"A reader commented, taking the position that the globalists are “exterminating” people to prevent other forms of deadly chaos such as famines, economic crashes, and resource wars, due to fossil fuel energy scarcity related to peak oil. " I have heard this argument (or other iterations) put forward many times and always been appalled by it.
First, why aren't they choosing to exterminated themselves then? Secondly, who is a small group of people to designate others for extermination? And thirdly, if any of this is true, the best way to handle it would always be absolute openness about the situation and seeing what solutions we, all of us, can pull together.
There are many smart people around and we can find a way to solve problems. Somehow, this small group never thinks this way. And if they really believed in what they were saying, that there's no way out except extermination, then if they were couragoueos, they would be first in line to self exterminate. But I never see them do that.
What I do see is they use the most resources in multiple homes, jets, cars, yachts, warfare, spying (the Utah NSA computers are drinking a lot of water!), etc. I think we can tell what is really the case by looking at the actions of the exterminators.
I'm counting on human intellect and compassion to take on the problems we face. And I completely agree this must begin w/a commitment to honesty, truth, this earth and our fellow living beings.
I am reminded of Trump telling us we have enough oil to last for the next 200 years! That threw a wrench into the global gears of scarcity ;)
We are learning that the stories and narratives pushed by the corrupted souls of the global elite cabal are their weapons of psychologically controlling us through fear over one scarcity or another. And not just scarcity but over health…scaring the masses into believing that we need their “science” to manage being a healthy human being!
Abundance - one apple seed will grow an entire tree full of apples with a little care and patience.
In 2010-11 my wife and I tore down a 1901 post and beam barn by hand in northern PA. This was in the middle of the natural gas fracking expansion in the Marcellus Shale deposit in WV, OH, PA and NY. Out of curiosity, I looked into the fracking technology because there had begun complaints about the process and climate contamination. As a coincidence, the farm which we were tearing down the barn was owned by a couple in their late 50's who "lucked" into a couple of large drilling wells and a pumping station on their property. Like many had done in the 50's and 60's in WV, they gave up the mineral rights with a payment rate that was promised to be a large monthly sum. At the same time, a good friend in another part of northern PA had a similar offer, but this was based on the gas under his property with no well on site. It was part of the lateral fracking vein going under his land. He was also promised a large payment monthly.
Fast forward, the couple who had the farm where we tore down the barn was interested in getting out of farming. The deal was too good to be true, and they bought a property in FL and became snow birds. However; the initial boon also had an added farming benefit as the fracking slurry was a composition of hay and water. It was clean, had no environmental concerns and was a rotating and recurring biodegradable solution. Within 5 years of the heavy drilling, the drill companies no longer required the hay. I asked the farmer about this and he said they came up with a "better" chemical fracking solution. Within that same year, all the chaos on fracking environmental impacts took off. Hay was not used anymore of course. Due to the newly hyped up fracking attention in the media, it was more cost effective (regulations created - intentional created chaos) to pump wet gas than straight natural gas.
Within a year of the farming couple buying a place in Florida and allowing us to tear down their old post and beam barn, the payments dried up. Not because there was no more gas, but because the excuse was the world wanted wet gas and that was in the SW PA, NE WV, and Eastern OH area. More money in it... supposedly. The odd thing is the drilling companies kept drilling wells, burning them off to prep them and capped them. The same is happening in the areas around Northern WV. This shale patch as well as a newer located patch in NE Texas have America as the largest deposit of both gas and oil in the world. And it is relatively unused.
My buddy in NE PA gets a little bit a month for the gas, but nothing like the first 9 months. Again, there is hardly any pumping of the resources. In looking at who owns the oil companies and large transmitters of utilities and you see the same corporations at the top of the ownership list.
The environmentalists do not wish to talk about the reality. They are being played by the same people who want to control it all at the end of the day. They find a way to get the resources, all but steal it from the the land owners, come up with an excuse why they can no longer extract the resource, putting the land owners in debt for false promises, bringing in crime and drugs to fill the depression gap, come up with a method that took something safe and clean to something dangerous and environmentally problematic, get half of the story out to the press to drum up chaos with the environmentally obnoxious half wits, and the rest is history. If they cared about the human factor as much as the intentionally created environmental problem, people would still have their land, be self-sustaining and improving the environment, and we would respect each other and the environment more for the right reasons.
I have met some smart land owners who kept their mineral rights (especially in WV) and only lease the drilling and pumping rights. But, that is a small percentage. There is a whole psychology around this issue that the globalists feed on from the problem they created, but that is for another day.
So, if you want to learn about what is really going on, turn off your main stream media and go talk to a farmer. What is true is not necessarily the "truth" from your living room.
Cant wait to read this carefully the bullshark of Peak Oil is the 2nd Covid-type scare psy-op after teaching us as kids where and which way to lay on the floor after we notice a mushroom cloud.
We have enough petrochemicals to last beyond the next asteroid impact or human hubris originated extinction level event which is almost certainly going to predate the next asteroid.
Over a decade ago I discovered Dr John Coleman, a lecture uploaded to YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCzR7NCeMYA then I bought his book, “Committee of 300” … he tried to warn us all…
Thanks, Katherine. I came to the same conclusion - none of it can be trusted. It's a Reality-Show-World of perpetually manufactured crises we've been living in. Are some things we've been told possibly true? Sure. But the over arching narrative about life on our planet has been directed, orchestrated, manipulated and distributed to the unsuspecting masses. All the messaging amounts to we can not trust life, (God, Source) or love, or goodness, or each other. This Reality-Show is an inversion of the truth. Our planet provides, our Creator is loving, and we are part of its creation. We'll need to recreate our world on a very different foundation.
There is more than enough fuel. And water. (And thus food.) If we want it. These essential things are and always have been about who controls the points of access (and thus the systems of distribution). If we build out our lives, individually and collectively, in ways that make us more dependent on corporatist fascistic government clipboard holders, then our lives become quite ugly. “Regulatory gated communities” and physical gated communities all around and armies of homeless everywhere. Look at life in urbanized California right now as exhibit #1. It is ugly. U.G.L.Y. Look at life in almost ANY urbanized area anywhere on earth right now for that matter. The split done happened. A buncha folk went borg. A bunch didn’t. But only a small portion of those of us who didn’t go borg are doing all that must be done: growing healthy living soil and food and choosing to live in places and ways where we control our own access to clean water (and fuel, and as much else as possible - local guns and bullets manufacturing included). I know most of y’all reading this bomb ass shit here that Sister Katherine puts out are already on it. But we’re a teeny slice. I am MOST worried NOT about the borg overlords. Nope. Them I got pretty sized up. What I am most worried about are all my brothers and sisters still living in cities thinking they gonna somehow ride out a 30yr war of attrition and feed themselves and have water and heat and everything while living in a physical place where they control ZERO spigots or points of access on which their survival depends. So - if you one of these fools who I love - please do yourself and all of us a favor and get the fuck out of Dodge City while you still can. Hell, I’ll even come give you a lift in the back of my pickup truck if you ask nicely.
Psy-ops work through a dialectic. Just like the followers of "lab leak" is the alternative story to the natural "virus". Regardless the belief is established that a "pathogenic virus" has created a massive swell of illness and death (pay no attention to the fact that all of this is fabricated).
The story about "oil" and whether or not there's enough depends on what you need it for. The economy is based on debt - money printed out of thin air by private banks. Does it matter? Are we naturally insatiable consumers of the Earth's resources that all become waste "products".? The path of Rome is not inevitable unless we allow the same game to be played as it has for over 3,000 years.
When did CO2 become an "enemy" when in fact we've been told it's essential to life? Does hydrocarbon once shipped, refined and consumed really emit CO2? (Unlikely.) If not what is emitted?
As long as they're calling the shots, than these issues do not belong to "us" but to them who flip and flop. Does peak mean no more, or a simple calculus of: it takes too much energy to extract anymore from that play? Thus a negative return? Are we told a lie?
Who discovered and exploited hydrocarbon. Who said we need(ed) it?
.....while I absolutely dismiss MOST of the Ehrlichian (read: Rockefeller / CIA) climate-change model, WIDESCALE institutional contamination & DEVASTATING damage of the terrestrial ecosystem - NOT to mention RARELY-recognized consequences to it OF many such subcrustal extractions (not JUST petrochemicals, and there FAR more efficient, AFFORDABLE means of propulsion which were systematically suppressed - such as the murdered Stanley Meyer's water-powered vehicle; other hydrolytic-based approaches) present a VERY real existential threat to MOST life on earth, Catherine; between Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea's WITHERING interview with pioneer Clifford Carnicom earlier this week and Ben Davidson's compilation video of a year ago, 'The Earth Disaster Documentary' we ARE facing IMMINENT challenges (again; cyclical heliospheric-transit effects) like NONE before in OUR lifetimes. MANY years - I have my own potential solutions to offer but, not sure if they're part of EXISTING contingencies.....
I suspect it's all one big psy-op - dogmas created and than reversed.
People coagulate around the notion of growth which was a dogma presenting itself through and for the rulers. Included was/is the notion of "oil" need to fuel the growth economy - again a dogma presented by and for the rulers.
Now that the rulers have switched the superficial dogmas so that they'll own everything, and the rest we're told will own nothing, "we" prefer the original dogma the rulers foisted on us - endless growth fueled by some sort of endless energy source that "god" has provided us with for our endless consumption on brick-a-brack what-nots.
These are dogmas we are fed. As each is "taken away", the old dogmas become preferred, as unquestioned as everything we've be fed from birth.
Ok, just know that you should be careful what you wish for. The rulers have you either way.
Yes the injections are pure poison, their contents are no different than who murdered JFK...the final chapter to be written - or do the CIA/FBI really have a detailed accounting of exactly what their role was? Jokes on us?
I very much admire your legal research and your focus. On this issue, I tell people, if oil were still abundant we wouldn't be drilling 15,000ft below the surface of the sea, we wouldn't be fracking, or mining tar sands. The only scenario by which oil is still abundant is if we have unlimited access to Greenland and the poles, which would imply a much warmer world.
I look at it like, our transhumanist, globalist, eugenicist overlords know resource constraints are a predicament, so they are trying to manage and hasten the population draw down. It is possible too that resource constraints are a fundamental predicament and global leadership are pathologically insane liars about everything.
“As a result, I no longer believe there are natural limitations to food production and distribution, nor that there are natural limitations to fossil fuel energy supplies.”
Operating from a position of “it’s impossible for us to know all the facts” seems very reasonable these days. Which is why worldview is so important. Will the stated purposes of the eugenicists come to pass ultimately? I’d say no, because I have a postmillennial and presuppositional worldview...which requires doing battle for the truth, not succumbing to apocalyptic negativity. I will admit it looking pretty grim these days however....but these hard times have often been followed by great awakenings!
I'm a former research fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, and former editor of The Oil Drum. I've followed, and contributed to, the energy literature for a very long time. EROEI is the critical factor. Energy limits are very real and non-negotiable. So are financial limits (another field I've worked in for decades). The global financial system is bankrupt and about to collapse. Everything that's happening with covid and the war is to cover up the fact that we've reached limits. The powers that be are trying to impose a control grid to prevent us from overthrowing them when people wake up. The limits to growth is the reason for all of this. That's why they want to depopulate. It's true that we're over carrying capacity, even with the arficial fixation of nitrogen from natural gas. That means it's true that there will be a population bottle neck. What the WEF is doing is pure evil. Nature will take care of imbalances. We won't like it, but it's fairer than billionaires playing god. What we need to do as a species is to opt for doing our best to live within limits, by practicing regenerative permaculture among other initiatives. Nothing we do will prevent a crunch, but we can certainly mitigate the impacts. The WEF has no intention of mitigating impacts. In fact they plan to make everything much worse than necessary, because they're psychopaths. Rejecting the WEF plotting doesn't require rejecting the well established science around limits to growth.
"A reader commented, taking the position that the globalists are “exterminating” people to prevent other forms of deadly chaos such as famines, economic crashes, and resource wars, due to fossil fuel energy scarcity related to peak oil. " I have heard this argument (or other iterations) put forward many times and always been appalled by it.
First, why aren't they choosing to exterminated themselves then? Secondly, who is a small group of people to designate others for extermination? And thirdly, if any of this is true, the best way to handle it would always be absolute openness about the situation and seeing what solutions we, all of us, can pull together.
There are many smart people around and we can find a way to solve problems. Somehow, this small group never thinks this way. And if they really believed in what they were saying, that there's no way out except extermination, then if they were couragoueos, they would be first in line to self exterminate. But I never see them do that.
What I do see is they use the most resources in multiple homes, jets, cars, yachts, warfare, spying (the Utah NSA computers are drinking a lot of water!), etc. I think we can tell what is really the case by looking at the actions of the exterminators.
I'm counting on human intellect and compassion to take on the problems we face. And I completely agree this must begin w/a commitment to honesty, truth, this earth and our fellow living beings.
Turtles all the way down....all lies built on top of more lies.
What a great article! Thank you.
I am reminded of Trump telling us we have enough oil to last for the next 200 years! That threw a wrench into the global gears of scarcity ;)
We are learning that the stories and narratives pushed by the corrupted souls of the global elite cabal are their weapons of psychologically controlling us through fear over one scarcity or another. And not just scarcity but over health…scaring the masses into believing that we need their “science” to manage being a healthy human being!
The Great Awakening indeed ❤️
Abundance - one apple seed will grow an entire tree full of apples with a little care and patience.
In 2010-11 my wife and I tore down a 1901 post and beam barn by hand in northern PA. This was in the middle of the natural gas fracking expansion in the Marcellus Shale deposit in WV, OH, PA and NY. Out of curiosity, I looked into the fracking technology because there had begun complaints about the process and climate contamination. As a coincidence, the farm which we were tearing down the barn was owned by a couple in their late 50's who "lucked" into a couple of large drilling wells and a pumping station on their property. Like many had done in the 50's and 60's in WV, they gave up the mineral rights with a payment rate that was promised to be a large monthly sum. At the same time, a good friend in another part of northern PA had a similar offer, but this was based on the gas under his property with no well on site. It was part of the lateral fracking vein going under his land. He was also promised a large payment monthly.
Fast forward, the couple who had the farm where we tore down the barn was interested in getting out of farming. The deal was too good to be true, and they bought a property in FL and became snow birds. However; the initial boon also had an added farming benefit as the fracking slurry was a composition of hay and water. It was clean, had no environmental concerns and was a rotating and recurring biodegradable solution. Within 5 years of the heavy drilling, the drill companies no longer required the hay. I asked the farmer about this and he said they came up with a "better" chemical fracking solution. Within that same year, all the chaos on fracking environmental impacts took off. Hay was not used anymore of course. Due to the newly hyped up fracking attention in the media, it was more cost effective (regulations created - intentional created chaos) to pump wet gas than straight natural gas.
Within a year of the farming couple buying a place in Florida and allowing us to tear down their old post and beam barn, the payments dried up. Not because there was no more gas, but because the excuse was the world wanted wet gas and that was in the SW PA, NE WV, and Eastern OH area. More money in it... supposedly. The odd thing is the drilling companies kept drilling wells, burning them off to prep them and capped them. The same is happening in the areas around Northern WV. This shale patch as well as a newer located patch in NE Texas have America as the largest deposit of both gas and oil in the world. And it is relatively unused.
My buddy in NE PA gets a little bit a month for the gas, but nothing like the first 9 months. Again, there is hardly any pumping of the resources. In looking at who owns the oil companies and large transmitters of utilities and you see the same corporations at the top of the ownership list.
The environmentalists do not wish to talk about the reality. They are being played by the same people who want to control it all at the end of the day. They find a way to get the resources, all but steal it from the the land owners, come up with an excuse why they can no longer extract the resource, putting the land owners in debt for false promises, bringing in crime and drugs to fill the depression gap, come up with a method that took something safe and clean to something dangerous and environmentally problematic, get half of the story out to the press to drum up chaos with the environmentally obnoxious half wits, and the rest is history. If they cared about the human factor as much as the intentionally created environmental problem, people would still have their land, be self-sustaining and improving the environment, and we would respect each other and the environment more for the right reasons.
I have met some smart land owners who kept their mineral rights (especially in WV) and only lease the drilling and pumping rights. But, that is a small percentage. There is a whole psychology around this issue that the globalists feed on from the problem they created, but that is for another day.
So, if you want to learn about what is really going on, turn off your main stream media and go talk to a farmer. What is true is not necessarily the "truth" from your living room.
Cant wait to read this carefully the bullshark of Peak Oil is the 2nd Covid-type scare psy-op after teaching us as kids where and which way to lay on the floor after we notice a mushroom cloud.
We have enough petrochemicals to last beyond the next asteroid impact or human hubris originated extinction level event which is almost certainly going to predate the next asteroid.
Over a decade ago I discovered Dr John Coleman, a lecture uploaded to YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCzR7NCeMYA then I bought his book, “Committee of 300” … he tried to warn us all…
Thanks, Katherine. I came to the same conclusion - none of it can be trusted. It's a Reality-Show-World of perpetually manufactured crises we've been living in. Are some things we've been told possibly true? Sure. But the over arching narrative about life on our planet has been directed, orchestrated, manipulated and distributed to the unsuspecting masses. All the messaging amounts to we can not trust life, (God, Source) or love, or goodness, or each other. This Reality-Show is an inversion of the truth. Our planet provides, our Creator is loving, and we are part of its creation. We'll need to recreate our world on a very different foundation.
For another way to look at the issue please check out:
Surplus Energy Economics -Tim Morgan
Consciousness of Sheep - Tim Watkins
Our Finite World - Gail Tverberg
Plenty of energy, climate change and covid skeptics find value at these sites.
There is more than enough fuel. And water. (And thus food.) If we want it. These essential things are and always have been about who controls the points of access (and thus the systems of distribution). If we build out our lives, individually and collectively, in ways that make us more dependent on corporatist fascistic government clipboard holders, then our lives become quite ugly. “Regulatory gated communities” and physical gated communities all around and armies of homeless everywhere. Look at life in urbanized California right now as exhibit #1. It is ugly. U.G.L.Y. Look at life in almost ANY urbanized area anywhere on earth right now for that matter. The split done happened. A buncha folk went borg. A bunch didn’t. But only a small portion of those of us who didn’t go borg are doing all that must be done: growing healthy living soil and food and choosing to live in places and ways where we control our own access to clean water (and fuel, and as much else as possible - local guns and bullets manufacturing included). I know most of y’all reading this bomb ass shit here that Sister Katherine puts out are already on it. But we’re a teeny slice. I am MOST worried NOT about the borg overlords. Nope. Them I got pretty sized up. What I am most worried about are all my brothers and sisters still living in cities thinking they gonna somehow ride out a 30yr war of attrition and feed themselves and have water and heat and everything while living in a physical place where they control ZERO spigots or points of access on which their survival depends. So - if you one of these fools who I love - please do yourself and all of us a favor and get the fuck out of Dodge City while you still can. Hell, I’ll even come give you a lift in the back of my pickup truck if you ask nicely.
Thank you Katherine.
Peak oil?
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/09/26/science/geochemist-says-oil-fieldsmay-be-refilled-naturally.html
Psy-ops work through a dialectic. Just like the followers of "lab leak" is the alternative story to the natural "virus". Regardless the belief is established that a "pathogenic virus" has created a massive swell of illness and death (pay no attention to the fact that all of this is fabricated).
The story about "oil" and whether or not there's enough depends on what you need it for. The economy is based on debt - money printed out of thin air by private banks. Does it matter? Are we naturally insatiable consumers of the Earth's resources that all become waste "products".? The path of Rome is not inevitable unless we allow the same game to be played as it has for over 3,000 years.
When did CO2 become an "enemy" when in fact we've been told it's essential to life? Does hydrocarbon once shipped, refined and consumed really emit CO2? (Unlikely.) If not what is emitted?
As long as they're calling the shots, than these issues do not belong to "us" but to them who flip and flop. Does peak mean no more, or a simple calculus of: it takes too much energy to extract anymore from that play? Thus a negative return? Are we told a lie?
Who discovered and exploited hydrocarbon. Who said we need(ed) it?
.....while I absolutely dismiss MOST of the Ehrlichian (read: Rockefeller / CIA) climate-change model, WIDESCALE institutional contamination & DEVASTATING damage of the terrestrial ecosystem - NOT to mention RARELY-recognized consequences to it OF many such subcrustal extractions (not JUST petrochemicals, and there FAR more efficient, AFFORDABLE means of propulsion which were systematically suppressed - such as the murdered Stanley Meyer's water-powered vehicle; other hydrolytic-based approaches) present a VERY real existential threat to MOST life on earth, Catherine; between Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea's WITHERING interview with pioneer Clifford Carnicom earlier this week and Ben Davidson's compilation video of a year ago, 'The Earth Disaster Documentary' we ARE facing IMMINENT challenges (again; cyclical heliospheric-transit effects) like NONE before in OUR lifetimes. MANY years - I have my own potential solutions to offer but, not sure if they're part of EXISTING contingencies.....
Mihalcea & Carnicom:
https://rumble.com/v22o590-synthetic-biological-life-forms-cdb-morgellons-live-blood-findings-in-post-.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Ben Davidson:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihwoIlxHI3Q&t=0s
I suspect it's all one big psy-op - dogmas created and than reversed.
People coagulate around the notion of growth which was a dogma presenting itself through and for the rulers. Included was/is the notion of "oil" need to fuel the growth economy - again a dogma presented by and for the rulers.
Now that the rulers have switched the superficial dogmas so that they'll own everything, and the rest we're told will own nothing, "we" prefer the original dogma the rulers foisted on us - endless growth fueled by some sort of endless energy source that "god" has provided us with for our endless consumption on brick-a-brack what-nots.
These are dogmas we are fed. As each is "taken away", the old dogmas become preferred, as unquestioned as everything we've be fed from birth.
Ok, just know that you should be careful what you wish for. The rulers have you either way.
Yes the injections are pure poison, their contents are no different than who murdered JFK...the final chapter to be written - or do the CIA/FBI really have a detailed accounting of exactly what their role was? Jokes on us?
I very much admire your legal research and your focus. On this issue, I tell people, if oil were still abundant we wouldn't be drilling 15,000ft below the surface of the sea, we wouldn't be fracking, or mining tar sands. The only scenario by which oil is still abundant is if we have unlimited access to Greenland and the poles, which would imply a much warmer world.
I look at it like, our transhumanist, globalist, eugenicist overlords know resource constraints are a predicament, so they are trying to manage and hasten the population draw down. It is possible too that resource constraints are a fundamental predicament and global leadership are pathologically insane liars about everything.
“As a result, I no longer believe there are natural limitations to food production and distribution, nor that there are natural limitations to fossil fuel energy supplies.”
Operating from a position of “it’s impossible for us to know all the facts” seems very reasonable these days. Which is why worldview is so important. Will the stated purposes of the eugenicists come to pass ultimately? I’d say no, because I have a postmillennial and presuppositional worldview...which requires doing battle for the truth, not succumbing to apocalyptic negativity. I will admit it looking pretty grim these days however....but these hard times have often been followed by great awakenings!
I'm a former research fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, and former editor of The Oil Drum. I've followed, and contributed to, the energy literature for a very long time. EROEI is the critical factor. Energy limits are very real and non-negotiable. So are financial limits (another field I've worked in for decades). The global financial system is bankrupt and about to collapse. Everything that's happening with covid and the war is to cover up the fact that we've reached limits. The powers that be are trying to impose a control grid to prevent us from overthrowing them when people wake up. The limits to growth is the reason for all of this. That's why they want to depopulate. It's true that we're over carrying capacity, even with the arficial fixation of nitrogen from natural gas. That means it's true that there will be a population bottle neck. What the WEF is doing is pure evil. Nature will take care of imbalances. We won't like it, but it's fairer than billionaires playing god. What we need to do as a species is to opt for doing our best to live within limits, by practicing regenerative permaculture among other initiatives. Nothing we do will prevent a crunch, but we can certainly mitigate the impacts. The WEF has no intention of mitigating impacts. In fact they plan to make everything much worse than necessary, because they're psychopaths. Rejecting the WEF plotting doesn't require rejecting the well established science around limits to growth.