaxes and negotiating the contracts in order to weed out the corrupt officials, prosecute them, and imprison them.

We need our government to listen to us.

We need to show them that we know they have been lying to us.

Please sign our petition and let them know that the people of the UK are no longer fooled".

PAUL EDWARDS,

PRISONER NUMBER A2385ET,

HMP BERWYN,

139 BRIDGE ROAD,

WREXHAM,

LL13 9QE.

If you want to contact Paul, you can via https://www.emailaprisoner.com/

Expand full comment

Yes we should pit them against each other

Expand full comment

Why Steve Kirsh and Naomi Wolf? I was wondering. Not that I don't admire them because I very much do. Thank you.

Expand full comment

They're just slow on the uptake with this pseudo-legalized, deliberate DOD-HHS genocide piece of the puzzle.

Both will catch up at some point -- hopefully soon -- and the painfully-acquired knowledge, statistical analysis experience and leadership/team organizing skill they have for working with and exposing the VAERS and clinical trial data (even though both data sets are so badly corrupted) has been incredibly important so far and will continue to be incredibly important.

Expand full comment

Yeah it will all be useful work so I've rethought the position I had a few weeks ago that it's a waste of time but all of thr information gathered can leveraged.

I expect Naomi will get there before Steve will. She's not far off really.

Expand full comment

I agree.

Expand full comment

Very few have delineated this...one can listen to Twitter spaces and hear there seems to be a political arm of discovery and a medical side that does not bring this up and is more interested in the science of the jab vs addressing the root cause analysis. They could be unaware. Perhaps with the right Twitter spaces host, you, Sasha Latypova, Karen Kingston could be guest speakers. You might have already given this thought, I am trying like all to get the word out while you have a beautiful mind to do this!

Expand full comment

Dr. Peter McCullough is aware.

Expand full comment

Karen probably won't agree to that which is a shame.

Expand full comment

Huh? What role do they have with this? They're not going to touch this. Well maybe Naomi l...she's gotten closer. Steve...NFW.

Expand full comment

Me too. You aren’t a nobody!

Expand full comment

Aww. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much for your passionate investigative work into the shadow, criminal government that has been operating for so many years. I am not the best at actually putting your 'dots' together and making sense of them--but it is obvious that you recognize the crime scene that has been playing out for many years AND I know that all the other Lions of Truth are so very grateful that you are on the trail and baying so loudly and clearly that even I can see and hear. Thank you Katherine!

Expand full comment

will a figure from popular culture step up to shine a spotlight on the injustices like Billie Holiday did with her Strange Fruit?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-DGY9HvChXk

https://www.biography.com/news/billie-holiday-strange-fruit

Expand full comment

I love Billie Holiday! I’ve listened to her for years.

Expand full comment

I agree with the scrutinisation of defeatist language. I believe that language is counter to what we are all building which is truth, morality and real and just laws. That is the last thing these criminals want to hear and that is that the people WILL prevail, the people WILL remove and right these injustices and the people WILL take back their government to serve humanity instead of tyranny posing as safety and security.

Expand full comment

OORAH!

Expand full comment