Thanks for keeping a torchlight to this issue. Just wondering, did you hear from Aaron Siri? Would a crowdfunding campaign help to get his firm interested in picking up this fight?
I heard back from someone on his staff who didn’t want to be cited by name, who wrote:
“The “willful misconduct” exception (for claims that can be brought) only applies to manufacturers and distributors. Further, no claim can be brought even for misconduct unless the government (HHS or AG) first brings a claim for the same conduct. So the DOJ would need to bring claims against, say, Pfizer for willful misconduct for a particular action(s) and only after there is a resolution there could someone else potentially bring a claim for willful misconduct.”
Siri’s associate was citing to the 2005 PREP Act. 42 USC 247d-6d(c)(5).
In my review of PREP Act and liability immunity, I think it covers manufacturers and distributors, but also developers at the R&D end, and vaccinators at the point of injection.
But I think the main point Siri’s associate made is right: that before *any* civil lawsuits by individual plaintiffs can be filed, first HHS or the AG has to file a criminal prosecution, mandatory recall or other ‘enforcement action’ against the defendant(s), and has to win that case, as a baseline to establish willful misconduct for use in subsequent civil suits. 42 USC 247d-6d(c)(5)(B)(i).
HHS itself is immune from suit under sovereign, government immunity.
HHS and AG are both in on the criminal treason/establishment of the public heath police state. And manufacturers and other contractors working through HHS procurement are also covered by sovereign government immunity because they’ve been reclassified as HHS employees for the purpose of fulfilling the contracts. 42 USC 247d-6a(d)(2)(A) from the 2004 Project Bioshield Act.
So HHS and AG, at least until a major changing of the guard, will not pursue ‘enforcement actions’ against their co-conspirators Pfizer etc.
So the first barrier to private lawsuits will not be overcome.
I don’t know if private attorneys like Siri, Renz, Callender, Wentz, Childers, etc., can initiate criminal treason prosecutions. I think Republican state attorneys general are a better target for grassroots organizing campaigns, since many of them have already worked together to challenge some of the vaccine mandates and other federal acts.
I asked Siri’s associate about their views on the bigger picture question,
“That it appears the US Congress and President, in 2004 and 2005, adopted American laws to automatically suspend the American federal government (President and Congress), the US Constitution, and US federal and state courts, and silently place the country under the control of the World Health Organization and the WHO Constitution, upon the trigger of the WHO Director-General declaring a “public health emergency of international concern,” operational through regulations adopted in early 2017 to authorize the domestic actions of the US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Attorney General, and Department of Defense Secretary that we’ve seen over the past two years?”
They said they hadn’t looked at that issue yet. Email exchange happened around April 8.
Meant to add, Ealy v. Redfield in Oregon comes closest to a criminal prosecution; it’s a petition for a grand jury investigation into federal crimes committed by agents of the federal government. It doesn’t include treason charges, but it does allege that the federal government has committed crimes.
Ealy, Linthicum and Thatcher v. Redfield, Walensky, Azar et al., USDC Oregon Petition to Impanel Special Grand Jury to Investigate Allegations of Federal Crimes (3:22-cv-356-HZ). Allegation that multiple federal agencies committeed multiple federal crimes, including rulemaking violations of Administrative Procedures Act, 5 USC 551 et seq., and defrauded US public and state and local governments.
Yes, that makes it "simple" LOL. I was also thinking along the lines of Republican state attorneys general, Democrats welcome, of course. Incidentally, David Martin (https://www.davidmartin.world/) indicated already last year that he was in contact and working with state attorneys general to bring up legal action in regard of COvid-19 pandemic fraud (Utah, in particular, was semi-committed ). Never heard about this development again. But maybe you could check this out?
I haven’t heard anything about Utah state attorney general doing anything, but Martin has said he chose Utah for filing Griner as a private plaintiff case, for specific reasons having to do with Utah state laws that differ from other states’ laws.
He's crying out loud for ANY attorney general with a conscience to pick up this case, for which he has evidence. Since Dec. 2021. His call went unanswered so far, I presume. But he doesn't build his case on fraud, rather on bioterrorism charges. An important difference?
Martin says he has three law enforcement agencies engaged in the process, with him to prosecute one of the criminal conspiracy architects, and will be announcing further developments on May 22.
All this "illumination" you have done of this issue has led me to the declaration that we are rapidly approaching the point where Jeff Cooper's solution is the only one left available to us.
“There ain’t many troubles that a man cain’t fix
With seven hundred dollars and a thirty aught six.”
I know about that case, but it’s not a criminal prosecution for treason. It’s a civil, Constitutional rights case claiming government is improperly violating Griner’s rights.
It also yields some significant terrain right out of the gate. Griner challenges the CDC classification of the products as “vaccines,” but offers as the alternative that they’re therapeutic or medical treatments for which Griner has the right to refuse medical treatment.
Instead of arguing that they’re weapons, in response to which Griner, as an individual, has the right of self-defense and in response to which the American people have the right to prosecute the perpetrators for treason and ensure that none can hold office ever again.
At some point I hope to do analysis posts about several of the lawsuits, but for now, I’ve only been able to skim, log and briefly think about most of them.
Below are the ones I try to keep tabs on so far, but none are criminal treason cases against Congress, US presidents and HHS secretaries.
Ealy v. Redfield in Oregon comes closest; it’s a petition for a grand jury investigation into federal crimes committed by agents of the federal government.
Butler v. Wolf, USDC Middle District Pennsylvania, Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Appeal denied without explanation by US Supreme Court (20-2936). Challenge to constitutionality of governor’s emergency executive orders.
Jackson v. Ventavia, Pfizer et al, USDC Eastern District Texas (1:21-cv-00008-MJT). Whistleblower, False Claims Act case alleging clinical trial fraud and defrauding of US government and FDA as emergency-authorizers, purchasers, marketers and mandaters of the toxic products.
Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital, USDC Southern District Texas, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (21-20311). Challenge to private employer vaccine mandate.
America’s Frontline Doctors v. Becerra, et al. USDC Northern District Alabama (2:21-cv-00702-CLM). Challenge to FDA Emergency Use Authorization of product.
Robert et al. v. Austin, Becerra, et al. USDC Colorado, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (21-cv-2228; 22-1032). Challenge to federal military vaccine mandate.
Ealy, Linthicum and Thatcher v. Redfield, Walensky, Azar et al., USDC Oregon Petition to Impanel Special Grand Jury to Investigate Allegations of Federal Crimes (3:22-cv-356-HZ). Allegation that multiple federal agencies committeed multiple federal crimes, including rulemaking violations of Administrative Procedures Act, 5 USC 551 et seq., and defrauded US public and state and local governments.
Costin v. Biden et al., USDC District of Columbia (1:21-cv-02484). Challenge to federal employee, federal contractor and federal military vaccine mandates.
Navy Seal 1 v. Biden et al., USDC Middle District Florida (8:21-cv-02429-SDM-TGW). Challenge to federal military vaccine mandate.
Church v. Biden, USDC District of Columbia (1:21-cv-02815). Challenge to federal employee, federal contractor and federal military vaccine mandates.
Navy Seal 1 v. Austin et al., USDC Northern District Texas (4:21-cv-01236), Class Action. Federal Department of Defense mandate on military personnel.
Missouri v. Biden, USDC Eastern Missouri (2021 WL 5564501) and Louisiana v. Becerra, USDC Western Louisiana (2021 WL 5609846), appealed by Biden Administration to 5th and 8th Circuit Courts of Appeals. Consolidated 21A240 and 21A241 at US Supreme Court (595 U.S.__ 2022). Challenge to federal mandate on health care workers at Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS)-funded facilities.
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden, USDC Southern Texas, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (3:21-cv-00356). Challenge to federal mandate on federal employees.
National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Department of Labor Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA); Ohio v. OSHA. Consolidated 21A244 and 21A247 at US Supreme Court (595 US___ 2022). Challenge to federal/OSHA mandate on private employers with 100 or more employees.
Federal Civilian Contractor Employer v. Austin, USDC Middle District Florida (8:2022-cv-00365). Challenge to federal mandate on federal contractors.
Doster v. Kendall, USDC Southern District Ohio (1:22-cv-00084). Challenge to federal mandate on Air Force servicemembers.
Griner v. Biden, USDC Utah (2:22-cv-00149-DAK). Challenge to federal mandate on health care workers at CMS-funded facilities, including challenge to the government’s definition of the product as ‘vaccines.’
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden, USDC Southern District Texas, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. (3:21-cv-00356). Challenge to federal ‘mandate’ on federal employees.'
We as the human species have walked ourselves into a nightmare from which we may not be capable of awaking. We need international citizen-based groups, free of Government, Corporate, Institutional regulations to pursue these concerns. These issues supersede nationalities. And supersede individual areas of professional expertise. An international multidisciplinary body focused on the larger intersections of law, medicine, public health and public policy, including issues like public versus private power and issues such as the presence of social control in banking is necessary. Without such a body to reach independent conclusions represented by we the people around the planet there will be insufficient conclusions, insufficient information to move forward.
As George Orwell makes perfectly clear in fiction it is entirely possible to stay trapped within the circular arguments of these middle managers forever.
Thank you for reading and commenting. It does impact everyone - I think the US framework is one of the central models, if not ground zero, and that the model has been exported to other countries from the core here.
If we Americans, with our Second Amendment and large population of dissidents (counting the silent resisters as well as the vocal ones) manage to wound the legal monsters here, or delay them, or, God-willing, decapitate them here, it will go a long way to helping citizens of other countries get control of the beasts in your governments and legal systems.
Once again helpful. Does anyone know if the video with Biden stating “we own the three branches of government” is real? Then again in his mind who knows what it may mean if he did in fact say this.
At the conclusions of Biden’s May 10, 2022 remarks on inflation he did answer a question on inflation by saying something rather nonsensical about the following points -
“The first is, we’re in power. That’s the first thing. And you — justifiably right, we control all three branches of government.”
I really like that idea, prosecute them for treason. This would hopefully make more of the public realize that the US is losing its sovereignty as a nation.
Thanks for keeping a torchlight to this issue. Just wondering, did you hear from Aaron Siri? Would a crowdfunding campaign help to get his firm interested in picking up this fight?
I heard back from someone on his staff who didn’t want to be cited by name, who wrote:
“The “willful misconduct” exception (for claims that can be brought) only applies to manufacturers and distributors. Further, no claim can be brought even for misconduct unless the government (HHS or AG) first brings a claim for the same conduct. So the DOJ would need to bring claims against, say, Pfizer for willful misconduct for a particular action(s) and only after there is a resolution there could someone else potentially bring a claim for willful misconduct.”
Siri’s associate was citing to the 2005 PREP Act. 42 USC 247d-6d(c)(5).
In my review of PREP Act and liability immunity, I think it covers manufacturers and distributors, but also developers at the R&D end, and vaccinators at the point of injection.
But I think the main point Siri’s associate made is right: that before *any* civil lawsuits by individual plaintiffs can be filed, first HHS or the AG has to file a criminal prosecution, mandatory recall or other ‘enforcement action’ against the defendant(s), and has to win that case, as a baseline to establish willful misconduct for use in subsequent civil suits. 42 USC 247d-6d(c)(5)(B)(i).
HHS itself is immune from suit under sovereign, government immunity.
HHS and AG are both in on the criminal treason/establishment of the public heath police state. And manufacturers and other contractors working through HHS procurement are also covered by sovereign government immunity because they’ve been reclassified as HHS employees for the purpose of fulfilling the contracts. 42 USC 247d-6a(d)(2)(A) from the 2004 Project Bioshield Act.
So HHS and AG, at least until a major changing of the guard, will not pursue ‘enforcement actions’ against their co-conspirators Pfizer etc.
So the first barrier to private lawsuits will not be overcome.
I don’t know if private attorneys like Siri, Renz, Callender, Wentz, Childers, etc., can initiate criminal treason prosecutions. I think Republican state attorneys general are a better target for grassroots organizing campaigns, since many of them have already worked together to challenge some of the vaccine mandates and other federal acts.
I asked Siri’s associate about their views on the bigger picture question,
“That it appears the US Congress and President, in 2004 and 2005, adopted American laws to automatically suspend the American federal government (President and Congress), the US Constitution, and US federal and state courts, and silently place the country under the control of the World Health Organization and the WHO Constitution, upon the trigger of the WHO Director-General declaring a “public health emergency of international concern,” operational through regulations adopted in early 2017 to authorize the domestic actions of the US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Attorney General, and Department of Defense Secretary that we’ve seen over the past two years?”
They said they hadn’t looked at that issue yet. Email exchange happened around April 8.
Meant to add, Ealy v. Redfield in Oregon comes closest to a criminal prosecution; it’s a petition for a grand jury investigation into federal crimes committed by agents of the federal government. It doesn’t include treason charges, but it does allege that the federal government has committed crimes.
Ealy, Linthicum and Thatcher v. Redfield, Walensky, Azar et al., USDC Oregon Petition to Impanel Special Grand Jury to Investigate Allegations of Federal Crimes (3:22-cv-356-HZ). Allegation that multiple federal agencies committeed multiple federal crimes, including rulemaking violations of Administrative Procedures Act, 5 USC 551 et seq., and defrauded US public and state and local governments.
Yes, that makes it "simple" LOL. I was also thinking along the lines of Republican state attorneys general, Democrats welcome, of course. Incidentally, David Martin (https://www.davidmartin.world/) indicated already last year that he was in contact and working with state attorneys general to bring up legal action in regard of COvid-19 pandemic fraud (Utah, in particular, was semi-committed ). Never heard about this development again. But maybe you could check this out?
I haven’t heard anything about Utah state attorney general doing anything, but Martin has said he chose Utah for filing Griner as a private plaintiff case, for specific reasons having to do with Utah state laws that differ from other states’ laws.
I’ll keep an eye out for more Utah cases.
Here's what I have found on David Martin's web page: https://www.davidmartin.world/attorney-general-document/
He's crying out loud for ANY attorney general with a conscience to pick up this case, for which he has evidence. Since Dec. 2021. His call went unanswered so far, I presume. But he doesn't build his case on fraud, rather on bioterrorism charges. An important difference?
For the reference of other readers (The Griner case): https://truthcomestolight.com/dr-david-martins-lawsuit-against-biden-the-covid-injection-is-a-bioweapon/ - very instructive reading!
Someone sent me a link to this video today:
https://rumble.com/v153ybt-dr.-david-e-martin-gives-explosive-jaw-dropping-information-in-canadian-zoo.html
Martin says he has three law enforcement agencies engaged in the process, with him to prosecute one of the criminal conspiracy architects, and will be announcing further developments on May 22.
Hurray! David Martin is getting somewhere!
All this "illumination" you have done of this issue has led me to the declaration that we are rapidly approaching the point where Jeff Cooper's solution is the only one left available to us.
“There ain’t many troubles that a man cain’t fix
With seven hundred dollars and a thirty aught six.”
― Jeff Cooper
And perhaps Thomas Jefferson - “we’re all gunmen”.?
Well, we are, if we value FREEDOM.
BRAVO
Dr David Martin is doing what you have suggested in Utah.
https://notaakhirzaman.com/9697/
I know about that case, but it’s not a criminal prosecution for treason. It’s a civil, Constitutional rights case claiming government is improperly violating Griner’s rights.
It also yields some significant terrain right out of the gate. Griner challenges the CDC classification of the products as “vaccines,” but offers as the alternative that they’re therapeutic or medical treatments for which Griner has the right to refuse medical treatment.
Instead of arguing that they’re weapons, in response to which Griner, as an individual, has the right of self-defense and in response to which the American people have the right to prosecute the perpetrators for treason and ensure that none can hold office ever again.
At some point I hope to do analysis posts about several of the lawsuits, but for now, I’ve only been able to skim, log and briefly think about most of them.
Below are the ones I try to keep tabs on so far, but none are criminal treason cases against Congress, US presidents and HHS secretaries.
Ealy v. Redfield in Oregon comes closest; it’s a petition for a grand jury investigation into federal crimes committed by agents of the federal government.
Butler v. Wolf, USDC Middle District Pennsylvania, Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Appeal denied without explanation by US Supreme Court (20-2936). Challenge to constitutionality of governor’s emergency executive orders.
Jackson v. Ventavia, Pfizer et al, USDC Eastern District Texas (1:21-cv-00008-MJT). Whistleblower, False Claims Act case alleging clinical trial fraud and defrauding of US government and FDA as emergency-authorizers, purchasers, marketers and mandaters of the toxic products.
Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital, USDC Southern District Texas, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (21-20311). Challenge to private employer vaccine mandate.
America’s Frontline Doctors v. Becerra, et al. USDC Northern District Alabama (2:21-cv-00702-CLM). Challenge to FDA Emergency Use Authorization of product.
Robert et al. v. Austin, Becerra, et al. USDC Colorado, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (21-cv-2228; 22-1032). Challenge to federal military vaccine mandate.
Ealy, Linthicum and Thatcher v. Redfield, Walensky, Azar et al., USDC Oregon Petition to Impanel Special Grand Jury to Investigate Allegations of Federal Crimes (3:22-cv-356-HZ). Allegation that multiple federal agencies committeed multiple federal crimes, including rulemaking violations of Administrative Procedures Act, 5 USC 551 et seq., and defrauded US public and state and local governments.
Costin v. Biden et al., USDC District of Columbia (1:21-cv-02484). Challenge to federal employee, federal contractor and federal military vaccine mandates.
Navy Seal 1 v. Biden et al., USDC Middle District Florida (8:21-cv-02429-SDM-TGW). Challenge to federal military vaccine mandate.
Church v. Biden, USDC District of Columbia (1:21-cv-02815). Challenge to federal employee, federal contractor and federal military vaccine mandates.
Navy Seal 1 v. Austin et al., USDC Northern District Texas (4:21-cv-01236), Class Action. Federal Department of Defense mandate on military personnel.
Missouri v. Biden, USDC Eastern Missouri (2021 WL 5564501) and Louisiana v. Becerra, USDC Western Louisiana (2021 WL 5609846), appealed by Biden Administration to 5th and 8th Circuit Courts of Appeals. Consolidated 21A240 and 21A241 at US Supreme Court (595 U.S.__ 2022). Challenge to federal mandate on health care workers at Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS)-funded facilities.
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden, USDC Southern Texas, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (3:21-cv-00356). Challenge to federal mandate on federal employees.
National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Department of Labor Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA); Ohio v. OSHA. Consolidated 21A244 and 21A247 at US Supreme Court (595 US___ 2022). Challenge to federal/OSHA mandate on private employers with 100 or more employees.
Federal Civilian Contractor Employer v. Austin, USDC Middle District Florida (8:2022-cv-00365). Challenge to federal mandate on federal contractors.
Doster v. Kendall, USDC Southern District Ohio (1:22-cv-00084). Challenge to federal mandate on Air Force servicemembers.
Griner v. Biden, USDC Utah (2:22-cv-00149-DAK). Challenge to federal mandate on health care workers at CMS-funded facilities, including challenge to the government’s definition of the product as ‘vaccines.’
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden, USDC Southern District Texas, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. (3:21-cv-00356). Challenge to federal ‘mandate’ on federal employees.'
We as the human species have walked ourselves into a nightmare from which we may not be capable of awaking. We need international citizen-based groups, free of Government, Corporate, Institutional regulations to pursue these concerns. These issues supersede nationalities. And supersede individual areas of professional expertise. An international multidisciplinary body focused on the larger intersections of law, medicine, public health and public policy, including issues like public versus private power and issues such as the presence of social control in banking is necessary. Without such a body to reach independent conclusions represented by we the people around the planet there will be insufficient conclusions, insufficient information to move forward.
As George Orwell makes perfectly clear in fiction it is entirely possible to stay trapped within the circular arguments of these middle managers forever.
So, sort of one global system of law, applied to all nations, and managed by local citizens?
I think we need more decentralization, not more centralization.
thank you so much Catherine, for your dedication and indefatigable work on this urgent topic, I'm in South Africa, this impacts us all... subscribed.
Thank you for reading and commenting. It does impact everyone - I think the US framework is one of the central models, if not ground zero, and that the model has been exported to other countries from the core here.
If we Americans, with our Second Amendment and large population of dissidents (counting the silent resisters as well as the vocal ones) manage to wound the legal monsters here, or delay them, or, God-willing, decapitate them here, it will go a long way to helping citizens of other countries get control of the beasts in your governments and legal systems.
Once again helpful. Does anyone know if the video with Biden stating “we own the three branches of government” is real? Then again in his mind who knows what it may mean if he did in fact say this.
At the conclusions of Biden’s May 10, 2022 remarks on inflation he did answer a question on inflation by saying something rather nonsensical about the following points -
“The first is, we’re in power. That’s the first thing. And you — justifiably right, we control all three branches of government.”
Red flag or further proof of confusion?
I really like that idea, prosecute them for treason. This would hopefully make more of the public realize that the US is losing its sovereignty as a nation.
So...there's going to be no help from anyone, before the WHO vote @ the end of this month.