13 Comments
author

Reader asked via email: Does the President have the legal (read: constitutional) authority to transfer US sovereign rights (on any regulatory matter) to a foreign entity?

My reply:

Does he have the moral right?

No.

Does he have the legal right under current laws?

Yes, in a three-step process.

1) Congress transfers all legislative power to President during state of emergency declared by President.

2) President transfers all legislative and executive power to HHS Secretary during public health emergency declared by HHS Secretary, and the HHS Secretary declaration is judicially unreviewable by Congressional statute signed by President.

3) HHS Secretary legally functions thereafter as legal subsidiary of foreign entity: WHO.

Are the acts of President, Congress and HHS Secretary treason?

Yes, because they are acts of war on American people, conducted on behalf of foreign entity.

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

Treasonous to the core.

Start w Carter, work out way up to now.

How many Presidents sold out our Country?

All should be charged.

All politicians who went along. Charged.

The sentence for treason, death

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

If they try to enforce this and have to publicly state the authority, it will trigger the revolution. Nobody's going to say, "Oh, wow! My bad. Take my stuff and let's get to the shared apartment living quarters." Especially not armed Americans.

They are fast approaching their line in the sand where they must start the war-type killing instead of the stealth genocide. Sooner or later, someone in the sane half the country will shoot back.

Expand full comment
author
May 11, 2022·edited May 11, 2022Author

Concur.

Some readers think — with good reason — that the digital identity passes and digital currencies will function as a non-kinetic escalation of the control paradigm, obviating the need for war-type killing.

I don’t think that will work in the US, because I think we have enough of a critical mass that didn’t get jabbed and distrusts electronic everything and government everything. A lot of them are silent, but they’re still resisting. I don’t know what the proportions are in the other 5-eyes countries, and also those populations aren’t armed at the household level, so it’s a whole different dynamic.

But yes, I agree that we’re rapidly approaching the point at which the mass of corruption at the center of the treason either collapses in on itself in in-fighting, or starts shooting at anyone they perceive as refusing to get with the program.

And that noise will bring a lot of people in from the sidelines.

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

Revolutions are started when 5% of the people decide they can no longer live under the daily conditions imposed. Mostly, the trigger is hunger and fear for the safety of one's kids. We haven't reached that point yet, but it's getting closer by the day.

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

😭 I just want my country back.

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022·edited May 11, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

Gov Brown and Wheeler Are so Treasonous and bought by Soros, WEF, China.

Just like Gavin and Inslee.

Sheriffs have the constitutional duty to arrest any Governors who are guilty.

Nancy too. Why isn’t she charge w insider trading at a minimum.

Gawd the cesspool is so huge.

Expand full comment

Bring on the Treason Trials 🫵😵‍💫

Expand full comment
May 11, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

"Griner challenges the CDC classification of the products as “vaccines,” but offers as the alternative that they’re therapeutic or medical treatments which Griner has the right to refuse."

This is also a crucial finding in that it would remove the liability shield for the jabs. If that occurs, the manufacturers will immediately remove the bioweapons from use.

Expand full comment
author

I don’t think it would remove the liability shield for the jabs, because legally, the jabs are regulated— or rather deliberately unregulated — as medical countermeasures (MCMs).

Legally, they are not the same as traditional vaccines, and the liability shield they enjoy is due to their MCM classification under EUA law, not their vaccine classification under other FDA regulations about vaccines.

Expand full comment

Politicians have complicated the common sense out of the system. It clearly makes no common sense to encourage everybody to take a shot of a concoction that uses brand new technology that has never been FDA approved to help protect people from an aggressive flu that has a 99.997 percent survival rate. To top it off, they restrict physicians from doing their job and prescribe medicine to treat early symptoms. Completely absurd.

Expand full comment

it's "crazy like a fox" ~

Expand full comment

At the present time, I can't see a clear path to trials for treason, mostly based on the existing laws and the corrupt judicial system. But I keep hoping and praying that someday soon we get there, before we are all dead. Thank you, Katherine, for all of your hard work illuminating the legal aspects of the kill box. Without the legal structure, they would never have been able to pull off the worldwide democide we are witnessing. We have to find a way to repeal the enabling laws, in this country and all others. May God bless you and strengthen you!

Expand full comment