Thank you, Kathrine -- Excellent information to add to the more than 200 medical and scientific studies and reports I've downloaded over the past 2+ years. Thank you for the link to your Feb. 9, 2023 explaining the significance of 21 US Code 360bbb-3(k) -- a document I downloaded from the Cornell U. School of Law back in Feb. 2021 after seeing a reference to it in an article I was reading.
At the time, there was a bare mention of the word "mandate" which gave me chills and I began my work researching EUAs and mandates. That's when I came across an article by Aaron Siri (founder of ICAN) in STAT News [Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA, Feb. 23, 2921] in which he interviewed then executive secretary of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Dr. Amanda Cohn. He asked Cohn if the vaccine could be mandated and she replied that "under an EUA, 'vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won't be able to be mandatory.' Cohn later affirmed that this prohibition on requiring the vaccines applies to organizations, including hospitals." Siri even pointed out that even the "Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act that authorizes the FDA to grant emergency use authorization also requires the secretary of Health and Human Services to 'ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed . . . of the option to accept or refuse administration."
We all know what the "FACT" sheets inside the box containing the vax vial looked like -- BLANK!
Siri's article also noted that according to the fact sheet given to recipients states that "It is your choice to receive or not receive the Covid-19 Vaccine," and if "you decide to not receive it, it will not change your standard of medical care."
Well, that was short-lived! How many people were denied medical care, organ transplants or even being placed on a transplant list because they were NOT vax'd!!!
I've been sending that information out, posting on Social Media wherever I can, for more than two years, but unfortunately, few people (friends, family, business associates, etc.) refused to believe me. And of course, the word "Experimental" went by the wayside, with many on social media sites arguing with me and claiming that the vax had been "approved." All was good to go.
Now, so many with turbo-cancer, many have died quickly from turbo-cancer (which is good when it comes to cancer -- faster is better); and currently I know personally four people with turbo-cancer: bone cancer; cancer filling both breasts; an ovarian tumor that has grown to a grapefruit size; and a cousin diagnosed 3 weeks ago with B-Cell Lymphoma in his right sinus cavity!
The destruction of the immune system continues! Sad beyond belief!
They changed the traditional legal implications of informed consent by using new phrases such as "option to accept or refuse" and establishing that "consequences" of refusal can, legally, include loss of your job or place in school.
"...The statutes include language that HHS Secretary may set conditions on EUAs that recipients be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product,” which appears to protect a meaningful option to refuse, thus upholding the principle of informed consent as framed by the Nuremberg Code.
have interpreted the “consequences of refusal” to mean that recipients may be told by the person demanding that they accept the product, that if they refuse, they will be disciplined, fired or lose their place at school, thus legalizing coercive medical treatment in violation of the Nuremberg Code."
I believe it was certainly part of the "experiment" -- to see how many would comply with the mandates. They were checking our compliance level in preparation for the next pandemic or the next lockdown, vaccine mandate, etc. They want to know who the sheeple are vs. the pure-bloods. We know who they will come for next.
Hello Clare Goldsberry: I've posted links to Cornell Law School documentation many times. Average citizens are too lazy to even read the documents, even when they've been injured by a related Criminal act. Perhaps Recovery of Losses accrued by the United States would spice up interest by agencies thereof. >>>
42 U.S. Code § 2651 - Recovery by United States
Excerpt: > b) Recovery of cost of pay for member of uniformed services unable to perform duties
“If a member of the uniformed services is injured, or contracts a disease, under circumstances creating a tort liability upon a third person (other than or in addition to the United States and except employers of seamen referred to in subsection (a)) for damages for such injury or disease and the member is unable to perform the member’s regular military duties as a result of the injury or disease, the United States shall have a right (independent of the rights of the member) to recover from the third person or an insurer of the third person, or both, the amount equal to the total amount of the pay that accrues and is to accrue to the member for the period for which the member is unable to perform such duties as a result of the injury or disease and is not assigned to perform other military duties.”
The title is rather long winded, but defines situations in which the United States government can demand recompense of costs related to injuries caused by “tort liability upon some third person” (3rd Party organizations) > Such as Pfizer….
You are so right, Paul!! How many times have I tried to get that through peoples' heads -- mandates are NOT laws, yet look at the number of cities (Los Angeles, for one) acted as if these mandates were laws, tried arresting people for not wearing a mask in public, even trying to fine then but obviously couldn't because there was NO law and therefore NO fines attached. Not sure how to get the ignorant masses to become educated.
And it is truly horrific when you consider that outside "the West", there are hardly any independent legal systems to speak of. Courts and judges in those parts of the world tend to receive instructions from government officials about what to say and do.
"suing the government" is a luxury fantasy for most people in the world.
Bans on *any* facial coverings, including masks. Reported as "burqa bans." But the law specifically included masks, all facial coverings. Prohibited. Period. Violations were fined. The Netherlands even banned masks as recently as August, 2019. Just months before nations across Europe, including the Netherlands mandated them.
Mask bans had already been upheld in international human rights courts just a few years before. Courts ruled that lawmakers were right to recognize that we have "the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing." Unobstructed human faces were declared a human right!!
"Judges at the European court of human rights (ECHR) have upheld France's burqa ban, accepting Paris's argument that it encouraged citizens to "live together". The law, introduced in 2010, makes it illegal for anyone to cover their face in a public place...the law was not aimed at the burqa or veil but any covering of the face in a public place... ...The European judges decided...that the preservation of a certain idea of "living together" was the "legitimate aim" of the French authorities. Isabelle Niedlispacher, representing the Belgian government, which introduced a similar ban in 2011 and which was party to the French defence, declared both the burqa and niqab "incompatible" with the rule of law. Aside from questions of security and equality, she added: "It's about social communication, the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing." The French and Belgian laws were aimed at "helping everyone to integrate", Niedlispacher added."
Burqa bans, headscarves and veils: a timeline of legislation in the west
"On August 1, 2019, the “Act Partially Prohibiting Face-Covering Clothing,”also known as the “Burqa Ban,” entered into force in the Netherlands. The Act prohibits the wearing of clothing that completely or partially conceals the face in spaces where people are expected to communicate with each other. Thus, face-covering clothing is banned on public transportation and in educational, governmental, and nursing care institutions, but is still allowed in such public spaces as on train platforms. The ban applies to burqas, niqabs, full-face helmets, balaclavas, and masks, but not to headscarves."
Bans on masks, all across Europe, laws prohibiting any facial covering in public, shopping, transportation, workplaces, anywhere people would gather - Illegal!! The headlines said "burqa bans." the laws said no facial coverings, not even masks in public. Illegal!!
And then came 2020....
Coronavirus: Germany's states make face masks compulsory
"The French prime minister said all pedestrians would have to wear face masks in public areas in the capital from 08:00 on Friday (06:00 GMT).
While individual streets and areas of the capital already have rules on wearing face coverings, this new rule will be far more extensive, covering not only Paris but its inner ring of Seine-Saint-Denis, Hauts-de-Seine and Val-de-Marne.
Paris is already a red zone, along with the southern area of Bouches-du-Rhône, where France's second-largest city Marseille made masks compulsory from Wednesday evening.
A broad expanse of the Mediterranean coast and the Gironde area around Bordeaux are also red zones.
Masks will also become part of normal life for French schoolchildren aged 11 and over. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended use of masks in school from the age of 12.
Masks are already required in most enclosed public spaces and will be mandatory in workplaces from next week."
France asks citizens to wear masks again in public transport
"French people should start wearing masks again in crowded areas, especially in public transport, as France has to deal with a new wave of COVID-19 infections fuelled by new variants of the disease, Health Minister Brigitte Bourguignon said on Monday.
"I'm not saying it should be mandatory but I do ask the French people to put the mask on in public transport," she told RTL, adding it was a "civic duty" to do so."
Coronavirus: Netherlands makes face masks mandatory indoors
"Mask wearing has been reintroduced in stores and public places, and the government is advising citizens to work from home for at least half the time.
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte announced Tuesday that the “corona pass” will be expanded on Nov. 6 to apply to public places including museums, gyms and outdoor venues."
Laws that contradict each other.
Prohibited ---> Mandated. Just months apart.
Human Rights ---> Dangerous Selfishness. Just months apart.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Humans including doctors are CONDITIONED to be obedient by the powers that be, to be obedient and ask no questions. Some doctors are immune to the brainwashing and have functioning consciences, thank goodness.
The only effective means to counter the totalitarian, administrative state is to fearlessly stand up and speak up when such contradictory injustice is perpetrated by it. One must become more familiar with these processes than the opposition, and also to expect adversity and persecution as Our Lord has predicted, but persistence to the end is the only alternative to surrender to these dark, spiritual forces. But we also know through Faith who has won in the end.
"I have said this to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world." -- John 16:33
17 million stood up one day to protest the Iraq War. Nary a ripple in MSM. Bush called it a “focus group” We can stand up but it won’t even be reported. If protesters were to get out of hand……think France recently…….we have Domestic Terror laws now. The recent Atlanta protest where a protester was shot by police was tainted by DHS sent a memo to Atlanta police dept. saying the protesters were deemed Domestic Terrorists. That is how they will or already have designated us. Now when CBDC’s are introduced they will target dissenters, prob everyone here that likes freedom. They can program your money such that you can only spend it, say at McDonalds 150 miles away and you can’t buy gas. Or the internet. MSM silent. This is how Orwellian nightmare happens. They are VERY afraid of us uniting. They are few, we are many. Unite with anybody that wants freedom, be they Christians, Magas, Marxists etc etc. Now is not the time to nitpick. They are almost there
Au contraire--the only effective means to counter etc. etc. is to TAKE THE MONEY OUT OF IT. Otherwise, those who are allowed to profit will just come back w/ new methods of doing the same. Broadly, this means nationalizing all necessary public services, & making the top 2% (you know, the ppl who own 90% of all American wealth) pay ALL. THE. TAXES.
Disagree, and for the simple reason that "money" is only a tool for better facilitating the trade of goods and services in our modern society. The fair and honest use of all the tools at our disposal is required, and individual and institutional corruption for personal gain seems to be at the root of the problem.
OF COURSE corruption (for personal gain--an unnecessary redundancy) is at the root of the problem. If there were no way to personally gain from the corruption, the corruption would end. Tell your favorite billionaire that he needs to fork over all his money to society because it's just a tool for better facilitating the etc. etc. etc., LOL. https://deanbaker.net/books/the-conservative-nanny-state.htm
One can do a right thing for wrong or corrupt reasons, and not necessarily for personal gain, but I digress. However, no one really "owns" anything in this life, as ownership is just another concept or word that implies control by the will of the owner. Both billionaires and paupers will someday die broke and naked, and what really matters is how they used those things that they "owned" or controlled (money, property, and even their own human body) to help make the world a better place while living in it. And the stoking of economic class warfare does not contribute to that noble effort. Have a blessed and wonderful day by helping to make someone else's day just a little better!
Are you saying that it's perfectly OK for billionaires to profit from the suffering of others, which those billionaires caused & enforced through their ownership of the gov't, because we'll all die someday & then it won't matter? And that pointing out these facts is "economic class warfare", but profiting from causing misery to those who don't have the financial wherewithal to escape that misery isn't?
Not at all. Only recognizing that we can only control what we ourselves do with our own resources and in our own sphere of influence. And it is our duty and obligation to NOT fall into the same selfishness and self-interest that seems to consume those who profit from the misery of others. The truly rich person does not covet the "financial wherewithal" of others but uses his own to the benefit of others as they may be able. There are millions of volunteers who donate their most precious possession in laboring to help others in a myriad of different ways. And that most valuable possession is their time, which most people sell in order to make money, although they have no idea how much they may have beyond today. So do a good thing for somebody today, as tomorrow will not come for some of us.
Thanks for what you are doing which is of the utmost importance. I would like to add some other thoughts that I hope that you will support: If the controllers have their way, i.e. WHO gets countries to give them authority to declare pandemics and to issue mandates (i.e. vaccine mandates), humanity will be inescapably trapped by those who wish to eliminate most and enslave the rest. People need to wake up to the realization that humanity has been and is controlled by a gigantic network of criminals (i.e. mafia, cia, nazi/eugenicists, billionaire nihilists).
Now, with the revelation that Biden's son's laptop was NOT Russian misinformation but was real. And it is clear that the Democrats knew this, but wanted it covered that month before the presidential election to insure Biden's victory not only indicts them, but makes it clear that they could blackmail Biden with this information and make him a stooge for all their evil machinations, if it is necessary.
RFK jr. who chose to run on the democratic ticket, doesn't talk about this and backed Hillery in the past. I would like to believe in him, but really if he is the real thing, he would probably be assassinated, since they love to kill Kennedys. No politician can be trusted, so there is one solution, that is, to restructure all government from vertical, which is so easy to subvert, corrupt, and control (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oilxI6Dgoy8&t=5s) to horizontal which would end politicians and political parties and rely instead on citizen participation and bottom-up direct democracy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMhg604W8).
If you agree, spread the message, because most people have never thought of "horizontal governance".
There are only two ways to lateralize government: 1.) The initialization of Direct Democracy via a 75% majority voted Civil Referendum. > Most western countries have representative systems. Switzerland is a rare example of a country with instruments of direct democracy (at the levels of the municipalities, cantons, and federal state). Citizens have more power than in a representative democracy. On any political level citizens can propose changes to the constitution (popular initiative), or ask for an optional referendum to be held on any law voted by the federal, cantonal parliament and/or municipal legislative body. Refer to complete text:
Thanks for such thoughtfulness; I've printed it out to read after I deal with a pressing problem one case of fallout from this kind of governmental corruption -- how the government and corporations used pressure and lies to force "vaxxes" on people in violation of the US Constitution and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
So that pressure was illegal -- and people are going to court. Which is how I learned about another "brick" in the technocracy pen being built to control people. And that brick is made of Adobe.
California and some other states have made e-filing mandatory for attorneys. I haven't checked yet to see if this was done legislatively, or only via the adoption of Rules of Court; "The rules in the California Rules of Court are adopted by the Judicial Council of California under the authority of article VI, section 6, of the Constitution of the State of California, unless otherwise indicated." In other words, a group of unelected members of the Deep State adopted these rules.
I'm running out of computer time, but basically, e-filing was pushed by three "national" associations -- which all have the same snail mail address, and which created a JTC -- Joint Technology Commission -- to push this idea. The three linked groups that reach a consensus are a Soros family specialty. More on these thoughts later.
Katherine: thank you for all you are doing! Could you at some point talk about the drug Remdesivere . When my husband and I got the Delta version of Covid, even though vaccinated, we were told we had to have it so we wouldn’t get sicker and possibly die.
other men and women, posing as doctors, nurses and pharmacists
Well said. These people are impostors. They are not medical personnel, they do not follow the oath they swore and they if they know the harmful ingredients, they are murderers. If they do not know the ingredients, they should not have a licence to practice.
No, they're not imposters. The awful truth is that MOST of "the medical profession" have always been pretty bloody hopeless. They have zero experience of science, don't know how to read scientific papers and have always just assumed that their professors know best. They are chosen when they enter medical school to have "good grades", which means they have obediently learned whatever is in the text books. In short, they're chosen from the outset to be ompliant and not at all independent thinkers -- to just do as they're told. The hospital system has always been modelled on the military. If a soldier doesn't do as he's told without question, he's court martialled and kicked out. If a junior doc doesn't do as his superiors tell him, he's struck off and kicked out. There's nothing new in this. And to be fair, these people are well aware that 90% of the time they DON'T know what they're doing, but they have to project the calming impression to their patients that they DO know what they're doing. But even if they're trying their best to follow the Hippocratic Oath (first do no harm) they need to KNOW what will do harm. And in the case of mRNA shots, they didn't. NOW they do (or should) -- but they're so deep in they don't have the guts to stop. In other words, they're human. And by and large, humans are a pretty pathetic lot.
Sincerely from the heart, “Thank you “ for all your efforts and support you bring.
Thank you, Kathrine -- Excellent information to add to the more than 200 medical and scientific studies and reports I've downloaded over the past 2+ years. Thank you for the link to your Feb. 9, 2023 explaining the significance of 21 US Code 360bbb-3(k) -- a document I downloaded from the Cornell U. School of Law back in Feb. 2021 after seeing a reference to it in an article I was reading.
At the time, there was a bare mention of the word "mandate" which gave me chills and I began my work researching EUAs and mandates. That's when I came across an article by Aaron Siri (founder of ICAN) in STAT News [Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA, Feb. 23, 2921] in which he interviewed then executive secretary of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Dr. Amanda Cohn. He asked Cohn if the vaccine could be mandated and she replied that "under an EUA, 'vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won't be able to be mandatory.' Cohn later affirmed that this prohibition on requiring the vaccines applies to organizations, including hospitals." Siri even pointed out that even the "Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act that authorizes the FDA to grant emergency use authorization also requires the secretary of Health and Human Services to 'ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed . . . of the option to accept or refuse administration."
We all know what the "FACT" sheets inside the box containing the vax vial looked like -- BLANK!
Siri's article also noted that according to the fact sheet given to recipients states that "It is your choice to receive or not receive the Covid-19 Vaccine," and if "you decide to not receive it, it will not change your standard of medical care."
Well, that was short-lived! How many people were denied medical care, organ transplants or even being placed on a transplant list because they were NOT vax'd!!!
I've been sending that information out, posting on Social Media wherever I can, for more than two years, but unfortunately, few people (friends, family, business associates, etc.) refused to believe me. And of course, the word "Experimental" went by the wayside, with many on social media sites arguing with me and claiming that the vax had been "approved." All was good to go.
Now, so many with turbo-cancer, many have died quickly from turbo-cancer (which is good when it comes to cancer -- faster is better); and currently I know personally four people with turbo-cancer: bone cancer; cancer filling both breasts; an ovarian tumor that has grown to a grapefruit size; and a cousin diagnosed 3 weeks ago with B-Cell Lymphoma in his right sinus cavity!
The destruction of the immune system continues! Sad beyond belief!
They changed the traditional legal implications of informed consent by using new phrases such as "option to accept or refuse" and establishing that "consequences" of refusal can, legally, include loss of your job or place in school.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/april-4-2003-rep-henry-waxman-questioning?s=w
"...The statutes include language that HHS Secretary may set conditions on EUAs that recipients be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product,” which appears to protect a meaningful option to refuse, thus upholding the principle of informed consent as framed by the Nuremberg Code.
However, the Department of Justice
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/attachments/2021/07/26/2021-07-06-mand-vax.pdf
and at least one federal judge
https://casetext.com/case/bridges-v-hous-methodist-hosp
have interpreted the “consequences of refusal” to mean that recipients may be told by the person demanding that they accept the product, that if they refuse, they will be disciplined, fired or lose their place at school, thus legalizing coercive medical treatment in violation of the Nuremberg Code."
The "experiment" must have been on gullibility.
I believe it was certainly part of the "experiment" -- to see how many would comply with the mandates. They were checking our compliance level in preparation for the next pandemic or the next lockdown, vaccine mandate, etc. They want to know who the sheeple are vs. the pure-bloods. We know who they will come for next.
Hello Clare Goldsberry: I've posted links to Cornell Law School documentation many times. Average citizens are too lazy to even read the documents, even when they've been injured by a related Criminal act. Perhaps Recovery of Losses accrued by the United States would spice up interest by agencies thereof. >>>
42 U.S. Code § 2651 - Recovery by United States
Excerpt: > b) Recovery of cost of pay for member of uniformed services unable to perform duties
“If a member of the uniformed services is injured, or contracts a disease, under circumstances creating a tort liability upon a third person (other than or in addition to the United States and except employers of seamen referred to in subsection (a)) for damages for such injury or disease and the member is unable to perform the member’s regular military duties as a result of the injury or disease, the United States shall have a right (independent of the rights of the member) to recover from the third person or an insurer of the third person, or both, the amount equal to the total amount of the pay that accrues and is to accrue to the member for the period for which the member is unable to perform such duties as a result of the injury or disease and is not assigned to perform other military duties.”
The title is rather long winded, but defines situations in which the United States government can demand recompense of costs related to injuries caused by “tort liability upon some third person” (3rd Party organizations) > Such as Pfizer….
Complete text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2651
A detail the media fails to inform upon. >
Mandates Are Not Laws 2.0
By Anna Von Reitz
http://annavonreitz.com/mandatesarenotlaws2.pdf
You are so right, Paul!! How many times have I tried to get that through peoples' heads -- mandates are NOT laws, yet look at the number of cities (Los Angeles, for one) acted as if these mandates were laws, tried arresting people for not wearing a mask in public, even trying to fine then but obviously couldn't because there was NO law and therefore NO fines attached. Not sure how to get the ignorant masses to become educated.
And it is truly horrific when you consider that outside "the West", there are hardly any independent legal systems to speak of. Courts and judges in those parts of the world tend to receive instructions from government officials about what to say and do.
"suing the government" is a luxury fantasy for most people in the world.
Laws that contradict.
Bans on *any* facial coverings, including masks. Reported as "burqa bans." But the law specifically included masks, all facial coverings. Prohibited. Period. Violations were fined. The Netherlands even banned masks as recently as August, 2019. Just months before nations across Europe, including the Netherlands mandated them.
Mask bans had already been upheld in international human rights courts just a few years before. Courts ruled that lawmakers were right to recognize that we have "the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing." Unobstructed human faces were declared a human right!!
France's burqa ban upheld by human rights court
The UK Guardian, July 1, 2014
https://archive.fo/Eg2vw
"Judges at the European court of human rights (ECHR) have upheld France's burqa ban, accepting Paris's argument that it encouraged citizens to "live together". The law, introduced in 2010, makes it illegal for anyone to cover their face in a public place...the law was not aimed at the burqa or veil but any covering of the face in a public place... ...The European judges decided...that the preservation of a certain idea of "living together" was the "legitimate aim" of the French authorities. Isabelle Niedlispacher, representing the Belgian government, which introduced a similar ban in 2011 and which was party to the French defence, declared both the burqa and niqab "incompatible" with the rule of law. Aside from questions of security and equality, she added: "It's about social communication, the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing." The French and Belgian laws were aimed at "helping everyone to integrate", Niedlispacher added."
Burqa bans, headscarves and veils: a timeline of legislation in the west
UK Guardian, May 31, 2018
https://archive.fo/WinLY
Netherlands: Burqa Ban Enters into Force
Library of Congress, August 27, 2019
https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2019-08-27/netherlands-burqa-ban-enters-into-force/
"On August 1, 2019, the “Act Partially Prohibiting Face-Covering Clothing,”also known as the “Burqa Ban,” entered into force in the Netherlands. The Act prohibits the wearing of clothing that completely or partially conceals the face in spaces where people are expected to communicate with each other. Thus, face-covering clothing is banned on public transportation and in educational, governmental, and nursing care institutions, but is still allowed in such public spaces as on train platforms. The ban applies to burqas, niqabs, full-face helmets, balaclavas, and masks, but not to headscarves."
Bans on masks, all across Europe, laws prohibiting any facial covering in public, shopping, transportation, workplaces, anywhere people would gather - Illegal!! The headlines said "burqa bans." the laws said no facial coverings, not even masks in public. Illegal!!
And then came 2020....
Coronavirus: Germany's states make face masks compulsory
BBC News, April 22, 2020
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52382196
"All of Germany's states have announced plans to make face masks compulsory to combat the spread of coronavirus.
Bremen became the final federal region to back the measures, with its senate set to confirm the decision on Friday.
Mask use will be compulsory on public transport throughout Germany, and nearly all states will also make face coverings mandatory when shopping."
France Covid-19: Paris compulsory face-mask rule comes into force
BBC News, August 28, 2020
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53934952
"The French prime minister said all pedestrians would have to wear face masks in public areas in the capital from 08:00 on Friday (06:00 GMT).
While individual streets and areas of the capital already have rules on wearing face coverings, this new rule will be far more extensive, covering not only Paris but its inner ring of Seine-Saint-Denis, Hauts-de-Seine and Val-de-Marne.
Paris is already a red zone, along with the southern area of Bouches-du-Rhône, where France's second-largest city Marseille made masks compulsory from Wednesday evening.
A broad expanse of the Mediterranean coast and the Gironde area around Bordeaux are also red zones.
Masks will also become part of normal life for French schoolchildren aged 11 and over. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended use of masks in school from the age of 12.
Masks are already required in most enclosed public spaces and will be mandatory in workplaces from next week."
France asks citizens to wear masks again in public transport
Reuters, June 27, 2022
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-asks-citizens-wear-masks-again-public-transport-2022-06-27/
"French people should start wearing masks again in crowded areas, especially in public transport, as France has to deal with a new wave of COVID-19 infections fuelled by new variants of the disease, Health Minister Brigitte Bourguignon said on Monday.
"I'm not saying it should be mandatory but I do ask the French people to put the mask on in public transport," she told RTL, adding it was a "civic duty" to do so."
Coronavirus: Netherlands makes face masks mandatory indoors
BBC News, December 1, 2020
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55143938
"The Netherlands has made it compulsory to wear a face mask in indoor public spaces in an effort to contain the spread of coronavirus.
The country is one of the last in Europe to introduce such a measure.
The rule will apply to those over the age of 13 in public buildings such as shops, railway stations and hairdressers from Tuesday.
The new face mask rule will remain in place for at least three months, with those who ignore it facing a fine of up to €95 (£85; $113)."
Netherlands reimplements mask mandate as COVID-19 cases surge
The Hill, November 2, 2021
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/public-global-health/579724-netherlands-re-implements-mask-mandate-as-covid-19/
"Mask wearing has been reintroduced in stores and public places, and the government is advising citizens to work from home for at least half the time.
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte announced Tuesday that the “corona pass” will be expanded on Nov. 6 to apply to public places including museums, gyms and outdoor venues."
Laws that contradict each other.
Prohibited ---> Mandated. Just months apart.
Human Rights ---> Dangerous Selfishness. Just months apart.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
.
Doctors Are Obedient By Nature.
Therein Lies The Problem.
.
Humans including doctors are CONDITIONED to be obedient by the powers that be, to be obedient and ask no questions. Some doctors are immune to the brainwashing and have functioning consciences, thank goodness.
The Most Heavily Vaccinated People And Those
Injured The Most - Are Still Wearing Masks.
Enjoy This Moment. It Is Yours.
Because They Are The Same Fucked-Up Morons
That Wanted To Force Inject You; To Quarantine You; To Fire You; And To Deny You Medical Care. They Still Do.
So Tell Them - To Their Faces:
“Don’t Get Sick - Because You Won’t Get Better”
You Owe Yourself That.
They Are Not Getting Better. Make Them Hear It.
Yes.
It Is A Matter Of Degree.
Their Problem.
Not Mine.
Bingo 👍🏽
The only effective means to counter the totalitarian, administrative state is to fearlessly stand up and speak up when such contradictory injustice is perpetrated by it. One must become more familiar with these processes than the opposition, and also to expect adversity and persecution as Our Lord has predicted, but persistence to the end is the only alternative to surrender to these dark, spiritual forces. But we also know through Faith who has won in the end.
"I have said this to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world." -- John 16:33
17 million stood up one day to protest the Iraq War. Nary a ripple in MSM. Bush called it a “focus group” We can stand up but it won’t even be reported. If protesters were to get out of hand……think France recently…….we have Domestic Terror laws now. The recent Atlanta protest where a protester was shot by police was tainted by DHS sent a memo to Atlanta police dept. saying the protesters were deemed Domestic Terrorists. That is how they will or already have designated us. Now when CBDC’s are introduced they will target dissenters, prob everyone here that likes freedom. They can program your money such that you can only spend it, say at McDonalds 150 miles away and you can’t buy gas. Or the internet. MSM silent. This is how Orwellian nightmare happens. They are VERY afraid of us uniting. They are few, we are many. Unite with anybody that wants freedom, be they Christians, Magas, Marxists etc etc. Now is not the time to nitpick. They are almost there
America in 1775. France in 1789. Here and now?
Au contraire--the only effective means to counter etc. etc. is to TAKE THE MONEY OUT OF IT. Otherwise, those who are allowed to profit will just come back w/ new methods of doing the same. Broadly, this means nationalizing all necessary public services, & making the top 2% (you know, the ppl who own 90% of all American wealth) pay ALL. THE. TAXES.
Disagree, and for the simple reason that "money" is only a tool for better facilitating the trade of goods and services in our modern society. The fair and honest use of all the tools at our disposal is required, and individual and institutional corruption for personal gain seems to be at the root of the problem.
OF COURSE corruption (for personal gain--an unnecessary redundancy) is at the root of the problem. If there were no way to personally gain from the corruption, the corruption would end. Tell your favorite billionaire that he needs to fork over all his money to society because it's just a tool for better facilitating the etc. etc. etc., LOL. https://deanbaker.net/books/the-conservative-nanny-state.htm
One can do a right thing for wrong or corrupt reasons, and not necessarily for personal gain, but I digress. However, no one really "owns" anything in this life, as ownership is just another concept or word that implies control by the will of the owner. Both billionaires and paupers will someday die broke and naked, and what really matters is how they used those things that they "owned" or controlled (money, property, and even their own human body) to help make the world a better place while living in it. And the stoking of economic class warfare does not contribute to that noble effort. Have a blessed and wonderful day by helping to make someone else's day just a little better!
Are you saying that it's perfectly OK for billionaires to profit from the suffering of others, which those billionaires caused & enforced through their ownership of the gov't, because we'll all die someday & then it won't matter? And that pointing out these facts is "economic class warfare", but profiting from causing misery to those who don't have the financial wherewithal to escape that misery isn't?
Not at all. Only recognizing that we can only control what we ourselves do with our own resources and in our own sphere of influence. And it is our duty and obligation to NOT fall into the same selfishness and self-interest that seems to consume those who profit from the misery of others. The truly rich person does not covet the "financial wherewithal" of others but uses his own to the benefit of others as they may be able. There are millions of volunteers who donate their most precious possession in laboring to help others in a myriad of different ways. And that most valuable possession is their time, which most people sell in order to make money, although they have no idea how much they may have beyond today. So do a good thing for somebody today, as tomorrow will not come for some of us.
"Regulation exempt biochemical products" is much truthier than "covid vaccine" and worth the expense of every syllable.
Thanks for what you are doing which is of the utmost importance. I would like to add some other thoughts that I hope that you will support: If the controllers have their way, i.e. WHO gets countries to give them authority to declare pandemics and to issue mandates (i.e. vaccine mandates), humanity will be inescapably trapped by those who wish to eliminate most and enslave the rest. People need to wake up to the realization that humanity has been and is controlled by a gigantic network of criminals (i.e. mafia, cia, nazi/eugenicists, billionaire nihilists).
Now, with the revelation that Biden's son's laptop was NOT Russian misinformation but was real. And it is clear that the Democrats knew this, but wanted it covered that month before the presidential election to insure Biden's victory not only indicts them, but makes it clear that they could blackmail Biden with this information and make him a stooge for all their evil machinations, if it is necessary.
RFK jr. who chose to run on the democratic ticket, doesn't talk about this and backed Hillery in the past. I would like to believe in him, but really if he is the real thing, he would probably be assassinated, since they love to kill Kennedys. No politician can be trusted, so there is one solution, that is, to restructure all government from vertical, which is so easy to subvert, corrupt, and control (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oilxI6Dgoy8&t=5s) to horizontal which would end politicians and political parties and rely instead on citizen participation and bottom-up direct democracy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wywMhg604W8).
If you agree, spread the message, because most people have never thought of "horizontal governance".
There are only two ways to lateralize government: 1.) The initialization of Direct Democracy via a 75% majority voted Civil Referendum. > Most western countries have representative systems. Switzerland is a rare example of a country with instruments of direct democracy (at the levels of the municipalities, cantons, and federal state). Citizens have more power than in a representative democracy. On any political level citizens can propose changes to the constitution (popular initiative), or ask for an optional referendum to be held on any law voted by the federal, cantonal parliament and/or municipal legislative body. Refer to complete text:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy
2.) Direct overthrow of the government via armed revolution.
Which way produces less slaughter and destruction?
Thanks for such thoughtfulness; I've printed it out to read after I deal with a pressing problem one case of fallout from this kind of governmental corruption -- how the government and corporations used pressure and lies to force "vaxxes" on people in violation of the US Constitution and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
So that pressure was illegal -- and people are going to court. Which is how I learned about another "brick" in the technocracy pen being built to control people. And that brick is made of Adobe.
California and some other states have made e-filing mandatory for attorneys. I haven't checked yet to see if this was done legislatively, or only via the adoption of Rules of Court; "The rules in the California Rules of Court are adopted by the Judicial Council of California under the authority of article VI, section 6, of the Constitution of the State of California, unless otherwise indicated." In other words, a group of unelected members of the Deep State adopted these rules.
I'm running out of computer time, but basically, e-filing was pushed by three "national" associations -- which all have the same snail mail address, and which created a JTC -- Joint Technology Commission -- to push this idea. The three linked groups that reach a consensus are a Soros family specialty. More on these thoughts later.
Katherine: thank you for all you are doing! Could you at some point talk about the drug Remdesivere . When my husband and I got the Delta version of Covid, even though vaccinated, we were told we had to have it so we wouldn’t get sicker and possibly die.
Don't enter a hospital again!. The next time you do, you will not come out!. X
Thank you Katherine, I hope your talk is well received in Dublin, and that the attendees resolve to protest these autocratic "health" measures.
great work Katherine, thank you.
Thanks Katherine. Each iteration of your analysis becomes more concise. We’re in a helluva mess.
other men and women, posing as doctors, nurses and pharmacists
Well said. These people are impostors. They are not medical personnel, they do not follow the oath they swore and they if they know the harmful ingredients, they are murderers. If they do not know the ingredients, they should not have a licence to practice.
No, they're not imposters. The awful truth is that MOST of "the medical profession" have always been pretty bloody hopeless. They have zero experience of science, don't know how to read scientific papers and have always just assumed that their professors know best. They are chosen when they enter medical school to have "good grades", which means they have obediently learned whatever is in the text books. In short, they're chosen from the outset to be ompliant and not at all independent thinkers -- to just do as they're told. The hospital system has always been modelled on the military. If a soldier doesn't do as he's told without question, he's court martialled and kicked out. If a junior doc doesn't do as his superiors tell him, he's struck off and kicked out. There's nothing new in this. And to be fair, these people are well aware that 90% of the time they DON'T know what they're doing, but they have to project the calming impression to their patients that they DO know what they're doing. But even if they're trying their best to follow the Hippocratic Oath (first do no harm) they need to KNOW what will do harm. And in the case of mRNA shots, they didn't. NOW they do (or should) -- but they're so deep in they don't have the guts to stop. In other words, they're human. And by and large, humans are a pretty pathetic lot.
They don't take the Hippocratic Oath anymore, most likely because abortion was totally forbidden for doctors' pledge to donno harm.
People said since Roe v. Wade that the murdering wouldn't remain in the womb.
They were right.
thanku
God help us all.