12 Comments
Commenting has been turned off for this post

The US and every other sovereign nation needs to get out of the WHO and the UN.

Expand full comment

Recent UN document about all sorts of Complex Global Shocks:

https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/our-common-agenda-policy-brief-emergency-platform-en.pdf

The Emergency Platform would not be a standing body or entity but a set of protocols that could be activated when needed.

pg 5 explains what these shocks are, covers just about anything they want:

The types of global shocks the world might experience in the future are uncertain. We are faced with a range of different risks that could result in

complex global shocks.

Several factors, including climate change, global interconnectedness and rapid technological advances, mean that there is a growing likelihood that complex global shocks will become more frequent in the future, while the multilateral system’s tools to respond have not kept up with the risks we face. Some of the global shocks that we may encounter in the future include:

a) Large-scale climatic or environmental events that cause major socioeconomic disruptions and/or environmental degradation;

b) Future pandemics with cascading secondary impacts;

c) High-impact events involving a biological agent (deliberate or accidental);

d) Events leading to disruptions to global flows of goods, people or finance;

e) Large-scale destructive and/or disruptive activity in cyberspace or disruptions to global digital connectivity;

f) A major event in outer space that causes severe disruptions to one or several critical systems on Earth;

g) Unforeseen risks (“black swan” events).

The range of risks that could potentially lead to future complex global shocks is broad and

diverse, and there are several potential future shocks in which the multilateral response architecture is underdeveloped or non-existent.

pg 7 - the WHY behind it:

Complex global shocks can severely undermine progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals

Expand full comment

Excellent analysis and facts Katherine.

You would find the "income tax" scheme and enactment interesting as it involves the same legal trickery. An excellent researcher with documentation is Pete Hendrickson and his website and books. In essence, "income" was originally considered in the Constitution as privileged money for government work. This was flushed out in the first Supreme court case (Brushaber) after the 13th amendment's passage. It has been expanded and memory-holed ever since. No one cared because it only started with multimillion dollar levels of "income" of others. (Blame can be laid upon human greed or lust if you want.) That is how the "direct" and "indirect" tax rules have been evaded and upheld by the courts. It has been to impoverish us. If you look at where we are today with taxes which had a 50-70 year head start, you can see how overwhelming the Federal push will be in the "emergency" arena. Now, the federal government provides 50% of state money and 30% or more of corporate "income" and, as you correctly show, pulls the strings. In essence, the constitution is a dead old piece of paper which has been neutered..

Any unconstitutional law is void before it starts but in whose eyes and how is it going to be enforced?

We have been had! "Criminal" seems to general and soft a word to describe our conquerors.

Excellent work of yours as usual.

Expand full comment

I am very grateful for your articles.

From your first sentence it can be understood that WHO and EU are working together to put in place the pandemic treaties. WHO is an UN agency. And the USA is controlling this institution, the principal headquarter is located in New York, the International Court of Justice is the only principal UN organ not located in New York city, but in Hague, NL. As for EU- currently is occupied by NATO(US) forces, around 70,000 US military personnel, with NATO bases across all EU countries. So to say that WHO and EU can have any independent initiative and action- does not seem to be real. American citizens are victims, like the entire EU/ Australia/New Zealand populations. Who is in charge- the one who has the military and economic power.

Why all of these countries leaders colluded and are destroying their own people, culture and civilization? The only explanation can be madness, divorce from the real world. From a spiritual point of view, they are not free, but slaves of the evil.

We can be free only in God.

Expand full comment

The bigger question is "Who controls the USA?" It ain't you and me, my friend. It is the secret society of central bankers and international mega-business owners who use the USA (for now) as their agent. Why do you think that David Rockefeller and his Kissinger praised China as the model. Rockefeller provided the land for the UN. Mao went to Yale with its secret societies of which Skull and Bones was one and learned there. All large organizations have been "penetrated" (to use Klaus Schwab's words). "They" want it all and want us dead and gone. Brave New World was not a warning. It was a game plan and prediction. Likewise with 1984. We are to be enslaved from above. Local is the only way to successfully resist , if that is possible. The days of Robin Hood resistance and secrecy are gone.

Exiting the UN and WHO are great ideas but what is to stop the federal and state rulers from suppressing us? Remember the war for southern independence in 1860 where certain states wanted to withdraw from the union as provided for and reserved in their joining the union to begin with? (If you research this, you will find that it was a masonic plan controlled on both sides by the Secret Society for population reduction and consolidation of power. Things have not changed very much since then other than tighter control.)

It is, indeed, evil which is the absence of good, not the opposite of it. The same evil that promotes heritage Christian America as supremist, privileged, oppressive and wrong and pushes to eliminate it and any concept of a creator God. It is a Godless survival of the fittest and powerful (them) backed by unsubstantiated evolutionary BS which leaves no room for a God or any other Creator. God will not be overthrown but it will not be easy or pretty.

Expand full comment

It is not "madness" or divorced if it has been so very successful. "Leaders" who are puppets do not consider you and I "their own people". They are above us in their eyes and we vermin need to go.

Expand full comment

Now it all makes sense

Expand full comment

Also certain mayors and congress members signed on in the 2000’s to One Health. 20:years ago

Expand full comment

Weird as I’ve posted most government departments and agencies CDC all devote resources to UN/WHO’s One Health. FDA, NOAA, US AID, Agriculture, Medical Journals, Veterinary Association etc. One Health.

Expand full comment

Makes me curious. In Louisiana SB133 was signed by Governor Landry. The language seems to encompass any past or present policy or regulation etc from the UN WHO or WEF as unenforceable by the state or any other local agency and the like.

Expand full comment

I live in Phoenix, AZ. At the onset of the Great Covid Scare of 2020, I recall with crystal clarity that our Mayor, Her Majesty Kate Gallego, launched a futile attempt to bring virtually ALL human social activity to a standstill. She issued various Royal Declarations and edicts aimed at micromanaging citizens lives with unusual vigor. It was evident that she thought of us as livestock to be herded about at her whim.

What I also recall is how few of us blindly obeyed, and how many openly refused to obey.

If the good citizens of this nation treasure our liberty, there is nothing the WHO can do about it. If we refuse to bend over and comply with a GLOBAL health cabal, drunk with the taste of power, and their pitiful proxies at the local and state level, they are welcome to even ATTEMPT to round us up and toss in jail. OUR CONSTITUTION is the only set of laws we are obliged to respect. And DHHS knows that if they ever try to ruin any of us at the behest of the WHO, they will regret it.

There's A LOT more of us than there are willing local law enforcement and National Guard.

Expand full comment