Saw this morning, on Coffee and Covid (Attorney Jeff Childers’ Substack), that Pfizer has filed a Motion to Dismiss Brook Jackson’s whistleblower case. Brook Jackson is the Ventavia clinical trials manager who contacted FDA in September 2020 to report egregious violations of standard clinical trial and patient safety procedures at two of the Texas sites where Ventavia employees, as subcontractors to Pfizer, were recruiting human subjects and administering Pfizer’s products throughout Summer 2020.
"neither Pfizer nor FDA ever believed anyone had a legal or moral obligation to protect the safety of the people taking the injections"
This is so shocking that the buildings for both should be burnt down, all surrounded by enough snipers and minefields as to guarantee nobody makes it out alive!
While this "solution" may seem extreme, it is nowhere as extreme as what has been done to not just Americans, but humanity!
Is this what it all has come too?
Someone will say "You can't solve a problem by becoming just like those you are eliminating."
"Nine CEO's sign historic pledge to continue to make the safety and well-being of vaccinated individuals the top priority in development of the first COVID-19 vaccines."
The CEO's of AstraZeneca, BioNTech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merk, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, and Sanofi, today announced a historic pledge, outlining a united commitment to uphold the integrity of the scientific process as they work towards potential global regulatory filings and approvals of the first COVID-19 vaccines."
Brooke Jackson is a hero. Out of all of the people involved in these egregious clinical trials, she is the only person in the world who stood up to EVERYTHING and said, NO, NO, NO, - NOWAY. NOT ON MY WATCH, NOT ON ANYBODY'S WATCH. I find that incredibly sad. She could probably use some support since she is basically taking on all the evil in our government by herself.
Brooke Jackson's story is COVID-19 in a nutshell. If this story doesn't blow up on the news, nothing will.
Basically, Pfizer says the government (DoD) was a party to the operative contract so the government has signed off on the shoddy/rigged/fraudulent trials. So, yes, Pfizer AND the government should be held liable for the massive damages. But we all know nothing will happen as we all know that no wrongful death or personal injury lawsuit will ever make it to a jury. If just one verdict was returned for any plaintiff, this would open the floodgates for millions of subsequent verdicts. The defendants in these cases would be virtually every company and large organization in the world (every one that either mandated or coerced employees or student, athletes, etc. into getting these jab). This could literally bankrupt every one of these organizations. The judges and Court System will provide the protection against these lawsuits and throw out any lawsuits that do get filed. I also note that hardly any lawsuits have been filed (that I am aware of). This tells me that our fearless Plaintiff Trial Lawyers intuitively know what lawsuits they should not file. This is just like all the "journalists" who intuitively know what stories they cannot write, or investigations they cannot perform.
The fakery runs wide and deep. The website A Warrior Calls.com /ai dominion games with Hawkins goes to a massive source and here I think we are hitting closest to the bottom of this vile barrel. We're so much closer than we think. Between you and a few others the whole thing unraveling fast.
Sorry I didn't see this article earlier. I feel everyone's pain here, but here's what you're missing: no facet of the gov't (in the US) is required to give a dang about anyone's health (except MAYBE the V.A.). Basically, the Constitution left every subject it didn't specifically address to the various states; and no law says you have A RIGHT to health, OR to appropriate healthcare. There's endless propaganda implying that you do, but that's nonsense. Instead, the entire medical-industrial complex exists for the profit of its private owners, & the gov't (at various levels) steps in to guide your regressive tax dollars toward upholding those owners' monopolies, limiting competition, etc. It's ALL about money; & science has nothing to do w/ it (except when it's part of someone's business model, or patents). Read my book, WHY THE U.S. GETS THE WORST CHILDBIRTH OUTCOMES IN THE INDUSTRIALIZED WORLD (or, wait for the updated version). Read E. Richard Brown's ROCKEFELLER MEDICINE MEN. Read Ellen Brown's FORBIDDEN MEDICINE. Read Randall Fitzgerald's THE HUNDRED YEAR LIE.
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 1 or 2 MONTHS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
The data is from the British/English government agency UKHSA (United Kingdom Health Security Agency).
Let's look at the (covid-19) death data for those over 80 years of age, both vaccinated, and un-vaccinated, from week 3, 2022 (the week of the great fraud) onwards:
The following table has 4 "columns".
Column 1 lists the period/week of 2022.
Column 2 is deaths among those vaccinated per 100,000
Column 3 is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column 4 tells the number of deaths saved/lost (i.e, Column 3 minus Column 2) due to the vaccines per 100,000.
week03 39 309 => the vaccines save 270 deaths per 100,000
week04 57 322 => the vaccines save 265 deaths per 100,000
week05 78 326 => the vaccines save 248 deaths per 100,000
week06 103 324 => the vaccines save 221 deaths per 100,000
week07 114 280 => the vaccines save 165 deaths per 100,000
week08 120 243 => the vaccines save 124 deaths per 100,000
week09 120 190 => the vaccines save 70 deaths per 100,000
week10 110 152 => the vaccines save 42 deaths per 100,000
week11 101 141 => the vaccines save 40 deaths per 100,000
week12 90 134 => the vaccines save 44 deaths per 100,000
week13 84 122 => the vaccines save 37 deaths per 100,000
week14............. they suddenly decided to stop publishing the data.
I WONDER WHY?
So Column 4 is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column 4 we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
I must emphasize that the above data only records deaths due to covid-19. It does not record any deaths due to adverse reactions to the vaccines.
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide an excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
The relevant data from the reports can be found in the following PDF:
Previously, this very data was used to justify the vaccine mandates. The argument was that the vaccines were saving more than they are killing. This is no longer true. What is now true, is that; The vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
I saw that in the news yesterday and wondered what would happen. From a purely legal analysis of contracts, has Pfizer got a viable argument?
"neither Pfizer nor FDA ever believed anyone had a legal or moral obligation to protect the safety of the people taking the injections"
This is so shocking that the buildings for both should be burnt down, all surrounded by enough snipers and minefields as to guarantee nobody makes it out alive!
While this "solution" may seem extreme, it is nowhere as extreme as what has been done to not just Americans, but humanity!
Is this what it all has come too?
Someone will say "You can't solve a problem by becoming just like those you are eliminating."
My reply, "I'm OK with that!"
Tuesday, September, 8, 2020 - 10:00am
"Nine CEO's sign historic pledge to continue to make the safety and well-being of vaccinated individuals the top priority in development of the first COVID-19 vaccines."
The CEO's of AstraZeneca, BioNTech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merk, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, and Sanofi, today announced a historic pledge, outlining a united commitment to uphold the integrity of the scientific process as they work towards potential global regulatory filings and approvals of the first COVID-19 vaccines."
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/biopharma-leaders-unite-stand-science#
Brooke Jackson is a hero. Out of all of the people involved in these egregious clinical trials, she is the only person in the world who stood up to EVERYTHING and said, NO, NO, NO, - NOWAY. NOT ON MY WATCH, NOT ON ANYBODY'S WATCH. I find that incredibly sad. She could probably use some support since she is basically taking on all the evil in our government by herself.
Brooke Jackson's story is COVID-19 in a nutshell. If this story doesn't blow up on the news, nothing will.
Basically, Pfizer says the government (DoD) was a party to the operative contract so the government has signed off on the shoddy/rigged/fraudulent trials. So, yes, Pfizer AND the government should be held liable for the massive damages. But we all know nothing will happen as we all know that no wrongful death or personal injury lawsuit will ever make it to a jury. If just one verdict was returned for any plaintiff, this would open the floodgates for millions of subsequent verdicts. The defendants in these cases would be virtually every company and large organization in the world (every one that either mandated or coerced employees or student, athletes, etc. into getting these jab). This could literally bankrupt every one of these organizations. The judges and Court System will provide the protection against these lawsuits and throw out any lawsuits that do get filed. I also note that hardly any lawsuits have been filed (that I am aware of). This tells me that our fearless Plaintiff Trial Lawyers intuitively know what lawsuits they should not file. This is just like all the "journalists" who intuitively know what stories they cannot write, or investigations they cannot perform.
What the AF. Just when I thought it was evil it gets diabolical.
This is outrageous! What can we do?
The fakery runs wide and deep. The website A Warrior Calls.com /ai dominion games with Hawkins goes to a massive source and here I think we are hitting closest to the bottom of this vile barrel. We're so much closer than we think. Between you and a few others the whole thing unraveling fast.
Sorry I didn't see this article earlier. I feel everyone's pain here, but here's what you're missing: no facet of the gov't (in the US) is required to give a dang about anyone's health (except MAYBE the V.A.). Basically, the Constitution left every subject it didn't specifically address to the various states; and no law says you have A RIGHT to health, OR to appropriate healthcare. There's endless propaganda implying that you do, but that's nonsense. Instead, the entire medical-industrial complex exists for the profit of its private owners, & the gov't (at various levels) steps in to guide your regressive tax dollars toward upholding those owners' monopolies, limiting competition, etc. It's ALL about money; & science has nothing to do w/ it (except when it's part of someone's business model, or patents). Read my book, WHY THE U.S. GETS THE WORST CHILDBIRTH OUTCOMES IN THE INDUSTRIALIZED WORLD (or, wait for the updated version). Read E. Richard Brown's ROCKEFELLER MEDICINE MEN. Read Ellen Brown's FORBIDDEN MEDICINE. Read Randall Fitzgerald's THE HUNDRED YEAR LIE.
HERE IS A SIMPLE PROOF THAT COVID VACCINES
INCREASE SICKNESS AND DEATH FOR ALL AGE GROUPS.
EVEN THOSE OVER EIGHTY YEARS OLD.
IT USES EXACTLY THE SAME DATA ONCE
USED TO JUSTIFY THE VACCINE MANDATES
WHAT MORE COULD YOU WANT !!!!????
Read about it here: http://www.preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 1 or 2 MONTHS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
The data is from the British/English government agency UKHSA (United Kingdom Health Security Agency).
Let's look at the (covid-19) death data for those over 80 years of age, both vaccinated, and un-vaccinated, from week 3, 2022 (the week of the great fraud) onwards:
The following table has 4 "columns".
Column 1 lists the period/week of 2022.
Column 2 is deaths among those vaccinated per 100,000
Column 3 is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column 4 tells the number of deaths saved/lost (i.e, Column 3 minus Column 2) due to the vaccines per 100,000.
week03 39 309 => the vaccines save 270 deaths per 100,000
week04 57 322 => the vaccines save 265 deaths per 100,000
week05 78 326 => the vaccines save 248 deaths per 100,000
week06 103 324 => the vaccines save 221 deaths per 100,000
week07 114 280 => the vaccines save 165 deaths per 100,000
week08 120 243 => the vaccines save 124 deaths per 100,000
week09 120 190 => the vaccines save 70 deaths per 100,000
week10 110 152 => the vaccines save 42 deaths per 100,000
week11 101 141 => the vaccines save 40 deaths per 100,000
week12 90 134 => the vaccines save 44 deaths per 100,000
week13 84 122 => the vaccines save 37 deaths per 100,000
week14............. they suddenly decided to stop publishing the data.
I WONDER WHY?
So Column 4 is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column 4 we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Image/Graph http://www.preearth.net/images/deaths-caused-saved-by-vaccines.png
I must emphasize that the above data only records deaths due to covid-19. It does not record any deaths due to adverse reactions to the vaccines.
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide an excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
The relevant data from the reports can be found in the following PDF:
http://www.preearth.net/pdfs/the-vaccines-are-killing-you.pdf
Previously, this very data was used to justify the vaccine mandates. The argument was that the vaccines were saving more than they are killing. This is no longer true. What is now true, is that; The vaccines are killing more than they are saving.