Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Katherine Watt's avatar

Reader sent me an email raising a related point, referring to issues raised by Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney and Attorney Todd Callender during a podcast posted Feb. 12, 2022.

https://www.americaoutloud.com/hemorrhagic-fevers-diabolical-warfare-plan-exposed/

Reader writes: “Lt. Gen. McInerney argues the position that COVID19 is a deliberate biological attack [as a form of asymmetrical warfare - https://www.britannica.com/topic/asymmetrical-warfare] from the Chinese Communist Party rather than a medical pandemic [and that] if this is true, then the treaties with the W.H.O. can be declared void.”

The idea being that, so long as the event is classified as a pandemic, the WHO International Health Regulations are in force, but if the event is classified as an act of war or bioterrorism, different international legal frameworks come into play.

I listened to that podcast shortly after it came out, and posted a couple of times about the likelihood that HHS and its globalist/communist handlers anticipated that maneuver and put provisions into the Code of Federal Regulations to head it off early.

March14 - https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/modernas-2013-patent-on-furin-cleavage

April 11 - https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/parallel-statutory-and-international?s=w

Summarizing: HHS/US Gov took a step, on Nov. 17, 2021, to blur the lines between biowarfare and public health, when they added engineered chimeric SARS-CoV-2 to the list of toxins that pose public health threats.

I think they did that specifically to muddy things and give themselves some more legal cover for their actions, by trying to ensure that all the gov’t acts undertaken since the start of the outbreak are classified as public health measures, even if the lab-creation, military deployment of SARS-CoV-2 becomes common knowledge.

The reader who sent the email about McInerney’s argument also wrote about elements of international laws of war:

“Callender made a correlation between the Treaty at the Hague http://lawofwar.org/hague_iv.htm and McInerney’s act of biowarfare argument.

Although Callender used the term “alien occupier” I can find only the term “occupying State.”

I am assuming that Callender is referencing; Section III. Military Authority over the territory of the hostile state at Article 42. Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army.

This seems to me reminiscent of General Orders No. 100: promulgated by Abraham Lincoln 24 April 1863. (commonly known as the Lieber Code) at Sec. 1. Art 1.

“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest.” https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/lieber.asp

Thus, there is no requirement for public notice nor the presence of an occupying force, but simply a surrender to an “occupying State” to effect martial law. This we have done with the International Health Regulations (2005).”

—-

I replied to the reader: I agree with your conclusion. I think that was the point all along, since the mid-1940s - to figure out how to take over a country without any armed invasion or announcement of occupation, by occupying it from within, gradually, over decades of legal changes and changing how the people in positions of authority think of themselves, their country and their relationship to the citizens.

One other point: I recently found an Executive Order signed by Obama relating to handling of civilian casualties.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2016-07-07/pdf/2016-16295.pdf

2016/07/01 - Executive Order 13732, US Policy on Pre- and Post-strike measures to address civilian casualties in US operations involving use of force.

My initial understanding is that it relates to the killing of American non-combatants, in areas outside of active hostility areas, in foreign countries and on American soil, with non-traditional weapons including drones and bioweapons.

However, this executive order is difficult to interpret and it’s going to take more time and more research to fit it into the overall puzzle well.

Several of the writers who have analyzed it suggest that it refers also, or primarily, to the people who would carry out attacks on American citizens, on American soil (rather than the weapon type). For example, it may mean that foreign occupying forces, such as UN troops or Chinese mercenaries, would be authorized by the US government to control and kill American civilians.

Others believe it relates more to domestic mercenaries, such as Black Lives Matter and Antifa rioters, who would be contracted to the US government to kill other American citizens and then their families would be compensated if they (the mercenaries, and maybe also the victims) died in the street-level conflicts.

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

When they said they were exempt from all rules, regulations, laws, oversight, morality, responsibility, liability, duty, accusations of fraud, and pretty much anything else, because they were co-conspirators with the US Government against not just US citizens, but the entirety of humanity, it was the first genuinely true thing they have said. I feel we need similar statements from them about China, Russia, the CDC, W.H.O., the Wuhan Virology Institute, Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, and the innumerable other individuals and public-private partnerships, domestic and foreign intel agencies, the WEF, George Soros, Ukraine, and, well, it is a long list!

Such statements will come in very handy at the Nuremberg 2.0 trials, which I sincerely hope, won't be held in Germany, or even Europe. I'm more thinking the South Shetland Islands, and at the immediate conclusion of the event, all of the convicted can be rapidly dispatched to the interior of Antartica where "Global Warming" will be the least of their worries.

Expand full comment
76 more comments...

No posts