72 Comments

My question regarding Robert Barnes strategy is this: Have you considered he may be a wolf in sheep's clothing? In other word do you know who his master is? It should be his client and his intent to win the case but what if it is to utilize a strategy that will lose the case and protect those he really serves. How do you tell the good guys from the bad (evil) guys? Just a thought.

Expand full comment

there are ppl all over twitter calling out those that are working to expose what's going on as Controlled Opposition, i.e. working for them. Robert Malone, Tucker Carlson and Russell Brand for example. It does not help our cause one iota to accuse somebody like this without proof. I know the phenomenon exists whereby CIA employs "limited hangout" and for me possibly TC could well be that. However none of the above have actually done anything against our cause and have furthered it no end. Those that don't e.g. Robert Barnes should be suspect. What I am saying is it's very easy to call someone out and would be a tactic used by them to divide us

Expand full comment

My question was not to call him out but was just a question regarding his current actions. When someone does not utilize everything that is available to him or her to achieve the desired goal and goes ahead in a single direction I believe deserves to be questioned, including me. We must stand united in order to win but you have to be aware of what the others around you are doing, their actions. Benedict Arnold would be a good example.

Expand full comment

I agree. B Arnold turned against the Patriots and America for the right offer. So it is absolutely possible that they have gotten to Barnes. His case will not hold water as is.

Expand full comment

Sage Hanna's substack has put all the Robert Malone pieces together. She's done several articles on him. His recent comment to the Daily Beast about all the "conspiracy theorists attacking him" (he really meant "being found out") is proof positive he's controlled opposition. It also emphasizes that there's a great division in the "antivax' side, which doesn't help our cause at all. He's denying that Callahan called him from Wuhan in Jan 2020 and his CIA/DARPA connections, even after he, himself, said these things on Joe Rogan's podcast! It's also documented in RFK Jr's book, which has been out for over a year now, and he's never denied it until now? He's busy suing the Breggins and Dr Jane Ruby and others in the truther movement to waste their time and money defending themselves in court, rather than being able to further their research and get info out to the public. And for me -a HUGE RED FLAG- Robert Malone invented the mRNA technology so one would THINK he'd be "smart" enough to avoid the jabs. But supposedly he took not one but TWO? And claims he was injured. And now says NO one should be jabbed with this kinda tech. Seems like he woulda had that knowledge beforehand, no? Sounds like he just wants to give the impression he, too was "tricked" and is also "one of us". There's several other data points about him and they all add up to he's controlled opposition. And a huge source of distraction. The guy is first on-scene in most anything vax related but others can't even get acknowledged by MSM. Kinda like Forrest Gump showing up in all important points in history!

https://sagehana.substack.com/p/here-is-a-prime-example-of-how-mockingbird

Expand full comment

He'll yes ConcernedGrammy!!! Sage lays it out very well. Another is Andrew Huff. Huff is the younger, less suave version of 🐴 , definitely another spooksmodel from Spooksville. He recently (Huff) was on Man In America show stating the CIA stole his top secret dataset on Bioterrorism against US food supply from his home in Michigan. Yeah, right?! Most likely because his book on Wuhan was a limited hangout and he has lost relevance. Or perhaps he's writing another on the fragility of our food supply? It's all bs or a grift or both. Here's the link:

https://rumble.com/v28wa0c-proof-theyre-deliberately-destroying-our-food-supply-dr.-andrew-huff-interv.html

Expand full comment

There's a series on now called Vaccines Revealed 2023 - Malone was on in episode 4 and he just stated the same story, about a CIA agent calling him from Wuhan and telling him "to get his team spun up." He didn't mention Callahan's name thos time, but it's word for word what he said on Rogan and what HE TOTALLY DENIED to Daily Beast.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Feb 16, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

I’m very surprised that the Hirsch expose missed out UK entirely. It no longer has ‘fighting units’ having been redesigned to be the ‘intelligence arm’ of the EU’s integrated army and NATO.

Add to the above, it was Johnson who put a cork into having any peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia.

Plus the Covid Psyop came from Spi-B and Nudge unit under the UK cabinet office and it’s army of keyboard warriors. Bot army.

Of course anyone with a still functioning brain knew WE (NATO) did it.

As for false frontmen in the movement, I have concluded it’s whether or not they express Real emotion. When Yeadon, Wolfe,Kingston, Breggin, Bhakdi, Zelenko etc speak about those injured,dead, or the babies lost - they are truly heartbroken.

Tbh I’ve never seen real emotion with Maalone. His face, voice and persona are too well controlled. Like an artifice.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Feb 22, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Only time the Lord reveals what a person is, for real, is almost like I can see their demons. I mean not like I’m The Devil’s advocate as their faces morph into demons. But it’s like a feeling. I see it with Blair,, Rich-ie Sunak, Hancock, Biden is more ghoulish as is Soros, Buffet and Gates.

As for Naomi, this biotech is out of her area of understanding. However, she was a Rhodes scholar. As was Hilary and many others that I can’t recall from the progressive aisle. Round tables, Bilderberg.

I no longer trust anyone. It’s a matter of gleaming as much info as one can.

NO HEROES . CREATING THEM IS IDOLATRY.

Expand full comment

Interesting comment. My comment was made in the most general sense but I get what you are saying. The only two names I recognize are Matt Taibbi and Tucker Carlson and I do not follow what they publish. According to the first amendment they are free to express their viewpoint as long as it is legal and does not put others in danger. I know this, that there are many distractions and often it is difficult to discern the truth. I tend to look at the big picture and how each of the pieces fit into the puzzle, is it logical and is there more than one source. Then I analyze it and make my decision about what was said for myself. It has to make sense.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Feb 17, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Love to know who your handful of substacks that are of use. Please share.

Expand full comment

🎯 read on Barnes. I agree.

Expand full comment

was about to write exactly what you already have!

Expand full comment

Sorry, but my studying of the case indicates that you a wrong.

Expand full comment

I am surprised by Barnes.

He can bring ALL of the theories, and should.

I'd be wanting to look at all the potential bad news of my strategy. That's why I had other lawyers look at my stuff and poke holes in it, ask questions. Yeah, I paid them for it, too (retired attorney). I was on a limited budget, but I found a way. Saved me a lot of grief and $.

Expand full comment

Katherine, you just FOUND THE ONE RING. One RING to rule them all, one ring to bind them One Ring to bring them all, and in the DARKNESS Bind them.

BIS - the Bank for International Settlements. To which ALL CENTRAL BANKS AND THUS GOVERNMENTS ARE BEHOLDEN.

This is the mysterious entity behind all of it...

And BIS is privately owned...and I think I know by whom.

This: Spells it out...the central bank of central banks: https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/what-s-really-keeping-covid-going-and-how-we-stop-it

Thank you for solving the puzzle. Now we have to figure out what we are gonna do about it.

Expand full comment

"58% of the ownership of The Federal Reserve Bank is held by ONE family—the Rothschild."

-from that article.

Is that true? What is the source of that? There must be some documentation, some proof, and if its true, then this would be very important because, given what's been done -13 to 25 million dead *just so far*- then names have to be named.

Not names of committees or names of clubs or names of organizations, but names of *people*.

Expand full comment

Can you find out who owns the Bank for International Settlements? aka the central banks' Central Bank? It too is privately held....but I don't think anyone knows who the owners are...suspect the same people, but my curiousity is strong on this...

Expand full comment

I thought the central banks of each country together own the BIS. But the U.S. Fed must be the elephant in that room.

Who owns the U.S. Federal Reserve? They print our money. They pretend to be a government entity. But we're not allowed to know who owns them?

The Substack scientists should be working on that, instead of ringing doorbells or producing endless charts showing that we're being killed.

Maybe ChatGPT knows...

Expand full comment

Historical Analysis of the Global Elite: Ransacking the World Economy Until ‘You’ll Own Nothing.’

https://www.globalresearch.ca/historical-analysis-of-the-global-elite-ransacking-the-world-economy-until-youll-own-nothing

Expand full comment

Century of Enslavement: The History of the Federal Reserve

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zwdCl18pslkC/

Expand full comment

No, the central banks do not own the BIS. I think it is privately owned.

Expand full comment

Great read here Duchess:

Tower of Basel: The Inside Story of the Central Bankers' Secret Bank by Adam LeBor https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15843114-tower-of-basel

Expand full comment

"the BIS is owned by 63 central banks"

- from bis.org

Expand full comment

Thanks. I should have looked it up. Do they list the Central Banks?

Expand full comment

This BIS issue brings new incite to the scriptural teaching that the love of money is the root of all evil. It certainly is a potent means to accomplishing evil.

Expand full comment

Are we out of time?

Expand full comment

Never say never.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this. Interesting

Expand full comment

Spot on about Barnes. I get that he has to make Pfizer the villain because he can’t sue DoD...but to bring you and Sasha into it was unnecessary and a cheap shot.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Feb 16, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Agreed

Expand full comment

I don't trust Robert Barnes, he was at one time and might still be a lawyer for the Father of the Vaccine. His involvement here is very suspicious to me, sounds like at least a conflict of interest to me.

Expand full comment

Robert Barnes says you did not read the contracts. According to him, the contracts stipulate that the products (whatever you call them) were to stop getting and transmitting covid19. They did not do that and on that basis Pfizer committed fraud. So, did you read the contracts? That is key. I agree 100% that all these so called vaccines are bad, not just Pfizer's and none of them actually work like the whooping cough vaccine that represses symptoms but does nothing about catching or transmitting the disease, like the polio vaccine that spreads the disease at the diaper changing table in daycare, or the pneumonia vaccine that has created a nightmare of variants that really pummel the elderly or go down the list of required vaccines...all of them...bad news,... even the measles vaccine that does not stop measles in a whole bunch of people and creates stealth virus. So... still we need to know if you read the contract and did Pfizer commit fraud?

Expand full comment

Read it very very carefullyhttps://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/repost-other-transaction-authority?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android

Expand full comment

Why was I seeing BS like "vaccine liability" and other phrases like it? THERE IS NO VACCINE! Or have they suddenly discovered one? They are looking for a virus, I've been told many times that CV is a bacterium, perhaps that would help them. Either way it's a braindead hoax!! However, Duchess has centered in on where it has been funded.

Expand full comment

Thank you Katherine.

Expand full comment

Katherine, you are a modern day Joan of Arc!!💜💜

Expand full comment

As to the Barnes hubris/gravitas framing (which I concur as being probable), this would truly disappoint me:

"I think Barnes is going to drive her case right into dismissal for her by failing to see and present the evidence in the way that Sasha and I see it and present it."

Expand full comment

Sounds like she should get a different lawyer.

Expand full comment

Yeah. Something smells in his kitchen.

Expand full comment

Barnes appears to me to be doing his client a great disservice by being too lazy to change his legal strategy.

Expand full comment

Maybe we could ask for clarification from these esteemed groups:

- Trusted News Initiative

- EU Commission for Values and Transparency

Expand full comment

— “ INTERNATIONAL L A W “ D O E S N O T —

SUPER-CEDE “NATIONAL — LOCAL LAW” …. !!!! —

Expand full comment

First thank you very much for turning an eye on Europe, your engagement is contradicting my prejudices toward americans being self centered and egoistic and I am very grateful to this!

just a correction regarding Germany:

it said in your article: "In Germany they installed a new Department 6 “Health Protection, Health Safety, Sustainability” in the second half of 2019. On March 1, 2020, a military general became head of this department with two sub-departments with five specialist departments each, including departments on national and international crisis management. He was also head of the “Corona Pandemic Crisis Management Team” and led the Health Ministry at the end of 2021."

the last part of the sentence is not correct Head of the ministry of Health until 11/2021 had been Jens Spahn (former bankster). since election and new coalition (8th of decembre 2021) then it is Karl Lauterbach (covidian panictrumpet with dubious titles and background, vaccinated children!).

the first military had been: (wikipedia)Hans-Ulrich Holtherm As early as March 1, 2020, however, he was then appointed head of the new Department 6 Health Protection, Health Security, Sustainability in the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG). Here, he was also promoted to Surgeon General on May 28, 2020.[7]During his assignment at the BMG, Holtherm also assumed the role as head of the Ministry of Health's "CORONA Pandemic Crisis Staff" and, together with the Head of the Public Safety (ÖS) Department of the Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI), headed the interdepartmental "Joint BMI-BMG COVID 19 Crisis Staff" at the ministerial department head level. Towards the European Union (EU), he was designated as Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of the Federal Republic of Germany during this period. On December 15, 2021, Holtherm was given command of the Bundeswehr Medical Academy, which had previously been led by Gesine Krüger.[8]

an then:

Carsten Breuer

On November 30, 2021, Breuer was appointed head of the Corona Crisis Staff in the Federal Chancellery planned by the traffic light coalition, whose goal was to improve coordination of the nationwide fight against the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.[3][4][5] In May 2022, the crisis staff was disbanded again.[6]

under the former government : On January 10, 2018, Breuer succeeded Major General Jürgen Knappe as commander of the Bundeswehr Territorial Tasks Command in Berlin. In this post, Breuer has been organizing the Bundeswehr's administrative assistance on the occasion of the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020. This includes the use of soldiers in health offices or clinics, the establishment and operation of vaccination centers, and the distribution of vaccines.[2]

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

if you want to get a visual impression you can look some of it up here:

https://www.corodok.de/bundeswhere-im-kampfeinsatz/

Expand full comment

and as NATO already in 2019 did a workshop on biosecurity on J.Hopkins university among many other hints the German ministry of defense published on it's website https://www.bmvg.de/de/aktuelles/nato-verteidigungsminister-gemeinsam-stark-durch-krise-corona-249870

...According to AKK[Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer M.o.D.], all NATO partners are affected by the pandemic - but not "in the same way and at the same time." Thus, he said, member states support each other most effectively when their resources are deployed in a coordinated manner.

Countering disinformation and fake news

"An additional challenge in the Corona crisis, according to Secretary General Stoltenberg, is disinformation and fake news from state and non-state actors. Their goal, he said, is to undermine member states' democracies. Defense ministers agreed to continue countering fake news with facts and concrete actions. "We are now working even more closely with allies and the European Union," the NATO secretary general said. The goal, he said, is to "monitor and detect disinformation and respond accordingly.""

I can no other think of this "health crisis" as a military operation.

Thank you and Sasha who helped a lot to clarify the links.

Expand full comment

Geez! Katherine....here's the FDA shill talking about "countermeasures", and so much more, from the Milken Institute's infamous 2017 "session". The real "serpents" in full play:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MJX9X7mQIt4C/

Excellent researcher, that Tim Truth.

Expand full comment