88 Comments

Such a satisfying read! Hits all the points of righteousness I have been craving.

Shame it's fiction.

Expand full comment

THIS is pure genius Katherine. I will be sharing it within my own daily Substack. It is a shame you are not the judge because there is nothing fictional about what you wrote. But using fiction to expose the truth is very impactful. I have no faith in the judicial system whatsoever. They too are bought and paid for. I also do not feel warm and fuzzy about her legal team either.

Expand full comment

Problem. Most of the lawyers are compromised especially judges. Look at Arizona

Expand full comment

Totally agree

Expand full comment

9 min. BREAKING NEWS: USA, Canada & Switzerland - 3 US Law Enforcement Agencies Activated - Ann Vander Steele and Pascal Najadi - https://rumble.com/v29up58-breaking-news-usa-canada-and-switzerland-3-us-law-enforcement-agencies-acti.html

Dr. David Martin MURDER CHARGES and Global Terrorism Against Dr. Fauci, Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric, Justin Trudeau and many others in connection with mRNA deaths and government mandates

Expand full comment

We have been hearing about the Dr. Martin lawsuit for a year now and until I actually see a court date or verdict I am going to keep this close to the vest.

Expand full comment

Saw this yesterday. I'm going with " If it sounds too good to be true....'' on this

Expand full comment

Me too. I have heard Dr. Martin on several interviews over the past year talking about his lawsuit but so far that is all it is. Not saying it could become something real but I am playing the wait and see game.

Expand full comment

At one time, early into this, I actually believed "People will pay for what they've done!" But over the course of the last 3 years, I have learned much about the workings of the world, and that what I actually should have believed, is " People will be paid for what they've done" because indeed they have, and they will do whatever they must, as a group, to protect their earnings and themselves. As they saying goes, it's a big club (pHarma, Wall Street, the UniParty, the legal system WEF, WHO, Big Tech) and we are definitely NOT in it.

Expand full comment

Amen. We must take comfort in the fact that these sociopaths will not be punished in this life but they will spend eternity burning in the fires of hell. I just hope that I can have my finger on the button that sends them down.

Expand full comment

I'm continually praying either for my own forgiveness for often finding myself wanting prolonged and brutal earthly punishment for every single perpetrator, and theirs.

Expand full comment

Amen. This world doesn’t contain the divine truth or justice. It runs on greed corruption and lies. The good people are the only reason we haven’t seen the second flood.

Expand full comment

Not gonna be a second Flood. Next up is Fire.

Expand full comment

I communicated with a physician who invited me on a Zoom call with Dr. Martin, and a small group of other people, one of whom was a convicted felon who laundered money, and represents he is a sovereign citizen, and, I guess, a jail house educated lawyer, without a law license, of course, to practice law.

He had been arrested at his home in Arizona for money laundering after fleeing it well armed having left his wife, and children in the house as he fled out back into the desert. He gave up rather quickly as the FBI were well prepared.

He charged this physician $9,000 to get them somehow free of some alleged birth certificate trading scheme involving the Vatican, etc. Oddly, from my cursory look into the claims of Anna Von Reitz it appears there is validity to the sovereign citizen movement but it doesn't interest me much. It's like flat versus round earth, we did or did not land astronauts on the moon, and viruses do or do not exist stuff to me. None if it will change my life one bit as far as I can tell if dispositively dispensed.

Needless to say I declined to participate in the Zoom call. I respect the incredible intelligence of David Martin, and the physician with whom I was in contact. However, I question their judgement a bit. I hope they are successful in their efforts.

Expand full comment

Fictional only in the sense that what should be said will never be said. Every question the “Judge” asks and the answer from the “DOJ Lawyer” are the truth that should be heard but never will be heard. These people are not afraid of lying under oath because they know they are fully protected. The real problem is the Judge does not know what Katherine knows. No good lawyer or judge asks a question they do not already know the answer too and have the facts to challenge false answers.

Expand full comment

Hello? "the judge does not know what Katherine knows." How do you figure this? A judge does not know what a paralegal researcher knows? Is that why he's the judge, and not she? Cause she knows more? I doubt the judge knows less, with all respect here. It is his job to know, that's why none of those, like all of we, needs to be paid until they've done the job and done it right.

I mean, I know, even Dave Barry admitted that a script saying "VAMPIRES ON THE SUPREME COURT' would go nowhere........

Expand full comment

Most para legals know more than the lawyers they serve. They are the people that do the research and without a good para legal a lawyer would not be successful. Judges are political beings and they do as they are instructed to do. If not then how is it that no judge to date even faced with irrefutable evidence has determined that election fraud took place. How is that a county in CA just arrested an elected city council member for mass election fraud when gee no judge in CA would even hear a case. Sorry buddy but our judicial system is bought and paid for just like our selected members of Congress, the President and the media.

Expand full comment

THis is all true. All I can do is quote a meme:

Teacher: Billy, what are the three branches of government?

Billy: Greed, Fraud, and Cronyism

Teacher: Now Billy, that's just not right.

Billy: I KNOW!

Expand full comment

Lady Supreme Court Judge thought the hospitals were inundated with kids dying from Covid. Remember that. When we knew no child was ever in danger of dying from Covid.

Expand full comment

Yes I remember it well. She knew darn well she was lying but that is what they do.

Expand full comment

Who knows what Katherine knows? Most people are ignorant of these facts. I bet this is the first time you have been exposed to many of these truths.

Expand full comment

Your comment makes no sense at all. I have followed her and Sasha for a long time and I would bet you dinner very few of our elected and even fewer judges know the truth. And even if they did they are all so corrupt they would rather see people die than give up their cushy job.

Expand full comment

Very few people know the truth about anything. In fact most people are so brainwashed they believe we live on a globe when their senses tell them otherwise. https://www.bitchute.com/video/CKaaNd5z7Hg5/

Expand full comment

My experience has too often been that judges don’t care about answers. Especially in political cases. Can society’s self-genocide be any more political ? Have any more severe repercussions for the judge, his family, his neighbors ... &c.

Expand full comment

Brilliant. Thank you!

Expand full comment

Katherine, I greatly appreciate your work! While FDCA 564 (21 USC 360bbb-3) is about unlicensed medical products becoming available to the public via EUA, I am not seeing any section that excludes EUA products from the requirements of "legally effective informed consent" as directed by The Belmont Report of the National Research Act of 1974. The definition of "research" in the The Belmont Report is much broader than just "clinical investigation[s]" as mentioned in 564(k). Section 564(l) makes it pretty clear that every activity laid out in section 564 is optional for all parties. Also, the "option to accept or refuse administration of the product" language in 564(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) appears to be derived out of The Belmont Report's requirement of "[v]oluntariness...free from coercion and undue influence." Any additional insights on this?

Expand full comment

Katherine - it appears that for any government funded medical product, it would be illegal to use coercion or undue influence to achieve public compliance. Do you have any thoughts regarding the Belmont Report? https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

Expand full comment

I pray that truth & justice prevails 🕊️

✝️🙏🏼🇺🇸

Expand full comment

This is a story of our own making. The global elites were smart (and rich and greedy and lucky and opportunist) enough to capitalize on our self-destruction at every turn. They give us puppetry and we re-elect them, despite their failures, and accept their establishment of surveillance, war and tyranny. They’ve reigned us in almost with our blessing. We were and continue to be an easy mark. We have no one to blame but ourselves.

Expand full comment

Well said. Also, the bedrock of Klaus' assurance that ..."they will own/admit nothing, and me/be happy."

I mean, it takes some kind of giinormous denial mechanism to avoid twenty years of shit in the sky.

Expand full comment

We don`t re elect anybody they are installed and we are doomed

Expand full comment

Yes, that pretty well sums it up. Brilliant. Too bad that is not actually what happens at this time but I do believe it is coming at some point. Keep up the good work. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Follow Clif High's substsck if you want a glimpse of the future. Follow him on Bitchute too. We are getting close to many of his forecasts coming to pass. He checks temporal markers to his forecasts and they are ticking off NOW!

Expand full comment

And if it happened, if the DoD atty fessed up, if it became generally known and accepted as true ...

... would it make a difference ? It’s a war, they want us dead and they will not stop. How about you?

Expand full comment

Agreed. They just kill the judge and move on

Expand full comment

It might. Yes it is a war. Actually if you were born after 1940, a certificate of live birth was issued in lower case letters and sent to the state you were born in and a birth certificate in all capital letters was issued which made you a corporation. You were reported as lost at sea and your birth certificate was sold many times over and money loaned against it. I am very much alive and intend to stay that way and collect what is due to me so I can do humanitarian projects with it. God wins.

Expand full comment

I’ll bite:

Catholics: get in the state of Grace,

go to confession

Pray always

Pray before all meals, give thanks and bless your food

Pray the Rosary daily

Next level: join the Auxilium Christianorum

We are dealing with evil they is beyond human means, but not above the heavenly forces

In the end, the Immaculate Hearts of Jesus and Mary will triumph

Keep hope

Expand full comment

Nothing fictitious about this...

Expand full comment

Re: the brothers Strecker: I have no idea what all they were up to, but, there wasn't an AIDS virus then, & there isn't one now. Which is not to say that a lot of our regressive tax dollars weren't wasted on flawed, erroneous, & useless "research," killing mostly gay men w/ dusted-off chemo drugs too deadly to use on cancer, propaganda/lies, Dr. Fauci, etc. etc.

Expand full comment

Good story. Maybe something like that will actually occur. Who knows?

I'd be a little cautious about relying of the Deagel Forecast tho. James Corbett of the Corbett Report did a deep dive on this website some time ago and came to the conclusion that it was just the imaginations of a single man in his basement, so to speak. There seemed to be no credible links to any inside knowledge. So there's that.

Expand full comment

🔥🔥🔥 Just wow!

Expand full comment

Wow oh wow. You really rocked on this one Katherine. How could you weave your tale and incorporate all the evil deeds of the banking cartel in one novel piece. What a masterpiece !!! Merci beaucoup

Expand full comment

Holy crappola, batgirl!...for sure most of this is FACT, not fiction. However, I doubt the court will go much beyond telling pfizer to get their sh*t together with the DOD next time. Case dismissed.

You (the innocent defendant) are free to carry on extermination of as many humans as possible in the next 2-3 years. But no nukes in Teaxs...anywhere else if fine.

Expand full comment