Excerpts from academic paper.
Sincerely from the heart, “Thank you “ for all your efforts and support you bring.
Thank you, Kathrine -- Excellent information to add to the more than 200 medical and scientific studies and reports I've downloaded over the past 2+ years. Thank you for the link to your Feb. 9, 2023 explaining the significance of 21 US Code 360bbb-3(k) -- a document I downloaded from the Cornell U. School of Law back in Feb. 2021 after seeing a reference to it in an article I was reading.
At the time, there was a bare mention of the word "mandate" which gave me chills and I began my work researching EUAs and mandates. That's when I came across an article by Aaron Siri (founder of ICAN) in STAT News [Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA, Feb. 23, 2921] in which he interviewed then executive secretary of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Dr. Amanda Cohn. He asked Cohn if the vaccine could be mandated and she replied that "under an EUA, 'vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won't be able to be mandatory.' Cohn later affirmed that this prohibition on requiring the vaccines applies to organizations, including hospitals." Siri even pointed out that even the "Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act that authorizes the FDA to grant emergency use authorization also requires the secretary of Health and Human Services to 'ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed . . . of the option to accept or refuse administration."
We all know what the "FACT" sheets inside the box containing the vax vial looked like -- BLANK!
Siri's article also noted that according to the fact sheet given to recipients states that "It is your choice to receive or not receive the Covid-19 Vaccine," and if "you decide to not receive it, it will not change your standard of medical care."
Well, that was short-lived! How many people were denied medical care, organ transplants or even being placed on a transplant list because they were NOT vax'd!!!
I've been sending that information out, posting on Social Media wherever I can, for more than two years, but unfortunately, few people (friends, family, business associates, etc.) refused to believe me. And of course, the word "Experimental" went by the wayside, with many on social media sites arguing with me and claiming that the vax had been "approved." All was good to go.
Now, so many with turbo-cancer, many have died quickly from turbo-cancer (which is good when it comes to cancer -- faster is better); and currently I know personally four people with turbo-cancer: bone cancer; cancer filling both breasts; an ovarian tumor that has grown to a grapefruit size; and a cousin diagnosed 3 weeks ago with B-Cell Lymphoma in his right sinus cavity!
The destruction of the immune system continues! Sad beyond belief!
And it is truly horrific when you consider that outside "the West", there are hardly any independent legal systems to speak of. Courts and judges in those parts of the world tend to receive instructions from government officials about what to say and do.
"suing the government" is a luxury fantasy for most people in the world.
Laws that contradict.
Bans on *any* facial coverings, including masks. Reported as "burqa bans." But the law specifically included masks, all facial coverings. Prohibited. Period. Violations were fined. The Netherlands even banned masks as recently as August, 2019. Just months before nations across Europe, including the Netherlands mandated them.
Mask bans had already been upheld in international human rights courts just a few years before. Courts ruled that lawmakers were right to recognize that we have "the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing." Unobstructed human faces were declared a human right!!
France's burqa ban upheld by human rights court
The UK Guardian, July 1, 2014
"Judges at the European court of human rights (ECHR) have upheld France's burqa ban, accepting Paris's argument that it encouraged citizens to "live together". The law, introduced in 2010, makes it illegal for anyone to cover their face in a public place...the law was not aimed at the burqa or veil but any covering of the face in a public place... ...The European judges decided...that the preservation of a certain idea of "living together" was the "legitimate aim" of the French authorities. Isabelle Niedlispacher, representing the Belgian government, which introduced a similar ban in 2011 and which was party to the French defence, declared both the burqa and niqab "incompatible" with the rule of law. Aside from questions of security and equality, she added: "It's about social communication, the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing." The French and Belgian laws were aimed at "helping everyone to integrate", Niedlispacher added."
Burqa bans, headscarves and veils: a timeline of legislation in the west
UK Guardian, May 31, 2018
Netherlands: Burqa Ban Enters into Force
Library of Congress, August 27, 2019
"On August 1, 2019, the “Act Partially Prohibiting Face-Covering Clothing,”also known as the “Burqa Ban,” entered into force in the Netherlands. The Act prohibits the wearing of clothing that completely or partially conceals the face in spaces where people are expected to communicate with each other. Thus, face-covering clothing is banned on public transportation and in educational, governmental, and nursing care institutions, but is still allowed in such public spaces as on train platforms. The ban applies to burqas, niqabs, full-face helmets, balaclavas, and masks, but not to headscarves."
Bans on masks, all across Europe, laws prohibiting any facial covering in public, shopping, transportation, workplaces, anywhere people would gather - Illegal!! The headlines said "burqa bans." the laws said no facial coverings, not even masks in public. Illegal!!
And then came 2020....
Coronavirus: Germany's states make face masks compulsory
BBC News, April 22, 2020
"All of Germany's states have announced plans to make face masks compulsory to combat the spread of coronavirus.
Bremen became the final federal region to back the measures, with its senate set to confirm the decision on Friday.
Mask use will be compulsory on public transport throughout Germany, and nearly all states will also make face coverings mandatory when shopping."
France Covid-19: Paris compulsory face-mask rule comes into force
BBC News, August 28, 2020
"The French prime minister said all pedestrians would have to wear face masks in public areas in the capital from 08:00 on Friday (06:00 GMT).
While individual streets and areas of the capital already have rules on wearing face coverings, this new rule will be far more extensive, covering not only Paris but its inner ring of Seine-Saint-Denis, Hauts-de-Seine and Val-de-Marne.
Paris is already a red zone, along with the southern area of Bouches-du-Rhône, where France's second-largest city Marseille made masks compulsory from Wednesday evening.
A broad expanse of the Mediterranean coast and the Gironde area around Bordeaux are also red zones.
Masks will also become part of normal life for French schoolchildren aged 11 and over. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended use of masks in school from the age of 12.
Masks are already required in most enclosed public spaces and will be mandatory in workplaces from next week."
France asks citizens to wear masks again in public transport
Reuters, June 27, 2022
"French people should start wearing masks again in crowded areas, especially in public transport, as France has to deal with a new wave of COVID-19 infections fuelled by new variants of the disease, Health Minister Brigitte Bourguignon said on Monday.
"I'm not saying it should be mandatory but I do ask the French people to put the mask on in public transport," she told RTL, adding it was a "civic duty" to do so."
Coronavirus: Netherlands makes face masks mandatory indoors
BBC News, December 1, 2020
"The Netherlands has made it compulsory to wear a face mask in indoor public spaces in an effort to contain the spread of coronavirus.
The country is one of the last in Europe to introduce such a measure.
The rule will apply to those over the age of 13 in public buildings such as shops, railway stations and hairdressers from Tuesday.
The new face mask rule will remain in place for at least three months, with those who ignore it facing a fine of up to €95 (£85; $113)."
Netherlands reimplements mask mandate as COVID-19 cases surge
The Hill, November 2, 2021
"Mask wearing has been reintroduced in stores and public places, and the government is advising citizens to work from home for at least half the time.
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte announced Tuesday that the “corona pass” will be expanded on Nov. 6 to apply to public places including museums, gyms and outdoor venues."
Laws that contradict each other.
Prohibited ---> Mandated. Just months apart.
Human Rights ---> Dangerous Selfishness. Just months apart.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Doctors Are Obedient By Nature.
Therein Lies The Problem.
The only effective means to counter the totalitarian, administrative state is to fearlessly stand up and speak up when such contradictory injustice is perpetrated by it. One must become more familiar with these processes than the opposition, and also to expect adversity and persecution as Our Lord has predicted, but persistence to the end is the only alternative to surrender to these dark, spiritual forces. But we also know through Faith who has won in the end.
"I have said this to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world." -- John 16:33
"Regulation exempt biochemical products" is much truthier than "covid vaccine" and worth the expense of every syllable.
Thanks for what you are doing which is of the utmost importance. I would like to add some other thoughts that I hope that you will support: If the controllers have their way, i.e. WHO gets countries to give them authority to declare pandemics and to issue mandates (i.e. vaccine mandates), humanity will be inescapably trapped by those who wish to eliminate most and enslave the rest. People need to wake up to the realization that humanity has been and is controlled by a gigantic network of criminals (i.e. mafia, cia, nazi/eugenicists, billionaire nihilists).
Now, with the revelation that Biden's son's laptop was NOT Russian misinformation but was real. And it is clear that the Democrats knew this, but wanted it covered that month before the presidential election to insure Biden's victory not only indicts them, but makes it clear that they could blackmail Biden with this information and make him a stooge for all their evil machinations, if it is necessary.
RFK jr. who chose to run on the democratic ticket, doesn't talk about this and backed Hillery in the past. I would like to believe in him, but really if he is the real thing, he would probably be assassinated, since they love to kill Kennedys. No politician can be trusted, so there is one solution, that is, to restructure all government from vertical, which is so easy to subvert, corrupt, and control (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oilxI6Dgoy8&t=5s) to horizontal which would end politicians and political parties and rely instead on citizen participation and bottom-up direct democracy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMhg604W8).
If you agree, spread the message, because most people have never thought of "horizontal governance".
Thanks for such thoughtfulness; I've printed it out to read after I deal with a pressing problem one case of fallout from this kind of governmental corruption -- how the government and corporations used pressure and lies to force "vaxxes" on people in violation of the US Constitution and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
So that pressure was illegal -- and people are going to court. Which is how I learned about another "brick" in the technocracy pen being built to control people. And that brick is made of Adobe.
California and some other states have made e-filing mandatory for attorneys. I haven't checked yet to see if this was done legislatively, or only via the adoption of Rules of Court; "The rules in the California Rules of Court are adopted by the Judicial Council of California under the authority of article VI, section 6, of the Constitution of the State of California, unless otherwise indicated." In other words, a group of unelected members of the Deep State adopted these rules.
I'm running out of computer time, but basically, e-filing was pushed by three "national" associations -- which all have the same snail mail address, and which created a JTC -- Joint Technology Commission -- to push this idea. The three linked groups that reach a consensus are a Soros family specialty. More on these thoughts later.
Katherine: thank you for all you are doing! Could you at some point talk about the drug Remdesivere . When my husband and I got the Delta version of Covid, even though vaccinated, we were told we had to have it so we wouldn’t get sicker and possibly die.
Thank you Katherine, I hope your talk is well received in Dublin, and that the attendees resolve to protest these autocratic "health" measures.
great work Katherine, thank you.
Thanks Katherine. Each iteration of your analysis becomes more concise. We’re in a helluva mess.
other men and women, posing as doctors, nurses and pharmacists
Well said. These people are impostors. They are not medical personnel, they do not follow the oath they swore and they if they know the harmful ingredients, they are murderers. If they do not know the ingredients, they should not have a licence to practice.
God help us all.