Important info from Maria Zeee.. She has Todd Callender on, a lawyer and advocate in the US, who is leading the fight here against medical tyrrany.
He explains that 47 states have legislation pending to use public health as a legal weapon to suspend our rights and to make it Permanent. Public health is moving under Department of Defense. The NDAA of 2021 and 2022 explicitly say Use of Force is authorized - this is medical military martial law. 3 states already have it enacted - Florida, Washington, & Alaska.
Called "Turning Point Model Health Act" - seeks to make emergency health powers permanent and eliminate your constitutional rights.
There is info and links on video page, including to a symposium happening tomorrow, Oct 6, to get involved in fighting this.
Discussion of this is going to be a major part of tomorrow’s symposium.
It relates back to the 2001 DOD anthrax attacks on Congress, used to get Congress to pass the PATRIOT Act and more in the series of biomedical police state laws.
In late 2001, Johns Hopkins and Georgetown and CDC put together a Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA) which they tried to get through all the state legislatures.
Because they realized that the American Constitutional federalist system (separation of powers between federal governments and state governments) meant that some states might put up obstacles to the centralized medical martial law system that Congress was setting up at the federal level in compliance with WHO IRH 2005.
Some states passed the MSEHPA, or components of it, during 2002 and 2003. Other states balked.
I recently learned (last couple of weeks) that the architects (under the name Turning Point Initiative and Turning Point National Collaborative, funded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) went back to the drawing board and came up with a slightly watered down version: the Model State Public Health Act, in 2003, presumably planning to get the state legislatures to adopt the weaker version, and then incrementally strengthen it to bring it to the totalitarian level of the original MSEHPA and the federal PREP Act/Project BioShield framework.
Lots of states went ahead and passed versions of the MSPHA between 2003 and now.
In other words, there are Mini-Me versions of the federal bioterrorism and population control grid in each American state.
So in addition to getting Congress to repeal the federal laws as unconstitutional, state legislatures need to repeal their own state-level Military Medical Martial Law statutes too.
All the thanks should go to you, Katherine. Your work is absolutely incredible and of incalculable value to all of us. And the PDF formats are fantastic. A million thanks!!!!!
🙀kitty head spinning… wondering if there is any state AG with courage to stick their neck out to pursue the unconstitutional PREP Act or 1986 Law… Big Pharma must have reviewed, gamed, provided for this scenario
Katherine, congratulations on a passing a new subscription milestone! As one of the 71 paid subscribers, what you are doing here is among the most valuable and insightful work being done on laying groundwork for someone, somewhere to do something using the legal system which may be the only way out of this. (Occasional wins recently make one vaguely hopeful.)
You are underappreciated and undervalued. Just wanted you to know that many of us are in awe of what you manage to uncover and expose so lucidly. Many, many thanks.
Just sent a link to the Republican candidate for Attorney General, Jay McMahon, in MA.
MA is a deeply corrupt blue state, with a RINO Governor and radical left elected officials. Even in my small town, the selectboard seem captured by the radical group-think rooted in a socialist mindset.
I worry about our local FIre/EMS/Police, the majority of whom have been double jabbed and boostered at least once. The select board tried to mandate the jabs for our Police and enough citizens got involved to stop the mandate.
Thank you, Bailiwick News, for the info you’ve been providing!
Have you heard of or seen any prosecutors or attorneys general who are willing to take this on? As you know, there is tremendous, life-threatening danger in going up against these people. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that they will not do to protect themselves and their empires.
No, not yet. Yes, they are under severe pressure from threats and bribes. Take action, and they become targets of the Predators. Stay silent, and they get rewards.
If the social and political momentum shifts — which is what the resistance movement is trying to bring about — then the incentives for those prosecutors and sheriffs will change too.
So the task is just to keep building the momentum on our side.
Hi Katherine. Very informative piece and some excellent digging to uncover these facts/bombs that have been hidden in our system. My question is why can an individual citizen not sue the state/fed government over these issues? Waiting for an elected AG to do something seems a waste of time as the clock keeps ticking. In the Constitution it states that We the People can sue for redress of grievances from the government. Does this mean that We the People can also pursue individual or class action lawsuits against these draconian laws?
The short answer is the federal PREP Act, preempting judicial review, Congressional oversight, private civil complaints and state action, through the blockade of the provision requiring the DOJ/AG and HHS to *first* bring “enforcement action” against bad actors. They won’t do that, because they’re in the criminal cabal. And since they won’t do it, the door remains closed to everyone else. 42 USC 247d-5d(c)(5)
Individual citizens can try anyway to sue the state/federal governments over these issues, and those who have the resources to do it should keep doing it.
Many have been filing all sorts of cases, trying to challenge lots of different aspects of the crime and the enabling laws, since Spring 2020. The judges have slow-walked the cases, upheld the enabling statutes, issued temporary injunctions against enforcement of the tyrannical provisions, or dismissed the cases.
The task is to keep pushing the judges and prosecutors to understand what’s happening, see political and social momentum building among the freedom-fighters, and change their minds and actions and rulings.
Thank you, Katherine. Very concerning. If you have time, could you confirm if my understanding of this is correct?:
1. The 1994 Public Health Service Act is the Act that reorganized and consolidated the pre-existing "public health" laws in the U.S. Amendments to acts such as this are called "Titles,", yes? For example, I read that the NIH Health Reform Act of 2006 amended Title IV of the Public Health Service Act.
2. If I'm correct so far, then Title 42, part of the Public Health Service Act of 1944 aimed to prevent the spread of communicable diseases in the country, amended the 1944 Act.
2.a. In 2005, did the PREP Act amend the 1944 Public Health Service Act under Title 42?
3. The 42 U.S.C. subsection you cited, 247d-6d, was that passed under PREP in 2005 or later -- in 2012? If later, how do any statute limitations come into play?
4. Lastly, I've read that Executive Branch authority under 42 USC § 265 had an expiration date attached to it. So, subsections of various titles that amend public law can have expiration dates? That seems lawful to me, but how would it be possible for a law or any of its titles to have an expiration date in terms of contesting its lawfulness? That by itself strikes me an unconstitutional in and of itself.
Wordy, I know, Katherine, but trying to wrap my head around this. I want to get in touch with my AG (for the third time) on this topic you've given us today. I want to sound at least halfway like I know what I'm talking about! :)
The two major laws under which most of this mess falls are the 1938 Food Drug and Cosmetics Act (Title 21 USC Chapter 9 Sections 301 et seq) and the 1944 Public Health Service Act (Title 42 USC Chapter 6A Sections 201 et seq.)
The FDCA was allegedly passed to protect the purity and safety of foods and drugs. The PHSA was alleged passed to protect public health through programs on things like communicable diseases.
The revision and expansion of federal powers under those two laws is the story told in the timeline at American Domestic Bioterrorism Program, and there are dozens of laws passed, mostly since 1983, that built the kill box we’re dealing with now.
42 USC 247d-6d was added to the PHSA through the 2005 PREP Act. It’s been revised a few times since then, but the main structure was added through that one.
I need to look at 42 USC 265 to answer your question about that one.
There are some provisions that have sunset clauses. Sometimes Congress quietly extends them. Sometimes provisions actually do expire. Sometimes they expire under one set of laws, only to be replaced in another set of laws.
In general, hierarchical, document-navigation terms like “Titles” and “Chapters” and “Sections” and Subsections are used in both the Public Law (PL), which is the version of the law that Congress passes during its sessions and Presidents sign, and also in the US Code, which is the totality of US federal laws, where each provision law gets filed, so to speak. after the Congressional Act passes.
BUT: the Titles and Sections and Chapters are not the same between those two records. Title X of a Public Law just means it’s the tenth section that Congress considered in that bill. And the topics in a bill can include lots of things that are unrelated to each other and just got mashed in together to get them passed without people really knowing what’s in the bill and what they’re voting on.
For example, the Title for the Public Health Service Act in the US Code is Title 42. The Section that covers liability exemptions for emergency use products is Section 247d-6d. So that section is referred to as 42 USC 247d-6d.
Me again. So when was Section 247d-6d added to the PREP Act? I thought I read somewhere that was in 2012? Does this make any difference in terms of the time we have related to this section? (IMO, all of PREP has to go.)
More on the four major numbering systems and dates of events:
Four major numbering systems:
-Public Law, for example, PL 109-148 - Which Congress passed the law, and where in the sequence of laws they passed.
- US Code, for example, 42 USC 247d-6d — The part of the total US federal law collection in which the new law has been filed.
-Statutes, for example, 119 Stat. 2818 - The volume and page number of the official acts of Congress at which the record of the Congressional act was recorded.
House Resolution/Senate Bill, (reference numbers for bills under consideration but not passed)
——-
42 USC 247d-6d *is* the PREP Act as put into the US Code, and it was added Dec. 30,2005.
The PREP Act as passed by Congress and signed by President Bush 12/30/2005, is PL 109-148, 119 Stat. 2818.
The overall Public Law passed by Congress was called the “Department of Defense, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations to Address Hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, and Pandemic Influenza Act”
The Stat. Page numbers show up in the upper left and right corners of the Public Law pages
Division C, starting at page 2818 (119 Stat. 2818), the last 14 pages of a 153-page document, was the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.
Division C starts off: “Part B of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 243 et seq.) is amended by *inserting* after section 319F–2 the following section: ‘‘SEC. 319F–3. TARGETED LIABILITY PROTECTIONS FOR PANDEMIC AND EPIDEMIC PRODUCTS AND SECURITY COUNTER- MEASURES.”
And then in the left margin, you read: “42 USC 247d-6d” which is the section of the overall US Code into which the PREP Act provisions were inserted.
The Congressional act numbering system corresponds to, but is not the same as, the US Code numbering system. You can use them to track the history of laws and how new laws relate to older laws.
Section 319F-2 refers to the original numbering system of the original 1944 Public Health Service Act.
So PHSA Section 319F-3 as added in PREP Act at Division C = 42 USC 247d-6d in US Code.
If you go to 42 USC 247d-6d at the Cornell database:
And scroll down to the bottom of the page, you can read about the dates and Public Laws through which that section was added and then amended, as follows:
[ORIGINAL Public Health Service Act] July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III,
§ 319F–3 as added Pub. L. 109–148, div. C, § 2 [PREP ACT], Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2818;
Amended Pub. L. 113–5, [Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act] title IV, § 402(g)(2), (3), Mar. 13, 2013, 127 Stat. 196;
Amended Pub. L. 116–127, [Families First Coronavirus Response Act] div. F, § 6005, Mar. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 207;
Amended Pub. L. 116–136, [Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act] div. A, title III, § 3103, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 361
—-
The third type of citation is abbreviated as Stat.
Those citations are the volume and page numbers: [Volume] Stat [Page Number] and refer to the chronologically organized records of Congressional Acts.
For example, the PREP Act within that 2005 bill (PL 109-148) is at 119 Stat 2818.
PL 109-148 means that it was the 148th bill passed by the 109th Congress (the Congress that sat from January 2005 to January 2007.)
119 Stat 2818 means that the bill they passed was recorded in the official record of Congress in Volume 119 at page 2818.
——
The last major numbering system is the system for bills after they’re introduced in Congress (either House or Senate) but before they get passed. That’s things like House Resolution/HR 4900 or Senate Bill/S.130. (Those are made up numbers just for example, not the HR or S bills that correspond to PREP Act)
Thank you, Katherine. And the average person is supposed to be able to understand all this hogwash? That it's hogwash should make it null and void...just because it's verbose, freedom-destroying, Constitution-shredding, Bill of Rights-dismantling 𝒉𝒐𝒈𝒘𝒂𝒔𝒉.
Important info from Maria Zeee.. She has Todd Callender on, a lawyer and advocate in the US, who is leading the fight here against medical tyrrany.
He explains that 47 states have legislation pending to use public health as a legal weapon to suspend our rights and to make it Permanent. Public health is moving under Department of Defense. The NDAA of 2021 and 2022 explicitly say Use of Force is authorized - this is medical military martial law. 3 states already have it enacted - Florida, Washington, & Alaska.
Called "Turning Point Model Health Act" - seeks to make emergency health powers permanent and eliminate your constitutional rights.
There is info and links on video page, including to a symposium happening tomorrow, Oct 6, to get involved in fighting this.
https://rumble.com/v1lng91-todd-callendar-stopping-the-who-camps-and-medical-tyranny-with-targeted-str.html
Thank you.
Discussion of this is going to be a major part of tomorrow’s symposium.
It relates back to the 2001 DOD anthrax attacks on Congress, used to get Congress to pass the PATRIOT Act and more in the series of biomedical police state laws.
In late 2001, Johns Hopkins and Georgetown and CDC put together a Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA) which they tried to get through all the state legislatures.
Because they realized that the American Constitutional federalist system (separation of powers between federal governments and state governments) meant that some states might put up obstacles to the centralized medical martial law system that Congress was setting up at the federal level in compliance with WHO IRH 2005.
Some states passed the MSEHPA, or components of it, during 2002 and 2003. Other states balked.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/why-do-local-law-enforcement-officers
I recently learned (last couple of weeks) that the architects (under the name Turning Point Initiative and Turning Point National Collaborative, funded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) went back to the drawing board and came up with a slightly watered down version: the Model State Public Health Act, in 2003, presumably planning to get the state legislatures to adopt the weaker version, and then incrementally strengthen it to bring it to the totalitarian level of the original MSEHPA and the federal PREP Act/Project BioShield framework.
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/turning-point-model-state-public-health-act-emergency-public-health-law-versus-civil-liberties/2010-09
Lots of states went ahead and passed versions of the MSPHA between 2003 and now.
In other words, there are Mini-Me versions of the federal bioterrorism and population control grid in each American state.
So in addition to getting Congress to repeal the federal laws as unconstitutional, state legislatures need to repeal their own state-level Military Medical Martial Law statutes too.
All the thanks should go to you, Katherine. Your work is absolutely incredible and of incalculable value to all of us. And the PDF formats are fantastic. A million thanks!!!!!
🙀kitty head spinning… wondering if there is any state AG with courage to stick their neck out to pursue the unconstitutional PREP Act or 1986 Law… Big Pharma must have reviewed, gamed, provided for this scenario
Katherine, congratulations on a passing a new subscription milestone! As one of the 71 paid subscribers, what you are doing here is among the most valuable and insightful work being done on laying groundwork for someone, somewhere to do something using the legal system which may be the only way out of this. (Occasional wins recently make one vaguely hopeful.)
You are underappreciated and undervalued. Just wanted you to know that many of us are in awe of what you manage to uncover and expose so lucidly. Many, many thanks.
Likely the most valuable research and dissemination on the internet, IMO.
Just sent a link to the Republican candidate for Attorney General, Jay McMahon, in MA.
MA is a deeply corrupt blue state, with a RINO Governor and radical left elected officials. Even in my small town, the selectboard seem captured by the radical group-think rooted in a socialist mindset.
I worry about our local FIre/EMS/Police, the majority of whom have been double jabbed and boostered at least once. The select board tried to mandate the jabs for our Police and enough citizens got involved to stop the mandate.
Thank you, Bailiwick News, for the info you’ve been providing!
Your comprehensive lists of the illegitimate laws allowing medical experimentation on citizens without informed consent are really well researched.
I, and I'm sure many others, really appreciate your work.
Stay safe!
Have you heard of or seen any prosecutors or attorneys general who are willing to take this on? As you know, there is tremendous, life-threatening danger in going up against these people. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that they will not do to protect themselves and their empires.
No, not yet. Yes, they are under severe pressure from threats and bribes. Take action, and they become targets of the Predators. Stay silent, and they get rewards.
If the social and political momentum shifts — which is what the resistance movement is trying to bring about — then the incentives for those prosecutors and sheriffs will change too.
So the task is just to keep building the momentum on our side.
Hi Katherine. Very informative piece and some excellent digging to uncover these facts/bombs that have been hidden in our system. My question is why can an individual citizen not sue the state/fed government over these issues? Waiting for an elected AG to do something seems a waste of time as the clock keeps ticking. In the Constitution it states that We the People can sue for redress of grievances from the government. Does this mean that We the People can also pursue individual or class action lawsuits against these draconian laws?
The short answer is the federal PREP Act, preempting judicial review, Congressional oversight, private civil complaints and state action, through the blockade of the provision requiring the DOJ/AG and HHS to *first* bring “enforcement action” against bad actors. They won’t do that, because they’re in the criminal cabal. And since they won’t do it, the door remains closed to everyone else. 42 USC 247d-5d(c)(5)
Individual citizens can try anyway to sue the state/federal governments over these issues, and those who have the resources to do it should keep doing it.
Many have been filing all sorts of cases, trying to challenge lots of different aspects of the crime and the enabling laws, since Spring 2020. The judges have slow-walked the cases, upheld the enabling statutes, issued temporary injunctions against enforcement of the tyrannical provisions, or dismissed the cases.
The task is to keep pushing the judges and prosecutors to understand what’s happening, see political and social momentum building among the freedom-fighters, and change their minds and actions and rulings.
OMG! 2 years of this
Thank you for reporting this
Leslie
Thank you, Katherine. Very concerning. If you have time, could you confirm if my understanding of this is correct?:
1. The 1994 Public Health Service Act is the Act that reorganized and consolidated the pre-existing "public health" laws in the U.S. Amendments to acts such as this are called "Titles,", yes? For example, I read that the NIH Health Reform Act of 2006 amended Title IV of the Public Health Service Act.
2. If I'm correct so far, then Title 42, part of the Public Health Service Act of 1944 aimed to prevent the spread of communicable diseases in the country, amended the 1944 Act.
2.a. In 2005, did the PREP Act amend the 1944 Public Health Service Act under Title 42?
3. The 42 U.S.C. subsection you cited, 247d-6d, was that passed under PREP in 2005 or later -- in 2012? If later, how do any statute limitations come into play?
4. Lastly, I've read that Executive Branch authority under 42 USC § 265 had an expiration date attached to it. So, subsections of various titles that amend public law can have expiration dates? That seems lawful to me, but how would it be possible for a law or any of its titles to have an expiration date in terms of contesting its lawfulness? That by itself strikes me an unconstitutional in and of itself.
Wordy, I know, Katherine, but trying to wrap my head around this. I want to get in touch with my AG (for the third time) on this topic you've given us today. I want to sound at least halfway like I know what I'm talking about! :)
The two major laws under which most of this mess falls are the 1938 Food Drug and Cosmetics Act (Title 21 USC Chapter 9 Sections 301 et seq) and the 1944 Public Health Service Act (Title 42 USC Chapter 6A Sections 201 et seq.)
The FDCA was allegedly passed to protect the purity and safety of foods and drugs. The PHSA was alleged passed to protect public health through programs on things like communicable diseases.
The revision and expansion of federal powers under those two laws is the story told in the timeline at American Domestic Bioterrorism Program, and there are dozens of laws passed, mostly since 1983, that built the kill box we’re dealing with now.
42 USC 247d-6d was added to the PHSA through the 2005 PREP Act. It’s been revised a few times since then, but the main structure was added through that one.
I need to look at 42 USC 265 to answer your question about that one.
There are some provisions that have sunset clauses. Sometimes Congress quietly extends them. Sometimes provisions actually do expire. Sometimes they expire under one set of laws, only to be replaced in another set of laws.
In general, hierarchical, document-navigation terms like “Titles” and “Chapters” and “Sections” and Subsections are used in both the Public Law (PL), which is the version of the law that Congress passes during its sessions and Presidents sign, and also in the US Code, which is the totality of US federal laws, where each provision law gets filed, so to speak. after the Congressional Act passes.
BUT: the Titles and Sections and Chapters are not the same between those two records. Title X of a Public Law just means it’s the tenth section that Congress considered in that bill. And the topics in a bill can include lots of things that are unrelated to each other and just got mashed in together to get them passed without people really knowing what’s in the bill and what they’re voting on.
For example, the Title for the Public Health Service Act in the US Code is Title 42. The Section that covers liability exemptions for emergency use products is Section 247d-6d. So that section is referred to as 42 USC 247d-6d.
Me again. So when was Section 247d-6d added to the PREP Act? I thought I read somewhere that was in 2012? Does this make any difference in terms of the time we have related to this section? (IMO, all of PREP has to go.)
Agree - all of PREP Act has to go.
———
More on the four major numbering systems and dates of events:
Four major numbering systems:
-Public Law, for example, PL 109-148 - Which Congress passed the law, and where in the sequence of laws they passed.
- US Code, for example, 42 USC 247d-6d — The part of the total US federal law collection in which the new law has been filed.
-Statutes, for example, 119 Stat. 2818 - The volume and page number of the official acts of Congress at which the record of the Congressional act was recorded.
House Resolution/Senate Bill, (reference numbers for bills under consideration but not passed)
——-
42 USC 247d-6d *is* the PREP Act as put into the US Code, and it was added Dec. 30,2005.
The PREP Act as passed by Congress and signed by President Bush 12/30/2005, is PL 109-148, 119 Stat. 2818.
The overall Public Law passed by Congress was called the “Department of Defense, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations to Address Hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, and Pandemic Influenza Act”
https://uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/109/148.pdf
The Stat. Page numbers show up in the upper left and right corners of the Public Law pages
Division C, starting at page 2818 (119 Stat. 2818), the last 14 pages of a 153-page document, was the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.
Division C starts off: “Part B of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 243 et seq.) is amended by *inserting* after section 319F–2 the following section: ‘‘SEC. 319F–3. TARGETED LIABILITY PROTECTIONS FOR PANDEMIC AND EPIDEMIC PRODUCTS AND SECURITY COUNTER- MEASURES.”
And then in the left margin, you read: “42 USC 247d-6d” which is the section of the overall US Code into which the PREP Act provisions were inserted.
The Congressional act numbering system corresponds to, but is not the same as, the US Code numbering system. You can use them to track the history of laws and how new laws relate to older laws.
Section 319F-2 refers to the original numbering system of the original 1944 Public Health Service Act.
So PHSA Section 319F-3 as added in PREP Act at Division C = 42 USC 247d-6d in US Code.
If you go to 42 USC 247d-6d at the Cornell database:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/247d-6d
And scroll down to the bottom of the page, you can read about the dates and Public Laws through which that section was added and then amended, as follows:
[ORIGINAL Public Health Service Act] July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title III,
§ 319F–3 as added Pub. L. 109–148, div. C, § 2 [PREP ACT], Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2818;
Amended Pub. L. 113–5, [Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act] title IV, § 402(g)(2), (3), Mar. 13, 2013, 127 Stat. 196;
Amended Pub. L. 116–127, [Families First Coronavirus Response Act] div. F, § 6005, Mar. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 207;
Amended Pub. L. 116–136, [Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act] div. A, title III, § 3103, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 361
—-
The third type of citation is abbreviated as Stat.
Those citations are the volume and page numbers: [Volume] Stat [Page Number] and refer to the chronologically organized records of Congressional Acts.
For example, the PREP Act within that 2005 bill (PL 109-148) is at 119 Stat 2818.
PL 109-148 means that it was the 148th bill passed by the 109th Congress (the Congress that sat from January 2005 to January 2007.)
119 Stat 2818 means that the bill they passed was recorded in the official record of Congress in Volume 119 at page 2818.
——
The last major numbering system is the system for bills after they’re introduced in Congress (either House or Senate) but before they get passed. That’s things like House Resolution/HR 4900 or Senate Bill/S.130. (Those are made up numbers just for example, not the HR or S bills that correspond to PREP Act)
Thank you, Katherine. And the average person is supposed to be able to understand all this hogwash? That it's hogwash should make it null and void...just because it's verbose, freedom-destroying, Constitution-shredding, Bill of Rights-dismantling 𝒉𝒐𝒈𝒘𝒂𝒔𝒉.