Discover more from Bailiwick News
In 2011, Congress prohibited patent-based ownership of humans.
In 2013, the Supreme Court upheld patent-based ownership of genetically-modified living organisms.
The recent filing of a patent case by Moderna against Pfizer, may be part of the legal process that brings the conflict between the 2011 statute and the 2013 Supreme Court precedent to a head.
Arkmedic has an excellent report out today on the juxtaposition of
the Moderna v. Pfizer patent case filed a few days ago;
a new preprint paper by Qin et al, confirming transmission of modified genetic material from mouse mothers to mouse offspring, following mRNA/LNP injections, through the oocytes;
Percy Schmeiser v. Monsanto, a 2004 Canadian Supreme Court case; and
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, a 2013 SCOTUS case
I’ve covered this issue a few times since my journey into the legal thicket began, including:
As we all know by now, we’re dealing with extremely bad stuff.
Evil power plays for mass enslavement.
Lethal injections for mass depopulation.
I don’t write about it enough, but there are threads of goodness woven through history, including the legal history where I spend most of my time.
For example, the US Constitution when upheld does help individual humans freely make our way through our earthly human lives with lots of opportunities to work and pray with fortitude, increase in faith, hope and charity, fight evil, promote justice, temperance, prudence and mercy, and make our way toward eternal salvation.
Other examples from the last few decades of Congressional activity include the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which have been effective legal tools for many people resisting the isolate/mask/test/vaxx pressures of the Covid-times brought to bear by the 2001 PATRIOT Act, 2004 Project Bioshield Act, 2005 PREP Act and related public health-police state enabling legislation.
The 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act is another one: Section 33 limits the authority of the US patent office under 35 USC 101, by prohibiting issuing of patents “directed to or encompassing a human organism.”
And then there are the laws prohibiting fraud, extortion, chemical and biological weapons development and use, genocide and war crimes, and many others.
The history of American law-making is not monolithic badness and universal legislative cooperation with evil.
God has seen fit to plant fruitful seeds of statutory goodness all throughout the weeds that are so distractingly prominent right now.
We’re tasked with tending those good seeds and yanking out the weeds by the roots to burn.
I got into a short discussion in a recent comment thread about the dark history of the human families who direct from the shadows the somewhat visible Rothschild and Rockefeller layer, who direct the even more visible Kissinger, Gates, Soros, Schwab, Fauci and Tedros layer, who direct the most visible layer: the talking heads on television, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, store clerks, police officers, judges, friends and neighbors more or less obligingly caught up in the lies, the coercion and the cull.
Who are each capable of standing up and saying “No.” at any moment.
One reader suggested that perhaps I use the word “secular” euphemistically when I identify the enemy as the secular globalist death cult. The reader expressed concern that such religious terminology makes the tent for resisters too small.
I don’t mean it euphemistically.
It's an ontologically-significant truth about the globalist death cult. Rothschild, Rockefeller, Kissinger, Soros, Schwab, Gates, Fauci etc. would like to substitute themselves for God, substitute secular technocracy for Christianity, render themselves immortal through AI, cloning and other technologies, grant themselves the power over life and death for all living creatures and the power to control the minds and movements of those creatures they permit to survive.
Transhumanist globalism is heresy.
The 'tent' is big enough for those who don't approach it from a Christ-centered understanding of the world. There's no religious litmus test for filing a pro se complaint or taking any other act.
Another reader sent me links to research work of her own and others, tracing the lineage of the Venetian Black Nobility.
Thank you for that link and the one about rule of law. I read both this evening — had seen another version of the second one that someone sent me a couple of months ago but not had a chance to read it through.
I understand that there are more layers of human (and non-human) orchestration above the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, and multi-century history of development of these forces.
There may come a time when I can look more closely at those things and develop more ideas about how to confront them.
For now (the crisis we're now dealing with), I think fostering effective counter-forces includes protecting and using the English-derived legal systems and the U.S. Constitution — even if the evil forces set them up intending them to be part of the illusions and distractions they use to try to maintain control — as if those legal systems' protections for the liberty and dignity of the individual human being are powerful and true, albeit imperfect, reflections of Divine law.
If God's plan for Creation is to help fallen humans grow our virtues, master our vices, and obtain the promises of Heaven through working through the suffering and temptations that we face in our earthly lives, then it seems possible — likely, even — that His work is embedded and woven into even the things that the evil ones thought they fully controlled themselves for only their own evil purposes.
And I do think the US Constitution as a governing contract, and America as a sovereign nation built on that contract — as those things have been generally understood (not the hidden version explicated in the research to which you and others have linked) — are Divinely-inspired things.
I think they're worthy objects of reverence and protection and loyalty.