Prosecute war criminals in personal capacity or US Government official capacity?
Very well summarized and the logic, and actual application of law, is spot on IMO. Those taking up physical positions in government, but are not fulfilling the ONLY duty of the positions of government which is the protection and defense of the sovereign people and their property (highest form of right a man or woman has). This man or woman is openly defying their duty in said position and as such are directly culpable and a perpetrator of trespass. The result is they can be personally held to account for the trespass with facts, findings, evidence and conclusions of law in a court of their peers (trial-by-jury - NOT jury trial) for the trespass in controversy of a value greater than $20 to obtain a decision on remedy and restitution that fits the crime of trespass proven. The best part is this must occur in the jurisdiction of the trespass which is the district and county of the man or woman who was harmed by trespass. This would include your local doctor pushing the bio-weapon medical countermeasure, the nurse, the medical office manager, the lawyer OR attorney (be cautious as "lawyer", "attorney", and "counsel" all have very different meanings), CPS (child protective services) people, corporate officers of companies, and the list goes on.
As noted, this is one way to handle the mess. If all the minions received notices for trespass at the lowest levels first and we all worked up the chain, it would send a message as well.
List of possible trespass by way of (examples with definition):
1) Harm - "physical or mental damage; to damage physically or mentally : to cause harm"
2) Damage to Person - "Bodily or physical injury directly resulting from wrongful act, whether lying in trespass or trespass on the case, and does not include torts directly affecting the person but affecting only the feelings and reputation."
3) False Witness - usually a lie that results in the commitment of fraud by default and/or possibly theft.
4) Theft (of business, property, job, etc...)
extortion - "Illegal use of one's official position or powers to obtain property, funds, or patronage. The act or an instance of extorting something, as by psychological pressure. An excessive or exorbitant charge."
5) coercion - "Compulsion; constraint; compelling by force or arms. It may be actual, direct, or positive, as where physical force is used to compel act against one's will, or implied, legal or constructive, as where one party is constrained by subjugation to other to do what his free will would refuse. It may be actual or threatened exercise of power possessed, or supposedly possessed.
6) Fraud - "An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right; a false representation of a matter of fact, whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of that which should have been disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive another so that he shall act upon it to his legal injury. Any kind of artifice employed by one person to deceive another. A generic term, embracing all multifarious means which human ingenuity can devise, and which are resorted to by one individual to get advantage over another by false suggestions or by suppression of truth, and includes all surprise, trick, cunning, dissembling, and any unfair way by which another is cheated.
Quick note on the definition of property: "Something exclusive to i, from all others in society; highest right a man or woman has, exclusive to all others in society". Taking property is a trespass by way of theft, for example.
This is very good reasoning. I believe it applies to every person/group/entity which claims sovereign immunity. BIS is a bank. What part of its legitimate charter as a bank allows them to control governments, people, causing crimes against humanity. BMGF is chartered as a charitable entity. What part of being a legitimate charitable entity allow war crimes such as sterilization and murder? And so on.
Even if the psychopaths put their charter as--we can commit any crime and we cannot be prosecuted for it, well who cares. That's not a legitimate legal document.
As they don't openly say it, we can go by their charters and see if that is what they are engaged in doing. The crimes are not covered in their charter and they have no immunity for those crimes. They should be sued in their personal capacity for fraud, murder, torture, genocide and crimes against humanity.
That there were and are no autopsies done on supposed "Covid deaths" when what was being touted as "Covid" was supposedly a "unique viral pathogen" illustrates a pre-planned cover-up and fraud.
In the past when there were deaths caused by what was considered to be a novel disease the medical and scientific establishment would investigate through autopsies in order to understand both origins and treatments.
Why not with "Covid?" In fact they mandated that autopsies NOT be done. I think the answer is pretty obvious.
That there are no (or few) autopsies being done on "sudden deaths" and the numerous instances of post-vaxx deaths from strokes/heart attacks etc., given the frequency with which they are happening, illustrates the same dynamics at play.
This is purposeful withholding of information in the face of potential criminal acts and again points to cover-up, fraud and criminal conspiracy.
Wow Katherine! This is sooo powerful it gave me chills and brought tears to my eyes!!! You take us step by step through complex issues with absolute ease of explanation !! You break it down superbly. Reading this gave me a new jolt of courage! We really can do this!!! Thank you for this gift of your intellect and use of language to help map this course out! My next paycheck I am going to donate more money to help you help lawyers/others in this fight. Many Blessings to you and MUCH Love and Respect! Michelle
Katherine, how do we help? We need someone like you to get a team together and then recruit the lawyers maybe with the help of Naomi Wolf, Jeff Childers, ICAN ,etc. , and then tell us how much we need...we can GiveSendGo as an entire country. I'm wllling to support anyway I can. Let me know .
Katherine: I like the Aristotelian/Thomistic analysis you made, but I have one reaction/suggestion with respect to the sentence which follows:
"To sum up, if an illegal, immoral war is being waged on the people, (it is) and if it’s legally and morally impossible for a VALID government to do such things, in the course of VALID official duties (it is), then by legal and moral definition, the people doing these things are not of, from or inside the US Government." I think you mean to say 'the people doing these things are not of, from or inside the VALID US government' since they are in fact of, from and inside a rogue entity that appears to have the same 'form" (external characteristics/superstructure) as the VALID government but not the same substance (thought of as the [internal characteristics] such as a functioning constitution, legitimate/just laws consistent with it, as well as with the natural and Divine law). The people doing these things are tools/agents of a rogue/foreign entity that has declared war on humanity. To do this they surreptitiously/covertly displaced the legitimate gov(s).
Well, this is the scary hard truth. A lot of people are stuck in the mindset that if we just convince the public health officials and the medical industrial complex that the "vaccines" are dangerous, we can stop what is going on. That is clearly a dead end. The silver lining in pursuing that avenue is that at least it is educating people that the regulatory agencies do not care at all about how dangerous and ineffective the "vaccine" is.
I still recall hearing that in the Brook Jackson case, Pfizer's defense amounted to something like, 'The FDA knew we were committing fraud, so we aren't responsible.' That didn't make sense to me at the time but it all lines up with what we are actually up against now that you have exposed the real problem at its root. The government agencies are being used to wage war on their people.
I hope all legal avenues are pursued and I hope there is victory. It seems unlikely but it's something to hope for and probably the best alternative to what is possibly ahead of us.
We surely are in a pickle aren't we but I do believe good will overcome when enough who know participate in bringing that about. When we hurry up and figure out that 99% of the world is good and just, it will be much easier than we think to eradicate that 1% without hate in our heart but for the love for our fellow humans, children, mothers, fathers, brothers. This horror is unbearable to watch. Only courage with the goal to turn it around will get us through this.
Mar 25.22 @11 - 14 mins https://www.bitchute.com/video/QMzzZi1s3EaE/
Every elected official must have a surety bond. They take an oath of office that generally says they will uphold the Constitution of the USA … The surety bond plays into that. The surety bond is there to ensure they are financially accountable for their actions. The governmental agency pays the annual fee for the surety bond but the public official is liable for any claims against the bond.
If you file a $500,000 claim against a public official and that claim is considered valid, the surety bond company pays the claim and then goes back to the public official to collect the money.
Only Catholics pray the Rosary. So perhaps just tell people to Pray and turn back to God our saviour. Great article and good advice because at the end of the day I believe it is going to get down to us vs. them.
#1 and #3: Praise the Lord and pass the Ammunition. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. Pandemic and War are early round action to size up and wear down the opponent. Best wishes!
Katherine, just wanted to say that I enjoy all of the difficult work that you’re doing immensely. I would like to recommend that you try and coordinate your efforts with two patriot attorneys that I have had some interaction with over the last year. The first one is Tom Renz, and he is available on Substack. The other one is Tom Callender. I think you all would benefit by discussing your work and coordinating efforts. I highly recommend them both, and hope you’ll make some effort to try and establish contact with them if you have not already done so.
I am relieved by your thoughtful analysis of the perpetrators of the COVID lie and conclusion they are not valid members of government. That means, I think, that they can be sued.
Do you see any place for something like the Nurenberg trials?
What I find interesting Katherine ( not to change subject) , our big powerful TV commercial attorneys are not involving themselves in any jabbed lawsuits . If there was money to be made , they would be on it like flies on poop. So.... they know the time is not right yet , or will it ever be ? I’m keeping my eyes on them.
Katherine, you investigation has been outstanding.
However I think you're after the little fish. This is a global operation, much of it run by the US security state with a slew of patsies. Prosecuting the front people doesn't bring this down, even if you can get the system which is orchestrating this to throw a couple under the bus.
As far as ignoring statistics or whether a "virus" has ever been proven...I don't think ignoring that should be part of any strategy - though you may not want to prove it in court. As far as strange illnesses in 2019 where's your evidence that something very different was occurring. Some people may have been suffering from the installation of 5G (the incidents of so-called pandemic was isolated mostly in urban centers where 5G was in the process of deployment.) I really don't think one should dismiss the all-cause-mortality which pin-points where and when peak deaths occurred and coincided with the injections relative to previous years. These studies are very important to any case.
This was not a health emergency...and strange symptoms can be found for any number of reasons scattered due to fear-factors and a number of proven psychological effects. I wouldn't make that argument in court - but than you seem to have more confidence in the judicial system than I do.
Keeping the system in tact suggests you think that this is just about a "few bad apples". I don't think you do, but that's what you point suggests.
This is a war, and has been for a very long time, but has been escalated over the last few years. I'm uncertain that the people you want to help will be with you or be against you. Communications are entirely under TPTB control.
If the Pulitzer Prize had any legitimacy you and Sasha Latypova would share it this year along with the Nobel Peace Prize (another dubious entity). I learned of your work via Meryl Nass, MD pointing me to Sasha Latypova's Due Diligence and Art in her Substack and how much worse but clearer the world seems. As a new subscriber, I just wanted to thank you for your work and pray that you both continue to throw light on this war against the world's non-billionaires.