Whistleblower-warrior Brook Jackson’s legal team led by Attorney Robert Barnes filed her response to the US Government’s Oct. 4 Statement of Interest in support of Pfizer’s April 22 Motion to Dismiss: Oct. 27, 2022 - Relator Brook Jackson’s Response to Statement of Interest
Original version incorrectly stated Judge's name as Matthew Truncale. His name is Michael Truncale. Error now corrected!
Praying for the judge and Brooke & team.
I heave a deep sigh at all the work you do. You are an inspiration to keep on keeping on.
Blessings and be well,
Katherine, another concise and powerful analysis! What can the everyday people that are awake and aware of the 4th Unelected Branch of Government's (DOD, et al) criminality and war crimes do? Are there actions you recommend the people can take specifically against this known charade of Clinical Trials and their poisonous fruits, the 'data and results' the FDA and CDC use to support the destructive and rights-limiting Guidance they to our People (through the media), our Government Agencies, and Corporations? Perhaps something we can file in court in support of Brook Jackson's case? And if not that, can we hold our own local government officials, employers and others accountable with this knowledge?
Thank you for publishing your research. Every avenue of resistance must be tried until one gains traction. The enemy is not an idiot but they may have made mistakes that can be exploited and they may have left some lever that we can use.
Thank you for the update.
🤗🤗 I'm so glad your most excellent substack is finally getting the attention it deserves from some of the lead activists, like Dr McCullough. Thank you for the thousands of hours you have dedicated to the minutia of legalities around this con of the millennium.👏👏👏👍🙏❤
The enormous complexities of what is legally ultimately a rather straightforward case of coporate criminal fraud make me wonder about the wisdom of a shotgun pro se strategy that Todd Calendar has in mind. I can see some obvious benefit to it in that maybe some pro se litigants luck into an honest judge's courtroom, are competent enough therein, and that their discovery turns up damaging info or the case even results in a sound judgement for a pro se plaintiff but given how rigged the system is it raises alot of questions.
Are you saying that once Jackson's legal team embarks upon this pathway they can pursue no other, even if discovery uncovers some new information? Or are you saying they are using this approach to achieve discovery so as to throw the door open to other avenues later?