Jun 12, 2022·edited Jun 12, 2022Pinned

Reader sent me an email raising a related point, referring to issues raised by Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney and Attorney Todd Callender during a podcast posted Feb. 12, 2022.


Reader writes: “Lt. Gen. McInerney argues the position that COVID19 is a deliberate biological attack [as a form of asymmetrical warfare - https://www.britannica.com/topic/asymmetrical-warfare] from the Chinese Communist Party rather than a medical pandemic [and that] if this is true, then the treaties with the W.H.O. can be declared void.”

The idea being that, so long as the event is classified as a pandemic, the WHO International Health Regulations are in force, but if the event is classified as an act of war or bioterrorism, different international legal frameworks come into play.

I listened to that podcast shortly after it came out, and posted a couple of times about the likelihood that HHS and its globalist/communist handlers anticipated that maneuver and put provisions into the Code of Federal Regulations to head it off early.

March14 - https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/modernas-2013-patent-on-furin-cleavage

April 11 - https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/parallel-statutory-and-international?s=w

Summarizing: HHS/US Gov took a step, on Nov. 17, 2021, to blur the lines between biowarfare and public health, when they added engineered chimeric SARS-CoV-2 to the list of toxins that pose public health threats.

I think they did that specifically to muddy things and give themselves some more legal cover for their actions, by trying to ensure that all the gov’t acts undertaken since the start of the outbreak are classified as public health measures, even if the lab-creation, military deployment of SARS-CoV-2 becomes common knowledge.

The reader who sent the email about McInerney’s argument also wrote about elements of international laws of war:

“Callender made a correlation between the Treaty at the Hague http://lawofwar.org/hague_iv.htm and McInerney’s act of biowarfare argument.

Although Callender used the term “alien occupier” I can find only the term “occupying State.”

I am assuming that Callender is referencing; Section III. Military Authority over the territory of the hostile state at Article 42. Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army.

This seems to me reminiscent of General Orders No. 100: promulgated by Abraham Lincoln 24 April 1863. (commonly known as the Lieber Code) at Sec. 1. Art 1.

“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest.” https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/lieber.asp

Thus, there is no requirement for public notice nor the presence of an occupying force, but simply a surrender to an “occupying State” to effect martial law. This we have done with the International Health Regulations (2005).”


I replied to the reader: I agree with your conclusion. I think that was the point all along, since the mid-1940s - to figure out how to take over a country without any armed invasion or announcement of occupation, by occupying it from within, gradually, over decades of legal changes and changing how the people in positions of authority think of themselves, their country and their relationship to the citizens.

One other point: I recently found an Executive Order signed by Obama relating to handling of civilian casualties.


2016/07/01 - Executive Order 13732, US Policy on Pre- and Post-strike measures to address civilian casualties in US operations involving use of force.

My initial understanding is that it relates to the killing of American non-combatants, in areas outside of active hostility areas, in foreign countries and on American soil, with non-traditional weapons including drones and bioweapons.

However, this executive order is difficult to interpret and it’s going to take more time and more research to fit it into the overall puzzle well.

Several of the writers who have analyzed it suggest that it refers also, or primarily, to the people who would carry out attacks on American citizens, on American soil (rather than the weapon type). For example, it may mean that foreign occupying forces, such as UN troops or Chinese mercenaries, would be authorized by the US government to control and kill American civilians.

Others believe it relates more to domestic mercenaries, such as Black Lives Matter and Antifa rioters, who would be contracted to the US government to kill other American citizens and then their families would be compensated if they (the mercenaries, and maybe also the victims) died in the street-level conflicts.

Expand full comment

When they said they were exempt from all rules, regulations, laws, oversight, morality, responsibility, liability, duty, accusations of fraud, and pretty much anything else, because they were co-conspirators with the US Government against not just US citizens, but the entirety of humanity, it was the first genuinely true thing they have said. I feel we need similar statements from them about China, Russia, the CDC, W.H.O., the Wuhan Virology Institute, Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, and the innumerable other individuals and public-private partnerships, domestic and foreign intel agencies, the WEF, George Soros, Ukraine, and, well, it is a long list!

Such statements will come in very handy at the Nuremberg 2.0 trials, which I sincerely hope, won't be held in Germany, or even Europe. I'm more thinking the South Shetland Islands, and at the immediate conclusion of the event, all of the convicted can be rapidly dispatched to the interior of Antartica where "Global Warming" will be the least of their worries.

Expand full comment
Jun 9, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

Similar to your feelings expressed in your article of April 28th, I am spending time confused, alarmed, and filled with despair. I was under the mistaken belief that Renz in the US and Fuellmich internationally we’re making progress on the road to Nuremberg 2.0. I will remain steadfast in hope and prayer that global humanity will rise above and win against this worldwide governmental tyranny and evil.

Expand full comment
Jun 9, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

This is as effed up as it gets. So, there is no intellectually rational or legal way to stop this rabid innovative bio warfare. That means we must dissolve it with love and light. Unless anybody has another suggestion.

Expand full comment
Jun 9, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

Katherine, if this is a true, why is pHarma desperate to get their clotshots approved and put on the childhood vaccine schedule, if not for the sweeping and open-ended product liability protections?

Expand full comment
Jun 20, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt


There can be no Organic Constitutional violation as you imply. The 1871 Act of Congress 'converted' the wording of same to a D.C. corporate charter upon which Congress could then legislate. Evidence of this is the first four words of the Tenth Amendment, "The powers not delegated..." clearly summarized the Founders' position that the SCOTUS never respected. The Constitution of 1789-91 was one of 'strictly delegated powers'. Thus, if the power was not listed therein, Congress did not have it. Read the Tenth Amendment several times and let that sink in. The BAR Members have been pretending using the Organic Constitution for 151 years, and it is time to expose them for the FRAUD of their intent to commit same. Therein lies the crux of the problem.

Bob Jungles bobj3631@gmail.com

Expand full comment
Jun 15, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

After reading this post, the puzzle pieces are certainly coming together. I can clearly see how it takes real legal scholarship and particular expertise, along with moral fortitude, to do the digging, the deep dives. All this is quite chilling: The long term orchestration, the fine tune engineering, assembling regulations, statutes, laws, rules, accomplices, the entire scaffolding of an evil plan. It’s all quite astonishing. The betrayal, apathy and banal contempt for Americans, and Humanity is so complete, so certain, it leaves no room for doubt. It blows any conspiracy out of the water. This latest revelation, or puzzle piece, is palpable and shatters all illusions of beneficent American life.

Brings the awareness to a whole new level.

If the ‘white hats’ or an ‘Alliance’ are true and real, then they may have been aware of all this in its breath and scope, as they may have been planning and tracking the demons all along.

I hope this is true and consequences will follow.

Expand full comment
Jun 9, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

Wow that’s just plain wrong!

Expand full comment
Jun 20, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt


Some of the very best research you will find is by Anna Von Reitz at www.annavonreitz.com

She has well over 3,000 articles on her website, and it's all about returning to the Common Law of the Organic Constitution. It's about getting the People of the States involved at the local level.

The entire purpose of the Civil War stems from Edmund Burke's speech before the British Parliament in 1774. Summarizing, he stated that, 'Americans were seeking their freedom. We will give them all the freedom they want, and put them under our Acts of Navigation'. The whole purpose of the so-called Civil War was to eliminate the Law of the Land (Common Law) and put America and Americans under the Law of the Sea (British Admiralty Law) combined with Statutory and Roman Civil Law some 85 years later.

The Vatican is the Mother of all Corporations, founded by the Holy See. The Vatican, the City of London, and Washington D.C., are the three City States. The 'Mother corporation' has/had both the Power of the Purse, and the Power of the Sword under its control. Those two powers should never be combined in one entity under its control. The Vatican controlled all municipalities and the British, all States of _____________ as those are the business entities for the soil jurisdiction states, such as Illinois, New York, Texas, Michigan, etc.. The Civil War was fought between the business entities of the respective northern and southern states involved. The soil jurisdictions were not involved.

Of course, all the legal groundwork for what followed other then the War of 1812 to attempt to kill the Original 13th Amendment officially ratified by Virginia in 1816 penalizing those taking Titles of Nobility forbidden by I.9.8 to Federal employees and I.10.1 to State employees. They needed the liawyers and banksters to pull off the Civil War and set-up America for control of the money with taxation and unlimited spending, and thereby, control of America and Americans totally. This was all achieved, and here we are today wondering how the hell they did it, while the vast majority are so dumbed down, they haven't the slightest clue of any of the facts recited above. The Vatican and the British had to have control of those two professions mentioned above to pull off the greatest FRAUD of the 19th Century to entice these two business entities of states to kill off 528,000 of their own people. The only one better is the present COVID-19 SCAMDEMIC !!!

Bob J / bobj3631@gmail.com

Expand full comment

The United States Security State (aka, the Blob, the Military and Intelligence Industrial Complex) is the Global Mall Cop for the Global Oligarchs.

The Blob also gave us the bioweapons to begin with.

The Blob murdered one of our Presidents and that President's brother. Because that family sounded the alarm to the Blob.

The Blob has murdered democratically elected leaders all over the world and fomented color revolutions and burned through trillions in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The Blob created much of the internet and privately outsourced their DARPA surveillance and pre-crime strategies to its Silicon Valley partners, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft.

The Blob works hand in hand with its Global Capital Partners such as Black Rock, State ST. and Vanguard. WEF. WHO. UN.

The Blob has alliances and outgrowths: NATO, Five Eyes, Council for Foreign Relations.

Make no mistake, that WHO Sovereignty Treaty? That is 100% Blob engineered in tandem with WEF, Gates, and Oligarchs R Us.

Nobody would sneak up on The Blob and pull a fast one on them.

There is a reason that the Five Eyes Nations are the ones who went Full on Fascism : NZ, Aussie, Kanada.

Why? Why do they do this?

The bureaucracy of the Blob is self perpetuating. They are a Virus now. And they are unelected, and they are unaccountable. They cannot be challenged.

Expand full comment
Jun 9, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

I stopped reading the stacks on how awful the vaccines are... I only read the titles. Why hear it again???

Your article feels like a rock in quicksand. Thanks. Much. It is closer to ‘What to do??’

Would appreciate ideas on :


Expand full comment
Jun 15, 2022·edited Jun 15, 2022Liked by Katherine Watt

This seems to confirm your analysis and conclusions that given the EUA, it renders no culpability, no responsibility for harm from the architects and their many accomplices implementing this bio weapon.

It is truly sickening, disheartening,

and disgusting.

Today from CHD;

FDA Advisors Unanimously Endorse Pfizer, Moderna COVID Shots for Infants and Young Kids, Ignore Pleas to ‘First Do No Harm’


Expand full comment

While I sincerely believe that the COVID-19 pandemic is the biggest fraud ever, I question your and Sasha Latypova's interpretation of ... "“shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation.” 21 USC 360bbb-3(k)".

The way I read and understand this statement is that issuing an EUA for a product and the EUA product's subsequent use does NOT constitute a clinical investigation. The USE of the product is NOT the clinical investigation. ... this does not mean that the product cannot undergo clinical investigation. This does not mean that EUA products do not exist -- they DO exist -- it's just that USING THEM does not constitute a clinical investigation, according to the statue you quote.

I DO believe that a case could be made that using EUA products constitute an EXPERIMENT with human lives. I DO believe that a case could be made that using EUA products designated as DOD prototypes that potentially put human lives at risk is an extreme ethical violation by DOD and HHS.

I believe that the clinical trials were a sham in their own right, ... that possibly the FDA was under pressure by the DOD to make things move as fast as possible (ignoring the sham trials that look good on paper), because DOD's immediate priority was NOT human health, but rather completing an exercise successfully to deploy a new technology, using the DOD's risk-acceptance philosophy of developing prototypes.

Expand full comment

It seems like fraud against men and women who have inalienable rights would be the way to go.

There is a course called "the sovereign way" which talks about the law for mankind. I haven't taken the course, but it seems that people agree to become a part of the system of law, and to give up their rights as a man or a woman, when entering a court of law and agree to be a "defendant", or signing a contract when our name is spelled in all caps. It seems very interesting, a reflects the truth about how our legal system is set up. When we call ourselves a citizen, or a defendant, we are agreeing to leave the system of men and women with inalienable rights that can put claims against others in court.


I also wonder about a leader who would use our special forces to arrest and charge everyone involved in fraud. Since corporations are people, it seems that the CEOs of the pharmaceutical and media corporations would be the person to arrest and charge with fraud, bevause they are the most obvious person associated with the corporation, which is also a person under the law.

I know it's a stretch, just a thought.

Expand full comment

It is a good thing that this substack is not hidden behind a paywall.

Expand full comment

Katherine, have you read Karen Kingston's substack? She believes firmly that the approval for Comiraty DID happen - read her substack highlighting using patent and research data in the criminals own words - and she also alludes to Malone and others have been blindly followed suggesting it was never approved ..if the Comaraty (spelling) was approved then the EUA shield is NO MORE? Hense they can be tried and prosecuted for their crimes. She also goes on to point out that MRNA has been proven (again by their own words) - see patent language she highlights that it cannot cross human to human. This voids any discussion that this Covid19 was ever a virus when it cannot cross human to human. The "spike" they are talking about is an Artificial Intelligence bioweapon device added to ensure this bio weapon injection to be weaponized into humans. Anyway, she has great legal points (to me) that any God fearing, justice seeking, men/women of legal resources can prove this was an attack on America and American's. Crimes against humanity, violation of Nuremburg and everything the like?

Expand full comment