But what if fraud could be proven? Would that not invalidate the immunity? And I don't mean myocarditis for instance. I know people are getting excited that Pfizer knew their jab could cause myocarditis. But if Pfizer showed it in their documents, then the fault lies with CDC and FDA IMO. The biggest shills have been the bureaucrats. But what if there was fraud in the clinical trial? What if they tried to skew the results, or fudge the documentation? Surely there has to be some way to stop this insanity? Bourla just said today that everyone needs a 4th jab!! It is beyond evil.
My current understanding is that the fraud evidence may not make much difference, at least on the clinical investigation side, because of legal definitions under EUA law that made everything after Feb. 4, 2020 (the date Alex Azar’s declaration of covered countermeasures, issued March 10, 2020, was made retroactive to) not part of any clinical investigation.
Under 21 USC 360bbb-3(k), no matter how experimental or untested a product is:
“(k) Relation to other provisions - If a product is the subject of an authorization under this section, the use of such product within the scope of the authorization shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation for purposes of section 355(i), 360b(j), or 360j(g) of this title or any other provision of this chapter or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262].”
I don’t know if those provisions will stand up, if a court ever gets to hear cases.
The FDA was certainly aware of the dangers very early in the process, as early as Sept. 2020 when Ventavia whistleblower Brook Jackson first reported severe problems in the Texas clinical trials that rendered the data unreliable at best, and clear evidence of toxicity sufficient to stop the experiment before the rollout began in Dec. 2020.
So it would be very difficult for the government to claim Pfizer defrauded the government. Because FDA knew and was in on the fraud on the public.
I also don’t know if fraud on the corporate side will be handled differently based on the Covid-specific conditions (public health emergency, EUA etc.) Ed Dowd, the Blackrock guy, seems to think that shareholders might have a corporate fraud case against Pfizer insiders. Corporate law during public health emergencies isn’t something I’ve looked into a lot, but the statutes I have found, about the unilateral, unreviewable procurement and contract power of the HHS Secretary in a declared emergency, make me think that shareholders probably don’t have standing either. Mostly because Pfizer’s negotiation of massive sales contracts for government-mandated products led to huge corporate profits, and that’s what the corporate executives are legally supposed to do.
But things are still unfolding. The best odds of courts and legislators stepping up to stop the whole mess and start dealing with the human suffering they’ve caused, is to grow the critical mass of well-informed, justifiably angry citizens and get that critical mass so loud that it can’t be censored or ignored anymore.
We’re not there yet, but things are moving in that direction.
But what if fraud could be proven? Would that not invalidate the immunity? And I don't mean myocarditis for instance. I know people are getting excited that Pfizer knew their jab could cause myocarditis. But if Pfizer showed it in their documents, then the fault lies with CDC and FDA IMO. The biggest shills have been the bureaucrats. But what if there was fraud in the clinical trial? What if they tried to skew the results, or fudge the documentation? Surely there has to be some way to stop this insanity? Bourla just said today that everyone needs a 4th jab!! It is beyond evil.
My current understanding is that the fraud evidence may not make much difference, at least on the clinical investigation side, because of legal definitions under EUA law that made everything after Feb. 4, 2020 (the date Alex Azar’s declaration of covered countermeasures, issued March 10, 2020, was made retroactive to) not part of any clinical investigation.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/17/2020-05484/declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical-countermeasures
Under 21 USC 360bbb-3(k), no matter how experimental or untested a product is:
“(k) Relation to other provisions - If a product is the subject of an authorization under this section, the use of such product within the scope of the authorization shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation for purposes of section 355(i), 360b(j), or 360j(g) of this title or any other provision of this chapter or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262].”
I don’t know if those provisions will stand up, if a court ever gets to hear cases.
The FDA was certainly aware of the dangers very early in the process, as early as Sept. 2020 when Ventavia whistleblower Brook Jackson first reported severe problems in the Texas clinical trials that rendered the data unreliable at best, and clear evidence of toxicity sufficient to stop the experiment before the rollout began in Dec. 2020.
So it would be very difficult for the government to claim Pfizer defrauded the government. Because FDA knew and was in on the fraud on the public.
I also don’t know if fraud on the corporate side will be handled differently based on the Covid-specific conditions (public health emergency, EUA etc.) Ed Dowd, the Blackrock guy, seems to think that shareholders might have a corporate fraud case against Pfizer insiders. Corporate law during public health emergencies isn’t something I’ve looked into a lot, but the statutes I have found, about the unilateral, unreviewable procurement and contract power of the HHS Secretary in a declared emergency, make me think that shareholders probably don’t have standing either. Mostly because Pfizer’s negotiation of massive sales contracts for government-mandated products led to huge corporate profits, and that’s what the corporate executives are legally supposed to do.
But things are still unfolding. The best odds of courts and legislators stepping up to stop the whole mess and start dealing with the human suffering they’ve caused, is to grow the critical mass of well-informed, justifiably angry citizens and get that critical mass so loud that it can’t be censored or ignored anymore.
We’re not there yet, but things are moving in that direction.