A few things globalist kill-squad commanders fear, hate and therefore blot from their public-facing acts

in an ultimately futile attempt to make them not be.

1. God

2. Truth

3. Human beings, especially babies and children

4. The immortal human soul

5. The living human body

6. Human conscience

7. Human reason

8. Human will

9. Love between an individual human person and God

10. Love between two individual human people and among human families

11. The human right to be free from violations of conscience (soul-trespass)

12. The human right to be free from bodily trespass

13. The moral and legal principle of informed consent

14. The US Constitution as a legal document articulating the inalienable moral rights of individual human beings to heed the voice of conscience; use the gifts of reason, faith and free will to recognize and draw away from evil and draw nearer to God; and protect our bodies from trespass, without interference from other individuals, from the majority, or from the collective.

---

I wrote this list after reading and thinking about the May 30, 2022 World Health Organization policy brief:

• COVID-19 and mandatory vaccinations: ethical considerations

H/t Jeffrey Hirschfield at Twitter via Susan Olmstead at Children’s Health Defense Fund.

I read it alongside an excellent overview of the transhumanist project from DailyExpose.

Key point from the DailyExpose piece:

Part of why Great Reset adherents seem so dissociated from human life is because they are. Most normal people believe humans are sovereign beings who are free by divine authority.

Technocracy, on the other hand, views humans as a natural resource, no different from an oil deposit or livestock, and they are to be used as such.

---

Thinking about these two pieces — the WHO brief and the transhumanism overview — I was reminded of a note I scribbled down many months ago as I began wrestling with the full, horrifying implications of current events.

“Is pure materialism possible? Can an ideology completely destroy every human’s awareness of soul, capacity for reason, and motivation to exercise free will toward Good and away from Evil?”

No.

Ideology can’t do that. It can kill a lot of people in body, and many ideologies of materialism have killed millions of people over the centuries, especially the 20th. Globalist transhumanism’s body count is high and rising daily.

Ideology can also drive a lot of people to deeply damage their own souls, or lose contact temporarily, sometimes for decades, sometimes right up until they breathe their last breaths.

But the human soul cannot be completely destroyed.

The lost is never more than a moment away from being found.

This inescapable truth drives the globalists bonkers.

---

As with the federal court rulings that ignore all US Constitutional issues raised by those injured through governmental acts committed on the Covid-19 pretext, the devil of the WHO document lies in what’s not in the details: mention of any of those above-listed fundamentals of human existence.

Instead, the transhumanist technocratic authors skip it all, because like the US government working domestically to enslave and/or kill all Americans, the WHO world government is not engaged in an argument on issues of social contract over which reasonable men and women of equal human dignity can differ, set mutually-acceptable boundaries, and come to mutually-respectful terms of co-existence.

They are engaged in a war.

Our bodies and minds are the battlefield upon which they attempt to exert force.

They seek to capture and control bodies and minds.

And they seek to suppress the main impediment to additional capture and control: living men and women who fully understand themselves to be immortal, God-seeking souls, and embody that living idea in close relationships with other people.

---

The reversal of truth starts with the very title of the WHO document, whose true subject is:

• Psycho-social cognitive behavioral manipulation of human beings and irreversible, lethal genetic alteration: practical considerations on clandestine use of coercion and force to achieve involuntary, submissive compliance.

Every word of the opening statement — “Vaccines are one of the most effective tools for protecting people against COVID-19” — is demonstrably false with the free application of human reason on the observable effects of the non-immunizing products on the course of contagion and illness among living human beings.

Toward the end, the authors trot out another demonstrable, observable lie:

“Authorized COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to be safe and highly effective in preventing severe disease, hospitalization and death, and there is some evidence that being vaccinated will make it less likely to become infected and pass the virus on to others.”

---

The phrase “informed consent” appears zero times, in a document presented to the world as being about biomedical ethics.

---

Section 5, on “Public trust” begins:

“Policy makers have a duty to carefully consider the effect that mandating vaccination could have on public confidence and public trust, particularly on confidence in the scientific community and vaccination generally (10). If such a policy threatens to undermine confidence and public trust, it might affect both vaccine uptake and adherence to other important public health measures, which can have an enduring effect (11).

But the authors quickly move along to deepen the cognitive, behavioral and social sludge into which they want us all to fall:

At the same time, policy makers should consider the effect that not mandating vaccination could have on public confidence, public trust and inequity, as well as on various important freedoms.

Public confidence and trust may be undermined, for example, if steps known to protect the public from harm are not taken as part of the pandemic response, particularly if they are not implemented in settings with populations that are in vulnerable situations (e.g. congregate settings in which care is provided to older adults and hospitals).

The extent to which mandatory vaccination policies accommodate conscientious objection may also affect public trust (15). There should, however, be strict scientific and prudential limits to appeals for accommodation or “conscientious objection”, especially when such accommodation might be used by individuals to ‘free ride’ the public health good of community protection (i.e., taking advantage of the benefit without contributing towards the cost of its production) or if they threaten public health and others’ right not to be infected with a virulent infectious disease (16, 17).”

---

Knowing what the control-and-kill squad fears, hates and wants to suppress is very useful.

It reminds us of what we can each do, every day, to draw ourselves and others away from their evil, and closer to God.

Pray and work to protect and uphold the things they cannot withstand: our faith in God; our immortal souls; our free and curious and discerning minds; our illumined consciences, expressions of truth, and refutations of lies; our fleshy mortal bodies; our love for our husbands and wives, sons and daughters, sisters and brothers, mothers and fathers, cousins and friends, and every single baby in the world; and our wisdom-steeped Constitution.

---

The Holy Apostles Peter and Paul.